presumably profits are higher, and you can get more flexibility where you locate the plants and operations ect.. i think a lot of americans are thinking particularly with the unemployment rate so high, gee, that sounds nice, but what assurance do we have for the americans that as a consequence of it being changed, that more jobs are to be in the u.s. rather than jobs overseas. let me start with you, mr. duke, and all four of you, just briefly touch on that. >> thanks, mr. chairman, and first i would say that in the growth overseas, when wal-mart grows overseas, we bring american companies with us, and i would welcome any members of the committee and travel to other markets to let us show you a wal-mart store and the products that are in a wal-mart store in countries outside the united states, so not only whether it's the agricultural products that come from the u.s. or u.s. beef that we export to markets around the world, but to those products that are on the shelfs that are produced by american companies would be an example. the other would be even here in the united states and the growth and

you don't think of prince albert as a key player in terms of peace, ect.. >> guest: no.t's one that's interesting outcrops of seward's policy. if there was not such friction -- >> host: not all viewers know what the affair was. briefly, what happened with that vessel? >> guest: yes. it's one of the small diplomatic accidents that became huge. it involved one called the trent, two passengers on board who were controversial, two confederate ambassadors, one going to france, and another to britain. seward, and up deed all americans,mented those two -- wanted those two ambassadors captured preventing them to go to europe. nevertheless, he found these two -- found the trent, took off the two ambassadors. >> host: in international waters? >> guest: yes. it's the equivalent of iranian fighter jets intrempting a u.s. passenger plane and taking off two iranian disdense and taking them back. you just can't do that. at the mere hint that america wasn't going to do that and suggestions that america wasn't and indeed, congress voted to give a medal of honor and sent over thousands of

the mix a different type of candidate in a very rich race already.cc1: >> reporter: and ed lee is a ected to take part incc1: candidate forum tomorrow night theater.strocc1: lee told the chronicle he changed his mind, but said that he had not changed, said that he still considers that he is not a onitician, but he is focusedcc: getting things done for the city. live in san francisco, monte franc francis, nbc bay areas news. >>> leaders are now investigating whether the taliban was behind the single deadliest incident in ten-year war in afghanistan. 30 u.s. service members and werecc1: an soldiers killed when a helicopter went down. among those was a navy s.e.a.l. whose father and aunt lived in the south bay. nbc bay area's kimberly tere talked with the family today and is here with more. >> reporter: kevin houston comes from a military family who says they're used to sacrifice. but they say nothing could prepare them for this. u.s. official says the navy s.e.a.l.s had just completed a rescue mission to help a u.s. army ranger unit that had come under fire as they were taking off, their ch

virtually every aspect of our nation's yit call infrastructure, aviation, banks, finance services, ect., and we are, our mission statement is to take advanced technology and blend it with public policy and economics to great a sustainable system of cybersecurity, so we're a security organization representing our company's security interests. >> host: when you look at the cybersecurity proposals put out by the white house this summer, what's your reaction? do you support it? what concerns you? >> guest: well, there's a number of things in the white house's proposal with broad support like providing more cybersecurity education, developing a much better system within the government to manage their own cybersecurity, research and development on next generation items. i think where we feel that the administration has not met our expectations is when they deal with the private sector. the private sector owns, operates, and frankly creates the vast majority of what is the interpret, and we don't believe that without a robust and really engaged partnership between the public sector and the pr

cover ect they didn't a young woman set up the tent while the editors of france twenty four b.b.c. and sky coughed up just a few meager seconds perhaps not even that interesting to. you know back in the studios ok there's a protest well what exactly is the protest a social protest. it's not the same kind of story that they're used to it's not as big and dramatic some of the bigger revolutions happening around the middle east and i mean isn't surprised by the worldwide lack of media interest he's worked in these weighty place for decades reporting for media both foreign and local there is a box that the international media has put israel in and that is the israeli palestinian conflict or so the israeli lebanese and syrian conflict and anything that doesn't fit into that. immediate time of of news item. which is unfortunate that just makes hundred reyes and others angry for nine days she's been camping here furious that she can't make ends meet as a university student it makes me feel sad that when egypt decided to stand up and say we've had enough and in the oven and they decided to

tax reform, what you all have all testified to, health reform, ect.. now, a big part of that tax reform is taking all of these tax preferences, otherwise known as tax expenditures, and getting rid of a lot of them, and instead taking that revenue that you gained from that and then allowing the tax system to be reformed and to do just exactly what all four of you have testified which is bring dop the rates -- down the rates for everybody and simplify the tax code. as a matter of fact, one proposal is simplified into three brackets for the individuals and lower, of course, all the rates considerably as well as the corporate rate. now, my question to you all is boy, are you going to be stepping on some sensitive toes when you get rid of all those special tax breaks otherwise known as tax expendtures, so i'd like your comment on it. >> senator nelson, we -- first, i have to say i am not familiar with the specific discussions that you referred to that are taking place at the moment, so the details of the current dialogue, i couldn't speak to. what i can spe

the area between rent, salary, ect.. we focus on the discretionary costs. >> host: how much in rent? >> guest: i don't have the exact figure. >> host: millions? >> guest: absolutely. >> host: millions to pay in offices. >> guest: absolutely. there's campuses in west virginia as well, criminal information division, state and local law enforcement offices, 56 field officers across the country, 370 satellite offices, and that's interesting because just last year there's a model to look at the offices and see if we need all the resident agencies, are they in the right places, and the directer closed down 12 of these that sounds small, but it starts to rationalize our footprints. there's also i.t. costs, secret networks, security costs, and each one we rationalize saves us money. >> host: what is the difference between a satellite office and field office? >> guest: satellite reports to a field office. they are smaller. new york there's large satellite offices, but they are small offices, two or three agents working in the off

., ect..s one example. that illustrates the scale of sensitivity that the forecast can have to this loss of data. we're not talking about slightly wrong. we're talking potentially 50% less good on where a storm is going or what the consequences it dumps on the ground may be. you know, human beings are pattern response people. one or two times you tell me you can count on this, it's going here, and it comes and hits me here? all of us -- all of us will begin to not respond to warnings. >> following on that theme then in the context of this pending data gap perhaps, the 2016, this gps system has a pretty long pedigree. colorado rocky road with impose. given that and what you discussed, the vital importance of not losing that afternoon, when is noaa thinking about in terms of a different model for placing a polar orbiting satellite in space in the future so there's not as much of a risk of losing that given budgetary constraints or anything else. what system is out there with a shorter timeline b

were inside the crime solving part of the museum where you can learn about toxicology, ballistics, ect., and we're joined by the chief operating officer here at the museum. thanks for being with us. >> no problem. >> host: when did the museum open, and give us the highlights. >> guest: we opened may 23, 2008, so we just completed our three year anniversary, and you kind of said a couple things, but the museum is broke into five galleries. we start with the history of crime, take people through the history of punishment showing there's a consequence to crime, and then we focus on crime fighting and all the different branches of crime fighting including the fbi, and then you work yourself into a crime scene investigation area where you start with seeing a crime scene taking through how law enforcement solves a crime, and then you go into the last level, the third floor which is the basement level for the america's most wanted area and the judicial system. >> host: the america's most wanted area is where john walsh did his program. >> guest: correct, correct. we hope he still comes there

., ect..s one example. that illustrates the scale of sensitivity that the forecast can have to this loss of data. we're not talking about slightly wrong. we're talking potentially 50% less good on where a storm is going or what the consequences it dumps on the ground may be. you know, human beings are pattern response people. one or two times you tell me you can count on this, it's going here, and it comes and hits me here? all of us -- all of us will begin to not respond to warnings. >> following on that theme then in the context of this pending data gap perhaps, the 2016, this gps system has a pretty long pedigree. colorado rocky road with impose. given that and what you discussed, the vital importance of not losing that afternoon, when is noaa thinking about in terms of a different model for placing a polar orbiting satellite in space in the future so there's not as much of a risk of losing that given budgetary constraints or anything else. what system is out there with a shorter timeline b

him because certainly impressed that part, you just walked into that longmeadow and it feels like an ect 9:00 through, he walked through like all of these wealthy people's estate off to the architects have learned about it. i think that had a big influence its outcome and not just the birkenhead, which was a public park and that's why i was so impressing. >> that's very true. he visited a lot of different states and there's this wonderful description of him at church council in wales. he wrote this letter -- really a diary and tree which he described the private accounts that the capsule and had to pull strings to visit the grounds. thirty-first of all first holiday feeling like he's sort of felt, what a beautiful place, so free of the rabble and so beautiful and well manicured. and then he just had a pendulum swing., which he suddenly thought as an american this is american cisalpine egalitarians to be appreciating this landscape, which has been cloistered. so he had this epiphany where he thought the city beautiful landscape. as an american i really can't conscience trying to think abo

we have standards of when they make contact, ect.. we are concerned about the cost they are looking at to document that we're doing what we're doing, that we are having the contact with the customer, but i think again our results show we are there. what we're looking for is that anything you're.cc doesn't add cost and burden to us and we have a carve out if we are -- if we're meeting certain standards. our late -- >> so if you -- go ahead, finish that. >> our delinquency rate proves at 1.7%, one-third of the national average, that we're doing the job we need to be doing. we just had a handful of foreclosures over the last few years. by handful, i'm talking 23 last year. i mean, that is not out of 5,000 loans, it's not an excessive number of foreclosures. those are life event things, divorce, lost a job, ect., that are causing those issues. >> all right. let me ask some of the council here. does the panel acknowledge that it is a conflict of interest for mortgage servicers to have an ownership interest in a company that performs servic

., ect..s one example. that illustrates the scale of sensitivity that the forecast can have to this loss of data. we're not talking about slightly wrong. we're talking potentially 50% less good on where a storm is going or what the consequences it dumps on the ground may be. you know, human beings are pattern response people. one or two times you tell me you can count on this, it's going here, and it comes and hits me here? all of us -- all of us will begin to not respond to warnings. >> following on that theme then in the context of this pending data gap perhaps, the 2016, this gps system has a pretty long pedigree. colorado rocky road with impose. given that and what you discussed, the vital importance of not losing that afternoon, when is noaa thinking about in terms of a different model for placing a polar orbiting satellite in space in the future so there's not as much of a risk ofosing that given budgetary constraints or anything else. what system is out there with a shorter timeline but

., ect., but we candidate -- we got to do everything we can to avoid a wide brush because it gets us nowhere, and we can't defend our own children and neighborhoods if we have bad information. why should we be surprised? we know our enemies are probing this system every day. they come in many forms, many shapes right now as we speak in this hearing the the enemy is probing our systems, no question about it. we need to be strong. the graph you showed a few moments ago is very hurtful to the very community you are investigating, very hurtful, and it's very hurtful to the administration because i don't think one administration wants to protect us any less than another administration. that is foolish. >> the time expired. >> it doesn't lead to any resolve, mr. chairman. >> even after five minutes of that, i still love you. >> all right. >> i recognize the gentleman from pennsylvania, also another former u.s. attorney, mr. marino. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to thank the chair for this desperately needed hearing. i want to thank your courage and your leadership for bringing this to

like a three-day process whereby there's 15-16 candidates from corporate america and private practice, ect, and we were interviewed by 33 ballplayers in the room, all of whom were the team reps, michael jordan, buck williams, ect., a group of them. every day they would cut somebody. it was like playing football. you get cut, they call you, turn in the book, and you're gone, and so by the third day, there's three of us left, and that's myself, another one who is president of the dallas mavericks now, and the other was bill strickland, a lawyer -- agent in washington, d.c., and i got selected from the three. i was the guy that the group chose to become the head of the union, and that's how i got here. >> okay. d? >> very similar to billy, both of us have very similar backgrounds, prosecutors, u.s. attorney's office, private practice, and in october of 2008, i got a call at the office from a search committee, and they left a message and said are you interested in a, you know, new job career, and to be dead honest with you, you know, i told my secretary, no, i'm not because back in 2008, you k

>> i want to ask why should bashar and others, ect., stay in power? anyone can reason, at least five, if you can. [laughter] >> i can give you 10 # ,000. >> that's something the regime made up. >> one of the reasons and this was touched by chris, actually, they have taken to the streets once in the 21st of june when 8 or 9 million people went to the streets in support of the president, about 70 or 80% of the electorat. it's not because they like them, but because they cannot see a light at the end of the tunnel. that's the point. we cannot see -- i'm pro-regime change, picked up regime change from inside because i cannot see any other way. same way in which you tell me these are the end products. all they are key simple questions. >> i don't think that answered the question really. >> i am, with regime, staying as it is for the transitional period in which there will be change. >> [inaudible] . >> no, but having mentioned that, i think the way things are going because i have seen it with my own eyes because of the polarization of the society it may we

it says, "we need therefore to be quite sure the prorifflation of banks ect. which in most cases is no more than brass plates doesn't get out of hand. there's no objection to their providing loopholes for nonresidents." it sums up the attitudes, and you find going through the archives in the bank of england again and again. we don't care what happens to other countries. we don't want to lose control of the situation, lose too much revenue to the places, but as long as we are safe, screw everybody else as long as they bring their money here. the bank of england had leapt, and this is still the case today, that these places became channels, conduits for business, for assets, and for the business of handling assets towards the city of london. the city of london has a network of havens around the world. not only is it a tax haven in its own right, but cast this web around the world bringing in money, and this attitude, this screw-you attitude pervaded the system ever since. you can do what you like here, we don't care. it's a very nasty picture that i found out in

., ect..one example. that illustrates the scale of sensitivity at the forecast can have to this loss of data. we're not talking about slightly wrong. we're talking potentially 50% ss good on where a storm is going or what the consequences it dumps on the ground may be. you know, human beings are pattern response people. one or two times you tell me you can count on this, it's going here, and it comes and hits me here? all of us -- all of us will begin to not respond to warnings. >> following on that theme then in the context of this pending data gap perhaps, the 2016, this gps system has a pretty long pedigree. colorado rocky road with impose. given that and what you discussed, the vital importance of not losing that afternoon, when is noaa thinking about in terms of a different model for placing a polar orbiting sateite in space in the future so there's not as much of a risk of losing that given budgetary constraints or anything else. what system is out there with a shorter timeline but gives

which i've just done, and then -- >> so is there a role for no child left behind, race to the top, ect.? would you -- >> i would do with education what i think we need to do with a lot of programs that have migrated to the federal level which is to return them to the states, return them from the states more into the local area, and have, you know, the education system as we found it from no child left behind which i voted for because i believed we needed to have some sort of natural testing to see how we were doing. it was clear we were not doing well, but there was a lot of, well, disagreement among the education world and as to how well we were performing and i thought some testing to give us an idea of how we were doing was a good idea >> [inaudible] >> i was not for the other things, all the levers to move states and local school districts to do what we wanted them to do. in retrospect, the testing was fine, but the other parts were a negative. i said that at the time. i didn't like it at the time. >> would you get rid of it it? >> yeah, i don't think we need the federal interventi

came in with a plan was to go after public employees, go after teachers, take away people's pensions, ect. i think they've shot themselves in the foot, and i think that those senators in wisconsin i hope will be recalled and they got a taste of it last night. i mean, can you imagine being a member of congress and being a republican this morning and you can't get legislated in the district that only votes for republicans? only votes for republicans, and the woman who won was behind 20 points a few weeks ago before the medicare vote. this is what -- if the republicans -- if we were smart as they are, this is what we would have done. as soon as the house took that vote to get rid of medicare, senator reid, the democrat, should have immediately called for a vote on it in the senate. it wouldn't have passed because we got the votes; right? but put every republican senator on the record for wanting to kill medicare. [applause] yeah, well, i think you're applauding the great idea -- [laughter] that'll get us -- that won't get us over to 10th avenue. [laughter] it's -- why don't the democrats do

be solved by this machine by turing's imaginary machine can be solved by a modern computing machine, ect> host: was his machine digital? was he to the idea of what we now call bits? >> guest: it was digitalty by definition because the symbols were discreet. there was nothing analog about it. it was not binary. it remained for next generation of mathematicians whether you could make turing's machines with two symbols, 0 and 1, and it turns out that you can. >> host: there they are working more or less side by side. do you have any sense of whether they, you know, knew or suspected what each other was working on? >> guest: i can only guess. i think they must have suspected. i mean, at least we know that their common interests were apparent because there they were talking about thinking machines. >> host: sure, sure. >> guest: turing even said something to a friend about how shannon -- shannon, he said,ments to feed not just da -- wants to feed not just data to a mechanic can call brain, but music. they were both -- each in their own way -- forward looking, visionary men, and they must have

of our diseases are preventable or the incidence greatly reduced through better diet and exercise, ect., so my proposal would be have a counselor available and even mandatory for every medicaid and medicare patient and help people change their lifestyle and over a ten-year period, we would save lots of money, and i want the doctor's comments on that. thank you. >> host: final thought. >> guest: well, i think you're exactly true and accurate, and a lot of this work, of course, has been done by our center for disease control, cdc, but it's clear the population of the united states is very much overweight, much of the population is very much overweight, and that does lead to diabetes, card vascular and other disease, and the question is this is not really classically acute medical care, and what can we do broadly in the nation to deal with diet and exercise, and, of course, that has to begin before age 65 of medicare. 2 has to -- it has to really get build into the entire culture. there's policies in the area and some funding in the health care

or trying this, we were given reassurance it is consistent with all the rules, all the 401k rules, ect., and in 1998, we issued a ruling defining this practice and naming it approving it and promoting it. negative election didn't seem like a great name. [laughter] this is washington after all, and we wanted people to understand that this is a positive constructive idea consistent with individual choice, but helping people find it easier to save so inertia, perhaps the most powerful force in human affairs would be on the side of saving rather than on the side of not saving, so we called it, and i'll confess also that my staff and i gathered over lunch one day spending a half hour discussing the name. you know, what should we call it? automatic enrollment just because that is descriptive of what it is. it's automatic in the sense that as an employee you're in the plan automatically even if you do not nothing, but not automatic in the sense you have to stay in. it's the presumptive thing. you can opt out. we want to plant to seed that all methods of automated can be in that sense and be m

all across the board they are critical of moo dearnty -- modernity, ect., but in every case they outdo moderates and liberals in the media. they are better at television, radio, and internet and so on. you put the worlds together in very different ways. the generalization is true. the majority of people in higher learning knew this. i think of darwin said when i start in science is i put my beliefs on paper in a drawer and years later i pulled it out and it was crumbled and old. he didn't work at it. people in science do work at it, and think fresh thoughts about religion, but your generalization i think is generally true. i don't think that it's uneducated. again, if i took you to -- i taught at cape town the year before the change, and the leaders of the christian resistance and couple jewish resistance there not government were top scientists. they were at the hospital where christian was, and i have seminars with people, in fact, six different religions 234 south africa. everybody's there, hindus were there all the way back to gandhi's time, communist, catholic, protestant, so many

i mean, how do you -- when you look across the board whether it's state based, cyber crime, ect., how do you characterize the threat that the united states is facing in cyberspace right now? >> guest: a couple places. one, you have to bucket it in the correct places. you mentioned cybercrime. we have seen that since we moved from bulletin board systems to the internet to the web and e-commerce that there's been concentrated efforts by criminals out there to take advantage of that. there's one piece we continue to see. that, of course, increases the more we are dependent on i.t. systems, the more people engaging in it, the more opportunities for criminals 20 operate in cyberspace. on the other end, we look at the dependency we have as a government, as a civil society. the lights are on because somewhere there's an i.t. system running a power generating system, so therefore because that dependency exists, any threats against those systems have a more dramatic effect on us which is why we get focus on identifying what's going on out there, isolating impact, and stop it from happening. >>

that are lacking the meaning of -- that is required to make it happen, you know, productivity talks, ect., but we can do that in an unsustainable way or sustainable way, and the solving the energy question in terms of make and energy accessible but also the solution being sustainable in terms of climate change and the environment will be a center piece, i think, of the discussions for the post-2015 era. >> thank you, thank you, rebeca. [applause] i was going to come back to you, rebeca, to have you share with us the latin-american experience. i hope we have time to do that because i think some of the fundamental points you raised about growth without inclusion and marginalization and the equalities into the ecological balance in latin america seems to -- to reflect poorly on the kind of transformation and the miracle that is happening in latin america, but we'll come back to that point. now, donald, you have been one of the leading painting of a very rosy picture about an african engagement. i know there's. brought out a number of -- i know there's been a number of writings in the past y

build a significant road, you'd see the economic development the national chains, the restaurants, ect. grow up all along that corridor, and it would be great for business, great for the local people as well, and toll is a small price to pay for that. also, toll roads, when you toll a road, that means, pete, that you can, in fact, get private dollars to invest and help you with the build out because private dollars need a return on investment, and that return can come from tolling. >> host: governor rendell us living on the east coast have driven the peages turnpike at one point or another in our life. where does the money go that's collected on that turnpike? >> guest: 100% goes back to the turnpike itself, a small part to the administration, but it's for the upkeep and building new ramps and stuff like that. when i first became governor, the turnpike commission said, governor, we need to raise tolls. we haven't raised tolls since 1991. i said, okay, that's reasonable. what will you do with the toll money? 100% goes into fixing the turnpike and maintains ramps. the pennsylvania turnpi

wheel, and when our country was founded after the women did all their daily work of cooking, washing, ect., in the evening they sat down at the spinning wheel and spin the cloth to make the clothes, so i have that spinning wheel just to remind me of what it used to be before the american private enterprise system created all these wonderful up vengeses that have given us the highest standard of living in the world, and all this attack on our energy is to reduce our standard of living because when obama said he wanted to redistribute the wealth, he just didn't mean from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. he means to the rest of the world, and that's what he's trying to do, and, you know, we live in a society where we have single family dwellings which are heated in the winter and cooled in the summer, and the rest of the world doesn't have that, and this is because of our great supply of energy, and he's trying to reduce it. he said you can't keep your thermostat set at 72 anymore. who is he to tell me i can't keep my thermostat at 72? [cheers and applause] he wants to take away our lightbulb, the

block that it goes well beyond immigration and issues of opportunity and economic develop and jobs, ectyou look at the numbers, there's clearly this disconnect, and i come out of business, and we look at this community, and you say this really is the future for anybody who is in business today, not only because of the demographic trends, but there's 1.2 trillion in buying power within the hispanic community. it is the group that has the fastest growth in terms of small business start yuchs, and -- startups, and yet we have the highest unemployment rates, highest dropout rates, work force training programs don't meet the needs of the work force of tomorrow as it relates to latinos. you do a tremendous amount of work in this area and it's demonstrated by macrotrends, but on the ground we're not preparing our population to be competitive as we move into the future. what sorts of things do you think can be done? i mean, clearly, a big question, but can be done that people are working on as well as the latino justice. what do we do to close the economic prosperity gap? >> i'm sure that all o