if the leader, ehud barak, he begins a process it is essential for israel's security that israel and achieve a peace with palestinians, neighboring countries, lebanon, syria, he was to achieve this in a fairly short period of time because he thinks it can only happen when clinton is there and before arafat would become too ill to do it. he wanted to move he thought it was critical for israel's security. two-thirds of the country were against or opposed to any agreement that divided jerusalem. over a two month period, the educated the public, open and a debates over the final summons that ended the conflict and the country moved. if the country moved and the majority supported the agreement with a divided jerusalem. as the leader who was listening he just said 2/3 opposed, i don't go there but a leader who was acting when he thought was a patriot the most decorated soldier of the israeli army, people trusted him although it was not high, and he was able to move the country in a different place. >> host: i should have said that the five leaders we keep referencing, you were chief advis