slate ture makes it illegal to marry one's first cousin and gives the marriage agency the power to effectuate that staut. agency would not have the power to vastly expand that statute by declare that you can't marry your second or third cousin either or anybody who grew up on the same street with you. not only would that go way beyond what the statute allows, there's no rational argument that the regulation is named at assuring the underlying statute's enforcement. the kinds of things that would be per missable in that context would be a requirement, for example, that one present one's birth certificate when one gets a marriage license because that helps effectuate the statute. inglations that are passed pursuant to a statute can sometimes go beyond what the statute requires, but they have to be aimed as enforcing the statute. they can't just be a sneaky way to expand it. the prar analogy is to the supreme court's decision in city of bernie versus flores. that case concerned how far congress can go in enforcing the 14th amendment's equal protection clause. since the supreme court had held tha

promote and create understood as understanding for positions when you look at the issues of common effectual in the united states for example when the sea of seals b.m.w. was coming. to the white house but on the other hand clearly we understand we have to take over the city more its own hands in terms of strengthening in europe that's what we have to put into the coalition agreement here i want you to i want you to lou take a listen to what mr trump said today about iran the iran deal. but we disagreed on thing when you look at the iran deal i think it's terrible i guess it was ok i wanted to break it or something. felt a little bit differently so we were not really thinking. all right what are you going to do with this new grand coalition government now that mr trump probably will say i want to break the iranian nuclear deal is that going to break your government your new government i don't think so i think we have a broad consensus on foreign policy issues in germany which is a good thing for our country in terms of providing stability and continuity. i think it's not about the fact that

if they have a federal policy ince place but they haven't enacted a federal policy but they will effectuate through the states that is commandeering. so both of those lines are answers will define commandeering in a way that will beer very important with sports wagering and different fields. the third issue i will not spend a lot of time on is the questions there is one provision so it is argued at some length even if the statute applies or the court finds those two parts unconstitutional for that provision, the whole statute does not have to go. and that is also an important thing to look for when the opinion comes out because a couple gentlemen will talk about what you might do if the cart one -- court strikes it down but you want to be careful how much is left in anything. it is always dangerous to make predictions and then we will get made fun of later when we get it wrong but i will make the prediction was that an oral argument it seems there are six votes for new jersey chief kennedy and scalia, thomas and alito, gore such andd breyer and gorsuch and they are saying there is a federal

you have of.5 million people in this country whose jobs are effectually affected by steel.llion people compared to 140,000 who work in steel. these are big differences and we ought to think what the long-term effects are on people's job. i am an economist and not a politics guy. you have to think how it affects the election. kennedy: we are already on the precipice of inflation. that's a worry right now. if you have more expensive products affected by the price of steel, that will exacerbate. that's one of the unintended consequences you are pointing to. >> we talked about crumbs increase an --incessantly when o nancy pelosi. and these little margins make a continues for people. it shows up in inflation numbers. you wonder why the stock market is moving around so much? that has toaferg do with our expectations that drives interest rates whether you can buy a home or a car. this is a main street industry. that turns out to be a heck of a lot of us. kennedy: people get very, very nervous when they start hearing about inflation. >> you know what else, people in agriculture get

they have a federal policy in place but enactedre, they haven't a federal policy but are simply effectuate federal policy through the states, that's commandeering. are,nk both of those lines definesort of -- will commandeering in a way that could be very important in sports wagering but also a lot other different fields. third issue which i'm not going to spend a lot of time on, severability question. and as i mentioned, there's only issueovision of paspa at here and only really two words with that one provision. so the sports -- in the states argued at some threapth even if the statute the courtd each if finds those two ports of -- unconstitutional, that provision, the whole statute does not have to go and that, too, is an important thing the opinionwhen comes out because there are a couple of gentlemen here today that will talk about what you do if the court strikes down paspa. i think you'll want to be very careful about parsing that figuring out how much of paspa is left, if anything. it's always dangerous to make predictions about how the court's going to come out. when i clerked for

they have a federal policy in place but enactedre, they haven't a federal policy but are simply effectuate federal policy through the states, that's commandeering. are,nk both of those lines definesort of -- will commandeering in a way that could be very important in sports wagering but also a lot other different fields. third issue which i'm not going to spend a lot of time on, severability question. and as i mentioned, there's only issueovision of paspa at here and only really two words with that one provision. so the sports -- in the states argued at some threapth even if the statute the courtd each if finds those two ports of -- unconstitutional, that provision, the whole statute does not have to go and that, too, is an important thing the opinionwhen comes out because there are a couple of gentlemen here today that will talk about what you do if the court strikes down paspa. i think you'll want to be very careful about parsing that figuring out how much of paspa is left, if anything. it's always dangerous to make predictions about how the court's going to come out. when i clerked for

ambitious reorganization of the state department, but hadn't gotten buy-in from the building which effectuateduld have been almost impossible. i took a trip to iraq and afghanistan for christmas and one thing left was understanding how more row of the state department was. mike pompeo have a natural advantage because he's more in sync with the president, and that he really needs to fight to get it key agency positions filled. assistant bureaus for the state department. we're attempting a complex negotiation with north korea. we need an ambassador to south korea and i would hope the secretary, mike andrea would prevail, the white house whereby anyone who criticized donald trump is not allowed to serve in a key post. that is counterproductive and shortsighted in light of other crises we face around the world, we need every talented% on deck grow in their oars the same direction. eric: there is a lot of talent out there that have been blacklisted and that should do it. >> absolutely. most americans regardless of whether they are super pro trump or not, if given the opportunity to serve this count

policy in place but where here, they haven't enacted a federal policy but are simply trying to effectuate federal policy through the states, that's commandeering. i think both of those lines are, again, sort of will define commandeering in a way that could be very important in sports wagering but also a lot of other different fields. the third issue which i'm not going to spend a lot of time on, is the severability question. and as i mentioned, there's only one provision of paspa at issue here and only really two words with that one provision. and so the sports leagues in the united states argued that even if the statute applies, and even if the court finds those unconstitutional, those two words, or that particular provision the whole statute does not have to go and that, too, is an important thing to look for when the opinion comes out because there are a couple of gentlemen here today that will talk about what you might do if the court strikes down paspa. i think you'll want to be very careful about parsing that opinion and figuring out how much of paspa is left, if anything. it's alwa

west wing, a confusing free-wheeling policy on gun reform, the resignation of a key aide and the effectual demotion of another. also a surprise trade announcement that sent global stocks tumbling. despite all this, sarah sanders says, no, no, things couldn't be better. >> if this is chaos, i'm surprised. the economy is strong, we have a lot of positive things happening in this country and that's happening under the direction and leadership of president trump. >> here with me to share their reporting and their insights, jonathan martin of the "new york times," cnn's caitlyn collins, kerry bacon and rachel bade with politico. we have a list of all the things that have gone on. i can't read them all because that would take the entire show. ivanka trump business deal. h.r. mcmaster could leave by the end of the month. hope hicks resigned. kelly fights with jared and ivanka. carrie, i want to start with you. from a scale of 0 drama, where is the white house on this scale? >> sarah sanders says there is no chaos, a well-oiled machine. there are staffers that work in that white house alongside sa

relationship and look to reset it i think the actions that this administration is doing are meant to effectuatehat change. in terms of allies we can turn to, there are a lot of nations that have seen how china behaves in terms of ip, intellectual property and i think they're going to join our cause in this effort. >> admiral, i am curious the likely reaction behind the scenes from our natoalit allies, especially the argument that steel tariffs are needed to protect national security, and yet our allies, some of them at least, might end up being slapped with them. how is that likely to effect nato relationships >> it is going to damage our nato relationships clearly, just to pick up on nova's point, i agree we have a strong network of allies around the world, not only nato, but japan, australia, new zealand, but tariffs against steel and aluminum i think are going to weaken it and as i have said, these are not good economics but terrible geopolitics because they're going to really push our closest allies away from us, and therefore you see the administration in this delicate dance of trying to d

liz: well, the government hasn't often beat out the government in ideas and effectuating these ideas, executing these ideas. i'm hoping the three of these, the smartest in business history can do it. sounds like you do too. liz: toby cosgrove, once again, it's not you, right? >> not me. liz: he's not running this new health care venture on behalf of buffett, dimon, combs, and, of course, bezos. thank you so much. >> thank you, liz. >> the biggest breaking news out of the interview is toby cosgrove is saying indeed someone has now been chosen for that position to run the new health care venture. don't know who it is, though. dow jones industrials up 402 points. blue checkmarks for all. closing bell 18 minutes away. twitter making a controversial move. ceo jack dorsey telling twitter users that the once coveted verified status on the social media platform, the blue verified checks that originally was only given to celebrities and public figures and journalists and people like that, about to be extended to all of you in the twitter sphere. executives hoping the extra identity verificatio

has this kind of intention, they are going to do whatever it takes to get some kind of weapon to effectuateey are desiring, whether it's somebody making, like in boston with the pressure cookers. people downloading videos. very troubling. they are going to find a way to do it. i'm a big proponent of having dogs and utilizing them. i've seen them be very effective with law enforcement. when i worked as a prosecutor and in schools i have taught in as an educator as well. i think it's a fantastic idea and i am familiar with some organizations that do this. why not? why wouldn't we? we use them in the military coming the armed forces, because they are effective. >> dana: train stations, bus stations. >> kimberly: why not protect our schools? >> greg: i worry so far we are relying so much on luck and chance. more to come in just a moment. i accept i don't bike the miles i used to. i even accept i have a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat not caused by a heart valve problem. but no matter where i ride, i go for my best. so if there's something better than warfarin, i

the hope is they will be able to effectuate a rescue here at some point. these pictures are a condensed shot from across the way, and we are hopeful they may be able to save somebody. it's going to be a very, very difficult task this afternoon. it's been more than three hours since the bridge collapsed, and we are still waiting to find out if anyone is underneath there and still alive. our correspondent phil keating is live on scene. so much work to be done. as they try to pull someone out. >> absolutely. they are actively in search and rescue mode, as they discuss here, at the press briefing. they still can't say how many people have been reported missing. friends and loved ones who may have been in the area driving down southwest eighth street when this happened and it can't get a hold of them. a total of eight cars were crushed underneath the bridge. all of those cars remain underneath it. unclear whether all of the drivers, all the passengers within those cars have been pulled out. a total of eight people have been pulled out of the rubble and taken to

he wouldn't need his office open in order to effectuate the payment. >> clearly the office he's talking about is the trump organization office, which is on the letterhead and underneath his signature. >> that is the office he's referring to, you look at the signature, and you put it up on the screen, he identifies himself as the executive vice president and special council to donald j. trump and lists the address. i'm wondering how significant is this. stormy's attorney is making the point why would the office need to be open if it's a personal matter between him and michael coh cohen. >> because it's not a personal matter. let's just cut the crap, it's late, it's been a long week. this is sleazy, disgusting garbage behavior on the part of donald trump and the part of his organization period. you know what's not fun? trying to explain to your 9-year-old son what a porn star is because he's watching the news. that's not fun. this is ridiculous. at a certain point we have to say, listen, well, it's donald trump, so it's okay. it's not donald trump, it's the president of the united states

payment was being made personally by attorney cohen, he wouldn't need his office open in order to effectuate the payment. >> reporter: now, stormy's attorney says this is further proof that he was not acting in a freelance role or individual capacity but on behalf of the president. cohen denies that saying that he did not violate any campaign finance reform laws or any campaign finance laws. but this story, guys, shows no signs of going away anytime soon. stormy daniels for her part is expected to prcherform here aga at the solid gold room later tonight. >> michael cohen there he used his trump org.com e-mail address, not a white house address. he wasn't in the white house. nick valencia there for us. thank you so much. and stormy daniels' attorney also says that it is unbelievable just not credible that the president's lawyer made this deal without the president knowing. >> listen to what he said about the timeliness of all of this. >> this took a long time, the negotiation, the drafting, the communication, the routing of the payment. we're talking about hours and hours and hours. and what

can the justice department effectually do it when he was such a big part. >> sean: if i deleted subpoenaedils, i wonder if i'd go to jail, if i acid washed my hard drive and beat up my blackberry and iphone, i want a will happen, sara. >> you'd probably be prosecuted and you would go to jail. that's a fact. that is the reason why these investigations are so important. they are not just a washington centric investigation. this is about the american people. thishi is about our fourth amendment rights when we think of fisa abuse, carter page, it's not just carter page. it's every single one of us. about the tools of our intelligence community being weaponized against us. >> sean: carter page is going to be rich. that is my prediction. carter page is going to be a rich man after all this. b >> may be. >> sean: good investigative work, both of you. we keep on peeling the onion. we are getting there. renee combat, dr. sebastian gorka, geraldo rivera, on the outrageous illegal immigration situation and the mayor out in oakland, california, literally risking lives. we'll explain sb 25 continues. -

this is effectually a tie. it's effectively a tie. but a tie is telling in a district like this that remember the republican nominee who was forced out amid a sex scandal, tim murphy, he didn't have a democratic opponent in 2014 or 2016. this is not a seat anyone circled when it came open and said look out. this is going to be a barnburner. yes, lamb was a better candidate. saccone did not raise the money he should have. this is a six to ten-point rick saccone win. that it isn't that is hugely telling. where are the lessons here? what does it tell them they need to do? they seem to have a more obvious case study f. lamb wins they can say, okay, we have to have candidates in the locality where they are running. we can't have a cookie cutter candidate. how do you see it? >> i think, you know, to chris's point, it's about what they do and don't do. they did tax cuts. that's going to be important if you're conservatives in conservative districts saying we got this through. tariffs play conservatives. here's the big point. this big nationa

. >> i'm here today to announce that the program known as daca effectuated under the obama administration. >> we all have a great heart for the folks we are talking about, a great love for them. hopefully now congress can help them and do it properly. i can tell you in speaking to members of congress they want to do something and do it right. >> joining us now to talk about daca and more, democratic congressman pete aguilar. thanks for joining us. where do things stand now? the president said he wants a deal, you want a deal. he's ready to give a pathway to citizenship for 1.8 million dreamers in the united states, more than the 700,000 who have officially registered with daca. what's wrong with that? >> nothing. a path to citizenship is legitimate. this is a crisis the president created. unfortunately congress hasn't acted in six months. >> what's the problem now? >> look, i'll tip my hat at least to mitch mcconnell for giving the senate an opportunity to vote. they didn't meet the 60 threshold, but in the house we can't even get a vote. while there are republicans committed to the issue

payment was being made personally by attorney cohen he wouldn't need his office open in order to effectuate the payment. >> joe, does this raise a question about why the office being open or closed would be relevant if cohen were truly handling this transaction on his own, as he claims? >> yeah, but it's at the end of the day, don it's all irrelevant. this is ridiculous. a monthing a this was just another salacious trump story. he called fake news. it's one of a million scandal he had in the last year that was going to be another thing that blurs the last thing you heard about him. and wasn't really going to have legs. it got legs and became a national news story when his own two people his lawyer and his press secretary -- osh the white house press secretary went on put their foot in their mouth that they opened because this thing was dead and buried. she had not a leg to stand on to talk about the case or anything else until they opened the door. michael cohen -- i don't know what he was thinking that day he stood in front of a gamut of reporters and pronounced i paid $130,000 from my own

payment was being made personally by attorney cohen, he wouldn't need his office open in order to effectuate the payment. >> reporter: there's a lot of anxiety, we're told, in the white house that this story is beginning to overshadow the day-to-day operations of the president. for her part, ms. stormy daniels is scheduled to perform here at the solid gold gentlemen's club here in pompano beach later today. the story showing no signs of going away any time soon. >> nick valencia for us in ft. lauderdale. the details of this story, i -- we were supposed to say the name of the tour -- >> i couldn't believe you didn't do it -- >> i couldn't say it. so many tawdry elements of what is happening test some of the bounds that we have for ourselves. >> it does. we came in and said, this is what we're talking about. >> will we stay or not -- >> this is what we're talking about. >>> let's get to mark -- >> senior analyst and senior white house correspondent for bloomberg news. thank you very much for being here. how potential at the end of the day dangerous is this for president trump, for his policy,

payment was being made personally by attorney cohen, he wouldn't need his office open in other to effectuate the payment. >> reporter: so michael cohen is responding to that saying that, you know, he is mike a normal person who sometimes uses his work e-mail to communicate about personal matters. he has a statement that he says, "the use of my company e-mail to communicate with the bank and ms. clifford's former counsel proves nothing despite the less-than-convincing documents. i used the e-mail address for virtually everything, as many people do." i think questions do remain about what exactly cohen was trying to do. and earlier this week here at the white house, we have been asking the white house what the president knew. did he know about the payment just 11 days before the election, and also did he know about the litigation that cohen has been pursuing on his behalf in the very last week. in this case, a judge has just been assigned to it. so it seems very much that this is moving forward in the legal sphere, and as a result, getting closer and closer to president trump. >> all right. ab

payment was being made personally by attorney cohen, he wouldn't need his on office open in order to effectuate the payment. >> clearly the office he is talking about is the trump organization office which is on the letter head and underneath his signature. >> that is the office he is clearly referring to because if you look at the signature and you've put it on the screen he identified himself as executive vice president and special counsel to donald j. trump. >> cohen says that he regularly used his business e-mail for personal matters and denies mr. trump knew anything about the transactions with stormy daniels. he says the earth shattering uncovered e-mail between myself and the bank corroborates all my previous statements which is i transferred money from one account at that bank into my llc and then wired said funds to mrs. clifford's attorney this beverly hills. here is drew griffin with more on all of this. >> reporter: the e-mails are brief. first republic bank advising that the funds have been 2k30ae deposited into your checking account. he forwards the message. what is potentially da

it is a significant act in the sense that what britt tain effectually does it cuts off their own abilityo get information on russia. because they know president putin will expand. there are other things prime minister announce, ministers of royal family will not attend soccer world cup later 0en in russia. but that under scores the challenges that the u.k. faces. and, andrea, i think really putting back from all of this, the real question facing the west, and facing the u.s., is what to do. because britain of course is america's closest ally. britain has now seen an an attempted assassination on its own soil. they have to respond. the question is whether the white house will follow the u.k. in that tough action. >> in fact, white house response so far has been what you might call weak tea, other than secretary tillerson's comments on his way back from africa. and we saw where that helped land him. so what do you think, i guess we should all be reporting how nikki haley or the white house response today at the security council? >> yeah, that's right. we should be, i think. and i think, al

he could certainly effectuate his firing. he's using these two lawyers pretty strategically as yin and yang on the one hand saying we're going to cooperate fully, we're not going to fire mueller. john dowd on the other hand is throwing out these bombs to discredit robert mueller and james comey and andy mccabe. you see this a lot with defendants on trial, especially when they start getting worried that the evidence is mounting against them, a common strategy is to put the police on trial, put the prosecutors on trial, try to undermine confidence in the very people who are presenting the case against you in an effort to undermine the credibility of the case. it seems like he's using these two lawyers juxtaposing on one hand, i'm fully cooperating, on the other the message you shouldn't trust this process. >> chuck, let me ask you specifically. would rod rosenstein follow the messages he's getting from the boss in the west wing, from the president himself and perhaps from his attorneys and fire robert mueller? >> this is a guy

but i think there's a very poignant line there about how he effectually felt how the people who questioned him didn't get the answers the way he intended, he setout to correct them. now, unless there's something showing he was mendacious and obviously so, it would seem to suggest that he may have been to some degree set up or -- and he certainly indicates he believes he was trying to make the record as accurate as possible. >> and describes in his first round of trying to remember truthful answers about this, he says he was doing the best he could amidst the chaos that surrounded me. and i think we all have a feel for what that must be been. we're joined now by phone by jill winebanks, and she's an msnbc contributor. jill, i wish you could be on camera so we could see your st. patrick's green you were wearing. first we began simply with the fact that jeff sessions approximately 10:00 p.m. tonight on a friday night fired andrew mccabe, the former acting director of the fbi with only two days left before his official retirement. we now have a full written statement by andrew mccabe that i've

how do they effectuate that within the strategy. that's where they have to grab some of the free trade problems they have. it's not just food issues although those are there. regulatory issues. there are other ways in which they probably weren't going to get into tpp as it was originally conceived, where they can get into tpp 11 or whatever it's called, or future things, it's up to taiwan to make some moves. that's where they have to go. >> next question. wait for the mike, please. thanks. >> professor, i'm asking in the near future, maybe china economy is close to the u.s. economy. my specific question is the role of china in international organizati organization. >> well, first thing i would say is whatever our policy on china's participation in international organizations that china is not currently in, whatever our policy is, we have to have a parallel policy to protect and maximize taiwan's international space and participation in all the same organizations. one can't go without the other. the second thing i would say about chi

one of them is this notion of the ability of congress to do that which is necessary and proper to effectuate the constitutional compact that was entered into between nationstates. one of the other ones that people do not talk about as much is marshall's conception of the relative roles of the court in congress. judgments about policy, about what is necessary, our judgments left to congress. this is part of the formulation that is central to the case. that deference to congressional judgments about what is good policy is a very significant factor. the other thing that enters in here is that marshall's willingness to sustain the bank of the united states at a point in time when it was a load institution -- loathed institution. the panic of 1819, 3 million out of 9 million people in german -- in dire economic straits. put the bank on square fitting at precisely the moment they did, and part of what makes cases landmark cases is not just the rules they articulate, but the circumstances within which they are decided. >> let's spend more time. what else should people know about the country? 1812,

effectuating the strong central government is one of the reasons we remember this case and him today. >> today when we talk about the kinds of things the federal government does, can one look to mcculloch versus maryland for opening up the door for the roles the government has taken on? part of it. part is the impulse of congress to legislate more and more and more. one of the things they don't understand if they did not pass anywhere near as many statutes then as they do now. --n in this discussion all this dysfunctional congress. >> thank you for being our inaugural guest and for helping us understand the history and importance of mcculloch v maryland. to the viewers, thank you for being with us for the first of 12 programs. special thanks to our partners at the national constitution center for their assistance in putting this series together. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2017] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] ♪ >> president trump and first 80 melania trump a

which receives capital for its business has a fundamental response ability to execute in the most effectual manner. given the american taxpayer has provided the capital to fulfill the mission we have the highest level of judiciary responsibility to continuously execute our operations in the most effective and efficient manners. we work hard to establish support to the predictable funding strain and the working of a foreign area. thank you for the committee's work to establish the steel. the secretary has outlined three main lines of effort for the department of defense, to building more lethal force, strengthened the traditional allies while building new partnerships and reform the department's business practices for performance and affordability. the responsibility and the chief management officer and the department of defense to execute the third line of effort come in reforming business operations for the solvency and security, gaining the full benefit from every dollar spent. looking forward to the department is not anticipating something about thfunding of ths for the fiscal 219 budget

knowing that no one will effectuate 700,000 citizens, knowing that no one means to do it and that's the basic problem. so we have a vision and we have meanwhile some goals and there is so much work to do for you and for us and let's not waste more time on talking. thank you very much. [applause] >> we've got time for a couple of questions. as he managed to outpace a lot of these questions is rather easy. i will let him take a sip of water first but one of the questions is could be occupation continue to exist without the united states support, please elaborate back on. [laughter] >> can the occupation continue? yes but can continue without the united states, even for a few months? this must be clear. it would have been an american president who would really like to move to the end of the occupation the occupation would've ended a long time ago. there was never any american president who wanted it. can i stand here so i can see everyone? thank you. then you don't know who is talking. >> the other question is extremely interesting and an esteemed scholar made this argument to me last nigh

which receives capital for its business has a fundamental responsibility to execute in the most effectual manner. given the american taxpayer has provided the capital to fulfill our mission, we have the highest level of fiduciary responsibility to continuously conduct our operations in the most effective and efficient manner. the two-year budget deal this committee worked hard is great support to a predictable funding stream and very helpful to all of our work in the reform area. thank you to your committee's hard work to establish this deal. secretary mattis has outlined three main lines of effort for the department of defense. build a more lethal force. strengthen traditional allies while building new partnerships and reform the department's business practices for performance and affordability. it is the responsibility of the chief management officer of the department of defense to execute the third line of effort, reforming business operations for solvency and security, gaining full benefit from every dollar spent. looking forward, the department is not anticipating funding above the o

cbo has everything it needs to full fit its mandate of supporting congress in the 21st century effectually and efficiently. we started this series by discussing cbo's organizational and operational structure with the director dr. keith hall. and our second hearing we began to explore technical aspect of how cbo crafts the impartial work products congress relies on to make informed legislative decisions. during our third hearing, we took deeper dive into cbo use of mogses as a tool in scoring legislative proposals and what kiengdz of assumptions are made in that process? and last week we heard from interested members of the house who share ideas ats and permit of on challenges they've experienced when interacting with the agency. today we will close out o the series my thanks to witnessing joining us as we do so. in our first panel we will hear from two former cbo director who is guided the agency at different stages in the cbo's history. each director was appointed during different areas of congress and both were selected to serve baseed on their ability to perform the duties of that role

d other networks they have been aided and abetted by the establishment types that are trying to effectuaten agenda. the media is the one institution that we have left that has lost the senate. they are desperate to get back into power. i ask this question because it was so unusual on thursday that it was the president who came out into the white house briefing room to announcer was an announcement on north korea. your reaction? guest: i love that style. the president runs the white house. and that is why the staff turnover doesn't really matter. i love that style. we go to the republican line with robert wasinger from the president super pac. caller: i am a very conservative and the rhetoric and language that trump used, i don't want my nephews and nieces to hear that. and the women that come out -- can yoump that talk about that a little? the women, a lot of those things are fake news. a lot of it already has been dealt with. in terms of the president, he is redefining the presidency. the communication, connecting with voters, it is effective. but the issue is with stormy daniels. the $13

i hope we will address the democratic will of the american public and effectuate the majority will of congress that if forced to a vote, the majority of congress would support this. james madison spoke about the factions, a minority of people animated about some thing that goes against the common good, against the will of the majority, but our institutions have got to be set up to legislate over the demands of one small faction the 2% or % of the people who don't want to see a universal background check because they spread the ythology that any gun safety regulation will lead to confiscation of people's firearms which is utterly absurd and demonstrably false. yet that tiny group of people that tiny faction has been allowed in this congress to criminal the public agenda and to dictate to everybody else when we have tens of thousands and soon on saturday, march 24, hundreds of thousands of young people marching for the most elementary right of life in a civil society. what's that? the right to security and safety. the whole reason we've got a social contract. if you read your thomas hob

our services are voluntary and not all effectual -- not all election officials except our support. in many cases, state and local officials have their own resources and simply don't require the assistance where offering. we will go into some detail, more than half the states have signed up for our cyber hygiene scanning service, and automated remote scan that gives state and local officials -- offering recommendations to mitigate them. -- assessments are more thorough. did for report -- increase the availability of these assessments and prioritized them . information sharing is also critical. we share our information directly with election officials through trusted third parties, -- and we look forward -- the department hub for information sharing activity. actionable and timely information powers election officials to make more risk-informed decisions. share information about potential compromises with the broader community so everyone can defend their systems. this collective defense approach makes all election systems more secure. -- to shareng with classified information on sha

we have a shared interest in reducing inventory, taking steps to effectuate smooth tran sticks and understanding of this process and ultimate impact on national security. thank you for the opportunity to be here today. i look forward to the next year. and i look forward to ens aing any questio answering any questions you may have. >> thank you. mr. reed. >> thank you. on behalf of secretary of defense mattis, thank you for the opportunity to meet today to discuss a very important topic at hand. i have submitted my statement for the record and, sir, with your permission i would like to take a few minutes to amplify an um could of points. first of all, the department of defense fully appreciates the necessary for security clearance for form. and fully committed to doing our part to implement new methods for sustaining trusted workforce. in a manner in which upholds the highest protection for national security information, safeguarding our people, and always ensuring the highest degree of readiness to defend our nation. with the support of congress, multiple committees, and our close interagency pa

guest: effectuate city is one that has a policy or ordinance or it can be a state or county, any jurisdictions a policy or practice that undermines the federal government's ability to enforce immigration laws. specifically deliberately tried to make it more difficult for the federal enforcement agencies to get custody of deportable individuals, usually criminals, and otherwise interfere with their ability to do their job. theseare about 300 of jurisdictions across the country that we found through our research, most notably the state of california, which has adopted some policies that went into effect in january. the legislature passed three laws and the governor signed them that go further than any other part of the country has gone before. sanctuaries have been around since the 1980's, but have never trying tofar and deliberately disrupt the work of the federal government. host: the attorney general has responded by saying this week the justice department of the u.s. would sue the state of california over these laws. what are these laws? guest: there are three of them. one of them would pro

she summed it upper effectually there. a lot of the kid in detention don't have support networks and come from traumatic backgrounds. so if you go to a facility, most are going to be released. you are going back to the same situation that ended up getting you there in the first place. >> it seems like bonaire is far away from where the population that is housed there is actually from. >> that's another thing particular to virginia. virginia has seen a very rapid decline in their inmate population in secure care facilities, facilities like bonaire. because of that, all of the facilities in the state closed, except for one. there is only one facility in all of virginia for kids sentenced to detention. that facility is about 20 minutes east of richmond. the majority of kids at bonaire come from three communities. that's norfolk, newport news and hampton, which are over an hour away. >> wow. this is one of three videos that you are participating in making. tell me about the subjects of the other videos. >> this is one of three