the eft, he see says they clauses are exploitative and undermine fair competition. and he and scott has more in that story for us from new york. yes. why does the f t c c non compete causes a such a big issue in work as contracts? well, daniel, it has been a hot topic. our debate for quite some time. i mean, originally this non compete clause was thought for high paid high ranking executives so that they don't leave the company to a competitor for example, and then take a trade secrets with them. so those non compete agreement basically mean that after you leave the job, you'll contact in the same industry for depending on the contract 6 months or up to a year. but then actually more and more workers also in the lower payment segment and also got so those non compete clause, meaning that they, for a while, could not find a new job, could not start their own business. that is hindering and innovation. and that's where the f t a comes in, so the heat is on, so to speak. the chamber of commerce already threatened to, to challenge legally. and if the f t c really gets r