efltry, even i am incensed time peta speaks for the speak for themselves. evidently all they care about ce peta is speaking for the whales. >> talk about rights under the u.s. peta the people for the animals, planning saying that animal these horses are essentially slaves. steep -- really? how many slaves got to hang out peta is wresting their case onat the 13th amendment while prohibiting slavery and involuntaryude, does not sp humans can be victims. it's what legalcholars refer to as the "air bud evidently there is nothing in the rule says wha oh disney, call me. peta's lawsuit is frivo cnn turned to "colbert report" legal tuben for some insight into whether the court willendment in >> if there is one court or one judge in the united states who thinks anything other than people, i would ben, it is implicit it only applies to people. >> stephen: and whales aren'te. otherwise. however, corporations like are people. the supreme court says so. and as people, we have to treat rations withare and not cage the ethil treatment ofst let sea world live theway god a