e. riley, put the programs under one item. and then number 7, and then we could have just, you know, standard yearly, you know, commission operations including annual reports, commission meetings, you know, materials are submitted on time. but lump it under sort of standard operations. >> i think that would be more efficient to do it that way. >> i agree. >> and arrange them in order of importance, 1 being the most important. this list may or may not have any relative importance. >> right. >> you have four, four recommendations. >> you mean, four goals, is that what -- >> four comments that have come back. change number 3 to incorporate 4, 5 and 6. >> yep. >> the second item is to streamline 8, 9 and 10, the streamlining project should be all lumped in together with a question mark on number 9. 3 were number 7, and 4 is to lump 1 and 2 into standard operations. >> that's perfect. >> all right. and then, so, does that sound good for the commission, then, with -- before we get into determining about number 9, so, the priority wo

our guest cynthia riley is from the american society of health care pharmacists. washington journal with your calls, treats and er mccain talks a lot about drilling. but we have a 3% of the world's oil reserves and reduce 25% of the world's oil. so what that means the fed cannot simply drill our way out of the problem. we are not going to be able to deal with the crime of places if our only solution is to use more fossil fuels that create global warming. we are going to have to come up with alternatives, and that means the united states government is working with the private sector to fund the kind of innovation that we can export to countries like china but also need energy. and are setting up one coal powered plant a week. we need to mature we are giving them the energy they need or helping them to create the energy they need. >> may not have noticed, but we have lights around here. there are the signals. >> i am just trying to keep up with john. >> i will look into. >> ok, senator. as a follow-up to that. it is a simple question. should we find a manhattan-like project the developing nuclear bomb to build alt