even though edison and einstein knew about it, your brain transmits and receives frequency. >> so we need to be able to receive it, right? >> no, we need to know how to.. what to transmit. so what the training is, uh, it trains the brain how to transmit the right frequency, so if you want a new car, if you want a better job, if you want to make more money, if you want to be happier, if you want to lose weight, if you want better health, if you want to be lucky, if you want to have a different home, if you want a better relationship with your kids or you want a lover in your life, whatever you want in your life, if you look at your life and saying, "there's things in my life i don't like... i want to change them," what is it that you'd change it to? so once you establish that, what this training does, your wish is now your command. what is it that you wish? i teach you how to command your wish and turn it into reality. some people say it sounds too simplistic. it isn happy by accident." no, it's not. there's specific things you do with your mind so that you can transmit a frequency, a

we claim edison as a son of michigan. claim and believe it was edison, not feinstein.enator chambliss. >> thank you. as i hear you talk about the average age of the workforce, i think above the average age of the united states senate. we're both heading in that direction, i guess. >> that is off the record. >> we are all dealing with experience, mr. chairman. mr. sullivan, your statement relative to the cost of this airplane being on known, you testified to that affect over and over, particularly last year as we were going through the defense authorization process and with the ongoing debate over the f-22. you noted in a statement that dod does not have piffle cost estimate for completing the program. you validated that statement again today. you made a statement on npr that when all is said and done, the price of the nearly 2500 f-35's , du still stand by that statement? >> i don't remember saying that. i am not sure what you are referring to. but i do not think -- that does not sound right. >> ok. would you concur with the estimate that was alluded to relative to $2,

. >> the edison laboratory. [ laughter ] he's this very powerful, old man who has a lot to do with musicm the stage to like all the big high, you know, highfaluting people. he says, "like joining us tonight, a 35,000-time grammy nominee, 60 years of making the music of our lives, miss barbra streisand. barbara, please stand up." and they get kind of a half stand from everybody. i couldn't believe it. like it's a four-hour evening. about 3 hours and 25 minutes after this for like 3 hours and 25 minutes, he says, "a young man, his first trip to the grammys from the world of comedy. mr. stephen colbert." and i did not give him a half stand. i went, "whoo!" [ laughter ] i ran around the room. i high-fived jon bon jovi. i high-fived sheryl crow. >> jimmy: yeah! >> richie sambora. >> jimmy: i saw -- >> richie sambora who was sitting next to my 14-year-old daughter. she saw him later. my 14-year-old daughter saw richie sambora performing with bon jovi later. later and goes, "oh, it's my prom date." [ light laughter ] because they were in former clothes together at the dinner. >> jimmy: yeah. >>

edison, they're has been a lot of written about it. but if you go -- if you go to the generals that fought the battle in the northern half goebel -- of the bulge they will tell you it was the right decision and having montgomery there probably saved their lives. you talk to the people the defendant for example, the u.s. seventh armored division and they will tell you the reason they survived the battle was because of the decision and this was one that ike made and it was a very unpopular decision. but he was willing to do that. he had a reputation of not doing that sort of think that that's not true. so myths grow about people and there certainly have been myths about ike, and i think one of the jobs of us in the historical profession is to try to tell you what we think really happened. and if it means dustin a myth, then so be it. but he was willing to take the unpopular, very on the popular choice because he felt militarily it was the right thing to do. do i have another question? usurp. >> our country's history has been a lot of war

the i wished that i had been there when thomas edison made the remark that i think applies here. there are no rules around here, we are trying to accomplish something and therefore when the deals go down all of this talk about rules, we make them up as we go along and i am now 18 years a significant amount of time in this committee and the leadership of the republican who had no time even when they claim all they did for the prescription drugs they left that big old doughnut hole in and they never talk about the fact they didn't pay for it while they're here now becoming fiscal conservatives. one of the brightest minds in this country is paul ryan for whom i have great respect. i think all is onto something that is beneficial for us at some time but then i want to clear up one more thing. and that is this business about partisanship. it's as if you were not all in mr. miller's education and labor committee hearing or that you're not in the commerce committee or that you are not in the ways and means committee or the budget committee. all of those committees have had a umpteen hea

customers are people like consolidated edison, new jersey resources.nd that opportunity is being enhanced significantly right now because of the development of the marcellus shale. >> right, which, of course, is one of the holy grail shales on pennsylvania -- >> absolutely. and we weren't smart enough to see that coming, but it is very much in the hands -- >> well, they can find it. they have to pay you to store it. so, what's the difference between the two securities? one, i know, you said is an operating partnership, one a general partnership. what is the difference to the average person looking at this? is the dividend different? the operating model? >> the assets, the limited partnership, the operating partnership. that is a little bit more tax-efficient. it is very, very steady. it's yielding about 7.4% today. >> right. >> nrgp is the general partner. it owns an interest in the underlying partnership in addition to incentive distribution rights. it's yielding a little bit better than 5%, has a higher growth profile. >> and quickly before we go, th

this prop wit which is an electc prop with an old american edison company on it.re's an exit marked for property department stage left, dressing rooms. >> okay. >> you can see old union card boards and under the stairs, they have the store docks like they do in every theater. >> right. >> it's actually creating a set to make it look like a theater in the 1926. >> it sounds like a great play. anyone who knows anything about our town will want to get out and see it. it's great because you have partnered with the baltimore school for the arts. we will give folks information on how to come and see you guys. >>> thank you very much. >>> our town is playing at the theater through april 18th. if you need more information log on to foxbaltimore.com/morning. >>> we're look at a dry start to the day with temperatures that are pretty mild in the mid-40s. the dry air is going to saturate. sky watch hd radar, the bigger picture shows the rain and it's moving out of the mississippi valley and headed in our direction with the low pressure center that is moving by later this even

floor just a moment ago, i was struck by the quote by thomas ed son, because as i've listened to -- edison, because as i've listened to more of my colleague, it seem thers driving themselves into failure and they just want to see this determined and committed number of members who represent constituencies across america driven into failure as well. but it says, many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. so the stories we've heard about a young 11-year-old who has the common sense to know that maybe his mother would have lived had she had the right kind of coverage. to my good friend who was just on the floor of the house and mentioned his constituents from his great state of alabama, i don't know if that constituent that drove 900-plus miles realizes that alabama has one insurance company, only one. no competition. and so when we think about where we are today on the eve of that magnificent vote, this is not arrogance. it is not an attempt to have the majority abuse the minority. it is to reflect on those americans who did not c

they are thomas edison and alexander graham bell. they were living in america when i wrote this book and nobody had ever heard of them. and i thought, boy, here it is. everyone would want to know that we america gave this great creation to the world and it was two americans. one guy from iowa. one from kansas. nothing. the book got very good reviews. it made a bunch of those, you know, best 10 books of the year kind of thing. and didn't sell a whip. i thought i was going to get rich on this book. nothing. but very good reviews and everything. and that book came out around 1985 or '6. >> host: 1986. >> guest: '86. yeah, and my wife and i kept saying to each other well, you know, it was a decent book but it was ahead of its time. it was before most people had a computer so they weren't into microchips, you know? in 2000, i was living in london and my editor called me up from random house and said hey, this is amazing. that book is selling like mad. it's 14 years later and we're really going to get going on this book. it was basically t

they are thomas edison and alexander graham bell and they were living in america when i wrote this book and no one ever heard of them and i thought here it was everybody would want to know that we america gave this great creation to the world and was to americans, one from on yellow one from kansas. nothing. the book got good reviews. it made a bunch of the best ten books of the year and it didn't sell a whip. i felt i was going to get rich on this book, nothing. good reviews and the book came out around 1985 for 66 >> host: 1986. >> guest: and my wife and i kept saying to each other it was a decent book but i was and it's time. there was before most people had a computer so they were not into microchips and here's what happened. in 2000i was living in one blonden and my editor called me up from random house and says this is amazing. that book is selling like mad, it's 14 years later now and we are really going to get going on this book. it's basically the same book but all of a sudden people were interested what happened. well, one of the two inventors in the microchip won the nobel pr

since we cling edison is a son of michigan, the perspiration inspiration, we claim. >> i am sorry. i am sure you are right. >> as i hear you talk about the average age of the workforce in the acquisition department, i think about the average age of the u.s. senate, we are both headed in that direction. >> that is off the record, by the way. >> we are all dealing with experience, mr. chairman. >> that is on the record. >> mr. sullivan, your statement relative to the cost of this airplane being unknown is not new. you testified to that over and over, particularly last year as you -- as we were going to the defense authorization process and with the ongoing debate over the f-22. you noted in your written statement dod does not have a estimate for the program. you validated that statement again today. in april of last year, you made a statement on npr that when all is said and done, the price of the nearly 2500 f-35's could approach $35 million for each plane. do you stand by that statement? >> i frankly do not having -- have remembered sitting -- saying that. at any rate, that is not