pavlo gorbasenko, the head of the economic court of the kyiv region, owns luxury real estate, sky-highes and practices fictitious divorces, passed illegal decisions that had signs of raiding. judges dmytro kostenko and andriy fedorchuk, kyiv district administrative court. in particular, fedorchuk is known for canceling and suspending the nationalization of a private bank renaming of the uoc of the moscow patriarchate. it is the same, for example, judge dzyuba. regarding whom there is information that the wife has russian citizenship, this is judge otrosh, who at the meeting of the commission's ukvals allowed herself to say that it was actually the ukrainian authorities who were not to blame for not ensuring the inviolability of the borders in crimea, which has millions, well, millions of unexplained property and so on. all these judges with such a position will be able to avoid the end of the qualification evaluation and leave their positions. in the center of anti-corruption, there is no doubt that having made a decision in the case of judge usatoy, the grand chamber played along with

especially fearless, unscrupulous servants of themis go to court, for example, the judge of the economic courtharkiv region vitaly usatiy. for us, for the judges of the commercial courts, the main thing is that the commercial courts remain in the system, the judicial system of ukraine in any change. form, or as they exist now, but they must remain. vitaly usatiy specializes in bankruptcy cases and was repeatedly accused of making dubious decisions that allowed private individuals to postpone debts. the experts had a lot of questions about the property of the usatoy family. in particular, a retired mother-in-law bought a house with an area of ​​533 m2 near kharkov in 2015 for almost 2 million hryvnias, and an elite mercedes suv for more than half. it is not clear where a woman who had no income other than a pension got such funds. he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council. he had valuable property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular his wife's. the second was that he received a prize weapon from minister avakov. t

for example, vitaly usatiy, judge of the economic court of the kharkiv region. for us, for judges, commercial courts, the most important thing is that in the system, the judicial system of ukraine, commercial courts remain in any modified form, or as they exist now, but they must remain. vitaly usatiy specializes in bankruptcy cases, and he has repeatedly were accused of making dubious decisions that provided an opportunity. private individuals to defer debts, experts had many questions about the property of the usatoy family, in particular, in 2015, a retired mother-in-law bought a house with an area of ​​533 m2 near kharkiv for almost uah 2 million, and an elite mercedes suv for over uah 1.5 million. which had no income other than a pension, such funds are unclear. he received a negative opinion from the public council of dobrochasnost. he had valuable property, which was questionable. declaration, the question of where the money comes from, in particular to him and his wife. the second was that he received a prize weapon from minister ovakov. the law stipulate

the unscrupulous, unscrupulous servants of themis go to court, for example, the judge of the economic courtkharkiv region vitaly usatiy. for us, for judges, commercial courts, the most important thing is that in the system, the judicial system of ukraine, commercial courts remain in any modified form, or as they exist now, but they must remain. vitaly usatiy specializes in of affairs for... industry and he was repeatedly accused of making dubious decisions that gave private individuals the opportunity to postpone debts. the experts had a lot of questions about the property of the usatoy family. in particular, in 2015, a retired mother-in-law bought a house with an area of ​​533 m2 near kharkiv for almost uah 2 million, and an elite mercedes suv for more than uah 1.5 million. it is not clear where a woman who had no income except a pension got such funds. he will get in the negative conclusion of the public integrity council, he had valuable property, which was a question before the declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife, the second - it was

the judge of the economic court of the dnipropetrovsk region, eduard bonderev, is suspected of ordering kidnapping of his business partner. according to the investigation, the judge started working in 2017 farming, and since he is not allowed to do so by law, he found a fake person on which... they registered a part of the business in the sumy region. for the start of the business project, the person involved allocated more than uah 3 million. with these funds , the fictitious person purchased combine harvesters, trucks, tractors and other equipment in his name. most of the profit was received by the judge. over time, the company expanded and money was invested in its development, including the suspect's partner. however , the judge began to feel less and less comfortable with the management of the company with his partner. in one. from the moment he decided to remove him from the company, blackmailing him with a million dollar loan. however, the man did not want to leave work without pay. they failed to agree on a peaceful exit from the business, and then, according to the investigatio

especially the fearless unscrupulous servants of themis go to court, for example, the judge of the economic courte kharkiv region vitaly usatiy. for us, for the judges, commercial courts, the main thing is that in the system, the judicial system of ukraine, commercial courts... bankruptcy and he was repeatedly accused vitaliy usaty specializes in cases of dubious decisions that allowed private individuals to postpone debts. the experts had a lot of questions about the property of the usatoy family. in particular , in 2015, a retired mother-in-law bought a house with an area of ​​533 m2 near kharkiv for almost uah 2 million, and an elite suv. odessa for more than 1.5 million. where did a woman who had no income come from apart from the pension, such funds are not clear. he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council. he had valuable property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife. the second was that he received a prize weapon from minister avakov. the law stipulates that the conclusion of the public inte

recently , pavlo gorbasenko, judge and head of the economic court of the kyiv region, once again had an interview regarding the suitability for the position. consideration of this issue is taking place after, uh, it was postponed for the previous time to find out additional information. last year, the commission postponed the final decision on gorbasenko and waited additional explanations and documents from him. so at this meeting it was necessary to make a final decision. the question is whether he will remain in the judge's chair. during this time, the public council of virtue discovered new facts of gorbasenko's dishonesty and made a new conclusion so that the members of the commission could study it. veronika kreydenkova, a member of the state council of ukraine , filed a motion to postpone the meeting. as a matter of fact, there should have been a review and completion of the review of the issue of his suitability for the post, but the public integrity council proposed to postpone the meeting, so that we voted on a new decision yesterday. in a new conclusion. it is said that the

vitaly usatiy of the economic court of the kharkiv region. dges of commercial courts, the most important thing is that in the judicial system of ukraine, commercial courts remain in any modified form, or as they exist now, but they must remain. vitaly usatiy specializes in bankruptcy cases, and he was repeatedly accused of making dubious decisions that allowed private individuals to postpone debts. the experts had many questions.

regarding the ex-judge of the solomyan district court of kyiv, maria zelinska, and the judge of the economic courtf the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko. we counted at least. five decisions of the grand chamber of the supreme court, which earlier in the same grand chamber indicated a completely different position, they indicated that it is really necessary for such a decision to be supported by the entire plenary composition of the highest qualification commission of judges, and the decision of the panel itself is not enough. the decision of the grand chamber of the supreme court contains a number of dangers for... judicial reform. by according to preliminary estimates, it can help about 180 judges who have already received negative conclusions from the public integrity council to remain in their positions. this decision of the grand chamber helps these, specifically 180 people to avoid this procedure now, and in fact they already automatically remain evaluated, if, in fact, this practice and this decision of the grand chamber are higher. the qualification commission and the vrp will now take it as a

especially fearless, unscrupulous servants of themis go to court, for example, the judge of the economic court of the kharkiv region, vitaly usatiy. for us, for judges of commercial courts, the main thing is to in the system, the judicial system of ukraine , commercial courts remained in any modified form, or as they exist now, but they should remain. vitaly usati specializes in bankruptcy cases and has been repeatedly accused of embezzlement. decisions that gave private individuals the opportunity to postpone debts, experts had many questions about the property of the usatoy family, in particular, in 2015, the retired mother-in-law bought a house with an area of ​​533 m2 near kharkiv for almost uah 2 million and an elite mercedes suv for more than uah 1.5 million. where do women come from which had no income other than a pension, such funds are not understood. he received a negative opinion of the public welfare council, he had valuable property, which was a question before the declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife, the second - it was, he r

regarding the ex-judge of the solomyan district court of kyiv maria zelinska and the judge of the economic courtthe kyiv region pavlo gorbasenko we counted at least five decisions of the grand chamber of the supreme court, which earlier the same grand chamber indicated a completely different position, they indicated that it was really necessary to support such a decision in the entire plenary. composition of the higher qualification commission of the court.

of culture together with the ministry of justice submitted a cassation appeal to the supreme economic court. still in 2021 in 2008, they tried to transfer the property of the museum in peregov to false persons. according to... representatives of the museum, the raiders forged all the documentation and are trying to illegally take possession of the land. as you and i understand, it is impossible to simply buy state property, especially the property of the reserve, which is protected by legislation, and cannot be privatized at all according to the law of ukraine on the protection of cultural heritage. the lands belonged to the museum from the very beginning of the foundation of the museum and the deed to this territory. the museum received this designation in 1976 a piece of land was never changed, this land was given for permanent use to the state museum of people's architecture and life of the ukrainian ssr, then according to this document. in odesa , law enforcement officers destroyed an international criminal organization that produced and sold up to 100 kg of heavy psychotropic drugs eve

especially the fearless unscrupulous servants of themis go to court, for example, the judge of the economic courtf the kharkiv region vitaliy usatiy. for us , for judges, commercial courts, the main thing is that in the system, the judicial system of ukraine, commercial courts. the courts remained in any modified form, or as they now exist, but they must remain. vitaly usatiy specializes in bankruptcy cases, and he was repeatedly accused of making dubious decisions, which made it possible for private individuals to postpone debts. the experts had a lot of questions about the property of the usatoy family. in particular, in 2015, a retired mother-in-law bought a house with an area of ​​533 m2 near kharkiv for almost uah 2 million, and an elite suv. vick mercedes for more than 15 million. it is not clear where a woman who had no income, except for a pension, got such funds. he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council. he had valuable property, which was a question to declare, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife. the second was that he re

of culture together with submitted by the ministry of justice. statutory complaint to the economic supreme court. as early as 2021 , they tried to transfer the property of the museum in pirogov to fictitious persons. according to representatives of the museum, the raiders forged all the documentation and are trying to illegally take possession of the land. as you and i understand, it is impossible to simply buy state property. moreover, the property of the reserve, which is protected by legislation and cannot be privatized in general according to the law of ukraine on... protection of cultural heritage. the lands belonged to the museum from the very beginning the foundation of the museum and the act for this territory the museum received in 1976. since then, the purpose of this piece of land has never changed. this land was granted for permanent use to the state museum of folk architecture and life of the ukrainian ssr, then according to this document. the state emergency service urges people to follow safety rules during long-term power outages. rescuers recommend keeping lighted candles at a d

and now it's time for economic news. the courtroved a settlement agreement in the case of metallurgists, interfax writes about this. we are talking about a dispute between the federal antimonopoly service and nlc. more in the twenty-first year , cases were brought against it, as well as mmk and severstal, for inflating prices for hot rolled products. fas also found the organizations to have violated antimonopoly legislation. all of them were fined. cargo transportation by road in june reached a record 615 million tons, vedomosti writes with reference to rosstat data. the main driver of growth was the development of e-commerce. the flow of goods from the railways due to the high workload of the infrastructure also has an effect. analysts note that in october, a traditional high season for the logistics industry, demand for transportation will increase several times. kamaz has increased the production of trucks of the new k5 model by one and a half times in 7 months. in total, more than 3,000 trucks have rolled off the assembly line

the government resorts to the underlying brief in the case and there was economic harm to this court's case specifically says the fact i'm part the nature of the harm was non-economic did not prevent the court from finding injury. havens whether there was an impairment of the organization's mission and second whether there was an expenditure of resources. both things are satisfied here. taking a look at how our organizations have been harmed they've been forced to use did resources and advocating for their pro-life mission to explaining the dangers of the harm from abortion drugs. one of the primary reasons that is required is because in 2016 fda took away the requirement that abortion providers report adverse events. >> but that would be anyone who is aggressive or vigilant about bringing lawsuits, just simply by using resources to advocate your position in court. you say now causes an injury seems easy to manufacture. >> i don't think that's true in this case justice thomas. i acknowledge you have a prelude litigation type of activity. in those cases those resource justifications don

courts. >>> economic policy taking center stage on the campaign trail with former president donald trump taking aim at vice president kamala harris' track record and proposals. >> as a result of kamala's inflation price hikes, they've cost a typical household a total of $28,000. now kamala is reportedly proposing communist price control. she wants price controls and if they worked, i'd go along with it, too, but they don't work. >> the news conference at trump's new new jersey golf course comes a day before vice president harris is set to deliver her first policy speech. she's expected to outline proposals to lower costs, including a federal ban on price gouging by food and grocery industries, which would require congressional approval. >>> meanwhile the harris campaign also said earlier today the vice president has agreed to a second debate at some point in october after the first debate september 10th. the vice presidential candidates have also agreed to a debate on october 1st on cbs. >>> we're now just four days into the start of the democratic national convention. final preparations are no

need to choose a new leader, potentially creating political and economic uncertainties, as kirida paopichit explained. no one expected the courtyesterday, so the economic prospects in thailand will probably look a little bleaker, because there is concern around who will be the new prime minister, and of course if the new prime minister comes from the current party, the pheu thai party, then the main economic policies will continue, including the digital wallet. but if the new prime minister is from a new party, then the digital wallet is up in the air and there might be other new policies by the prime minister from a new party. but in any case, i still think most of the long—term policies, that has to do with energy transition, going lower carbon, will continue regardless of who becomes prime minister. in the short term after that budget, giving that we don't know who will be leading the country, a country's budget very much determines the focus the country will be moving towards. yes, so the indication on the budget is that other than that it is going to be delayed, i don't think there will be major changes, even if a new pri

this court's opinion, havens, did not rely on the economic nature at all. i point your honor to the line in havens where the court said the noneconomic nature of respondents interest in housing. they were speaking broadly. again you have to dig to the underlying briefs to find the economic interest that this court did not rely on. with respect to our own injury, it's absolutely redressable. for example, if the regulations are put back in place, the protections whereby individual abortion providers need to provide information about adverse events, that would provide our respondent organizations with more accurate information about the harms from abortion drugs. >> counsel, can i ask you about the remy. the way i was talking with the s.g. it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption, but as i understand it they already have that. so what they are asking for here is that in order to prevents them from possible -- prevent them from possibly ever having to do these procedures, everyone else should be prevented from getting access to this

thailand has been plunged into deeper political and economic uncertainty, after the country�*s constitutional courty appointing a minister who�*d served time injail for contempt of court. he�*s been in office less than a year. the ruling threatens to destabilise thailand�*s governing coalition. the country has faced decades of political uncertainty and governments toppled by the courts. srettha is the fourth thai premier in the past 16 years to be removed by the same court. and just last week, the court dissolved the main opposition move forward party and banned its former leader from politics for ten years.

vance, share economic in pennsylvania as i hope to court voters in the swing state. conomic plans, the vice president made a stop over the weekend. nationally syndicated political reporter is there. we were talking to mike summers of american petroleum institute about fracking as an important spirit i want to show shale runs largely through pennsylvania. you can see it right there. this energy message, does it energize those voters there? are there enough orders there that would vote for president trump to counteract the kind of overwhelming support she has in a place like philadelphia? >> yeah, absolutely. in fact, 2016, the entire election hinged on these more world postindustrial counties. they are the ones that took trump over the top as opposed to pittsburgh and philadelphia. the show industry is multifaceted. it is not just the people in the industry but this eric dimock stereotype that you think, a welder or blue-collar worker. there is engineers, chemists, geologist, people that work on the computer, and also very much a part of that industry. and then, there

thailand has been plunged into deeper political and economic uncertainty, with the country's constitutional courthavisin. the court in bangkok ruled that he'd violated the constitution by appointing a minister who'd served time injail for contempt of court. he's been in office less than a year. amazon has been chosen for a uk trial to deliver parcels using drones. parcels from the prime air service can be delivered within an hour of being ordered. the service is already running in parts of the us as emily brown reports. well, it's been a decade since amazon founderjeff bezos announced drone deliveries. we did know that it would be a possibility when amazon said last year that it would start using drones in the uk, but we just didn't know when that would be. amazon is one of six organisations selected by the civil aviation authority to trial beyond visual line of sight drone flights. that means operators won't maintain physical sight of the drones. the prime air service is expected to launch in the uk by the end of the year. small packages will be delivered in less than an hour of an order being p

supreme court, three things, talk about all the other issues, but my standpoint the supreme court on economicsful. it is rolling in the regulatory bodies. you have to pass legislation which is the way it is supposed to be, larry. across the board in economics he is the single best first term president on economics i ever seen. i'm an economist. that is what i use. that is what i judge by. it is the most stellar record ever. larry: you and i both worked for reagan. reagan's tax cuts were very good. but the first tax cut took three years to phase in. >> that's wrong. larry: you've been critical. people waited until they can reap the lower tax rate return. the point is trump was immediate. >> bang. larry: as soon as the legislation was passed in late 2017 it went in and that helped really ignite a strong economy. >> it did an amazing job. if you look at u.s. growth before the tax cuts and jobs act we and europe were in sync a little slower, moving quarter to together. one the thing passed the u.s. takes off after two years, our gdp was 2 1/2 times, 2 1/2% higher than it would have been had we gro

discipline 40 can be things done with all of these other issues from my standpoint, the spring court and economicsis really the regulatory bodies and you to pass which is the way that is supposed to be so across-the-bod and economics of think that is the single best first term president and economics i have ever seen. limiting point is that this will use this what i just by just a stellar record ever. larry: you and i both work for reagan but in reagan's tax cuts were very good the first tax cut to three years face it and you've always been critical because than people just waited until they could be the lower tax rates return the point is that trump was immediate this is legislation was passed, they 2017 to anyone in that helped ignite a strong economy. art: did an amazing job you look of the u.s. growth before the tax cuts and jobs act, we are poor running think and we were a little bit slower than your pipework together with something best, in the u.s. takes off and think after two years, her gdp was to have times do that percent higher than within had we grown at the european rated so we whale

thailand has been plunged into deeper political and economic uncertainty, with the country's constitutional courtconstitution by appointing a minister who'd served time injail for contempt of court. he's been in office less than a year. the ruling threatens to destablise thailand's governing coalition. the country has faced decades of political uncertainty and governments toppled by the courts. mr srettha is the fourth thai premier in the past 16 years to be removed by the court. and just last week, the court dissolved the main opposition and banned its former leader from politics for ten years. the move could also have major implications for south east asia's second—largest economy and impact investor confidence. 0ur south east asia correspondent jonathan head gave us this update on the court's decision this is a court that many people argue is more powerful than any elected government in the country. for all that, the whole business about this petition against mr srettha was not taken that seriously. i mean, thailand's politics are not famous for their ethics, all sorts of colourful and pretty

thailand has been plunged into deeper political and economic uncertainty, with the country's constitutional courtng the prime minister, srettha thavisin. the court in bangkok ruled that he'd violated the constitution by appointing a minister who'd served time injail for contempt of court. he's been in office less than a year. our south east asia correspondent, jonathan head, has more. we still do not know what lies behind this verdict, apart from reminding usjust how intervention reminding us just how intervention the courts are, throws the country into disarray. there is a process for choosing a new prime minister and cabinet. that will probably happen pretty quickly, meeting on friday where the current coalition of ii parties can discuss. there has to be somebody already registered as a prime ministerial candidate for the last election, which will become prime minister but it is clear... it seems the dominant party in the coalition did not expect this verdict and there is some confusion about exactly what kind of government will emerge. donald trump has been out on the campaign trail in the las

honorable president of the court in 1987 was the beginning of a new chapter in the political and economic life of our country and the beginning of the history of iran's oil industry. but instead of starting the industrial development and progress of iran, unfortunately. it deepened england's expansionism and extensive control over iran's resources and government. the british colonial agreement gave them the right to exploit the oil fields for a long time without any restrictions and finally give a small percentage of the profits to the employer, the iranian government. this type of contract is the first oil contract during the time of muzafardin shah, iran gave to england for 60 years in the northern year. the share of cash in all of iran, except for 5 provinces of iran, was 16% of the total darcy score. reza khan pahlavi gave this privilege in 131 ah. but a contract of the same type called the contract of 1312 gaskel. it is enough for golshayan that iran's share is considered to be 20% of the total oil sales. this contract continued until 1329. the nationalization of the oil industry is

some human rights institutions and commissions, recommending economic sanctions, establishing special commissions and even creating a special court for israel or other legal capacities. what is also mentioned in article 22 of the un charter, the general assembly can establish such suborganizations as it deems necessary to carry out its duties, complete legal isolation. the tree of wishes in the yard of the peace of palace is where children write their wishes on peace. is there something written about palestine in these papers? "big events are first formed in minds, before they are created in reality. the day hitler saw the grandier of a great leader of the nazi army, he may never have thought that one day he would lose all his power, but all those people who saw him were sure that it was the day that the nazis died in their minds and in reality. the legal campaign against israel is similar." to that, increasing pressure on israel and changing people's view on the regime is very dangerous for israel's behavior in the future, because basically they engage in fascist behavior based on the story of the holocaust in people's minds, ki

thailand has been plunged into deeper political and economic uncertainty, after the country's constitutional courtmissed the prime minister, srettha thavisin. the court in bangkok ruled that he'd violated the constitution by appointing a minister who'd served time injail for contempt of court. he's been in office less than a year. the ruling threatens to destabilise thailand's governing coalition. the country has faced decades of political uncertainty and governments toppled by the courts. srettha is the fourth thai premier in the past 16 years to be removed by the same court. and just last week, the court dissolved the main opposition move forward party and banned its former leader from politics for ten years. the move could also have major implications for southeast asia's second—largest economy and impact investor confidence. mr srettha spoke shortly after the ruling. translation: i respect the verdict of the constitutional court. - i reiterate that for almost one year i have been in this role i have tried with good intentions to lead the country with honesty. let's speak to our south east asia

court. legal expertise to economic think about the decision of the kind of rivalry between different forms of expertise and the way i read the opinion of the court is to say when it comes to questions where what's at issue is the scope of the agency's power which john mentioned is at stake when it comes to ambiguous statute. agencies don't have the competence to decide whether they have the competence to deny that. it's a meta claim. there confidence runs out when it comes to determining the scope of their own expertise. precisely because questions of law are at stake in this as i think it kind of practical argument that has this expertise in the course agencies have legal experts too. ultimately the strength of that argument is that that's the role of the court in the constitutional system in based on the administrative procedure act the role of the courts to interpret law so they are many instances in which when we are dealing with ambiguous statute the expertise that comes from technical domains are from policy are all jumbled together in ways that are difficult to separate out and just as

courts. back to you. david: edward, thank you. bring in kevin hassett and economics and howh power and money and lawlessness this administration wants to take from congress and the supreme court. don't you think? >> during covid, you recall i went back to the white house to help coordinate the economic recovery and at one point there's a mee meeting and everye thought about all the options that one could possibly have and stimlouis for the lock downs and absolutely unconstitutional to forgive student debt and can't do this during the covid emergency and this is they have the right to do it and going for the way they're founded in the language and deny of education saying it's unconstitutional and we don't have the this is right authority and the thing that's most interesting about this case to me is the astonishing partisanship of the justice department that career people during a national emergency said it's 100% unconstitutional to forgive student debt and then where did those people go and president biden said i want to do this. david: $500 billion is going to be