., ect., ect., and then at some point, you know, in different ways, dylan and i reached the same conclusionwhich is that that's not going to get us anywhere, and that right now this country is in deep crisis, much deeper than we realize, and we have a moment of choice. we can channel that anger into dividing and scapegoating, and that's happening already all around us, and that will destroy us. all we can take -- or we can take that anger and acknowledge it because it is legitimate, and channel it into rebuilding our communities and lives, and as dylan pull it building bridges, not motes. in researching the book, i discovered we have time to help. this was started by seth who is here from portland, oregon. seth lost his job in portland, and after filling out multiple job application and after getting depressed, he decided that the one thing he had in abundance was time. he created literally wegottimetohelp.org. people can come together to help people with needs. it can be i'm preeing inapt and i need to move and i need a truck with someone to help me. it can be as basic as that or a child c

t we ected ws to built on ts roperty. lding biding a ress th rusand eguaons that have enpu i place after thoughtful crual by e ar of supervisors-- cnsideraion anthe bod ofsperisors and others on howhis nehborod shoulbe developed and h bngs shouldbut. t what wha currntly under yoururr view r unde your examination a buildig llskings or he trieffecfbuding excepons,n bk ad height second street nsie dince. anthroghoutthiswhoe ocess of lanning delohe have bee almosminiinputs frm he sidents of thineighoood. eplnnng departnt in its velopment of t e.i.r. d and theuildingdevelo, inpu until thdraftei.rwas put intace, did not ask or any for tis cmmssionoslw downhis rocess. this building is not goin to going to bbuilt year. we a that you slowdown his ocess and ve the reiden -- tl the nin eatmen gback a ge the ve inputito thbuiling.o thk you. coissionr tnk yo >> my na isronzalez. i'm awnerat199 montgo, looking directly t withr with te amdmets. to be brie would like to see the paing lot dvoped into a much betr project the e ghborhd is i

., but their argument is you don't have to be in a totally new area, ect.. apply traditional 1st amendment standards, and we win. that's their argument, and i'd like to hear what you have to say about that specifically. >> your honor, they do not suggest there's an existing exception to the 1st amendment applying -- >> this is not an exception. it is the traditional, strict, scrutiny 1st amendment test. >> well, they make a -- >> well, to get you to focus on it i'll say i made the argument. >> there you go. okay. [laughter] >> i think if you apply scrutiny here, it's not close to the showing required under the 1st amendment. first of all, they have not shown any problem, let alone a compelling problem, requiring regulation here. in a world where parents are fully empowered already to make these calls, where crime including violent crimes since the introduction of the game is plummeting in the country, down 50% since the day doom went on the market 15 years ago, in a world where parents are fully aware of what's going on in their homes and aware of the rating

of global warmg and ot gre he changein the future but te past has obe tro the aou at wild design and ect. te ed a ttut at e yoikolarify a lite >>et mrt sllyifferent w. t think i'she ge tegrese. we havhve nteating r th re milos e sore pins etting l agenciesitegrate fod su e ih owre wee tyinggois n have aqutouher we'te se cao anme mping ap tongesso i asot mcolet you on e urface my o, weve hese clate modd h o it o to operatio del. ac'sginta ine amsstnw tdtat we on'thhose anrdizeds. hhkey, whilu ou oav sile plot, you ctuallop seraarnives yocact fte change that's oo gs rom mmiotra, y owti tr and hei channel. you te th r sen llarca ts gg line. i ink po anoc gr i wasesop workwi. ybe ey lite anne when sglowaing, th d aif tis cagnchie soinen door aboutnga our favotehrasway of lkinabout th wntto eecve e have ditlik campgn reon o oe thii ard. e chaengewfaceis leve of utain n nowledge ad we o acrdingl e tho agency started doing hreeyebis budi at e a ffer. we're inpercentera innsvatiarecling anll at bintiaplan ff fr oject urtaint veoften jects on't com ine at e pace ou want weuerstanh is an aed cost

do they have ties, ect.? what we found out in the research of talking with him is back in the 1970s, it was the time of student movements throughout latin america, and it was in the early-mid 70s, and he was involved in the student youth movement as well, a revolutionary spirit going on throughout lit tan america, and a lot of people he was associating with in college ended up going to the root of the guerrillas. he told us, you know, five years into making the book, we were talking to him one night saying something about, well, you know, you got an interview with a high-level guerrilla member, now the leaders of the guerrillas. in 1987, the guerrillas had not given public interviews for many years, and in 1987, he got an interview with the top level leader. we asked how he gt that interview, and he revealed in college, he played pocker with this -- poker with this man. there was five people in the student movement, and they had been hanging out together, and he said, i went the root of the journalism, two pe

fws w're crently in the process of ursuing habitaonservation pl to o w wee to tudy climate change ects on our system. 002 thugh the universy of washington ou richard palmer anargaret hn, i won't g over h now dash ybe later. next slide. a couple mayor tudies we conducd areduc of our

. >>> coming up, keeping newly ú%ected official out of ffice.orge's county office are trying to force a new councilmember from her seat. >> reporter: they are returning home to an eerie scene of destruction. i'm megan gilliland. why police are still circling after tuesday's tornado. ú%> it worked today if you looked to the side next to you and the person has a in th

there was no dna toafd ect guandique today murder but prosecutors told jurors that levy's death fit a pattern of other crimes. guandique will be sentenced on february 11th. he could be sentenced to a minimum of 0 years and a maximum of life in prison. lefty's mother talked about the verdict. >> the results of the verdict may be guilty but i have a lifetime sentence of a lost limb missing from our family tree. it is painful. i live with it every day and so do my son, my mother and other family members. >> several jury members also talked publicly following that verdict. while they wouldn't specifically discuss their deliberations, the jurors say they carefully weighed the evidence before coming to a unanimous conclusion. >> we did the best we could with the evidence we were given to come to the conclusion of this case. >> i'm a confident with the decision that we made but it doesn't mean that i don't, you know, wish that we didn't have to be here today. >> prosecutors won that conviction even though they lacked the physical evidence to link guandique to chandra levy. jurors say they th

., ect., at the state and local level that unfortunately i think was overlooked not out of bad reasons, but out of reasons of people just overly pushing the issue of what is this country going to do to protect itself in the future, and i really feel that particularly in the last couple years that we're looking back at an area of expertise and an area of sophistication at the state and local level that can be actually quite helpful. the other part that has been done at the state and local level with a lot of, i think, success is balancing the privacy in the civil liberties area with the agreement in new york and even though changes were made, the intelligence audit and the changes in the seattle police department where i served for nine years as chief. we were able to certainly work within those existing laws and still feel comfortable in gathering information, sharing information, and actually protecting the people of seattle. the other part that i want to stress now because of the new role that i have or it's not so new, about a year and a half, is we have the height, the height inten

., but their argument is you don't have to be in a totally new area, ect.. apply traditional 1st amendment standards, and we win. that's their argument, and i'd like to hear what you have to say about that specifically. >> your honor, they do not suggest there's an existing exception to the 1st amendment applying -- >> this is not an exception. it is the traditional, strict, scrutiny 1st amendment test. >> well, they make a -- >> well, to get you to focus on it i'll say i made the argument. >> there you go. okay. [laughter] >> i think if you apply scrutiny here, it's not close to the showing required under the 1st amendment. first of all, they have not shown any problem, let alone a compelling problem, requiring regulation here. in a world where parents are fully empowered already to make these calls, where crime including violent crimes since the introduction of the game is plummeting in the country, down 50% since the day doom went on the market 15 years ago, in a world where parents are fully aware of what's going on in their homes and aware of the rating

., but their argument is you don't have to be in a totally new area, ect.. apply traditional 1st amendment standards, and we win. that's their argument, and i'd like to hear what you have to say about that specifically. >> your honor, they do not suggest there's an existing exception to the 1st amendment applying -- >> this is not an exception. it is the traditional, strict, scrutiny 1st amendment test. >> well, they make a -- >> well, to get you to focus on it i'll say i made the argument. >> there you go. okay. [laughter] >> i think if you apply scrutiny here, it's not close to the showing required under the 1st amendment. first of all, they have not shown any problem, let alone a compelling problem, requiring regulation here. in a world where parents are fully empowered already to make these calls, where crime including violent crimes since the introduction of the game is plummeting in the country, down 50% since the day doom went on the market 15 years ago, in a world where parents are fully aware of what's going on in their homes and aware of the rating

., ect., ect.. it doesn't say whether we want to or in our discretion or when we have funds available. it says shall. >> our point doesn't turn on the response that dhs makes. it turns on the conduct of the state and local police officers who would be -- and by hypothesis are making inquiries of the aliens before we even get to what is submitted to united states. they stop someone and prolonging that stop by hypothesis they mite not otherwise do it in the absence of the 1070. >> they might not do it or they might do it and this is a facial challenge. you have to prove every time they would stop someone that's an unconstitutional stop. >> no, our burden is to show every time the mandatory application is inpermissible because it takes away the discretion of the local law enforcement to decide whether to persue a local -- >> what about section ii? it says if you have reasonable suspicion if it's practicable, if it won't interfere with the investigation, then you can request the immigration status. >> t

you actually buffering american public from the cost of questions from what's going on in iran and ect so i think it's complex. the key is there's no larger discussion of general strategy. yes, ma'am? >> kansas city, and all of you have talked about the fact that china has a strategy maybe right or wrong, and the united states doesn't. it's easy to see how china can develop a strategy because they are not a democracy. they just have to get a few people alone in a room and say this is what it is. in the united states just looking at tuesday in the election, how do we ever get to agreement? how do we get to a strategy whatever that might be? >> i'll respond quickly on this. that's an oversimplification of china. they have many moving pieces. it's a mistake to think decision making in china which i think has been getting a lot right and some wrong, nonetheless is more and more sophisticated if not a democracy. on the united states side, i think the question is not -- it's how you bring together and are you willing to bring the environmental community, the energy community, the 17 differen

., ect., ect.. it doesn't say whether we want to or in our discretion or when we have funds available. it says shall. >> our point doesn't turn on the response that dhs makes. it turns on the conduct of the state and local police officers who would be -- and by hypothesis are making inquiries of the aliens before we even get to what is submitted to united states. they stop someone and prolonging that stop by hypothesis they mite not otherwise do it in the absence of the 1070. >> they might not do it or they might do it and this is a facial challenge. you have to prove every time they would stop someone that's an unconstitutional stop. >> no, our burden is to show every time the mandatory application is inpermissible because it takes away the discretion of the local law enforcement to decide whether to persue a local -- >> what about section ii? it says if you have reasonable suspicion if it's practicable, if it won't interfere with the investigation, then you can request the immigration status. >> t

., ect.. what does the leadership in pakistan do? they have an existential threat, and there our strategy is of minimum defensive deterrence in the conventional and unconventional. now, previously it was conventional, but now with india going nuclear, it is also unconventional. >> jim moody. mr. president, nice to see you again and thank you for your frank comments. stepping back from the issues you've been discussing that are important, but those like myself who lived in pakistan and love pakistan, we're concerned about the educational system there. i've been to many villages where it says on the education map there's a school there, but you go there and there's no school. they're called ghost schools. thank you for initiating a good program and only 40% of pakistani children of school age are in school. this is a huge burden for the future. stepping away from the media issues, how do we get pakistan to head towards the goals that are crucial to the long term pakistan? >> yes, i couldn't agre

this included eating, sleeping, and receiving medicine, ect.. i could not even go to the restroom. he saw himself as the exclusive ruler of our lives, and as the defender of holy regime. he viewed me as a traitor, a spry, and immoral. he was the image of god while i was satan. i had to confess to whatever he dreamed up. i lost consciousness under his torture. i spent night and days hanging from the ceiling with one arm tied to my back. i was forbidden to sleep and even forced to eat my own fecses. i confessed. i had been with the most hateful person. i had marched and marched. i spent 6082 days in solitary confinement, and then, and then make confessions, but would be used against me in my six minutes trial in court. make no mistake, please, this system of torture continues today. since the electoral call of 2009, torture in iran has occurred in new fads which i call mock torture. the rape of women and even of men has been added to the earlier tech technical of routine unhuman torture practices. when at last i was released from prison after six years, i didn't know that my torture

., ect., ect.. it doesn't say when we want to or in our discretion. it doesn't say when we have funds available. it says shall. >> our point doesn't turn on the response that dhs makes. it turns on the conduct of the state and local police officers who would be by hypothesis are making inquiries of the alien before we even get to what would be submitted. they would be stopping someone and prolonging that stop by hypothesis and circumstances that they might not otherwise do it. in the absence of the -- >> they might not do it or they might do it, and this is a challenge. you got to prove that every time they would stop someone, that would be an unconstitutional stop. >> no, no, our burden is to show that every time the mandatory application is impermissible because it takes away the discretion of the local law enforcement offer -- officer whether to pursue a local line of industry rather than mandate. >> what about the first section of issue 2. if it's practicable and won't interfere with the investi

>> here we set. 300 ected representatives in the most historically influenced house. and still transportation problems remain. saved from the coalition spending cuts. mr. speaker i ask you this. why do my friends from age of 16-19 have free public transport while other does not? why do young people in scotland have a third of fare office my sisters in the southwest pay outrageous fees. at the end of the day young people getn education thus benefitting economy, but what happens when that young person is struggling for that transport to education. at the end of the day that person does not get a result of a the result and it does not benefit our economy. lady in nikon stitch wen si said young people should pay like everyone else? why are they different? young people have a lower minimum wage and young people by law must work shorter hours and we need cheaper transport. they're starting a full-time education to be leaders and that's why we need cheaper transportation. lady of the age of 567, has a freedom of owning a car. safety net of the life savings and plus, she's en

he said he didn't want to give an ect time frame. they're still working the state attorney's office. as you can imagine, it is a huge case. we're dealing wth more than 100 crime that have been happening since august. some are crime where the suspect has gone into home when people were slping. in other cases, he's broken into vehicles. all of this happening in the dead of the night. they have to piece this all together and make sure they can actually prove that he was t person responsible for all these crimes. if you remember during the course of this investigation, there were no witnesses. no one actually saw him committing these crimes. there was no description of him or the vehicle. so police have a lot of work to do to try to actually piece together ts investigatioand make sure they have the right man, if they can prove it. we should mention in the court records, it indicated there were people who have home surveillance video of him. but he was wearing dark closeding. he was wearing a mask. so again, no actual description of anyon

. >>> find out what sarah palin has to say in her new >>> still to come, newly ected prince george's county baker ts down with jim >>> breaking news out of south korea. we're continue to go follow this story. two marines, two south korean marineare dead. 16 are injured following a series of artillery strikes from north korea on south koreain retalation by south kor on north korea. the first strikes came from the north on the highly populated island of yeongpeong. the white house has condemned this attack on the north by the south. the north has attacked the south with artillery shells. 16 injured. two associaten marines are dead. the white house has condemned these attacks. more throughout the news cast. >>> today vice president joe biden will visit an indiana transmission plant in kokomo as part of the white house main street tour. it was saved by the federal bailout. it received more than 400 million in stimulus money. the city also received 600,000 in stimulus funds to renovate downtown sidewalks. chrysler received an emergency $10 billion bailout has not repaid it. >>> one local

., but their argument is you don't have to be in a totally new area, ect.. apply tditional 1st amendment standards, and we win. that's their argument, and i'd like to hear what you have to say about that specifically. >>our honor, they do not suggest there's an existing exception to the 1st amendment applying -- >> this is not an exception. it is the traditional, strict, scrutiny 1st amendment test. >> well, they make a -- >> well, to get you to focus on it i'll say i made the argument. >> there you go. okay. [laughter] >> i think if you apply scrutiny here, it's not close to the showing required under the 1st amendment. first of all, they have not shown any problem, let alone a compelling problem, requiring regulation here. in a world where parents are fully empowered already to make these calls, whererime including violent crimes since the introduction of the game is plummeting in the country, down 50% since the day doom went on the market 15 years ago, in a world where parents are fully aware of what's going on in their homes and aware of the rating syste

new york state to get reform laws on the state books dealing with child labor, the eight hour day, ect., for women. when she came to hull house, she was seasoned, and i that, oh, add ms is way -- adams is way behind here. because kelly had a lively personality, you didn't have the actual conversations, but you didn't need them. you knew kelly was sitting her down saying, jean, get in the political arena. there's no time to be wasted. we need you in illinois advocating. adams had never lobbied before and writes in 20 years about how she had a distaste for lobbying at this time which i think is because her father disapproved a lobbiests. he was a state senator and was of the classical fashion belief that you made up your own mind, trust your conscious, and not be pressured by anyone, and so he thought lobbiests were bad people. adams had also ignored the fact her father would have disapproved of her becoming a lobbyist, but with kelly next to her, and also other women, women at the chicago women's club and trade women who too had become political activists including mary kenny. they were

the work we did in indonesia and the united states and the pakistan earthquakes and ect. and ect.and the list goes on, in afghanistan, the amount of effort u.s. soldiers and leaders put in to troy to avoid civilian casualties is atonnishing. i have seen classified images of drone strikes and they didn't pull the image because there was a child in range. a guy who killed hundreds and hundreds of people. we don't get credit. contrast that to the soviets who deliberately targeted civilians. on the one hand the media doesn't give us credit for the good we do, overemphasize the mistakes, and don't look at the contrasting conditions around the world. having said that, there no question that our engagement in the middle east in israel and palestine and i say this as a proud friend of israel is harming our security and israel in the long run. unless we reconcile that in a constructive and just way, that will continue to be the focus for many people. i was in the swat valley in pakistan right after it was cleared out, and we were meeting with people and i was ask what their thought was abo

s toe is expected to be some ected to be soover the federal reserve's decision last week to pump another0 billion into the markets through government onds. before arrivin arriving in seoul the president was greeted warmly at a stop in indonesia. he told a large audience in jakarta that the u.s. is not and never will be at war with islam. obamar. obama agreed that much hore could be done to improve eelations between america and the islamic world. ic in salt lake city, elizabeth smart returns to the witness smart re stand today, this time to be bess examined. >> for the last two days, smart, now 23, has been giving jurors ghe horrific details of her nine-month ordeal. diana alvear has more. good morning, diana. >> r b, reporter: vinita and rob, good morning. good morning. oe are learning so much more about what elizabeth smart was fofoed to endure. esday and spokeand again on uesday and spoke openly about o ing assaulted, of having to wear veils and disguises, and andn about one close encounter enc a police officer that nearly resulted in her rescue. his attorneys say brian david mitchell

foreign affairs because it does not present its philosophy of free enterprise, libertarian beliefs, ect. as well as it should. sounds almost familiar to the current day, doesn't it? finally, as he predicted, in the 1980s or there abouts, the american people realize that economic security is not necessarily freedom. they realize their freedoms are being abridged. they realize the economy is becoming too regimented and the government too bureaucratic. the people will then change the trend of events back to common sense conservative principles of government. remember his prediction was 1980, and if you recall from history, 1980 as it turned out was indeed the year in which the american people voted for a conservative president, ronald reagan, who did indeed -- [applause] who did indeed change the trend of events back to common sense conservative principles of government. bromgard sited at yafer for events in the future of 1996 to 2000. his predictions were as follows. 1968, republican victory. 1972, reagan elected president. 1976, reagan reelected. 1978, fall of soviet russia. 1985, end of

that are unlikely to be ect connected and try to find a reason, try and find it to control our environmentswe keep doing it, keep doing it. it's handed down generation to generation. >> can it be a good thing to believe in superstitions? >> there good elements. control over environment. it can motivate us. we can see good outcomes. there has been probably major discoveries that have occurred because of trial and error and things went together. there is a pla see placebo effe. keep my fingers crossed, wish on the first star, feel better, more in control, and things will happen. >> a self-fulfilling prophecy. >> you wish it, it will come. >> if you're caught up on negative things, it can have a negative effect? >> absolutely. positive attributions lead to positive and negative, if you go in thinking negative things and looking only for the negative things they're going to come true. absolutely going to happen. >> what are signs you're taking your superstitions way too seriously. >> you can and you have to be careful. three main things. the first thing, think about are you feeling more anxious

judgment, i mean, basically what you're saying is in the most recent case with respect to the world series ect., those fees were accessive, is that correct? >> yes, from our point of view, we had done deals over 18 months with cbs, nbc, univision, and abc, and all of those deals were less than being asked for the particular service in question that had the world series, so that was -- we thought that was a lot, and we thought it was irrational, and we thought that we should say no to that. you know, ultimately -- >> but to what degree might there be a legitimacy to someone's belief that you're somehow saying, well, okay, let's get washington to get involved in this and, you know, we'll make this a case so that we don't get beat up in the future and in the market just in terms of the normal market forces? >> right. well, # what we reallimented was -- what we really wanted was a price similar to what the other stations we had already done deals with had agreed to absent that, and we had basically a take it or leave it offer. we thought that binding arbitration would make sense. we thought that a

decision made there to extend our military occupation of afghanistan into 2014 and possibly beyond will ect untold, unsustainable, unacceptable costs. a war that has already tragically cost us 1,400 money lives will now take many hundreds more. a war that has already drained the treasurey of $370 billion will drive us further into debt and a war that has undermined our national security goals will continue to make us less safe. here we are, patting down holiday travelers at the airport while we escalate a war that is foe meanting, rather than fighting terrorism. that's the current state of our national security policy. talk about missing the forest for the trees. this decision to stay the disastrous course in afghanistan represents a broken promise, plain and simple. a promise that was to begin ending at least begin ending this war in july of next year. meanwhile as the timetable extends, the tactics seem to grow more violent. remember a shock and you a -- or remember shock and awe in iraq? well, we're now engaged in what one american officer called awe, shock and fire power in the form of

i think i want to know more about what the records for such a justification would be, ect., but i would like -- >> well, same as in the family medical and leave act, but making it a parental leave rather than a historically maternity leave. >> in that situation it's expanding on a gender neutral basis rather than single out one parent over another. there's a critical piece left out, and that is the counsel for petitioner says if a father legitimates an out of wedlock child, he is in the same position, or that child is in the same position as the child of an outside of wedlock mother, and that is not likely to be so, and it's not likely to be so at birth, and this is the reason why. when the child is legit mated, -- legitimated the child has two parents as the court described to that child. the u.s. citizen father, and the alien mother in the other country. you have two parents whose interest have to be taken into account. in the situation the congress addressed in 1409c the child born out of wedlock where at the moment of birth there was no recognized father, you have only the mother. i

judgment, i mean, basically what you're saying is in the most recent case with respect to the world series ect those fees were accessive, is that correct? >> yes, from our point of view, we had done deals over 18 months with cbs, nbc, univision, and abc, and all of those deals were less than being asked for the particular service in question that had the world series, so that was -- we thought that was a lot, and we thought it was irrational, and we thought that we should say no to that. you know, ultimately -- >> but to what degree might there be a legitimacy to someone's belief that you're somehow saying, well, okay, let's get washington to get involved in this and, you know, we'll make this a case so that we don't get beat up in the future and in the market just in terms of the normal market forces? >> right. well, # what we reallimented was -- what we really wanted was a price similar to what the other stations we had already done deals with had agreed to absent that, and we had basically a take it or leave it offer. we thought that binding arbitration would make sense. we thought that an

if you're in an exit area, you better have the world's best consumer experience ect.. one of the things that the company outside the organization of the company get in the press and patch or at aol is they make people work so hard. you know, it's if you don't want to work hard, this is not the industry for you. there's a point where working too hard is too much. you have to be careful. our organizational structure is masked with a large culture drive to make complentd products. that's why i go to disney. they have excellent products. those people care about what they do. >> okay. more questions? go ahead. >> [inaudible] [inaudible] >> paying for aol or patch in >> i would say overall patch, if i'm wrong, come up here and correct me. right now i believe what we are focused on is the consumer experience. my guess is down the road that will be a question we'll run smack into whether you have to pay for patch. ton honest with you, i have not been in a meeting where paying for patch has been discussed. i would say this about going back to what you can sell to consumers. you

a major one is not a major american influence in the spending, finance, ect. in this country, and sending $10 million a day to pakistan to harbor terrorists, health care, and tax cuts are not going to solve the issues that we're voting for or against. >> host: all right. fred. >> guest: i'm not sure what the question was there. >> host: respond to her commentary i guess. >> guest: i will. particularly to pakistan and that's a fair point. sending money to pakistan, a country that's almost out of control and has a huge islamic radical element there, it's a tradeoff, and the tradeoff is that we're going to support the government there. we're hoping to get their help against al-qaeda and the taliban and we have to some extent, and that you weighs -- outweighs what might happen if we pull out and then terrorist groups might take over the country, a country like pakistan with nuclear weapons, and we don't want that to happen. you can raise questions about this policy towards pakistan, but it's one that i think has bipartisan support, and obviously it was one the bus

>> it's a very sll percent, i can't give you the ect amount. but a very small percent. for example since we started the new pat down procedure, we have had approximately 34 million people travel, it is a very small percentage in number of those who have actually received this type of thorough pat down. so it see like from what i have seen in the media, every passenger is receiving a pat down, that's clearly not the case. it's a very small percentage. >> again, it can be overblown. i'm not going to be the one and nor can you be to decide whether people think this is overly invave or not inveiasive enough. but one thing we can agree on is this is not theault of the tsa screeners, but they're being blamed for this, they're being called names at airports and that clearly can't continue, can it? >> i have heard both sides. i have receiveded comments from some of the security officers who have said that customers, travelers have been very complementary and appreciative of the work they are doing to keep them and the traveling public safe. but clearly we can'tave passengers wh

act is it not only asked us to track where the money was going down to the recipient and subrecipient ect. and to the vender, but it also asked how many jobs are being created with this money, and so we had not just the layer of where the money is going, we had this critical performance measure associated with the recovery act. is it creating jobs? and so now you have a really multidimensional full view of taxpayer dollars and what's happening. it's the fullest view we've ever had, and the results are people are paying attention, congress, ceo, federal agencies, the public. everyone is much more informed and important debates are occurring on the recovery act that would not have been able to occur if not for this effort, so it's really a great example of the cfo act as it was originally intended in action. i think this was what was envisioned in terms of having that information to spur public debate and to allow the public to at least have the knowledge and the trust that they can see where their taxpayer dollars are going and how they're being put to work and raise concerns or celebrate

configuration of our teams, to develop guidelines for children, to deal with basic pediatric care, ect.. in closing, i just want to say how much i've appreciated the commission's energy, focus, and activities on there. i want to ensure you we are in for the long run, our communication with fema is in this for the long run. we're working now on a stability plan. when we met a year ago, i was launching this effort in my office with a fellow, janet lee, who got the activity up and running. she'll be leaving at the end of the year, and we're in the process of identifying a staff to carry on this effort for the long hall. my goal and yours is when all of our tenures end, we've baked enough of into the infrastructure and organization, the children will continue to be a focus and never forgotten. i look forward to the discussion that follows. turning it over to david. >> thank you. >> thank you, laurie. >> chairman and commission members,, we're delighted to have you. as i move back into the acting role, although i work with the commission throughout my ten year here, it's wonderful to have t

let's go to another hispanic governor newly ected, governor-elect suzanne into martinez fro -- suzanne martinez. before we go to the clip tell us what some of the buzz is about her and how she's distinguishing herself from thether new governors. guest: she is both a woman and latino governor elected. the republican governors association spent a lot of money on her race wanting her to get elected. she partly benefited from the unpopularity not only of the a administration, the cycle, but of the governor bill richardson. at one point during the campaign she offered to debate him and not her opponent because he was so unpopular and she wanted to tie him as the person she was running against. but those -- as a woman and latina that is a demographic the republicans think is something that they can reach out to other groups that don't traditionally vote for republicans. so theare excited to have her as governor of new mexico. host: we will listen to what she had to say on immigration reform. >> it is not about the mexican population. it is merely about the mexican border which has been weak.

voters do not have a lot of ideas and they do not have any interest that these candidates, if they are ected, they are getting elected because the voters are looking for change. they want to but someone out of washington. they wanted -- they were really unhappy. what happens when these tea party candidates -- i think they're really interesting group of voters in that regard is going to be women voters. the women voters still want a role for government. they are very unhappy with how that role is implemented right now. women want government to do something and that tea party perspective is very challenging. i think it helped move the women voters back over to the democratic side. >> everyone keeps referring to the tea party movement. they look at it like aarty and not understanding that it is a movement. is it an attitude or believe orate under current of feelings about the country? yes, you can look at what has occurred in some of these campaigns. there has been some demonization of certain candidates. some with a little bit of. -- of help. >> of your the one that said the men she. -- you ar

the united states to enforce the right of muslim women and girls to wear in the streets and schools ects our position, a position we articulate when talking to our european friends. >> is it your view widely that religious intolerance is a growing problem in europe? >> there is certainly a growing sensitivity in europe, and i think what we are urging, again, are european friends are to take every measure to tree to e leaveuate that tension. these are often in europe and elsewhere, these are tensions between communities, and it's for the government to be as proactive as it can in each situation to reduce the level of tension. >> thank you, sir. since 2003, the christian communities in iraq have been target of a great deal of violence, towns where they are blown to bits. how do you deal with that panic? how do you deal with people who want to immigrate as a result of this fear? >> we are and have expressed great concern about the situation of the christian community in iraq, the bombing last month of the our lady of salvation catholic church where more than 50 people were killed as an exa

judgment, i mean, basically what you're saying is in the most recent case with respect to the world series ect., those fees were accessive, is that correct? >> yes, from our point of view, we had done deals over 18 months with cbs, nbc, univision, and abc, and all of those deals were less than being asked for the particular service in question that had the world series, so that was -- we thought that was a lot, and we thought it was irrational, and we thought that we should say no to that. you know, ultimately -- >> but to what degree might there be a legitimacy to someone's belief that you're somehow saying, well, okay, let's get washington to get involved in this and, you know, we'll make this a case so that we don't get beat up in the future and in the market just in terms of the normal market forces? >> right. well, # what we reallimented was -- what we really wanted was a price similar to what the other stations we had already done deals with had agreed to absent that, and we had basically a take it or leave it offer. we thought that binding arbitration would make sense. we thought that a

has been very busy at peace processing, invoice, plans, ect., but we haven't achieved very much. the big things were done by the parties themselves, but since the arab peace initiative and the fact that everybody, the most hardlined people in this town in the west bank and the mountains of afghanistan know what the final solution looks like, why is it so hard for a president -- what is the impediment for a president who really wants is to get this done because every american who understands something about israel knows that the support for israel runs through the blood of the politics of american. it is not a jewish issue in the u.s.. secondly, the safety, security, the fulfillment of the zionist dream, will not be done until the israelis draw a line with the palestinian. it's all the palestinians who can finalize for good and forever the israeli states. why can't we get this done? >> let me see if there's anyone in the gallery who didn't get the seat at the table. is there a question back there? final thoughts? >> all right. let me start if i may. do you mind giving us your fina

also, efforts to try to align domestic resolution regimes, legal frameworks, bankruptcy codes, ect.,ake sure they are at least not unfriendly to cooperation across borders, and then there's the issue of regulatory arbitrage across borders, and the real risk is that you get some, some national bodies applying much more stringent regulatory regimes and systemic risk charges for example that may or may not shift activities across borders in ways that are not necessarily to be of advantage to the global systemic ability. >> it's been interesting to see that forms of all of these shifting as to what they do based on what is about to come. for example, you see the goldman sachs, they closed the proprietary unit and trying to figure out what to do with the private investment unit, what's the appropriate side they should go down to. the other day standard charts announced they will increase their capital from 9% to 11% and set minimums to 7% and came out saying they're going to 11%, and the u.k. regulators are talking about not just meeting the basal timeline, but it needs to be happen much