every editorial from january 1st through today.e been no editorials at all about isis atrocities but there is one about american atrocities. i have no problem about running editorial about american atrocities, i would feel better if the gods who write editorials at the "new york times" showed the same outrage, actually they should have showed more outrage. >> of course they should. >> for what isis does on a daily basis versus what americans did on a very rare occasion. >> perhaps they will now based on the amnesty international report. that's a group the "new york times" loves about the raping and enslaving of 10 to 12-year-old girls in iraq, maybe they will do something. maybe we should save those girls, bernie, you know. maybe we should try to save those girls. >> i not only hope they do an editorial, but to not do it would be a dereliction of their duty as editorial writers. >> bernie goldberg everybody. when we come right back, did you know that a fox news person was once a very powerful first lady of a major american city? al

since i came on board the new republic we doubled the size of the editorial staff.ave significantly invested in our digital products and in the print magazine. and everything from you know the feel of the paper stock to the size of the magazine. owe4h all of these things this has been a process of investing in the values of the place so they come to greater fruition. now early on we did not see eye to eye. his belief that the same kind of values that he talks about in that essay is humanist ideals which is incredibly important that we support must move into the 21 if century. if we're honest with our serves and we walk down the middle of a train or plane, we think about how we read today we spent an enormous time on enormous amount of i'm on our moral devices, on our tablets and on our computers. and the kind of journalism we do have to adapt to those formats. that doesn't mean we don't do long form. doesn't mean we stop doing criticism. we continue to do those things. in addition to that we also have to think creatively about audio. interactive graphics, time lines

in late november, to change editorial leadership. made that decision in conjunction with our ceo because we are entering a new era where we have to think of ourselves as a digital media company that produces a print magazine that has one of several different products and points with our leaders rather than a print magazine that happens to do digital work. just as in any other company there are great leaders at certain times, and other times you need new leadership, guy veeder and i made a decision to make that change. charlie: what would you have done differently other than the language that guy used? chris: i think that there the topline thing that i have spoken about, it was an important learning for me personally. communicating much better with a team that the investments we were making in evolving as a company into a digital brand did not mean we were going to do big idea journalism. we start with the idea and the idea might take all of these other forms we discussed. data visualization. but the quality of the journalism does not

his editorial really addresses anti-semitism across europe and in this editorial it says you are us. the israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu has called on european juice to move to israel in the wake of this attack in copenhagen. the attack last month in paris as well. this editorial calls on european juice to stay in europe. it has that juice, christians muslims, atheists, we must all fight together here in europe against this barbarity. >> here in the eastern part of france, there has been another desecration of a jewish cemetery. >> that is right, lots of focus in french papers. according to authorities, five teenagers are in custody with aged between 15 and 17 for these five teenagers grew up in this region of france, no criminal record according to police. the teens say they did not know this graveyard with a jewish graveyard. they thought it was an abandoned graveyard. that is what they are saying. they say they did not carry this out in an anti-somatic way. they do not realize what was going on until after they had started vandalizing. that is their take on things. >> it

"the journal editorial report" is up next. thanks again for spending your saturday with us. >> i'm uma uma pemmaraju. see you next time. >>> this week on "the journal editorial report," the obama administration steps up attacks on israel's benjamin netanyahu ahead of his speech to congress next week. are they smart to elevate this fast? >>> and plus, three are arrested for aiding isis as the fbi warns that radicalization is happening in all 50 states. >>> and from the internet to obama net? what the fcc's new rules mean for the future of the world wide web. welcome to "the journal editorial report," i'm paul gigot. tensions between the obama administration and benjamin netanyahu escalated this week, just days before his planned a dr.ess to congress. with national security adviser susan rice calling his visit destructive to the fabric of the relationship between israel and the u.s. speaking outside jerusalem wednesday, netanyahu said it appeared that the west had given up on its commitment to prevent iran from acquiring nuclear

the journal editorial report is coming up next. >> here on a snowy saturday in washington, d.c. if you're on the east coast be safe out there. have a great day. we'll talk to you guys next weekend. >> make it a great day, folks. >>> this week on the journal editorial report as jihad spread to libya and beyond, the white house convenes a summit on violent extremism causing many to wonder if we can win a war against an enemy we refuse to name. pro russian rebel sees a key ukrainian town sees sunday's cease-fire a sham. where will an emboldened vladimir putin head next? president obama's immigration rebuke. what this week's ruling means for the administration's attempt to govern by executive action? and the bitter showdown over funding on capitol hill. >>> welcome to the journal editorial report. i'm paul gigot. isis extended its bloody reach into libya with the beheadings of 21 egyptian christians. as the obama white house hosted a three day summit on countering what they call violent extremism the president and his staff once again refused to use the term islamic to describe the

i would throw it back to the journalists -- what are your editorial publishes around -- editorial policies run publishing that information? and how are they centered? are they centered to serve the public? >> the point you make is an excellent one. we are agents, essentially, at the journal. we are institutions safeguarding freedom of the press, and at the same time we are curators of the culture, what is taboo and what is not taboo. and how taboo evolves. we are a family newspaper, so we will avoid foul language whenever possible. there are occasions when you cannot escape using an epithet a foul word, if it is in transit intrinsic to understanding the story. when you reach those judgments a judgment has to be made. you can communicate the same information without offering the explicit language or the explicit images. all i would say is that there is no science to this. it is editors sitting around a table making often difficult judgment calls. as i said, i wrote the editorial on why we would not publish the cartoons back in 2006. after charlie hebdo, it seemed like a different set of con

"the journal editorial report" is next. >>> this week on "the journal editorial report," jordan vows to wage a relentless war on isis after the brutal murder of a captured fighter pilot. could this be a turning point in the fight against the terror group? and will the u.s. back up its middle east allies? plus, the vaccine debate proves to be a political mine field for two potential presidential candidates. but democrats aren't immune from the controversy. where candidates obama and clinton stood on the issue in 2008. >>> and washington conquers the internet. what the fcc's new rules mean for the future of the web. welcome to "the journal editorial report." i'm paul gigot. outrage spread across the world this week after a video was released showing a caged jordan yan fighter pilot being burned alive by islamic state militants, an act that king abdullah vowed to a avenge with a war. and president obama called it a brutal and vicious death cult but he told the attendees that violence rooted in religion isn't exclusive to islam. >> and lest we get on our high horse and think this is uniq

i have not seen the editorial. i have not seen it either. as far as the expense of free muni people may remember free muni for youths we had a hard time getting the mta to fund it and there ended up being a private do nation made so there hasn't been city money going into that so that doesn't make any sense for them to claim that that is affecting revenue. and people for disabilities is estimated to cost 4 to 6 million which is a very small drop in the bucket. sunday parking is a larger issue, but i think for people to claim that allowing poor people in our city to be able to get around is causing problems isn't at all true. we at senior and disability action and a lot of other folk who is have been working on free muni feel very strongly that self reporting is the best way to go. the big reason is we see in countless city and state programs that verification is often very difficult for people especially when talking about poor people people dealing with age and disability people who may not speak english. there are a lot of examples where i

>> thank >>> this week on the journal editorial report. after years of saying that bashar al assad must go, are they ready to cut a deal with the dictator? plus the senate passes a keystone pipeline deal as the president sets his sights on a new target. is alaska ground zero for the next energy showdown? and mitt romney bows out as two gop governors inch closer to a 2016 run. who is most likely to benefit from his exit? >> so the serious future can begin. the only way to bring stability and peace to syria is going to be for assad to step down. >> assad needs to go. he needs to transfer power to a transitional body that is the only way we're going to resolve this crisis. >> welcome to the "journal editorial report." well, after repeatedly calling for the oust of assad is president obama changing his policy? sources are leaking that the president thinks assad and his regime may be part of the solution. as the priority shifts to defeating islamic state. this as moderate syrian rebels claim that u.s. money and supplies have all but dried up ov

and i think we were that by running an editorial saying violence works.out do we want to live in a fear society or do we want to live in a free society? >> i want to talk a little bit more about censorship and about the appropriateness of what we publish or don't publish. after charlie hebdo was firebombed in 2011, the paper was criticized in time magazine. that editorial said the paper was baiting muslims, it was openly begging for violent responses, creating more division and anger. and tony barber, the europe editor for the financial times >> who is a good friend of mine. >> yes. on the day of the paris attacks, he actually called the paper “stupid” initially, in something he wrote, for provoking muslims. and the paper then edited out the insult after that happened. both pieces clear that the attacks were inexcusable. but they raised that issue. should we say something just because we can? >> of course not. not because we can. but i think that a cartoon is a very civilized response to intimidation and violence. i mean, what can be more peaceful? a cart

welcome to the "journal editorial report." i'm paul gigot. isis extended its bloody reach into libya this week with the beheadings of 21 egyptian christians. but as the obama white house host ad a three-day summit on countering what they call violent extremism, the president and his staff once again refuse to use the term islamic to describe the threat, a distinction they say is necessary in part to deprive terror groups of legitimacy. >> al qaeda and isil and groups like it are desperate for legitimacy. they try to portray themselves as religious leaders, holy warriors in defense of islam. we must never accept the premise that they put forward, because it is a lie. nor should we grant these terrorists the religious legitimacy that they seek. they are not religious leaders, they're terrorists! >> joining the panel this week "wall street journal" columnist and deputy editor dan henninger editorial board member dorothy robenowitz and columnist bret stephens author of the new book "america in retreat." so, dorothy the president's summit was supp

>>> welcome to "the journal editorial report." i'm paul gigot. the white house released its 2015 national security strategy last week with susan rice telling a washington, d.c. audience that quote, as a nation, we're stronger than we have been in a very long time. the president's national security adviser accused administration critics of lacking perspective and claimed america no longer faced existential threats. >> while the dangers we place may be more numerous and varied they're not of the existential nature we confronted during world war ii or during the cold war. we cannot afford to be buffetted by alarmism and a nearly instantaneous news cycle. >> in an interview with vox.com, president obama agreed that the media has overhyped the threat from terrorism while down playing the risk of climate change. a charge white house press secretary josh earnest doubled down on a day later. >> the point that the president is making is that there are many more people on an annual basis who have to confront the impact the direct impact on their lives of c

i will never forget that shortly after the outbreak the economist had an editorial, the economist is a serious magazines and perhaps one of the best if not the best magazine in the world. there was a line the israelis are a superior people, their talents are above the ordinary but they must curb their greed for land. if that is not an anti-somatic trope. and there was -- it was hard to sit in brussels and have dinnertime conversations with the class of commissioners and foreign-policy people and not get a great deal of it. now with the attack on the kosher supermarket i think it is out in the open and in that sense i am almost grateful it happened. that at last europe is coming to recognize that it has around problem with anti-semitism that cannot be denied or passed off as a function of a reaction to israeli policy. the third point is this. my grandmother knew trotsky. he said, you may not be interested in war but war is interested in you. you may not be interested in the middle east and its troubles and turmoils and ideological fanaticism's emma but it is interested in you and i th

you know, the "washington post" has done several editorials very, very critical of president obama's opening up or moving towards opening up diplomatic relations or further relations. and they made a very selling point, and i would just like to underscore here, and that is that we're repeating mistakes that have been made in the past. when bill clinton went to vietnam and opened up relations with vietnam which followed very quickly with the bilateral trade agreement under president bush, many of us said it was a mistake not to get human rights reforms durable reforms first and then move to the diplomatic recognition followed by an economic relationship. the post points out that it is the way mr. obama has gone about this that is a mistake not reform first, but moving in to provide a lifeline as one of their editorials pointed out, a lifeline to a dictatorship at a time when venezuela is less capable of providing funding, and we know several years ago that funding from what was then the soviet union ceased to exist. a very opportune time to press the case for human rights and we blew

as john wrote in his editorial it is the one time they get their picture in the newspaper.was paranoidly optimistic. he thought classical liberalism was under threat. you look at russia, turkey. china. russia, in the 1990's or even 2000's, we might have thought it was going to direction it is hard to think it is going now. people have questioned their faith in free markets. it has made people think there is a different, more state oriented approach. classical liberalism has been under attack. what i think our response really is is to interpret liberal principles for the 21st century. >> has it been under attack because of its performance? >> in part because of its performance. there were big things wrong with the financial system on the eve of the financial crisis. >> 2008. >> too big to fail banks. basically free markets, free trade, is a force for prosperity. look at the rise of emerging wealth. i think we need to think about what the big challenges of our time are. inequality, which is a function of rapid technological change and partly globalization. we are seeing big i

at the same time as john wrote in his valedictory editorial and the one time i can come on your show that economist, editors get their picture this the newspaper and reflect on their tenure is he was paranoidly opportunistic but liberal, classic liberalism you look act russia turkey china countries which let's exclude from china from this but say russia in the 1990s even 2,000s we thought might have been going in a direction that now it is very hard to think it is going in, and if you think about economic liberalism, you know, the financial crisis, the subsequent aftermath have made a lot of people question their faith in free markets and they have made a lot of people think that actually,, you know, there is a different approach, more state oriented approach so classic liberalism has been under attack and what i think our responsibility is is to interpret liberal principles for the 21st century. >> rose: has it been under attack because of its performance? >> well, it has been under attack in part because of its performance, in the sense that, you know i wouldn't argue with you that

just like the editorial page of a newspaper. when hard news people deceive their viewers and readers to advance a political agenda, that's when the nation gets hurt: and to brian williams the anchorman for the nbc nightly news. every day about 9 million people watch them report the events of the day. mr. williams was successful, beating out abc and cbs news. exaggerate stories. nbc had to suspend him for six months. it wasn't just the iraq helicopter deal. mr. williams apparently misreported other situations as well. for example, nbc won a peabody award for its coverage of hurricane katrina in new orleans. mr. williams was a big part of that. subsequently he said he was attacked by gangs, gangs in the ritz carlton hotel. talking points was suspicious of the story and so was the "the washington post." yesterday, i talked with post reporter terrence mccoy who has been investigating. >> i'm reflecting what the hotel manager said in her assessment of brian williams when she said that he misremembered that gangs were inside the hotel

the editorial speaks to the rising tide, election after election, opinion poll after opinion poll. the leaders discover a troubling reality in which they appear powerless. the national front is france's biggest party now. they are seeing some of their historical supporters taking refuge in the far right. things are little bit easier for the ump but they have not rid themselves of 30 years of complexes and stopped defending values in a timber resource -- in a timorous voice. should we make that get for them? clare: the french papers looking east to ukraine and the continuing conflict. oliver: this year marks one year since the overthrow of president viktor yanukovych, but there is not much to celebrate. "one year on, maidan's impossible justice." at least 95 civilians are believed to have died, along with 17 police, and investigations are dragging along, not helped artifact that many -- helped by the fact that many protesters working at the time were masked. few people have faith in getting any justice. in "le figaro," a reporter went to to baltimore -- to debaltseve in the east of

propaganda and the daily telegraph and add money influencing the editorial agenda which how do you like to read your news times roman or gothic condensed and photographs from the front lines of the news. since the first i.s.i.l. video came on line in august of 2014 showing beheading of the journalist james foley the crafted out put has been increasingly gruesome, at the beginning of the month there was a pilot being burned alive and this past week footage of 21 egyptian copyic christians being beheaded in libya and the first material to be filmed outside of the territories outside syria and iraq and each video and propaganda pulled more players in the fray and in the past three weeks jordan and egypt and new zealand joined in and i.s.i.l. out put visual and compelling feeds in a narrative of inevitable war and revenge, this is story-telling material made by those who know beyond potential recruits it's global news organizations that will find these images hard to ignore the listening post will go to i.s.i.l. the battle and propaganda that is defining the latest war in the middle east ou

host: does this "wall street journal" editorial put any pressure on republican leaders? they conclude this by saying "it is not too soon to say that the fate of the gop majority is on the line. precious weeks are wasting and the consequence of weak leadership and a rump minority unwilling to compromise is playing into democratic hands. the only winners of gop dysfunction will be mr. obama nancy pelosi, and hillary clinton." guest: absolutely, that is what the editorial is designed to do, to put pressure on republicans and say wake up. you can be against the comprehensive immigration reform plan and the executive order on immigration but if you cut off your nose to spite your face you will have an done that and have the president and democratic leaders in congress a victory. shutting down the government or part of the government is not proved to be a particularly effective strategy to you could see from the last midterm elections it didn't hurt republicans as much as it could have, that short-term shutout, but i don't get the sense that anybody wants to go campaign on pay

this is the new editorial in the paper calling on the state's governor to resign. if you have not been paying attention to what is going on in that state, and who has? this kind of dramatic call seems like a surprise. he was just reelected. he is the longest serving governor in the state's history. he was sworn in as a fourth term governor. they have been watching unravel this long disaster that keeps piling up revelation after revelation, and they're all about the governor and his girlfriend. the latest revelation reported this week that the governor appears to have had his top advisors find his girlfriend paid jobs. jobs with companies and interest groups that want to influence the state's policies on energy and the governor had his girlfriend working as an advisory with him on state issues. it's one thing to bring your girlfriend to work. it is another thing to try to arrange for people with interests before the state to pay her while she advising you on their interests. that is just the latest of a year now of stories like this. the governor's girlfriend also o

as i said i wrote the editorial on why we would not publish the cartoons back in 2006. after "charlie hebdo," it seemed like a different set of considerations were in effect. and people sort of looked for hard and fast and relatively simple rules for how these things are done. and the truth is there are none. what we try to be are responsible adults making serious judgments about difficult questions. and anyone who would suggest that there's some simple line or it is all one way or all the other i think is just not engaging in a serious conversation. >> other questions from the audience? there are many americans who never heard of "charlie hebdo" before the murders. i've seen it many times in paris and candidly, didn't read it. what's the difference -- from someone like yourself and other educated french people to what they thought of it then, how they came to think of it and what is the future of specifically "charlie hebdo"? >>py was not a regular reader of "charlie hebdo." my brother is. he's a subscriber. he's a teacher and we had this discussion sometimes that we j

. >> guest: ...out there as the editor, but i became the editor, which meant editor of the editorial page. c-span: and i can remember growing up in that state and you were the youngest editor of any major daily in the united states. >> guest: well, you're giving away a lot about both of our ages there, brian... c-span: yes. >> guest: ...because that was a long time ago. c-span: i know it was, but isn't that true? wasn't that what you were called? >> guest: yes. yes, i was 20... c-span: you were, like, 26. >> guest: i was 26. yeah. c-span: how did you ever get to be editor of a major newspaper at 26? >> guest: well, i remember time magazine wrote an article about that, and the first thing -- these papers, for the benefit of your viewers -- are the newspapers of the pulliam family, which is the dan quayle family. and eugene pulliam sr. was then the publisher of those papers. and when i got made editor of the editorial page, and that's an important distinction, i got a call from time magazine, which wrote an article about it at that juncture, and the first question they asked me was, "a

so it seemed only natural that i would pursue a career in editorial cartooning. i chose this career path in the early 1970s during the heyday of the art form. like most i tried to emulate the artists who dominated the profession of the time. unlike many of my contemporaries i just wasn't talented enough to do it. and so i had to fashion a drawing style that was more suited to my modest ability as an artist. ..ummm, my approach to cartooning was also shaped by my weaknesses than by my strengths. temperature, for example i've never considered myself to be a good caricature. you might think it would discourage someone from pursuing a career in a profession virtually driven by caricature. i wasn't going to let a little thing like not being able to capture'-- someone's likeness to keep me down. eliminating them altogether seems like a good solution. with time, i found ways to criticize public officials without depicting them at all. [applause] -- [laughter] 8 can yes. there are times when this job demands you draw a character. on those days, i do the best i can. now -

the journal editorial board wasn't. rand paul joined the vaccine follies monday.ave to avoid the libertarian dormitory passions if wants to be a credible candidate. and chris christie about vaccinating kids and leaving vaccine doubters and jenny mccarthy said the not so great measles debate of 2015 is one of the events that make us wonder if there's such a thing that human progress. we leave questions about the fate of humanity to the editorial pages but for weeks, some politicians who seem to have presidential ambitions quick to stake out positions on childhood vaccination. some of them senator paul and christie have been backing from positions they held a few hours before or getting vaccinated on twitter. including hillary clinton have been piling on, recently tweeted, quote, the science is clear, the earth is round, the sky is blue and #vaccineswork. best protect all of our kids. not so certain though telling autism advocacy group say we don't know what, if any, kind of link there is but we should find out. now we know. the science is clear at least to an overw

britain's daily telegraph and allegations of add money influencing the editorial agenda.t do you like - helvetica, times new roman, franklin gothic condense. and photographs from the front of the news. since the first i.s.i.l. video came online showing the beheading of james foley. the groups output has become grew some. at the beginning of this jordanian pilot moaz al-kasasbeh burnt alive, and footage of 21 coptic christians beheaded in libya - the first material filmed outside i.s.i.l.'s territories in syria and iraq. each propaganda video placing more into the fray. for the past three weeks nigeria joined in. the output - it was a narive of a war and revenge. this material made by those who know, beyond it is an organization hard to ignore. there's an intensifying battle and propaganda that has defined the latest wore in the middle east. the starting point this week is egypt. >> are we now seeing holy war against a religious component. >> every video that we are getting from the islamic state is more intense, more dramatic. it is overpowering. >> journalists and report

it does not make sense to organize our editorial staff by a format.nstead, our staff will work together in teams made up of editors, writers, designers, and developers who will decide the best ways to tell each storedi es. the very first words in our very first issue were " the new republic frankly is an experiment." and that is how we are working right now. in new york and d.c., it feels like an experiment. it is fun, it is tough, it is racing, scary, and sometimes we will screw up, but we are conducting this for a reason. we believe in great journalism. journalism is the pursuit of insight of new knowledge of truth, and the truth is this recent revolution and the ways of human direction are not conversing. the pace of change will likely increase in five years' time. references in this speech may be as quaint as a pneumatic tube. if we stick to our values to discover inform, the light, i am sure we can commit pretty great acts of journalism, and that is why i am an optimist. thank you. [applause] >> thank you, gabriel. i appreciate your support of np

and i think there's a point that a news editorial decision turns into a political decision.sue about this as well. what we've heard a lot on the right from conservatives who say that people like president obama are denying the reality of islamic terrorism. people like president obama aren't willing to look it square in the eye and see it for what it is. we've heard that political argument. i think at times these news editorial judgments are turning into political judgments as well. >> i hope that's not true but i have a sneaking suspicious it is. brian stelter, thanks so much for the interesting conversation. i appreciate it. >> thanks. >>> still to come in the "newsroom," ashton carter heads to capitol hill as hearings to confirm him as the next secretary of national defense begins. could a lack of firsthand military experience be an issue? i've smoked a lot and quit a lot but ended up nowhere. now...i use this. the nicoderm cq patch with unique extended release technology helps prevent the urge to smoke all day. i want this time to be my last time. that's why i choose nico

i'm going to ask sylvia who as you probably already know, is the editorial director and columnist and contributing writer to "the new york times" and then i'm going to ask floyd abrams to follow on all of us -- i hope everyone in journalism knows, if you have a problem with the first amendment, you call floyd abrams and there really is no number two. you just call floyd abrams. and then to sort of talk about the elephant in the room and really bring us to the point of understanding what the problem is, what the underlying problem is and where things are going and i'm hoping there's a lot of cross dialogue. i'm going to ask each person to speak for about five minutes to set the stage. sill yeah will tell us what is going on and what the problems are, from her perspective. i'll let floyd outline the differences and similarities between our idea and america of free expression and perhaps a french notion which may be different in some respects. and then finally, brett. with no further ado, sylvia, can you let us know what you think? >> thank you very much and thank you for having me here.

. >> following up on an editorial done by our station manager. >> chris christie and his port authorityer have made it clear that they are representing the interests of limo riding business travelers, not not the poor celebs who use buses and trains. >> wants to extend the train that we will cost one half billion. the governor wants to spend half a billion on creating a train that will take you from the new york city subway system to laguardia airport. >> why the focus? >> airport, bus terminal, bridges and tunnels they are all extraordinarily important. >> am sorry. >> okay. >> your speaking very loud. please just about site. >> okay. all right. sorry, i have to step outside. bill: zero, my god. >> where was i? bill: who was that? a security guard? i didn't see anyone around you. you weren't disturbing one person. >> they were all listening to my report. she -- they are pushing to get us started right away. bill: why is government still involved? you think about the idea the taxes that we pay the bigger story is how i we will 11 people been asked to resign by the two governors that man

he writes an editorial where he addresses such religious intolerance. he says charlie hebdo will considered -- will continue to criticize those who let themselves get locked up and provides them with an excuse to stop doubting for themselves. >> let's look at the front page of --. the show goes on. they have an exclusive look behind the scenes. after the attack on charlie hebdo's office, they have reached out to surviving staff members and gave them the top four had orders for the makeshift homes. it has been very hard and emotional for the survivors. they talk about a long tunnel of down and also projects. there seems to be hoped among the remaining staff members. a lot of people are still in shock. we all almost died for the magazine. staff members remained defiant. he only were the way of paying tribute to those that died is to keep on keeping on. >> wall street journal reporting there is divisions emerging among the staff. >> charlie hebdo was put in the spotlight and began a major transformation in the wake of that attack. it went from being in its

combining editorial content with technology to cater to the modern shopper.he future of the magazine is the editor-in-chief. thank you for joining us. we are talking about the future of the magazine. who is the perfect shopper you are targeting? who has the money to spend? >> this was launched with the net-a-porter woman in mind. she's always on the move. she traveling 11 times a year and she loves fashion page she's traveling and looking for a beautiful generation. that is our typical woman. guy: what defines success? is it different from the past? >> for us it is. what we have done is approached it in a different way. we have torn up the grill book and started again -- the rulebook and started again. success was about engagement. we are finding it is inspiring women to shop more. for us, success is being able to engage existing customers but also draw in new customers. francine: this was started a year ago. critics were saying we do not need another glossy magazine. it must have been a challenge for you to incorporate another editorial but at the same time

they end that editorial by noting -- the editorial board of the "washington post" this morning. mike is up next in monroeville, ohio, on the line for independents. good morning. caller: good morning. we have a mess here. the last election proved that the american people are sick and tired of what is going on. i'm a retired veteran and i'm sick of having my security held hostage for a bill to pass other bills. we have to stand up to this and put a stop to it ourselves. host: how would you do that mike? caller: well, back in the 1970's, i can remember more -- marching on washington. i was just a little kid. i didn't understand. but now i understand what america is about. it is about freedom. the problem is, we've become a tyrant. all of these countries that we've helped around the world, now they are turning against us. enough is enough. how much more are we going to take? we are about broke. the only people that are going to help us is ourselves and we cannot turn to washington leadership. it is obvious we are being held hostage again. host: that is mike in ohio. up next, leslie

our final rule to the human stories to seek facts and to investigate and to speak with a strong editorial hold public institution accountable. that work will endure for years and as the region works to rebound we know that everyone is indispensable and on their behalf i accept this award. thank you very much. [applause] >> thank you. >> this year it is my honor to present the chairman's citation to brian. brian has demonstrated that one one journalist can build a digital news organization from the ground up and he shown that we can have an impact across an entire industry by upholding the highest standards of reporting. he is a pioneer in crowd wearing crime and conflict in cyberspace while facing physical threats and digital assault is a result of his on the ground coverage. it is my pleasure to introduce to you brian. [applause] [applause] >> well, thank you so much, heather, as heather said my name is brian and i am a journalist here. and i seriously want to thank the national press foundation for this prestigious award because it is a great honor and it is hugely humbling, particularl

and some of the editorials and reviews saying god, this is reviews saying god, this is ruining the world now because ruining the world now because women have guns. women have guns. >> we should remind viewers who >> we should remind viewers who haven't seen it, that susan haven't seen it, that susan sarandon's character in the sarandon's character in the movie shoots a man because he's movie shoots a man because he's threatening your character threatening your character sexually. sexually. >> yes, he was. >> yes, he was. he had actually stopped when she shoots him. he had actually stopped when she he had stopped and said shoots him. he had stopped and said something that incenses her so something that incenses her so much that she kills him. much that she kills him. yes, there is that bit of violence. yes, there is that bit of violence. then we kill ourselves at the then we kill ourselves at the end, so there is that. end, so there is that. but it's so profoundly not a violent movie. but it's so profoundly not a violent movie. the reactions are so over the top. the reactions are so over

its editorial, he addresses religious intolerance quite the finally. he says charlie hebdo will continue to criticize those who allow themselves to get locked up in the comfort of religion that supposedly has all the answers and provides them with an excuse to stop that can -- stop thinking for themselves. >> looking back at the paris attacks in january and taking an exclusive look at how the shooters plotted their rampage. >> how they prepared their attack. these are screenshots of video surveillance. an incredible investigation into the 12 days that led up to the attack on charlie hebdo. they used video surveillance to track down the shooters. these 12 days, the chilling countdown. the official investigation is just begun. one thing is for sure, the brothers -- the shooters did not act alone. they were not lone wolves. they got a lot of help. they look at who helped them prepare the attacks and where they got the money from. four people have already been arrested and five others are actively wanted for giving them logistical support to set up these a

the "wall street journal" editorial page attacking republicans this way is like romano going after thehis is not where you expect to take incoming criticism so i think they will have to back down. the house has done what it does, it passes similar polk leslation going nowhere. 57 times they repealed obama caimplet that's what they did in this case. they sent it to the senate, and it's going to die there. it's on the republican's doorstep. >> woodruff: one last thing to make time for. this is a tumultuous and in many ways bad week for the media. brian williams suspended at nbc news, the death of david carr, bob simon with cbs and the news from jon stewart. david, on the brian williams question, what i'm curious to know is does that reflect on everyone in the media? how does the media come out of this episode? >> i think it speaks to a couple of truths. one is no amount of public success is satisfying. you can have all the accolades in the world, be where brian williams was at the tippy top public's fame is still ever thety and still leaves you hungry and you still want to brag a little