ei data is not a good place to start. when you have wall street and rate cases at the state level and at the federal level that have real numbers that go into real rates. for wind that's in the $30 megawatt hour range. the one other thing about your research, i didn't quite understand why the oil and gas drilling component of the study was included in the electricity piece. i agree california should drill but i don't think they will. i don't think it's a likelihood. if they stop all imports into the california, what they would be eliminating is hydrofrom the pacific northwest, the lowest form of energy going into california today. as well as some of the coal plants built where power shifted into the los angeles basin. so the second study, i don't know where to start to be honest with you. i have found -- in fact, my paper shows just while mr. zycher was talking i have so many more things to say. i'm going to try to get through it in six minutes. i think there's three areas i'll focus on, land impacts, cost of renewables a

in her letter on the draftç ei, she writes this -- of most concern to me is the lack of peer reviewed scientific and medicalç datamental impacts of artificial turf that uses tire chrome infill. the data presented seems to be chosen collectively, rather than representative lee. there's no indication on why these studies were chosen instead of other more recent studies. no indication of the criteria used to select studies for inclusion, and no indication why literature searches were not done to update the references in ñrthe reports. these questions need thorough answers. i ask that, given the dearth of the purpose is scientifically valid and the current data presented in the eir, an unbiased, independent experts, someone without any interest in the project andq knowledge of the site to the mets did conduct a thorough review and evaluation. [bell rings] this person months -- must declare all potential conflicts of interest before taking up this task. she further asked for peer review journals only to be used. i think this information is very important. i have harer full letter. we support the renovation of speech c