ection 5 preclearance was the engine of that process and always been true that only a submissions of under section 5 result in objections. progress under section 5 hat follows from that is the deterrence and restraint but not in the of rcement by means objection. when congress faced the question of whether to reauthorize had to 5 in 2006, it decide whether it could be confident that the attitudes and jurisdictionsover had changed enough that that very effective constraint and eterrence could be confidently removed. has justice kagan and i had earlier, a need of it before it -- i ask a little bit about that record. you know how many submissions preclearance to the attorney general in 2005? >> i don't know the precise number. thousands. that's true. >> 3700. >> you know how many objections lodge? >> one in that year. >> one out of 3700. justice, that's why i made a point a minute ago that the key way in which section be the case s to that everyone agrees that significant progress that we've -- is principally because of section five of the voting rights act. been true that only a tiny f

media stole the ection?uttenbaum melos to for many reasons but i do believe the media was fair barack obama uld have b hey, buddy? oh, hey, flo. you want to see something cool? snapshot, from progressive. my insurance company told me not to talk to people like you. you always do what they tell you? no... try it, and see what your good driving can save you. you don't even have to switch. unless you're scared. i'm not scared, it's... you know we can still see you. no, you can't. pretty sure we can... try snapshotoday -- pressure. neil: and leased it is something if the irs will not c any one then let's cut the fund of the targeted budget. welcome, everybody. i am neil cavuto. how is this? republans looking to cut 3 million from the budget more than what the white house once it is a penalty for the agency that will not reprimanded cells because two months after thewhite house promised it would get to the bottom of thi not a single group has been questioned or have initial findings reported. maybe the irs is get

to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an ection lasting more than four hours.udden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rashhives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathg or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial. lou: my next guest says the mainstream media has not shown as much bias as they did during the presidential election a and if conservatives to do something now they will not win in 2016. here to talk about his new book in the media's role with the bombing is reelection from the media research center the author of the brave new book entitled collusion, how the media's role the 2012 election and how to stop them from doing it in 2016. congratulations on the book. with the cables you talk about the cnn candy crowley the way she responded a and interjected in that debate asserting that the president had declared benghazi was an act of terrorism and there was no consequence in civic no. every f

to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an ection laing more than four hours.or right away if you perience a sudden decrease or loss in vision or hearing. this is the age of taking action. viagra. talk to your doctor. , ♪ stuart: an update on edward snowden. they are contradicting an earlier report. the lawyer says that snowden is going nowhere for now. higher profits, raised its forecast, its stock is up 40%. shares of broad, are lower. they made a disappointing forecast. down 14%. they make chips for smart phones. getting fired, bad enough on its own. imagine getting fired by a text message. in general, we fear that you have outgrown the company and it will be better for your career to move on. welcome to the program, michael. >> thank you for having me. how long have you worked for them? >> i worked for them for ten years and known them for ten. stuart: had you had any hand that they were not satisfied with your performance? >> absolutely not. it is very hurtful. i feel as if they were my family. it would be as if your mother told you she did not want you in

ection five and section two litigation on redistricted is indistinguishable. you bring in experts and -- > it is dramatically different in my state because when we put in a redistrict and reapportion map together we know it will be challenged. thatlicans an democrats do for a living. it is not a situation of and trying aintiffs to get the money and evidence together. we are prepared for this. it is a regular ritual in my state and most others. underlawyered operation. the notion that these plans are through justice ginsberg said you have to wait for four electoral cycles. a lot different than some rephoetd rural jurisdiction that might be faced with the ame allegation of discrimination and have to bring together the lawyers, money and evidence to challenge it two.rstood section >> your argument with respect is not you have to wait for lections, you have to find a lawyer. we can both agree that justice ginsberg was flat wrong in you have to wait for elections to go by. as your experience in illinois the lawyers get together right after the map is passed and run

the response to my letter of inquiry about the first option, you made the following statement. .ection four 031 in describing his handling of the earlier transition, the commissioner adopted our .roposed metrics notwithstanding the broadcasters request to the contrary. one could assume that they stunned that statement -- that that on that statement, pursuant to the negotiations with canada and mexico that salon going -- is that correct? >> yes. >> is that going to happen? >> as i stated in response to the prior question, we are doing every a and i can to provide as as we can. -- irtainty on this matter remind you this is subject to intense discussion, or should he, between the u.s., canada, and mexico. so services do not go dark. is it correct that they have not 403 of theection act? >> yes. i encourage you not to assign or reallocate the frequencies negotiationsntil are concluded with mexico pill -- with mexico. for their sake, i prefer you measure twice and cut once when it comes to broadcast repackaging. i would like to turn my attention to the former auction. i noticed the commissi

section 203, sections 203 and ection 209 of public law shall apply if such sections were included in this title. section 204, any grant made pursuant to title 2 shall be made on a competitive basis. section 205, funds shall be available for legal services and for making payment for services of the federal national mortgage association. section 206, no part of any appropriations shall be available for any program in excess of amounts set forth in the budget estimates. section 207, corporations and agencies of the department are subject to the government corporation control act, hereby authorized to make expenditures and contracts without regard to fiscal year limitations under ection 104 in carrying out the programs. section 208, the secretary shall provided quarterly reports to the committees regarding all-access funds in each program within the jurisdiction of the department. section 209, the president's budget request for fiscal year 2015, shall use the identical account structure provided under this act. section 210, a public housing agency that administers federal housing assista

attempt to create shallow water habitats, so this sturgeon can reproduce, they're opening up bows and ection that's all right. but what they're doing is dredging millions of cubic yards of dredge spoil out of those old channels into the river channel itself. and we know the dredge spoil is listed under the clean water act as a toxic pollutant. they wouldn't let farmers do it, they wouldn't let contractors do it. the corps of engineers doesn't need to. they have better alternatives that are consistent with the clean water act. so my amendment simply says, none of the funds can be used to dredge this into the river and they would need to follow their own rules like everybody else does and i urge the adoption of the amendment and i would yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek rec? mr. frelinghuysen: i move to strike the last word. mr. chairman, i don't have any objection to the amendment, though i do have a few concerns which i'd like to cover. first of all, i want to thank my coll

its prioritization of project --ection, and considerable the tifia success story goes beyond the $11ed and $43 billion worth of projects. just the fact that borrowers have to repay funds encourages sponsors tear pick funds that return on investment. project repaid with toll revenue bring significant discipline to the project thection process, avoiding challenges of bridges to nowhere. increased funding with tifia was helpful to the program. but i would encourage the committee to allow the department to use some policy criteria for awarding loans and not have tifia just morphed into a broad, grant-like program that subsidizes every program. removing some of the subjectivity of the process, it also broadens the criteria so that every potential process could qualify. in the bush administration, we used tifia program to encourage governments to utilize pricing to finance their infrastructure and manage congestion. the obama administration used tifia to encourage livability. both administrations provided tifia loans to high-priority projects that did not directly advance policy goals. but