, is a very. _ example, oversight of the ecj, is a very. very— example, oversight of the ecj, is a very and i think, you know, to have _ wouldn't be. and i think, you know, to have that— wouldn't be. and i think, you know, to have that kind of dynamic environment, you have to have a court _ environment, you have to have a court enforcing the rules and we need _ court enforcing the rules and we need to— court enforcing the rules and we need to hear what labour— mack's position— need to hear what labour— mack's position would be and how you would enforce _ position would be and how you would enforce that if it's not the ecj. i think— enforce that if it's not the ecj. i think probably there's a question about— think probably there's a question about how much people are really paying _ about how much people are really paying attention now to these kinds of technicalities and the way they were _ of technicalities and the way they were previously.— of technicalities and the way they were previously. paying attention to brexit, according _ were previously. paying attention to brexit, according

bodies, and as a consequence of the court decisions themselves, which is evaluated extremely negatively ecjy the way, the ecthr emphasizes this and writes as follows, well, it sounds in their decisions, in the decisions of the ecthr, thus, there is a systematic violation for ukraine, the court limited itself to citing a standard set of norms, that is, this is the problem that today really prompts an appeal to the european court of human rights and a negative acceptance by the court itself. solution for ukraine. ms. natalya, in principle, if we look at any cases related to human rights in ukraine itself and in general how the ukrainian judiciary currently works, do not lawyers and lawyers feel a certain bias in what is called a presumption innocence yes, when the court has not yet proven the guilt of a person, he actually cannot be considered a criminal, since at the moment he is still the court... did not make such a decision, do we now have a problem with the fact that, well, in principle , we believe that we are really correct in this whole process to distinguish when a person is really g

. >> interesting that jonathan reynolds did not rule out giving up ecj oversight and also saying we are going to give away our negotiating hand. quite a similar stance to the way they talk about the unions and negotiating over strikes and also saying when circumstances change, plans change, so the huge elephant in the room is what will happen after the election? >> our u.k. correspondent unpacking what we heard and that debate -- in that debate and where we stand on this election. more on the electoral politics. now this is evolving and a focus on what's happening with the green party. they say investing in renewables could help tackle the soaring cost of living. they plan to hike public spending with income taxes on high earners and a new wealth tax. adrian ramsey spoke to guy johnson. >> the cost of not acting on the climate crisis is bigger than the cost of acting but in terms of business opportunities, and i work in the renewable energy sector for homes and buildings, but you could say the same about electric vehicles, public transport, farmers producing more food within the u.k., a

has objected to that and said no, actually we can't have such an agreement without alignment with the ecjput us slightly back to square one. although, to be fair to laboun one. although, to be fair to labour, they have said that they don't want to rejoin the eu, they don't want to rejoin the single market, and they don't want a customs union. even though the likes of david lammy, the man hoping to be the next foreign secretary, has constantly talked about closer alignment . constantly talked about closer alignment. let's bring in mike galsworthy, the chair of the european movement uk group, to analyse this. mike why do we believe labour when they say that they don't want to do these things? no rejoining, no single market, no customs union because sir keir starmer , having been an sir keir starmer, having been an absolutely ardent remainer for all of his time on the shadow frontbench before he became leader, seems to have been very much banging the eu alignment drum , he wasn't that ardent drum, he wasn't that ardent a remainer. i mean, you've got like voted against brexit multiple, multip

has objected to that and said no, actually we can't have such an agreement without alignment with the ecjput us slightly back to square one. although, to be fair to laboun one. although, to be fair to labour, they have said that they don't want to rejoin the eu, they don't want to rejoin the single market, and they don't want a customs union. even though the likes of david lammy, the man hoping to be the next foreign secretary, has constantly talked about closer alignment . constantly talked about closer alignment. let's bring in mike galsworthy, the chair of the european movement uk group, to analyse this. mike why do we believe labour when they say that they don't want to do these things? no rejoining, no single market, no customs union because sir keir starmer , having been an sir keir starmer, having been an absolutely ardent remainer for all of his time on the shadow frontbench before he became leader, seems to have been very much banging the eu alignment drum , he wasn't that ardent drum, he wasn't that ardent a remainer. i mean, you've got like voted against brexit multiple, multip

ela nta deal hyper keim, a try po rta gme by selling leon scl, the l1, make tarik myc, trc and de end ecj>> sarazen, serca in is bruhat soma from tampa correctly swelling 29 words, 90 seconds defeating seven other finalists and the bees. second ever spell-off addition to the stiffness award, who takes home $50,000 amazing. all right. that wraps this hours cnn newsroom. i'm kimberly, who were for viewers in north american, cnn this morning is next let's the world. it's african voices, changemakers xsoar on the xor, a json for theory our page, ario she'd clay she sel ashwagandha. ash wga engaging post on piazza i also wrote them russia. >> we're trying to spy on us. we were spying on them. >> this is a secret war. >> secrets and spies premiers tomorrow bombs. >> oh carney asada, it's gotten me. i saw them. that's what i got gotta be carnot. >> but with more flavored gotten me car and tracing it like this proceed and use holes. okay, everyone, our mission is to provide complete balanced nutrition for strength and energy ensure with 27 vitamins and minerals you're nutrients for immune health,

so what the ecj is, the european court of justice has done is effectively just call hungary out on this you've signed up to. and it's fine that this 200 million is ,1 million a day as well, forcing hungary to comply. >> but then what do you what do you think of if they if the people are saying, you know, we don't have the infrastructure, we're struggling ourselves and it actually is more cost effective, which is not impossible to pay this fine as opposed to allowing multitudes of asylum seekers in when they don't have the infrastructure. as we can see, even with, with, you know, our, our boat migrants, we're having to pay on a daily basis millions for hotels. so when you look at we're going to listen to our people, we're going to ensure that we don't accept loads of people in. unfortunately, if they cannot accommodate that, we'd rather pay the fine. do you understand? >> hungary signed up to play by the rules. hungary gets huge benefit economic benefit from being a member of the european union, of course, as well as all the security benefits and all of that. so being a member of the eu