it could be to eastern neighborhoods that were from a design perspective. we took this to the eastern neighborhood c.a.c eastern neighborhoods. they adopted it unanimously. and then finally, the conversation that never goes away is the question of p.d.r. and weç all agree that preservg jobs for less educated -- it has to be part of a civici] vision. but it doesn't seem quite to work in a city where now it's -- its chief objective is jobs, jobs, jobs, and in a city that chronically underproduces housing. we're not sure if the p.d.r. question isn't right for a fuller discussion at some point and we don't see a reason to waitç five years. could start now. thank you. president miguel: thank you. is there additional public comment on this? if not, public comment and closed. commissioner commissioner antonini:?ç commissioner antonini: thank you. i really appreciate thexd repor it's veryç enlightening. just a few comments on what was in there. i think inç regards to the dege of commercial that weç see, i thinkç tft fairly smallç givee vast amount of land that is included inçç these eastern neighborho

the eastern neighborhoods advisory committee first convened in the autumn of 2009 andç has been meeting monthly sinceç then. y believe members of the c.a.ck after this presentation. so far the planning department has collected a total of 750,00ç in impact fee revenues over