chief justice earl warren was aware that this was going to be difficult.fter a social revolution, by 1968, millions of americans wang protesters get water hoses tu them are beaten. ■7by 1968, the majority of americans had come around to the idea an white house press secretary takes questions on the administration's decisions regarding the executive privilege claimed by the president regarding audio transcripts. after that, members of congress part in an unveiling ceremony for a statue of the lly graham at the u.s. capitol. and mike johnson and other republican leaders speak out in support of a bill requiring immediate delivery of weapons to israel and it was later passed by the full house. and more coming up tonightn c-span. >> c-span's washington journal. a live form involving you to discuss the latest issues in government, politics and public policy from washington,.c. to across the country. friday morning we will talk taryid to israel, inflation in the economy and congressional news today first with north carolina democratic co wiley nickel and tennesse

then earl warren is appointed by dwight eisenhower. >> who is earl warren? >> he's the former governor of california. republican candidate for vice president in 1948 when tom doohy ran. he was is a tall, blond, all-american, moderate republican. this is someone who really made civil rights one of his callings in california and called for the people to be brought together. he does have one stain on his legacy, a very important stain. and that is supporting the japanese internment that you talked about so vividly in the other case. as governor in california, he supported that. it wasn't until in his memoir in 1976 that he expressed remorse for that and he wept, regretting what he had done. but he was a very, very moderate, this was a time when the democratic party had been the party of segregation. and the republican party was the party of lincoln. for warren to be in favor of civil rights was not up usual. he had wanted the first supreme court seat, eisenhower promised it to him. he said -- vincent dies, warren says give me the seat. eisenhower said i didn't

earl warren, the governor of california, is withholding the delegation's votes. tells eisenhower, "i'll deliver the delegation for you on one condition. i wanna be the next chief justice of the supreme court." ike, the great war hero, shakes hands, says, "you got a deal." he wins. one year later, earl warren is the chief justice of the united states supreme court. rod wanted a political appointment from obama, and for that, he was prepared to trade obama's old senate seat, which is actually legal. otherwise, eisenhower would have gone to jail, and americans would not have "liked ike." do you see yourself as somebody who was just trying to function in perhaps an inherently corrupt but legal system, and that theoretically almost any politician could be snagged the way you were? absolutely. of course i do, except i'm giving me higher marks. because i was using that money that--that-- and that power gave me to fight an established system that served itself on the backs of the people, and when you do that, you piss a lot of people off, and they wanna get rid of you. bu

now, some history from jason riley, how earl warren, then governor of california, the greg abbott of his day, warn pushed president eisenhower to launch operation wet back to stop the invasion of illegals which was imposing a massive welfare burden on his state. in mid 1954 in june. went 6 weeks, more than a million mexican nationals in california and texas had been rounded up and forcibly deported. two years later. ike was reelected in a landslide. president trump running for reelection. is looking to i'm plate what earl warren and eisenhower did with respect to deporting illegals and criminals. today, budget chairman jodey arrington estimated cost of biden illegal invasion to be 150 for things like healthcare, education and criminal justice, i am sure that a low ball. mounting this biden's illegals have been taking jobs away from native born americans, and the surge of illegals has reduced wages now at campus riots, spotlight has moved away from the open border crisis. but as polls show, americans have neither fore get ern, or forgiven joe biden's failure to act. and that is the ri

earl war return was governor of california. warren became liberal justice of the supreme court.rked to deport the illegals. this was in the mid 1950s. they were able to do it. actually it was very popular. ike left office with a 60% popularity rating. >> sure. you know what? did he did it before. we can do it again. if you look at recent surveys, even the last couple weeks, 42% of democrats, i'm not talking about independents or anybody else, 42% of democrats say that they support mass depour tearings policies. as do a majority of americans because they understand we're a nation founded on the rule of law. so shame on joe biden. shame on mayorkas for turning their bang on the rule of law. i think were a new administration and the right people in charge, starting with president trump at the topped we're going to do it. larry: thank you, vivek ramaswamy, we always appreciate having you on the show. take care, good luck. we'll take a break. coming up alabama senator katie britt. again how can biden take weapons away from israel? congress passed bills on this point which biden wante

the venerable team of earl warren and norman siegel for the defense. for the state, d.a.u bring in fitzpatrick from down in syracuse for what reason? >> bill fitzpatrick has over 75 homicide prosecutions. is been a prosecutor for over 24 years and i've been a prosecutor for over 2. >> almost immediately, a bombshell. 10 jurors had all been quickly selected, all-white, when they made a shocking announcement. they were opting for a bench trial, letting judge felix catena decide his future. >> i think their calculation was, were better off going with a legal mind, someone that knows the law. >> you will be the judge and jury. >> absolutely. >> good morning, everybody. please be seated. mr. fitzpatrick, your opening statement. >> bill laid out the state's case, painting a picture of nick hillary as a scorned lover and a liar . he said nick's own words from his video deposition given under oath would mail him. >> the only reason he has to lie was because he was killing garrett. >> siegel said nick is an innocent man and could prove he was home at the exact time garrett was bei

saying he wants to overturn the one person, one vote rulings which earl warren said were the most important rulings of that court,or saying you can't challenge racial gerrymandering ever, whicher will basically gu the 14th and 15th amendment. he's basically saying from reconstruction onwards -- from the 1860s and '70s onwards we should repeal all of that and we should go back to the day ironically when black people have nohe rights and other racially disenfranchised minorities have no rights. yes, it's concurrence, but the fact he's even putting this out there, what we see these radical concurrences, they become theic thing the lower courts pick up on and it goes back to the supreme court. >> it reminds me of the dobbs decision where thomas is suggesting gay marriage may be something to follow. moving the goal posts down the field and saying maybe we should rethink brown. that may not be the immediate impact of all this, but it does sort of set a new goal for the right, does itor not? >> it does. and it embodens as ari says lower court judges trying out constantly for the supreme court to b

of education was one of the first landmark decisions from the supreme court under chief justice earl warren decade and a half would take major steps to expand civil rights and liberties, not to take them away. the aim was not to alter the fabric of the constitution, but instead to bring our laws in alignment with the stated goals of our founders. to make good on the promise that all men and women are created equal, with certain unalienable rights, nor was the project partisan. warren was a lifelong republican, appointed by a republican president. many of the fiercest opponents of his court decisions were democrats from the south. brown versus board of education pushed our country forward, toward a more perfect union. we should respect his legacy by rejecting conservative efforts to use the courts hard won legitimacy to justify self- interested rulings that would turn back the clock. we cannot allow a few radical right-wing justices to turn our history upside down. we will be right back. ight bac. >> tech: does your windshield have a crack? trust safelite. this customer had auto glass damage

signal to the world is that they are fighting for a theocratic america, one that dissurprises earl warren's supreme court that made landmark rulings, recognizing a right to contraception for married couples and to interracial marriage, barring state sanctioned school prayer, and guaranteeing access to public defenders for indigent criminal defendants. these men who hold incredible power over more than 340 million americans, are on a crusade against secular america. now, after notching wins on rolling back access to reproductive care, expanding prayer in schools, and crippling the voting rights act, they have delivered yet another blow to diversity and equity just this morning. and the justice who is flying a christian nationalist flag outside both his homes was the author of the majority opinion in a case that gave a full-throated endorsement of political gerrymandering, even if it's racially motivated. samuel alito in his opinion stated that the purpose of the ruling was to prevent litigants from repackaging a partisan gerrymandering claim as a racial gerrymandering claim by exploiting the

and that's why i've always thought i'm very glad that earl warren had some experience with politics, it was tough, getting thaty enforced. andi'm saying never. but i am saying you have things like your own background that sneaks and you have political and you have listening to others and you have sometimes the real politic. so ended up by not a good quote, but i used to say, you ever read p.g. wodehouse like p.g. wodehouse? very funny. in one of his statements, he says of wasn't disgruntled. but he wasn't exactly grumbled either. so that's sort of it. but i think is better. i it's better. no judge tes into account the of the day but all judges do take into account the season the climate of the season. and that's sort of where we are, which not a real answer, not a definite answer, but an experience allowance. why? at the end of the book, i would say you're a very you're famously optimistic and your optimism uplifts, all of us. it certainly uplifts me in tough times. but i would call the end of the book studiously agnostic about whether is merited. you say these are very serious times

what a lot of people today don't remember or understood or have studied if they weren't alive, earl warren saw a republican in the white house, dwight eisenhower. it was not that republicans and democrats had this acrimony around race and other things in the '60s like we see now. when a republican can sit there and this is the first supreme court decision we'd seen since the end of construction that gave blacks rights. this was the landmark case, '54, '55 rosa parts sits in. it started with thurgood marshall, a black attorney educated at howard university, later on the supreme court, argues before a republican supreme court with earl warren and is able to break segregation. it's a real day that we need to get all of the implications of. >> what happened in '64 and '65, i think we all appreciated it less when it seemed like that arc of history was bending toward justice. now that we're running into so many roadblocks, you look back and go, my god, what was accomplished in '64 and '65 was breathtaking. you write about it in your new book. >> thousands of people were able to put themselves on

seventy years ago this month chief justice earl warren wrote the majority opinion in the unanimous opinion of brown versus board of education part of these days it's doubtful every child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life the opportunity with it education for at such an opportunity when the state is undertaken to provide it is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. the court went on to say segregation of students by race denies the children of the minority race of an equal education opportunity because segregated schools are inherently unequal but regrettably today we must acknowledge in 2024 america's public schools are a segregated by race and class as they were in the late 1960s. today we have a chance to hear from secretary cardona how the is working to finally fill the promise of brown and bolsters support for students and teachers while also tackling the systemic inequities present in our public school system. for example, at last congress democrats and president biden and acted to pass the american rescue plan act. without the support of a single repu

thank you for being with us today. 70 years ago chief justice earl warren wrote the majority opinion, unanimous opinion of brown be board of education. any child may reasonably be expected denied the opportunity of education such an opportunity the state has undertaken to provide it is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. the court went on to say that segregation of students by race denies the children of the minority race of an equal education and opportunity because segregated schools are inherently unable. regrettably today we must acknowledge that in 2024, public schools are segregated by race and class as they were in the late 1960s. today we have a chance to hear from the secretary about how the biden and harris administration is working to fulfill this promise and bolster support for students and teachers while also tackling systemic inequities in our public school system. for example president biden enacted to pass the american rescue plan act without the support of a single republican vote. the largest one-time federal investment in k-12 education in th

chief justice earl warren was aware that this was going to be difficult. a social revolution, by 1968, millions of americans watching protesters get water hoses turned on them are beaten. by 1968, the majority of americans had come around to the idea, this is un-american. let's move forward. host: we are talking this morning about brown versus of education sheryll cashin is our guest. democrats: that (202) 748-8000, republicans (202) 748-8001 and independents (202) 748-8002 you can text your city and state (202) 748-8003 and on facebook facebook.com/cspan and x cspanwj . guest: in brown versus it was a unanimous decision said that separate is inherently unequal. particularly because it sends a message of inferiority to black children as far as their development. they also talked about the importance of the common public school to cultivating shared ideas of citizenship. this is part of the opinion that was speaking not only to black americans but also white america that our democracy requires education and common values of citizenship and implied us learni

the law was signed by then-governor earl warren. seven years later, mr. warren, then chief justice of the supreme court, wrote the opinion in brown vs. board of education in which the court rule that segregation of any kind in public schools is unconstitutional. if h.r. 5754 is enacted, the los angeles federal courthouse would be the first courthouse in the nation named after a latina. i strongly support this legislation and urge my colleagues to do the same. i thank you and reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady reserves. the gentleman is recognized. mr. molinaro: i reserve. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from nevada is recognized. ms. titus: i yield five minutes to ms. no poll tau noah, who -- mrs. napolitano, who we're going to miss terribly when she retired from her role on the committee. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman is recognized. mrs. napolitano: i rise in support of h.r. 5754 to designate the united states courthouse located at 350 west first street, los angeles, california, as the felicitas an

thank you for being with us today. 70 years ago chief justice earl warren wrote the majority opinion, unanimous opinion of brown be board of education. any child may reasonably be expected denied the opportunity of education such an opportunity the state has undertaken to provide it is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. the court went on to say that segregation of students by race denies the children of the minority race of an equal education and opportunity because segregated schools are inherently unable. regrettably today we must acknowledge that in 2024, public schools are segregated by race and class as they were in the late 1960s. today we have a chance to hear from the secretary about how the biden and harris administration is working to fulfill this promise and bolster support for students and teachers while also tackling systemic inequities in our public school system. for example president biden enacted to pass the american rescue plan act without the support of a single republican vote. the largest one-time federal investment in k-12 education in th