the eo ec. this is a thin layer of people in charge of operating these agencies where it has been designed in by congress that they should have fixed terms and can only be removed for cause. at the same time, everyone agreed on the basis of the myers decision that the president should have removal authority over cabinet level agencies and there has been no question about that. there is an uneasy compromise or line drawn between, for example, cabinet level agencies and these independent regulatory commissions. starting in the 1980's, people associated with the reagan administration and justice scalia in particular started raising serious questions about this line and, in effect, embracing the unitary executive model announced in the myers decision. and they have been responsible for sort of a decades long campaign to get that removal authority at will, removal authority extended to the entire executive branch. and if that were to happen, that would indeed be big news. separately from that, there

hehehh h ,,, ,, ,,, h it "he”ece hh. 'te fe'eem'h seseh h hh ,. h h 7it would 7 "he”ese ah. ts. eve7rything was 7 eve7rything was going to 2—0, everything was going to plan. 2-0, everything was going to ian. . plan. than the third goal in when i - upstairs, - plan. than the third goal in when i - upstairs, and l when i went upstairs, and that's where this may that's where i thought this may been a bit of a mistake. that's where i thought this may �* partner bit of a mistake. that's where i thought this may �* partner bit fellow stake. that's where i thought this may �* partner bit fellow landlord at home in the match was at home in the match started, unaware of the generous offer when the goals started coming in. the generous offer when the goals started coming in.— generous offer when the goals started coming in. 7 uproar, uproar, and 777u7proar, and thought, oh §e= z-z by the seventh, i 'oined no: b, the seventh,.i-|' - - em no: b, the semth. [joined no: by the semth. [joined a so it was kind them for a pint, so it was kind of fun— them fora pint, so it was kind of fun in— the

.- -err*ec e -. people and it's time may achan-eto 7 achan-et that 7 7 a change to that policy7 7 a change this point. thank you so much for sharing your thoughts with us. . ~' for sharing your thoughts with us. . ~ , ., on friday, prompting a major emergency response. city, according to the local fox29 channel. we'll bring you more updates when we have them. stay with us here on bbc news. thanks for your company, i'll have more for you at the top of j°.i.-n r- at. rre cor join us then. hello there. after a january that delivered more than its fair share of stormy, turbulent weather, the start of february does there will be some sunshine around this weekend — now on the satellite picture, you can see plenty of cloud out to the west of us. we do have this rain—bearing weather system, but it is will slow the progress of this weather front — eastwards through the weekend. many places starting saturday, though, with a fair bit a bit of sunshine for the southwest, as well. to see some sunshine. but for northern ireland and western scotland, as our weather front approaches, we will see thickenin

as victory ec his enough winis him victory in his first round — the big question will be, he was aheadhe qq q qq qq q v to win he'll have given that he was ahead ire—the qq q qq qq q v to win outright, e given that he was ahead ire—the q— q qq qq q v to win outright, or enough to win outright, or whether he'll need to challenge louisa potentially louisa gonzales potentially again and second round in again and a second round'in qq qq qqqqqqqqqqqqq those again and a second round'in q q qq'q q q ' those two were certainly april. those two were certainly in the polls in the opinion polls the furthest to a head — but we furttht to a head q but ws qqqqq’q qqqq ..- have to furthest to a head q but we ' q s q ' have to wait furthest to a head q but we q q s q q have to wait another furthest to a head q but we q qq * qq q have to wait another hour will have to wait another hour �* two will have to wait another hour �*two before will have to wait another hour �* two before we start or two before we start getting results of the selection. he’s results of the selection. he's a bit a results of the

ec security much as major in order to identify those patients. and to give them some sort of security clearances. so for palestinians now, officer watching and a on standing the release of the as well. it captives names. they are right now waiting anxiously for the release and to the hand over a process that is the schedule to take place on such a day tomorrow, as they believe that it will be completely made on 2 stages and in 2 different locations that will be in the north and also in the central areas of a straight static i want, i want to respond to that a little bit because in the last few occasions when they're happy and handled because you'd be watching what's been happening when he is ready captives or a user and kept his have been released in con eunice just from your experience this remind us what that process is going to be life on saturday. it was the process of the hands over they used by the captives will follow the same previous particles in previous exchanges. the fight says the military rank of how much on the very strict a securi

the eo ec. this is a thin layer of people in charge of operating these agencies where it has been designed in by congress that they should have fixed terms and can only be removed for cause. at the same time, everyone agreed on the basis of the myers decision that the president should have removal authority over cabinet level agencies and there has been no question about that. there is an uneasy compromise or line drawn between, for example, cabinet level agencies and these independent regulatory commissions. starting in the 1980's, people associated with the reagan administration and justice scalia in particular started raising serious questions about this line and, in effect, embracing the unitary executive model announced in the myers decision. and they have been responsible for sort of a decades long campaign to get that removal authority at will, removal authority extended to the entire executive branch. and if that were to happen, that would indeed be big news. separately from that, there

b when they started paying, "politico"ec, no one a "politic" reported biden was burned, they tanked they all this money, didn't you think you might learn biden was brain dead m? they pay you not to do .ournalism and they never even said this was a conflict, they had it.m >> igo have to turn it over to u jessica. so, the way this story was told was that usaid spent $8 million on "politico " but they just said "politico"o" p, that could be te website that we all go on every what they think about this morning's coffee klatch at the bottom of the hill. - i do like that- . but that is not true at all, $8 million across the entireov federal government, i think usaid was 44,000er. you know that people are using this to do their work, not just to find out where they can get a good reservation with whatever lobbyist, they have a very expensive bystander terms but if you have any of these tools, you know how much they cost. a tool that looks like an mri, why are you making a face?d si >> it's been around since 2010 and all of a sudden. >> [multiple people talking]e 20 >> get over itt . >> [multip

what and prime minister ec bow.g man, i think he's a very strong man, very. — think he's a very strong man, very. very— think he's a very strong man, very, very strong. _ think he's a very strong man, very, very strong. i— think he's a very strong man, very, very strong. i great- vary. var; a. -- .. for vary, verystreflgfkgfeat -m- vary, verystreflgfkgfeat - for him. i've - very! aw - for him. i've known 7a lon- time throu-h - a long time through a - shins 7—7 ,—77_ reputation, shins oh abe thought— reputation, shins oh abe thought the _ reputation, shins oh abe thought the world - reputation, shins oh abel thought the world . him, reputation, shins oh abe - thought the world . him, and i thought the world of him, and i think— thought the world of him, and i think he — thought the world of him, and i think he is— thought the world of him, and i think he is going _ thought the world of him, and i think he is going . do- a ma thlflkhe ' as job as prime fantasticjob as prime minister, _ fantasticjob as prime minister, ver

and tariffs in particular drive a wedge between half the ec sr -- sectors. a lot of sectors heavily affect by tariffs. as you mentioned, autos, aerospace, chemicals, energy. but there are a lot of other sectors that are pretty much insulated whether it's communications, utilities, a lot of domestic pharma companies. so it really does require investors to instead of just taking a passive etf approach to the market, to start drilling into various sectors. liz: okay. but how do you do it, jack? i'm kind of trying to open your mind and your playbook. >> sure. so one is, you knowing or not only are there parts of the market that are since insulated -- insulated, there may be other parts of the market that actually could benefit like a new core. so when you have tariffed imposed on their foreign competitors, it serves as a pricing umbrella for domestic manufacturers that they can raise hair prices too. that drops to the bottom line, nucor. liz: i did check this because a year after the trump steel tariffs, those stocks were mostly done. so there is that risk. stua

. >>> elon miss ec's -- elon musk's doge already hard at a work.eek, and now the department is looking at going after the small business administrationful we'll tell you all about that next. ♪ ♪ where ya headed? susan: where am i headed? am i just gonna take what the markets gives me? no. i can do some research. ya know, that's backed by j.p. morgan's leading strategists like us. when you want to invest with more confidence... the answer is j.p. morgan wealth management ♪ stuart: elon musk's doge has been digging in through a number of government agencies. well, now musk reportedly has his eye on the small business with administration. hillary vaughn on capitol hill. what's elon musk looking for? >> reporter: well, stuart, government waste, which is what he's looking for everywhere because president trump promised an audit of the government to see how every taxpayer dollar is being spent. and the best way to do that, they think, is to start at the u.s. treasury where all the money flows. elon musk, through doge, having access to sensitive informati

eugenics thermo ecs, our most powerful fat incinerator ever. absolutely free.f the day. >> with the msnbc daily newsletter. >> get the best of msnbc. >> all in one place. sign up for msnbc daily at msnbc. com. >> to understand more with msnbc. as usual, everything donald trump said to reporters in the oval office today was a lie, and there was no indication that any of them understood what he said about california water. >> i opened up the water for california. it's a great thing. it's too bad they didn't do it themselves. i had to do it and it was not easy. we did it at a very rough way, and i didn't like to do it a rough way. we shouldn't have to do it a rough way. >> in the stupidest water action in the history of california. last week, without warning, donald trump had the army corps of engineers open up a federally controlled flow of water in northern california that was completely unnecessary and unusable by anyone in southern california and possibly by anyone in california, because it almost created flooding in an excess of water beyond what anyone could

is republican in-fighting threatening the ec tex of -- extension of trump tax cuts? >> well, no.ause even the democrats can't go home -- they realize if you don't extend them, you have a huge tax increase on the average family. and when that sinks in, do you really want to vote for a tax increase? if that's what you're doing if you vote no. so in the end, they're going to get this done. my worry, and i say this over and over again, they have to get it done by may or june in order to have an economy next year growing fast enough to increase the house republican majority. if they lose the house next year, and you just had a report on this, the democrats are going to go crazy with investigations, with fights over policy, with efforts to impeachment so for the trump presidency to truly succeed, one of their highest goals has to be to keep the house. in order to keep the house, they have to get a tax bill through by may or june and, frankly, my good friends in the senate just don't seem to get it. if they want to move early, fine. move the tax bill early. but don't tell us you're goin

this is relatively self-ec plan story. february -- explanatory. february, kind of weak, right? of tough it out, if you will, and it's kind of weak sometimes. but the next few months look pretty good. >> right. february's the second weakest month of the year next to september obviously. september's much weaker. february often provides a buying opportunity. sometimes you take a pause in may and then you get a summer if rally. we're in the first yee of the presidential cycle -- year of the presidential cycle, so february can be more volatile and even bigger rally off the lows s. to this year could add a little extra if you're getting in on a dip in february, you could get a better rally. charles: this is traditionally a buy on the dip month. >> right. exactly. charles: maybe you bide your time and pick your spots. >> that's what i like to do with seasonality, buy the weakness, sell the strength. charles: i mean, listen, so far, so good. it's only been two days -- [laughter] >> we'll see what happens. charles: advanced decline, i talk about this a lot, and this for you right now is

every coordinated hunter considers ecing events. the question is, whether you can use that preceding events as a basis for making a argument that theffer made a mistake or used --. justice jackson: that's nothat you argued before and i'm very ed now. it seems as though the moment of the threat doctrine exists, as everybody has understood it, about evidence, essentially. an you look at to prove the unbudgeted fourthment -- a legend fourth amendment excessive force claim? can you look at anything that occurred outside the momt the threat, anything that occurred previously? now you seem to be suggesting it'abt liability. that they a on to creating a new breaconstitutionor it is about whether or not the police officer can be held liable for his own negligence in the time preceding. i have not seen that concept anywhere. mrmccloud: that was the argument made below, issue number othe petitioners fifth circuibrf that sergeant felix aelated the nger and was negligent jumping onto the car. that issue divides the circuits. the fifth circuit s

the eo ec.s is a thin layer of people in charge of operating these agencies where it has been designed in by congress that they should have fixed terms and can only be removed for cause. at the same time, everyone agreed on the basis of the myers decision that the president should have removal authority over cabinet level agencies and there has been no question about that. there is an uneasy compromise or line drawn between, for example, cabinet level agencies and these independent regulatory commissions. starting in the 1980's, people associated with the reagan administration and justice scalia in particular started raising serious questions about this line and, in effect, embracing the unitary executive model announced in the myers decision. and they have been responsible for sort of a decades long campaign to get that removal authority at will, removal authority extended to the entire executive branch. and if that were to happen, that would indeed be big news. separately from that, there is t

the eo ec.s is a thin layer of people in charge of operating these agencies where it has been designed in by congress that they should have fixed terms and can only be removed for cause. at the same time, everyone agreed on the basis of the myers decision that the president should have removal authority over cabinet level agencies and there has been no question about that. there is an uneasy compromise or line drawn between, for example, cabinet level agencies and these independent regulatory commissions. starting in the 1980's, people associated with the reagan administration and justice scalia in particular started raising serious questions about this line and, in effect, embracing the unitary executive model announced in the myers decision. and they have been responsible for sort of a decades long campaign to get that removal authority at will, removal authority extended to the entire executive branch. and if that were to happen, that would indeed be big news. separately from that, there is t

we may even allow the ec] some oversight. but a lot of ecj some oversight. but a lot of what was discussed last night will become clearer at a summit that's going to happen in this country in the middle of may. i guess that sir keir really is a rejoiner at heart, and i fear that we're going to sort of head a little bit closer towards that brexit in name only, as long as it doesn't get too close, because if he does, it'll reduce our ability to be flexible with america. i'm joined in the studio by sir david davis mp. i'm joined by sir ranil jayawardena and joe just ordinary joe phillips. i'm very sorry about that. that's all right. david. you were heavily involved in the brexit negotiations for many years. what's going on? >> well, firstly there's a degree of labour naivety about this. they think of europe as a good thing. they're all intrinsically remainers. they're a couple of honourable exceptions, but the vast majority are intrinsically remainers. they'd love to be back in. and so they're going to be fairly weak willpower, shall we say, in this exercise, t