but also eic helps us to, you know, intervene sometimes, to help us to talk to also the producers and the writers about how to positively portray particularly those shows. i know that we've worked with grey's anatomy and brothers & sisters and many others. but there are those shows, however, in cable, there are some shows that i've seen, you know, that really take the addiction to its extreme, almost portraying it and glamorizing it. right and, you know, one of the key things is, you know, we love the media. they're such a powerful tool in our ability to get out accurate messages and, at the same time, the media is there to entertain and there is a creative process that goes into creating storylines and when a storyline gets off or could potentially be doing more harm than good, one of the great things about the recovery community and the treatment community is they're willing to pick up the phone and say, let's sit down and talk about, you know, what the implications of this show are and how it might be impacting people in recovery and how they feel about themselves and how they inte

. >> reporter: heather, we're here at eic one of the nonmilitary agency that is deal directly with at risk veterans at work trying to help curve the suicide rate. the department of defense reports that the suicide rate among u.s. army soldiers in june hit an all time high did not surprise people at the veteran's service center at efc life buildings. kerry says suicide among active veterans has been a hitting ongoing problems for generations. >> i know a lot of people that have taken their life and committed suicide. >> was there any particular common denominators that you can remember. >> i think the feeling of hopelessness. too many people feel like nobody cares. >> reporter: the army has revealed a new video, soldier to soldier. sighting reasons including relationship problems, financial problems as well as drug and alcohol use. judith paradise is getting housing assistance and daily therapy. >> people are really trying to get the programs? >> they've dealt with some criminal history, they've had a mental health or substance abuse behind their service. having that outreach to find t

. >> just to clarify, i'm not saying we shouldn't have a kin eic role and we shouldn't be engaged in kinetic operations. what i think is, to your question about the afghan security forces, we're growing them as fast as we can. it's a ram shackle army, it's a work in progress. any professional army takes years and years to develop. again, i can speak to my experience there, and the afghan soldiers i worked with , i was very impressed. at their motivation and understanding of the big picture of what was trying to be done in afghanistan. in other words they weren't just there to get a paycheck. their commitment to working with coalition forces, and we came in there with a lot of arrogance and ignorance and well intentions, and they put up with us and helped us walk the afghan landscape and understand it a little better. so the cup is half empty, the cup is half full. there's a lot of progress being made, you know, we had that tragedy of an afghan soldier, i believe, killing the three british guys yesterday, the day before. >> lehrer: is that an aberration or is that a serious problem? >

who have led a very potent and important convening of souls who have supported and understood the eics and the humanitarianism of real comprehensive immigration reform. and i'm humbled by the sincerity of my colleague from california, and i believe that he is sincere. but i think it is important to maybe go against the grain of a familiar refrain in a song that says, as i remember, tiptoe through the tulips. and i think that we are tiptoeing through the tulips. i would adhere to the fact that once a law is passed, we should be meticulous in how it's implemented. reverend land, i believe that your controversial statement to some should be on the table. but we must have it on the table where we can all discuss i in its implementation and so you can hear the cons for tse of us who may not agree and we can hear the fors. but the good news would be that we have moved forward. i've worked for a very large nondenominational church to give them relief for one of their evangelistic workers who didn't meet a standard to get a visa to be able to come in, and we attempted to change the law, i thin

it says background for internal purposes only at the time of the 2007 plan was being drafted, the eic over the prior two years had been permanently assigned elsewhere. no replacements or additional resources were being provided for additional leadership or examination. it goes on to say the authors of the plan i think the final thing i would like to say in this regard, if you look at the april 23, 2007, a idg visitation review, a i g designed its credit to match its activities and risk management personnel adequately addressed them. the board and senior management provided adequate oversight. we saw those guys yesterday and, frankly, we would disagree. the minimize financial market risk by offsetting derivatives transactions and hedges. the mitigated market risk exposure. i would like to enter into the record the relevant portions of the april 23, 2007, report of examination of aig. it appears to me that ots did not get this right. >> the commission has a lot of information on aig that we did not have in april of 2007. at that time, just to clarify what we looking at, ots was looking

and now, just when we thought this thing was going to be over, maybe, the eics committee decided to create adjudacatory committee which will basically review those findings and either a ask the full house to ad militia -- admonish him or reprimand him or say, you're fine, no problem. >> there is going to be a public hearing next week. what will happen? guest: that's the interesting thing. the ethics committee makes you think there is more there than meets the eye. basically they said it is going to be an organizational meeting. that means we could see several -- you know, we'll see who gets to be empeled on this adjudicatory committee. it doesn't mean they will disclose what the investigative panel found. that just means they are organizing. i have a feeling a lot of those meetings might be held behind closed doors. we're just not sure. >> will charlie rangel be testifying next week? guest: we have no idea, and he doesn't either. as a congressional reporter we've covered charlie rangel for years. for him, this is driving him -- in fact, he pretty much said yesterday when i ran into him tha