even more, -- matt: up to the ecj and not up to the e.u. and the u.k.?s heribert: that is not up to negotiations according to our view. we think we initially agreed to a new treaty and this treaty includes the competent authority of the ecj. and if we go forward and establish a sort of arbitration institution offer, and so on, this would probably not be covered, but what our constitution permits us to do. and so, i see a potential problem as a conflicts which arises, the conflict between them and the german constitution. there would be a possible solution around the e.u. and u.k. guy: professor, one very quickly an ecjfore i ask you related question. is it your understanding that once triggered, from a legal point of view, article 50 cannot be reversed? heribert: this is not absolutely true that article 50 cannot be reversed. there was a discussion yesterday in a meeting on this, and a couple of days ago in luxembourg, that there is a possibility to just withdraw the thearation to withdraw from u.k., and there is one point that is open. that is the quest

so you'd accept ecj? well, not necessarily the ecj.role of british judges are on it. keir starmer, thank you very much. thank you. desperate to get the clarity there, even if it means my summarising what he's saying. day one of the negotiation is done. let's take stock with our political editor, nick watt. everybody is asking, is theresa may's weakened position going to affect this, is she even going to make the running for the 18 months of negotiation. what's the thinking? the numbers in parliament have moved in a mildly soft brexit direction. the prime minister is weakened after that general election result. i have to say, i do not detect a love for theresa may in the tory party. cabinet ministers are saying they think she's had a loss of nerve over the election setback and also over her response to the tower fire. one cabinet minister, who's a loyalist said to me, "she can stay, if she wants to." i sense that some grandees are warming up to say to theresa may, have your queen's speech on wednesday, get the vote through next week, th

i think people were very clear they did not want to ecj to have jurisdiction in the uk. courts are perfectly... we have fine courts in this country, they'll be able to uphold eu citizens' rightsjust as be able to uphold eu citizens' rights just as others. be able to uphold eu citizens' rightsjust as others. thank you mr speaker. the prime minister did not a nswer speaker. the prime minister did not answer the question from my right honourable friend the member for leeds central. if there are french pa rents leeds central. if there are french parents whose daughter is studying in paris and who is 19 and they‘ve been living here more than five year, will that daughter be able to return to live with them here without them having to pass the income threshold? and if those pa rents income threshold? and if those parents have been living here for less tha n parents have been living here for less than five years, will they still have all the same rights as if they had been living here more than five years? yes, if they've been living here more than five years, they daughter wil

country which the prime minister doesn‘t want it to have any role, the european union insisting the ecjtheir rights? the eu's already set out the broad sweep of its thinking on citizens‘ rights and it‘s very clear that it wants the european court of justice to be in charge of policing the arrangement for citizens‘ rights after brexit. but the prime minister‘s already been clear, she wa nts minister‘s already been clear, she wants the uk to leave the jurisdiction of the ecj and she wa nts jurisdiction of the ecj and she wants british courts to be in charge of these new arrangements. i think that seems to me the biggest gulf between the british and the eu positions when it comes to this crucial central issue of eu rights for citizens. thank you very much. after more than two weeks of talks, the conservatives and the democratic unionist party have agreed a deal to support theresa may‘s minority government in parliament, in what‘s described as a ‘confidence and supply‘ arrangement. there will be £1 billion extra for health, education and infrastructure in northern ireland. the tories have a

because it may be helpful in the negotiation to say that, look, ecj, this european court, can governor for example could govern the nuclear materials? is that something you could tolerate or accept at all? the eu doesn't do that with any other non—eu member state. could you tolerate it, could you... why would we go in wanting a worse deal than switzerland, norway, serbia, every other european country. that would be a bizarre position the way you can get around that issue and make it work to the advantage of both sides, is to do what the swiss have done. to say, you'll have your court, will have hours. where there is a plain interest in the same policy are harmonised outcome, we will simply do that through a bilateral treaty, so we will not be inviting foreign jurisdiction but the outcome will be the same. the swiss have replicated 85—90% of the contents of the single market, including the real big one, the discrimination on goods or services on threads of origin, but they do that by bilateral treaties and domestic legislation. you are veering towards the swiss option but by and large

. >> we will have the ecj? >> some of the elements, but not -- >> we will have free labour. >> what was it all for? >> that's a good question. >> thank you very much for your time. professor malcolm chalmers at russi. to recap, if we do have red lines blurred, jeffrey, and free movement and labour, ecj dominance and single market, i reiterate the question, to our audience, what is it all about? >> a little bit confusing, you have to say at this point. i want to bring in the other side. brexit talks, jeremy corbyn, the labour leader says his party would push for a jobs first brexit, that means prioritizing proper trade deal with europe. corbyn added it was clear who won the election and his party's ready to serve. let's get out to carolyn for more at labor hq and joined by downing street. some of the calls from corbyn that he might have won the election given he had 261 versus 31 216. he hasn't won. what does this mean for brexit? >> look, i think you raise a couple of very important points and i don't have the

but it would not be the ecj, once we leave the european union we no longer have a judge on the ecj.ern ireland, and south—west scotland. it is also dragging that blanket of cloud across the country. that means it is going to be staying pretty mild. wet north. gradually, moving to the far north of scotland. behind that, some showers, heady, and some going to the south east corner. going to continue to drift eastwards. stays humid south east. 22. fresher in the north. 11, 15. plenty of showers, across england and wales on wednesday, moving gradually north, not wishing to central scotland. scattered showers behind that. pretty unsettled weather, over the next few days. 12-20 the weather, over the next few days. 12—20 the high on wednesday. iam i am ross aitken is what outside source. part of donald trump‘s travel ban will come into force. the supreme court has ruled that a 90 day ban on people travelling from six muslim majority countries can apply in some circumstances. we will explain what they are in a moment. more details in the uk‘s plans for eu citizens after brexit.” more detail

that might be in every and which the european commission wants ecj involved.ritain. theresa may said those that have been you for five years would be able to get similar rights to british citizens. that's something the european commission weren't happy with. they said it hasn't gone far enough. labour says it should be all european citizens, notjust those that have been every five yea rs. those that have been every five years. the disparity between what british citizens would have the right to and what european citizens would have the right. european citizens, david davis said, would not be able to vote, but they would have access to the nhs. he did say clearly that they would not be seen as second—class citizens. explicitly, it will not be any earlier than the triggering of article 50. we think that's fair. we could have said june 23 last year, when the referendum decision was taken. but there was a lot of people who didn't think we'd carry through with it. so we take the article 50 date as the minimum and the maximum is the last day. we will discuss with the

but the eu insists that the ecj must continue to protect the rights of eu citizens here in the future and what about the huge issue of immigration? labour says it accepts that free movement of people will come to an end. but it also says it wants to maintain tariff—free access to the single market. the eu says you can't really have both at the same time, so that's got to be negotiated too. both the tories and labour say that under their leadership, the uk will be more prosperous after brexit. maybe it will be, but the government's independent forecaster, the office for budget responsibility, says that, for a few years at least, growth is likely to be lower and inflation is likely to be higher. there's nothing wrong with being optimistic. but critics ask if we've had an honest debate about whether "taking back control" might come with a cost. what it means is that a week before an election that was called specifically because of brexit, at a time when the eu is setting out its plans in detail, we know remarkably little about how the uk will approach the most complex and most important

would like to there's no rule for the ecj to play beyond brexit.here are others contained in this document. it will be negotiated in the next few weeks. does the dup make her position a little more secure? >> absolutely. there is a vote later in the week on her legislative programming. needed it for her party. mark: self-indulgent was among the phrases over the weekend. -- herat tell us departure is further in the distance? you're probably not too confident that you want another election. risku don't want to another election that becomes another issue. the brexit talks have just begun. of thoughtschool that says theresa may can last a little longer. she is subject to both of the demands of her party than she was before and she is also subject to events like grenville. her response was criticized. she can't really afford another one of those. ultimately she staggers on for a while longer it looks like. vonnie: thank you, simon kennedy. breaking news. it turns out the self driving car unit of alphabet has reached an agreement for avis budget group ma

looking at european stocks in the red with two big events in europe coming up, the uk election and ecjmeeting two days away. bing's among the big losers among expectations monetary policy will stand pat. it's the shift in language that will likely be key on thursday. european bond yields falling across the board. there is this flight to safety in germany and france as you can see here but same goes for the uk, where polls show a tightening race ahead of thursday's election. let's move back to stocks, though. roe roche, a clinical trial showing only a modest benefit to women taking a combination of their cancer drug. shares down nearly 6%. shares of burberry also moving lower, being downgraded by hsbc to reduce from hold. the firm citing long-term visibility issues on sales as well as weakness in america. analysts pointing out burberry does 30% of its wholesale sales in the united states. hsbc also pointing out valuation as a concern. shares are up almost 60% over the past 12 months and trading at 23 times forward-looking earnings. >> seema, thanks. >>> apple developer conference yieldi

they want the ecj, the european court ofjustice, to oversee these rights for a long time, the uk governmentat are behind donald tusk‘s and jean—claude juncker‘s comments. but on the face of it, this proposal does look fair. she, of course, is going to these negotiations in a much weaker position than she would have wanted. what should her strategy beat now to soften the plans that she might have had before? not specifically on eu immigrants, but generally? renegade is clear to me that she is weak. that is not a controversial statement at all. she expected a strong mandate and foster majority. soi strong mandate and foster majority. so i think that is not controversial. and clearly, because of the situation of the tories not having a majority empowerment, there may now be a need for some sort of cross— party may now be a need for some sort of cross—party anchoring of the brexit mission, the brexit offer. perhaps not legislation, perhaps not a formal cross—party deal of some sort, but spiritually, if you will, there needs to be some sort of cross— party there needs to be some sort of cross—pa

mr hammond support the position that mrs may set out on the position that mrs may set out on the ecjr party which said they would be leaving the single market and the customs union. he may have disassociated himself with it, but the labour party ma nifesto with it, but the labour party manifesto was that, for the good reason that the official labour position and the official conservative position is we want to have lots of trade arrangements that improve our trade with the rest of the world and you cannot do that if you're in the customs union or the single market. we don't need these lies from labour. it is in contradiction of the dup's position. 0n the single market, i mean i agree there is a debate going across parliament on this and we're seeing a lot of the more pragmatic sensible wing of the conservative party coming toa wing of the conservative party coming to a position... talk about your own party. there is a debate within the labour party, i recognise that. my position is that this is all about a transitional deal. there is no way that we're going to get the details of the