that you would achieve what barak tried to achieve and what ehud olmert tried to achieve -- so i think that the efforts that were undertaken in the last several years from when i was secretary, now with secretary kerry, are very much in the interest of israel and the palestinians. >> i hope it happens. but we will see. a secretary of state, what is the one thing you wish you had done differently? >> oh my gosh. >> is there a list? >> there are a number of things, and i write about a lot of them. i say in my book one thing that, looking back, i believe that we could have done differently or better was our reaction to the iranian unrest following the election in june 2009. we consulted broadly, and a lot of experts on iran, sources from within iran, sources in other intelligence agencies. long list. the consensus was that it would not be productive for the united states to be vocally supportive of the demonstrations. and really speak out persistently against the abuses of the iranian regime. the reason for that is -- it did spring up from the iranian people. the concern was that we will

i want to know from you, why you think you'll achieve what he failed to achieve and ehud olmert tried to achieve. what are you going to do different to get to a two-state solution? >> i'm not willing to give up to try again. part of it has to do with psychology. we're not dealing with psychology at all. the fact there's no connection, no discussion, no discourse or no trust between the leaders is, adversed to the ability to reach an agreement. yesterday morning, i had breakfast with jerry adams the leader of the i.r.a.sinn fein. he was an outcast. i know him and we had breakfast. i said, jerry, tell me what was the moment of truth when you guys moved? and he said, when we all came to realize, they would not achieve it in any other way. and also, there was a unique configuration of leaders. amongst them, predominantly one of them is bill clinton, who knew how to work on the psychology of the leaders and the people. this is part of it. and nobody's dealing with it. i speak a lot to him and i said, i said to him, people say even if i negotiate with you, you'll never make peace with us an

i want to know from you, why you think you'll achieve what he failed to achieve and ehud olmert triedace with arafat, the second with -- it didn't work. what are you going to do different to get to a two-state solution?ajqz >> i'm not going to any e allusions.l g÷ i'm not willingwújlr to give up. we're not dealing with psychology at all. the fact there's no connection, no discussion, no discourse or no trust between the leaders is, adversed to the ability to reach an agreement. yesterday morning, i had breakfast with jerry adams the leader of the i.r.a.sinn fein. s

specifically from you why you think that you would achieve what barak tried to achieve and what ehud olmert tried to achieve -- they try to make the first with yasser arafat and the second with abu mazen. >> i am not going to go to it, but i am not going to give up trying again. and moreover, part of it has to do with psychology. we are not dealing with psychology at all. the fact that there is no discussion, no trust is adverse to their ability to reach an agreement. yesterday, i had a meeting with the leader of the sinn fein, and may i remind you, he was an outcast. he came to palestine and we had breakfast and i said, jerry, tell me what was the moment of truth when you guys moved, and he told me it was when they came to realize they would not achieve it in any other way. both sides. and also, there was a unique configuration of leaders, and one of them is bill clinton, who knew how to work on the psychology of the leaders and the people. this is part of it. and nobody is dealing with it. i spoke to all the mazen. i said, people say that even if i negotiate with you, you will never make