earl warren, the governor of california, is withholding the delegation's votes. n tells eisenhower, "i'll deliver the delegation for you on one condition. i wanna be the next chief justice of the supreme court." ike, the great war hero, shakes hands, says, "you got a deal." he wins. one year later, earl warren is the chief justice of the united states supreme court. rod wanted a political appointment from obama, and for that, he was prepared to trade obama's old senate seat, which is actually legal. otherwise, eisenhower would have gone to jail, and americans would not have "liked ike." do you see yourself as somebody who was just trying to function in perhaps an inherently corrupt but legal system, and that theoretically almost any politician could be snagged the way you were? absolutely. of course i do, except i'm giving me higher marks. because i was using that money that--that-- and that power gave me to fight an established system that served itself on the backs of the people, and when you do that, you piss a lot of people off, and they wanna get rid of you.

earl warren puts this thing together. interesting that this case was argued in 52. the chief justice of the supreme court dies after oral argument. chief vinson, who was to be leaning toward dissenting. he dies and gives the president an opportunity to appoint a new justice who happens be earl warren and integration from california who then comes on the court and leads this consensus and this opinion remarkably concise, it's thought it was 13 pages. i looked at the it stops at 12. the internet's wrong, by the way, h.a. was wrong on this as well. a caution to everyone. randall, i saw you right that this was probably in and perhaps. but then you went on to say, but it rendered the opinion pallid. yeah. what you mean? well, we. chief justice warren right before. you know, handing down the opinion writes a memo to his colleagues describing what he's attempting to do and he says, i want to write opinion that is brief. write an opinion that regular people can read and write. and he says he says and above all write an opinion that is non accusatory. now he wanted to write

report is a chief justice and conservatives route against him for the next 30 years but it was earl warrenort the mexican immigrants in the criminals there because his day could not afford to keep them and you will ever trump say, perhaps maybe said today, if you keep throwing out eight or ten or 12 or 15 million illegals into the cities, you are breaking the cities you won't break in the entitlement system because we of a sudden i see the new york city renown then mayor eric adams and it went out of this so that's an interesting thing in you can afford it sustainable and plus the criminal problem. >> we been dealing with us in texas try to do something about it what evidence but is doj sued texas top of the federal government what happens is this is a start to realize we start to ship these to the states they start feeling okay now is a bigger conversation we cannot afford it pretty for trillions of that and running 2 trillion-dollar annual deficit and then when you at 11,000,012,000,000 people that we know of this country you are only adding fuel to the park fire cannot afford us as a co

thing is possible and general, the liberal, so-called liberal republican governor of california, earl warrenwho ike put on the supreme court as the chief justice and conservatives railed against him for the next 30 years, but it was earl warren who convinced ike to have to deport the mexican immigrant, the criminals there because his state couldn't afford to keep them. >> that's correct. larry: i heard trump say, perhaps maybe he said it today, you keep throwing out eight, 10, 12, 15 million illegals into these cities you're breaking the cities. >> yes, you will break the entitlement system. we can't afford all of this stuff. i see it in new york city every now and then our mayor eric adams says i want out of this, i want out of this. >> yes. larry: that is interesting financial. we cannot afford it, it is not sustainable. plus the criminal problem. >> this is what we've been doing in texas the past few years. we tried to do something about it. what happens? biden's doj sues texas doing the job for the federal government. what happenses is this, other states start realizing, start shipping i

this decision for it was 70 years ago tomorrow that the united states supreme court chief justice earl warrennimous the unanimous ruling indicating a critical turning point in our nation's history. it signal an end of legalized racial segregation in schools of the united overruling the quote, separate but equal principle set forth in the 1896 supreme court case, plessy versus ferguson.thr s support of the national archives its mission■ again to engage our citizenry and to tell the unstoppable untoldand somets of how our nation has come be the nation that it is today. i now have the pleasure of introducing tony lewis. tony lewis is the vice president of publicolicy at verizon. tony is responsible for shaping policy, and he directsc activit. this region of the boards, including site for children, the alvin ailey american dance theater, johns hopkins university, carey school business and kipp. kipp, as you, is a network of high performing college preparatory charterich serve und communities across washington d.c. mr. lewis is the chairman of the board, directors of the washington nationals youth

future of the supreme court is doomed if you ask the left, they missed souter and brennan, blackman, earl warreno turned out to be justices. fox news contributor, ben domenech, breaks it all down next on "sunday night in america." ♪ ♪ happy kids heal faster. that's why starlight children's foundation is dedicated to improving the mental well-being of sick kids, regardless of their illness or injury. when a child is hospitalized, the happiness of childhood feels out of reach - but that's where starlight comes in. we provide entertainment through our gaming stations, comfort with our specially designed hospital gowns, play with our toy deliveries, and distraction through our virtual reality headsets. starlight programs are what happiness is made of, the things that make being a kid special. the simple power of a smile - delivered to over 800 hospitals across the country - can make a lifetime of difference for sick kids. learn more at starlight.org ♪ a love song that goes on forever ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> good morning and welcome to "fox news life" i'm jackie ibanez in new york. potentially life-threatening

thank you for being with us today. 70 years ago chief justice earl warren wrote the majority opinion, unanimous opinion of brown be board of education. any child may reasonably be expected denied the opportunity of education such an opportunity the state has undertaken to provide it is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. the court went on to say that segregation of students by race denies the children of the minority race of an equal education and opportunity because segregated schools are inherently unable. regrettably today we must acknowledge that in 2024, public schools are segregated by race and class as they were in the late 1960s. today we have a chance to hear from the secretary about how the biden and harris administration is working to fulfill this promise and bolster support for students and teachers while also tackling systemic inequities in our public school system. for example president biden enacted to pass the american rescue plan act without the support of a single republican vote. the largest one-time federal investment in k-12 education in th

chief justice earl warren said the same thing. i'm not the only justice to have said this. know my colleagues agree. i think it is because things that the court or the way we make decisions -- the nature of our business is different. we are trying to say what the law means. we are not the policymakers. that is your job. so i think, one -- we speak publicly in these kind of settings, but we do not have press conferences and that sort of thing. so really, the products of our work is the opinion. i don't go out and talk to the press or talk to people in between oral argument and the issuance of an opinion about what i think should happen in the case. so it is very different from the political process and that respect. so i think, if you want to know what the court's reasoning is, you have to look at the opinion, because it explains the decision. justice sotomayor and i've been on opposite sides of difficult issues. last year, there was the student loan case, and i joined the chief justice's opinion -- the opinion did not mirror the debate. it was not about whether loan forgive

chief justice earl warren said the same thing. i'm not the only justice to have said this. know my colleagues agree. i think it is because things that the court or the way we make decisions -- the nature of our business is different. we are trying to say what the law means. we are not the policymakers. that is your job. so i think, one -- we speak publicly in these kind of settings, but we do not have press conferences and that sort of thing. so really, the products of our work is the opinion. i don't go out and talk to the press or talk to people in between oral argument and the issuance of an opinion about what i think should happen in the case. so it is very different from the political process and that respect. so i think, if you want to know what the court's reasoning is, you have to look at the opinion, because it explains the decision. justice sotomayor and i've been on opposite sides of difficult issues. last year, there was the student loan case, and i joined the chief justice's opinion -- the opinion did not mirror the debate. it was not about whether loan forgive