it would have taken on member 12 weeks of pleading of hospital to pay for the escort services the eaxville is d alleged to have paid for in one night. madam deputy speaker, voting in favor of this motion would be a demonstration of support for the 77,000 members of the health services unit. voting against it is a vote for continuing the protection racket that exist around the member for deauxville and has protected him from three years of questioning. does the prime minister truly believe the next election will be about who stance for the privileged few and who stands for working australians? she would want to stand up for working austrians today and direct her caucus to support this motion. why wouldn't the cross bench and the labor party oppose -- vote for a motion that calls on the member to have 10 minutes to explain his side of the story and one of the most tawdry episode to ever besmirch the parliament. to vote against this motion, to vote this motion down, is eventually a continuation of that protection erection of a member for deauxville. he is no longer a member of their caucus. w