but at the department of interior or at the census bureau or at social ecurity. you're going to do that for the same amount of time you got the scholarship for. then when you go to work in the private sector, the private sector will loan you back to the government for the proverbial one weekend a month or 10 days a quarter where this is going to improve the cross pollination of ideas between the public and private sector. >> watch "the communicators" tonight at 8:00 eastern on c-span2. >> joining us for "newsmakers" is the top democrat on the foreign affairs committee and here in studio with us, allana shore, congressional reporter with "politico" and rachel. allana has the first question. elana: this morning, minority leader pe he see said they were willing to drop some objections to let it move forward that would be

been --ecurity has forever. but government of the u.s. has borrowed that money. don't change that. you are going to hurt a lot of elderly people that are disabled. we appreciate that call. let's go over to mike in berlin, maryland, calling on the line for republicans. go ahead, mike. your on see their -- on c-span. caller: i appreciate your service. you are doing a great thing for america. the should retell, repel, act. the plan at the republicans have is a disgrace to the poor people in the country. it has just been handed over to the insurance cover -- companies. wish that control of the insurance companies. they have to cooperate also. they have all the power and the company dominates all of society. -- leavingading out a medicaid which hurts the poor people. they cannot do that and it is a disgrace to humanity. republicans have really let us down. the republican congress, paul ryan and mitch mcconnell, they are weak leaders and not good statesman. host: you called on our line for republicans. if republicans don't do something between now and the midterm elections in 2018, what

. >> this willll not bring jobs or .ecurities for the farmers there are huge unknowns about healalth risks, risks t to the water, t the offers. is susceptiblele at thehe best of times. there arere all sorts of risks associated and we need toto address that. we need a reliable future. this is very short t and potentially disastrouous. >>>> opposition grew draramaticy following an earthquake linked to expxport tory g gas drilling. >>>> it will devastate the whole country. i cannonot walk away from this. peoplele need to know abobout i. once you know the f facts, they will sayay, stop fracking. led to a temporaryy nationwiwide moratorium. although this has been lifted, some remain in limbo. >> we are not surprised. >> in sussex, it is unclear whether fracking will go ahahea. >> t this is a a process i woult wish on anyone ananywhere. i think it t is a poisonous, potentially very dangerous process. here, we live in a beautiful part of the world thahat is classified of an a area of f the outstanding natural beauty. people have livestock, farms. we have beautififul streams running through.

are returned, obviously not in that condition, regime north korea mistreats its citizens, the un ecurity council, commission of inquiry concluded human rights violations are so widespread constitute crimes against humanity. as far as taking out kim in -un, you know, assassination attempts goes against u.s. strategy and he but also that, along with any kind of military option uns risk of efk population on orean peninsula, even limited tactical response to tactical attack. host: who is second in charge in north korea? guest: really no one. gaining power or influence is seen as threat to jong-un. he even had his uncle, who was deemed second most powerful man in north korea several years he was executed because he kim een as encroaching on jong-un's power. host: if kim jong-un is gone, what happens to the government there? we don't know. similarly, when his father had a he died at 08, had that time, we don't know who would have taken over, kim else, they omeone then put in a place procedure to power.m jong-un in right now nothing in the constitution indicates who would successor. no procedur

the this is matter of national ecurity, air traffic control, virtual border across this globe know, one thing i look t is the actual air traffic controllers themselves who are -- many of them, many are prior service, spent their whole life dedicated this process. you know, privatization these guys, i mean this goes back to reagan days, when he fired everybody for having too much controllers. i think we've dealt with that, but the issue at hand is one are the actual people that are running our air traffic control system, the best that we can possibly get and should be always that way. and hould be part of national security. number two, the actual technology. put money into technology, let's have the best technology, that takes years, as say, years of planning to do that. with this rward concept of privatization slowly. people like usly elan musk and space x have been the nasa aspect of space exploration, maybe we can a test program air traffic ontrol system, but for general aviation -- host: caller, thank you, thank you. guest: i appreciate it. point, you make some excellent points, you

on earlier, social ecurity, medicaid, all that kind of stuff together, i worked worked , two jobs, i don't up as a nurse and i appreciate being cloned in with get -- they probably need it, too, i'm sure, but a difference, i paid my andy in for social security i deserve to get it out and the got to say is i trump more than ever.dy in the whole world thank ♪ c-span, where history unfolds daily. in 1979, c-span was created as a public service by americans cable-television company, and is brought to you today by your american cable or satellite provider. a number of media outlets are reporting that president trump is about to hire a new communications director. he spoke to reporters number of times from her -- from trump tower. right now, sean speiser has been filling the job on a temporary basis. tonight, look on the trunk communications office. we talked to sarah huckabee sanders about what it is like. here is a bit of what you will see tonight. >> when did you say to yourself that you are going to work for donald trump? after my dad got out of the race, even during the campaign, i not

presented to us and in america by the when they party, claim they were not cutting and social is example, ecurity, there is 62 to 64 billion dollar on the cut, when go in and ough and community that to folks, around our economy. got to get the economy 12,000 -- weeople need to train people in those obs, it is not a magic bullet here. we need to understand that people need to be trained for jobs. out loud, we ying should have started this 12 years ago to begin to train them economy, for west virginia, for kentucky, falling behind. you have to listen to educators the ught to listen to parents and students instead of listening to focus groups and better. no doubt in my mind, the economy will be centerstage next year's election. host: she was talking about messaging, we noticed in "washington post" yesterday effort on capitol hill on aiming for messaging to the working class. debate over ernal white working class are coming to head is the piece. since donald trump shocked hillary clinton in november and won victory up and democratic lot, the party has been debate whatting they need to do to put itsel

[applause] ecure -- president trump thank you. i spoke to parents, incredible parents. got to know so many parents of children that were so horribly killed, burned to death, beaten to death, just the worst kind of death, stuffed in barrels, and the person that did it was released, and you look at the file and there were letter after letter after letter begging not to let this animal back in society that if this would happen, it would happen quickly. it's not like it would happen over a long period of time. they said he is a totally violent person. you cannot let this person out. they let the person out and sometimes it would happen like on the first day. and then you have to talk to the parents and hold the parents and hug them and they're crying -- i mean crying, their lives are destroyed and nobody thinks about those people. they don't think about those people. they're devastated. but we're ending so much of that. we're ending hopefully all of that. the laws are tough. the laws are stacked against us, but we're ending it. [applause] president trump so we are going to

because we might see some unpredictable consequences, and it could come to a head, but this year is ecuree interesting about the speech is the international aspect because if the beginning and throughout, there was a motion of taking on the globalization mantle. there was the free flows of capital. all of these have permeated his speech, whether indeed or not we will see them, in principle china wants to take on this motion, promoting globalization nd it is all for it. scarlet: a number of leading ceo's also spoke with bloomberg this week your he must begin with bmw's chairman. he visited the u.s. to announce a major spending increase that will create about 1000 new jobs at the south carolina plant. he toured that and considers the second home. harald: the united states is still a very important big market for us. being successful in south carolina is a part of the long-term plan. reporter: this is not just about you in the united states. you touch so many jobs and billions of dollars. have you explained this to president trump? harald: i did when i was visiting with the president and his

not ecure assets will be replicated. testimony testimony, secretary joe mattis stated he has reservationed about the brac assessments. cost saving measure. d they plan to carry new projected savings. and to communities around the nation to close downing military installations without a study and grow the force to address emerging threats. i urge my colleagues to reject this amendment. and i reserve. the chair: the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. >> i yield a minute and a half to the the gentleman from washington, mr. smith. mr. smith: i support this amendment. and i disagree the remarksment the past bracks have saved us enormous ooments of munt. and the fifth one was more expensive. but the fifth one was done in 2005 when we were building up army. it is now saving us army. you can argue against brac but don't argue it is saving us army. it absolutely safes us army. there have been a number of studies, the air force estimated they are over 20% over their installations. i agree with that. what our bill has done

products that the people's bank of china and regulators, whether it be insurance regulator or the .ecuritiesy are not happy with it. tos is very much an example other chinese companies to clean up their act, right off their bad loans, and be very careful of what kind of foreign investments to get involved in. yvonne: how do you think hong respond?nbang should we have already seen some of them sell some of their theme parks and hotels. given? --nk they will give in? reporter: the companies will follow. the question is the matter of timing. , whenw head of the cbrc he says he is going to do something, he does it. he has the backing of the president, without a doubt. yvonne: you are mentioning that rings could get more interesting after the people's party congress. there could be a squeeze in the banking system. what would that look alike -- look like? reporter: in addition to the ones i talked about with betty liu, you have the question of these zombie companies. the president has mentioned on several occasions over the last couple of years that he wants to clean them up. not much has been don

he has experience in national ecurity and law enforcement. there glawe has previously served as an f.b.i. agent and started his career in public service as a houston police officer. mr. glawe has a certificate from the john f. kennedy school of government at harvard university and ambassador of arts degree from the university of northern iowa. there demra way in this role i think your extensive background in law enforcement across the spectrum from local, state and federal, is just going to serve you well. it's crucial. so, again, we appreciate your and look s to serve forward to your testimony. mr. glawe: chairman johnson, ranking member mccaskill, members of the committee, thank you and look forward to for the opportunity before you today as the president's nomify for the undersecretary of intelligence and analysis at the department of homeland security. i'm honored to have been nominated for this position by president trump and i'm humbled to receive the support of secretary kelly, deputy secretary duke, and director of national intelligen

we have a role in easing tensions in the region but not at the expense of our national ecurity interest and our values. qatar must cut ties with terrorists. or allies cannot provide support to our enemies. dr. schanzar i have no sympathy for supporters of hamas, nor do you. you have called the u.s. base in qatar an insane arrangement, i think is the quote. do you believe the base location is dangerous? and how would you propose safely moving the base in such a way that it doesn't compromise operations in the region? >> congresswoman, thank you for the question. i would probably put hit the way. first of all,s the an insane arrangement. the idea that you have this air base conducting the most crucial operations on the world in terrorism and that it is miles away from the taliban presence, hamas presence where there are designated financiers, this sends the wrong message. it sends the wrong message to the united states and to our allies to fight isis and al-qaeda. it sends the wrong message to our middle east allies. when we tell them we're going to hold them to account for their countert

we have the growing cyber .ecurity issue you indicated that you would support the treasury's release that certain regulatory relief is in order. can you tell me a couple of those recommendations that you would support to help our small banks? chair yellen: i am very supportive of trying to reduce the burdens on community banks. we have suggested that immunity banks, there are things that congress could do to help reduce burdens, for example invoke a role for incentive compensation. >> are you saying you would eliminate the rules for small committee banks? where would you make that cut off? that would you make arbitrary decision? >> we could discuss that. >> you don't have an idea in mind where we could do that? i would love to know. chair yellen: i would prefer to get back to you. theink there is a lot that banking regulators can do on their own. we're finished and agrippa review of the banking regulators addressinged to concerns of community banks, to come up with a simplified cuttal regime, we have reporting requirements for committee banks. we had tried to extend exam the workd to