let's talk to ed balls.n strictly, spending 10 weeks on the show and only getting kicked off a week before the semi finals. i'm sure he's sick to death of seeing that but not for the rest of us! and now he's got a new documentary out. travels in euroland sees him head to europe to find out why so many people are rejecting mainstream politics and supporting right—wing ideas. let's take a look at tonight's episode. is the european union supporting coal mining in poland? yeah. nearly 90% of polish electricity comes from coal, but it turns outjoseph runs on a different fuel. what's wrong? i don't know how to do it. i've never snorted anything before, let alone powdered tobacco, which has long been a tradition amongst the miners. you show me. 0h! it definitely perks you up. whoo! the programme is called travels in euroland with ed balls — you can watch it tonight at 9 o'clock on bbc2. hello. what effect did soaring tobacco hello. what effect did soaring to ba cco have hello. what effect did soaring tobacco have a

course reading this last night, my first reaction was, oh, okay, the new york ed board said y'all go figure this out, ball'syour court and we're going to back off here. ultimately that reminded me of two things. one, this primary is going to be long and drawn out and ultimately going to be -- have some divisive components between voters who do want that return to some degree of normalcy versus voters who want to break and disrupt systems. and i think that kind of highlighted the reality that not one candidate in this entire field can meet both of those demands. so that might have some negative externalities down the line. second thing was shoutout to the ladies, right? but klobuchar and warren are not playing in the same field when it comes to polling, fund-raising, any other realistic benchmark that would determine success for our candidate. and so it really highlights like, okay, really throwing away that traditional playbook here from "the new york times" editorial board. but klobuchar definitely must have had some massive midwestern appeal that didn't come across to twitter folks. >> i wondered watching

ed's -- edwards ferry. then you have some artillery. brought some guns to cross over to balls bluff. only one of them got there. he also had a couple of mountain hauser's that belong to the new york state militia. all the new york state militia units were militia, but they had one company dedicated to artillery. they eventually rogoff and became an independent new york ottery. -- new york battery. any cavalry tove speak of involved in bills bluff. you have these two forces spending the summer following first manassas watching each other over the river. the men on both sides very quickly came to make localized truces so that they would not would notht there -- get shot right there. "hey, yank, i will not shoot at you if you do not shoot at me. " "works for me." it was a pretty pleasant time. one union officer later wrote about his time during that summer and fall around leesburg and montgomery county maryland and he described it as a very civil war unquote -- a very civil war. up at theng -- gens end of this period. in early october general stone men reinforcements of 5000 called the

ed. it's the case for letting senators vote secretly on trump's fate. robert alexander from northwestern university argues a secret ball lot would give the senate what alexander hamilton described in confidence to preserve uninfluenced the necessary impartiality to render a fair trial. are they so desperate to block transparency on impeachment? is this a possibility? >> it's not a real possibility. you're right, raymond. they're so nervous letting the truth come out. that's why we started off, remember, in the secret chambers of the house with adam schiff and closed door meetings. so most of us that were ultimately going to vote on this didn't get a chance to hear it. they do not want this to come forward. so i think the alternative will be, i've got to call on my friends in the senate, particularly lindsey graham, that i need to have a few witnesses come in to bring forward some of the evidence that the democrats suppressed, which further undermines their case. >> congressman scalise, i can talk about impeachment another hours. you have two republicans, susan collins, murkowski saying they want witnesses. we'll see wh

ed: -- like what isis does, but this is the facts. this is what we're doing. pete: this is who we are. this is what we do. no sugarcoating on it at all. and i think the ballies? we hear all about this cyber attack. what's it going to be? they talk about 35 targets. and when you talk to members of the military, they're not cowering. no one's looking over their shoulder, what's going to happen iran coming next? it is iran putting their heads together as they're mourning which is actually code for " "planning" if you've been to the middle east, if they're considering something else, man, that's going on in their head, we know the americans have more capabilities, we know what -- that they can see us, that look at the act on us, we can pinprick touch them if we want to but will we risk a president whose bite has been as big as his bark when you've got the previous deposition obama they get get away with anything, not the case. ed: the red line was not enforced. emily: i think it's important to note that obviously we're responding because of the threat and the actual death to americans that have occurred throughout these years. but people all over the world ar