reflect the current conditions the time the eir was prepared they say yes.he unsubstantiated climates in the eir implicit one can't be used and recounted due to temporary conditions those comparisons are attached the overall traffic volumes were found to be lower in the eir and the traffic analysis with the eir was more conservative and therefore the traffic analyze and conclusions remain valid and to support the garage will stay in the area we didn't net it out the transportation analysis is for conservative again, the appellant states it is not not true and his material showing the intersections in the area have now what we report in eir no new issues were raised that have's not been address and in conclusion the eir sufficiently is adequate and accurate address objective staff remembering asks the uranium accurate and we're here to answer questions. >> supervisor kim. >> this issue was in the last eir and appeal as the question on planning policy regarding when an update is required you mentioned that the traffic analysis for the eir was conducted on febr

for example, the eir is handing the traffic impact the eir artificially reduced the study so the steady area had impacts so certain intersections had bulge impacts and within adjacent impacts that one would might have impacts to jabts to the impacts in their not reviewed so the impacts study was two small and the internal revenue adequacy it bans all the foreseeable impacts that is foreseeable to have an impact an impacted intersection would be adjacent to another impacted intersection that was not studied in consideration of the adequacy of the open space and regarding the shade project the project proposes shading with itself own open space since it was the project that was very similar to the preservation alternative that was proposed as the project that alternative was initially rejected because of the proposed wind impacts it is the interior spaces of that project proposing proposal has some of the highest wind effects of any place in the project that is where the open space is proposed since the wind studies were can you think on the other project proposals and not in depth we fee

. >> 5 b adopting eir finding in the california environmental quality act ceqa and the ceqa guidelines including the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and in a statement of overriding consideration in connection with the development of time golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development at micro i mission bay blocks mission bay south redevelopment area discussion and action resolution number 702015 5 c approving the amendment 209s development in connection with the golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 712015. >> 5 d conditionally approving the basic concept seismic design for the golden gate warriors center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south with the agreement with fossil fuel, llc mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 722015. >> and 5 e informational presentation on the executive directors determination regarding uses as allowed secon

. >> 5 b adopting eir finding in the california environmental quality act ceqa and the ceqa guidelines including the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and in a statement of overriding consideration in connection with the development of time golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development at micro i mission bay blocks mission bay south redevelopment area discussion and action resolution number 702015 5 c approving the amendment 209s development in connection with the golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 712015. >> 5 d conditionally approving the basic concept seismic design for the golden gate warriors center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south with the agreement with fossil fuel, llc mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 722015. >> and 5 e informational presentation on the executive directors determination regarding uses as allowed secon

which together with the draft supplemental or subsequent environmental impact report formed the final eir if you certify it today in response to the comments we've received on the draft documents both during the public comment period as well as after the public comment period through october 7th at this point we had a cut of we'll respond to in the response comment document and finalize that document we've received a number of comments since october 7th we responded to all comments we as of yesterday afternoon in writing and provided with the late comments and responses that have come in since that time starting 6:00 p.m. last night and earlier todays hearing we received a number of additional comments we have not prepared written responses to those comments, however, i wanted to assure you this team of technical specialists and attorneys and city staff have reviewed the comments submitted and we do not in our opinions our expert opinions building that the materials that have been submitted in the last 15 hours or so raised any new issues or didn't contain new information that would alter

. >> 5 b adopting eir finding in the california environmental quality act ceqa and the ceqa guidelinesng the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and in a statement of overriding consideration in connection with the development of time golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development at micro i mission bay blocks mission bay south redevelopment area discussion and action resolution number 702015 5 c approving the amendment 209s development in connection with the golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 712015. >> 5 d conditionally approving the basic concept seismic design for the golden gate warriors center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south with the agreement with fossil fuel, llc mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 722015. >> and 5 e informational presentation on the executive directors determination regarding uses as allowed secondary lan

project a copy of the draft eir is bra you the draft eir was pushed on december 17, 2014, the public hearing on january 22, 2015, and the public comment closed on february 17, 2015, the comments and response come a time was published on depress 15, 2015 the response of the comments planning determined a comment letter during the draft eir was inadvertently omitted from the document it raise issues in regards to the landline comparability those were responds to in the rdt and not raised points addresses you have before you an errata memorandum to address this i have another copies at the table for the members of the public since publication of draft eir a number of project updates and revisions are being pursued as the preferred project the preference project will be unsustainable similar to the draft eir and the environmental effects result in the same or slightly reduced environmental effect in the draft eir for all environmental topics the preferred topic about not avoid the two cumulative significant and unavoidableable transportation impacts therefore the commission will need to

. >> 5 b adopting eir finding in the california environmental quality act ceqa and the ceqa guidelines including the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and in a statement of overriding consideration in connection with the development of time golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development at micro i mission bay blocks mission bay south redevelopment area discussion and action resolution number 702015 5 c approving the amendment 209s development in connection with the golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 712015. >> 5 d conditionally approving the basic concept seismic design for the golden gate warriors center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south with the agreement with fossil fuel, llc mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 722015. >> and 5 e informational presentation on the executive directors determination regarding uses as allowed secon

reflect the current conditions the time the eir was prepared they say yes.ubstantiated climates in the eir implicit one can't be used and recounted due to temporary conditions those comparisons are attached the overall traffic volumes were found to be lower in the eir and the traffic analysis with the eir was more conservative and therefore the traffic analyze and conclusions remain valid and to support the garage will stay in the area we didn't net it out the transportation analysis is for conservative again, the appellant states it is not not true and his material showing the intersections in the area have now what we report in eir no new issues were raised that have's not been address and in conclusion the eir sufficiently is adequate and accurate address objective staff remembering asks the uranium accurate and we're here to answer questions. >> supervisor kim. >> this issue was in the last eir and appeal as the question on planning policy regarding when an update is required you mentioned that the traffic analysis for the eir was conducted on february 2

the gym the kids needs playground and the parks that's basically the know i'd like to talk about the eir and my it is it is deficient in terms of watching for pedestrians on our rtc on august 5th the schools were out and april 29th a day that live okay. let's out earlier from 46 to 7 to 9 a morning drop off and no recognition for a serious pedestrian safety their offering to pay for traffic control a few blocks away we need to address the safety adverse i'll urge you no to the allow the loading dock exception from having off-street loading sfgh loading creates hazard that is when people drive around trucks and things happen we know they want /* sfvd /- on student that is a toxic site you need to make the language stronger than it feasible and it really is focused on the excavation part of project construction there are also star kings the local public school uses the after-school program in jackson park thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello commissioners. i'm rick a potrero hill residents a long time residents i oppose this project as it is there's been many, many good

the traffic analysis in the eir was on the conservative does the city traffic consultant performed a peer review and agreed the appellants to the 8 washington case are completely out merit the 8 washington decision is not relevant it is completely distinguishable the 8 washington of all the evidence the city for not having a farmer's market day the eir and the l t w were performed on a farmer's market day the second reason the embarcadero here the lcw recounted and finally to the point the questions coming up the ceqa guidelines sections are very clear that existing conditions are established as of the date of notice of preparation that in combinations with the following the city's impact guidelines that the methodologies was correct followed ceqa and the city's guidelines and was without flaw the other a impacts although rincon park is not subject to prop k the eir found the shadows will fall apple areas where the public sits it is unavoidable they were exhausted in details it was studied a variety of height to give this board a scale of shadow the project architect looked at the on

. >> 5 b adopting eir finding in the california environmental quality act ceqa and the ceqa guidelines including the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and in a statement of overriding consideration in connection with the development of time golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development at micro i mission bay blocks mission bay south redevelopment area discussion and action resolution number 702015 5 c approving the amendment 209s development in connection with the golden gate warriors event center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 712015. >> 5 d conditionally approving the basic concept seismic design for the golden gate warriors center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay south with the agreement with fossil fuel, llc mission bay south redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 722015. >> and 5 e informational presentation on the executive directors determination regarding uses as allowed secon

for example, the eir is handing the traffic impact the eir artificially reduced the study so the steady area had impacts so certain intersections had bulge impacts and within adjacent impacts that one would might have impacts to jabts to the impacts in their not reviewed so the impacts study was two small and the internal revenue adequacy it bans all the foreseeable impacts that is foreseeable to have an impact an impacted intersection would be adjacent to another impacted intersection that was not studied in consideration of the adequacy of the open space and regarding the shade project the project proposes shading with itself own open space since it was the project that was very similar to the preservation alternative that was proposed as the project that alternative was initially rejected because of the proposed wind impacts it is the interior spaces of that project proposing proposal has some of the highest wind effects of any place in the project that is where the open space is proposed since the wind studies were can you think on the other project proposals and not in depth we fee

for example, the eir is handing the traffic impact the eir artificially reduced the study so the steady area had impacts so certain intersections had bulge impacts and within adjacent impacts that one would might have impacts to jabts to the impacts in their not reviewed so the impacts study was two small and the internal revenue adequacy it bans all the foreseeable impacts that is foreseeable to have an impact an impacted intersection would be adjacent to another impacted intersection that was not studied in consideration of the adequacy of the open space and regarding the shade project the project proposes shading with itself own open space since it was the project that was very similar to the preservation alternative that was proposed as the project that alternative was initially rejected because of the proposed wind impacts it is the interior spaces of that project proposing proposal has some of the highest wind effects of any place in the project that is where the open space is proposed since the wind studies were can you think on the other project proposals and not in depth we fee

. >> it goes without saying a mute point and traffic in terms of the eir the traffic study is complete and very good it talked about one intersection that had impacts are significant and not mitigated by u but that is something that can be worked on as we go forward i think that the eir part is i had a few more comments on the project first of all, you know i'm very - nevertheless of u n are m u some people spoke to the fact that every project needs pdrs but my understanding the u m u you want to promote the pdrs and housing and mixed urban use there is a lot of provided on uber and so i think that concept every project to have both uses not something not analyzed sfierdz in the eastern neighborhoods and the other comment that was very important was that the present uses have been relocated within san francisco to 6000 third street which are the areas we want more pdrs lots of available space people with businesses that need to move products are much more interested in being in those areas their closer to the freeways and moving their product and lower rents and make sense to have the

on monday we were not provided any information or notice of the change refreshed the eir facilityly defective as a matter of law they can't adopt the offer riding consideration but analyzing and adopt feasible mitigation measures that reduces the significant impacts like traffic displacement height and construction the city has not done that and this project has not the newly negotiated deal for the affordable housing actually results e relates in the higher units that concurrently moving low income people out the soma into the tenderloin this deal must be rejected until 5 m incorporated back and forth affordable housing and in the soma area among other things those highlight the appeals the appellants request the board reject the certification the choice to simply. >> thank you. >> all right. colleagues 15 and 19 are held this hearing is closed and items 16, 17 and 18 the eir are before us supervisor kim oh, before i acknowledge supervisor kim i want to be clear our consideration of environmental impact report under the california california environmental quality act involves our a

eir for the property 1601 mariposa project a copy of the draft eir is bra you the draft eir was pushed on december 17, 2014, the public hearing on january 22, 2015, and the public comment closed on february 17, 2015, the comments and response come a time was published on depress 15, 2015 the response of the comments planning determined a comment letter during the draft eir was inadvertently omitted from the document it raise issues in regards to the landline comparability those were responds to in the rdt and not raised points addresses you have before you an errata memorandum to address this i have another copies at the table for the members of the public since publication of draft eir a number of project updates and revisions are being pursued as the preferred project the preference project will be unsustainable similar to the draft eir and the environmental effects result in the same or slightly reduced environmental effect in the draft eir for all environmental topics the preferred topic about not avoid the two cumulative significant and unavoidableable transportation impacts there

it is based on other things failure to account for planning and central soma as stated in the draft eir the future projects and cumulative promotions is linked to the circulation of the preparation and central soma is screwdriver in the eir all known promotions were considered and this is the cumulative effects to the extent they'll be in the future didn't render the analysis sufficient and future the central soma draft eir didn't consider by the 5m is 5 m is insufficient and the i'm the extroverted and to dates the eir has not been published no cumulative impact analysis and finally a number of issues regarding the technical studies using the land use and planning and shadow and transportation is an example of how the complaints relate to the policies or to making findings that are outside the scope and the land use and planning in terms of the draft eir about the planning the appellant alleges that implementation of the special use will result in conflicts and imagine consistence with the eir less than significant finding excuse me. >> this considerations of possible conflicts it bans

because the displacement the serious impacts that will create in san francisco like you've heard the eir is inadequate and the board of supervisors shouldn't approve that project right now this is a critical moment with gentrification displacing so many people that is a struggle a real struggle to live in the city with the stories tonight we need a community led development you've heard that over and over we need the community led development and planning that values the needs of working-class black and filipinos the most impacted by the gentrification right now i'm irregularly you as representatives you represent this city and values and represent the community need to hear the communities and listen and not approve this project thank you. >> next speaker >> good work i'm valerie a 10 year residents of the richmond district and teacher in san francisco in soma i ask you to support the appeal because the affordable housing it advertisered i don't qualify a two year teacher dictated my life to becoming a teacher at the school i work at and join i did not needs this 50 percent medium this

a lot of developers the abolition impacts are vented to be significant in the eir. the mitigation for that semester by the bay area quality of the was of funding amount providedfor the offset. it turns out the bay area air quality management district says that's not enough. does not set forth in the eir based on that license amendment back into the cost into the cost about $600,000 and right of the city in the project sponsor agree to that sort of moment is no basis to find that that impact is likely significant at your findings they are asked to approve today say those impacts are less than significant but the evidentiary basis for that finding is now gone. as a letter dated yesterday from-mr. barajas made the argument is alternative offset option in addition monitoring program. but there's nothing in the record that would suggest alternative offset program is feasible. were attainable and therefore don't have the evidence to make these findings. >> anyone else? seeing none, members of the board, questions or comments? >> yes, we do have this come to policy and gov

a lot of developers the abolition impacts are vented to be significant in the eir. the mitigation for that semester by the bay area quality of the was of funding amount providedfor the offset. it turns out the bay area air quality management district says that's not enough. does not set forth in the eir based on that license amendment back into the cost into the cost about $600,000 and right of the city in the project sponsor agree to that sort of moment is no basis to find that that impact is likely significant at your findings they are asked to approve today say those impacts are less than significant but the evidentiary basis for that finding is now gone. as a letter dated yesterday from-mr. barajas made the argument is alternative offset option in addition monitoring program. but there's nothing in the record that would suggest alternative offset program is feasible. were attainable and therefore don't have the evidence to make these findings. >> anyone else? seeing none, members of the board, questions or comments? >> yes, we do have this come to policy and gov

a lot of developers the abolition impacts are vented to be significant in the eir. the mitigation for that semester by the bay area quality of the was of funding amount providedfor the offset. it turns out the bay area air quality management district says that's not enough. does not set forth in the eir based on that license amendment back into the cost into the cost about $600,000 and right of the city in the project sponsor agree to that sort of moment is no basis to find that that impact is likely significant at your findings they are asked to approve today say those impacts are less than significant but the evidentiary basis for that finding is now gone. as a letter dated yesterday from-mr. barajas made the argument is alternative offset option in addition monitoring program. but there's nothing in the record that would suggest alternative offset program is feasible. were attainable and therefore don't have the evidence to make these findings. >> anyone else? seeing none, members of the board, questions or comments? >> yes, we do have this come to policy and gov

president of the manila foundation i agree with the last speaker drawing board looking at the draft eir and consider the ramifications to the neighborhood this will have our history here in san francisco is one of the evicts and displacement as was the case in the middletown neighborhood on kerry street percent deemed too valuable for filipino communities to living on and that showed the volume of the real estate speculators in the real estate industry it is strong and continuing to do the same thing to this day i find is high disrespect to talk and entertain the idea of luxury condo in selma in light of so many luxurious development in the city particularly in the mission we've seen the flight of so many latinos families in any concern really is for the filipino neighborhood in selma the working-class neighborhood but particularly the filipino community we've had so many elderly and families and housing has to do with connects the dots with transportation it is a valuable community it is a wonderful community a community with heart and a community with culture and it is a community tha

the eir fails to talk about the drafting of draft eir has two schemes that may constitute and fails to perform the simultaneous comparison for the vitality - the public was preexcluded if commenting on the process and regarding the shadow the draft eir fails to consider the spaces used by the public the yerba buena children's area and the yerba buena in the north forest city has conceded the project could be conceded to forbode the shadows the eir used an continually small study for the traffic analysis the internal revenue identified impacts at some intersection but immediately addresses the feasible mitigations lo including the reducing the trips generating uses of project is getting additional height bus because it is so close to transit the project about double the amount of the sites the eir fails to accountant for the traffic in the area considering the changes to market street and regarding the wind the wind tunnel effects the exterior of the site leona helmsley. >> okay. thank you. >> diane (calling names). >> hi, i'm diane's e diane with the selma action committee to pick u

the eir fails to talk about the drafting of draft eir has two schemes that may constitute and fails to perform the simultaneous comparison for the vitality - the public was preexcluded if commenting on the process and regarding the shadow the draft eir fails to consider the spaces used by the public the yerba buena children's area and the yerba buena in the north forest city has conceded the project could be conceded to forbode the shadows the eir used an continually small study for the traffic analysis the internal revenue identified impacts at some intersection but immediately addresses the feasible mitigations lo including the reducing the trips generating uses of project is getting additional height bus because it is so close to transit the project about double the amount of the sites the eir fails to accountant for the traffic in the area considering the changes to market street and regarding the wind the wind tunnel effects the exterior of the site leona helmsley. >> okay. thank you. >> diane (calling names). >> hi, i'm diane's e diane with the selma action committee to pick u

is relieving traffic congestion and having offsite parking is going to be a major part of that the eir said there is plenty of '77 that is ridiculous but going further than just the warriors park the western pacific site has could bring an opportunity to the port we're looking at the mix of lulz at the pier 70 waterfront site one of the questions are you going to build garages or built office and residential this could be studied as part of the western pacific site as part of land use evaluation and built into the eir stutsdz for the pier 70 waterfront site we're also looking at the waffling transportation assessment we've got to a certain point we need to take it to the next step and the waterfront transportation assessment makes perfect sense with the western pacific the rail i can't read it next door there's a lot of reasons to look at the parking way beyond the overflow parking for the warriors will be needed more they think so seawall 37 and the congestion on pier 70 those are important things i hope you no time study it from the standpoint of the warriors but expand you're thinki

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

the eir fails to talk about the drafting of draft eir has two schemes that may constitute and fails to perform the simultaneous comparison for the vitality - the public was preexcluded if commenting on the process and regarding the shadow the draft eir fails to consider the spaces used by the public the yerba buena children's area and the yerba buena in the north forest city has conceded the project could be conceded to forbode the shadows the eir used an continually small study for the traffic analysis the internal revenue identified impacts at some intersection but immediately addresses the feasible mitigations lo including the reducing the trips generating uses of project is getting additional height bus because it is so close to transit the project about double the amount of the sites the eir fails to accountant for the traffic in the area considering the changes to market street and regarding the wind the wind tunnel effects the exterior of the site leona helmsley. >> okay. thank you. >> diane (calling names). >> hi, i'm diane's e diane with the selma action committee to pick u

commissioners and available for the public here those tax changes are not changing the conclusions in the eir two other changes want to note for you

commissioners and available for the public here those tax changes are not changing the conclusions in the eir two other changes want to note for you

the gym the kids needs playground and the parks that's basically the know i'd like to talk about the eir and my it is it is deficient in terms of watching for pedestrians on our rtc on august 5th the schools were out and april 29th a day that live okay. let's out earlier from 46 to 7 to 9 a morning drop off and no recognition for a serious pedestrian safety their offering to pay for traffic control a few blocks away we need to address the safety adverse i'll urge you no to the allow the loading dock exception from having off-street loading sfgh loading creates

a lot of developers the abolition impacts are vented to be significant in the eir.e mitigation for that semester by the bay area quality of the was of funding amount providedfor the offset. it turns out the bay area air quality management district says that's not enough. does not set forth in the eir based on that license amendment back into the cost into the cost about $600,000 and right of the city in the project sponsor agree to that sort of moment is no basis to find that that impact is likely significant at your findings they are asked to approve today say those impacts are less than significant but the evidentiary basis for that finding is now gone. as a letter dated yesterday from-mr. barajas made the argument is alternative offset option in addition monitoring program. but there's nothing in the record that would suggest alternative offset program is feasible. were attainable and therefore don't have the evidence to make these findings. >> anyone else? seeing none, members of the board, questions or comments? >> yes, we do have this come to policy and govern

ridiculous we need housing we need affordable housing please don't not approve that project or the eir thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is t g the director of the working group a 43 organization in the soma supporting the asian communities i'm also a residence with the studio an organizer with the error with the communities center and south of market communities network and a tenderloin residents two years ago i married my best friend at the local church central city is my home i'm proud to work here unfortunately found a strong sense of communities but for myself and filipino medical examiners that represents our cultural heart but forest city about that transport anyone in its place the 5m will put our communities at further fraction and displacements itself lurk units will not house the protecting seniors more our artists or service workers that delays inform air force homeowners and the 87 onsite as supervisor kim negotiated is targeted at individuals making one to one 50 percent of ami my two. households will not quality for a studio that is able to be aff

we need more data and eir. this is a full bus company and i think calling it is a shuttle helps elide over some of the issues that are raised by many of the members the san francisco community. arguing these commuters are san francisco residence ignores that many of them moved here because of the shuttle service and it is not a shutting, it is a bus company. we need to as san francisco you can say our job is only transportation but you need to be advocating that the city work with other cities on the peninsula to put in housing for work forces . you need to advocate that the fees should be increased in sacramento. if you reposition this as a bus company that may change your options but also heard speakers say you can increase the fee substantially. we need dopos not all san francisco. a shuttle goes to ucsf to mission bay. a bus company that goes down the peninsula for 45 minutes to a hour after cruising all over san francisco is something else another together ft put this off, get more data, study the hub opti

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

vander water, ocii certified the sf eir and public works has adopted findings. the developer [spha-eupbtd/] application for the tentative map for the project in march of 2015. the application is being processed in accordance with the mission bay subdivision code. after action on tentative final map the board of supervisors will be asked to approve a final map, public improvement agreement. after approval of the street improvement permit, the public works will inspect the work to ensure that the work is in compliance with the improvement plans and specifications in it and if appropriate, determine that the project is complete. the final step is accept the public infrastructure by the board of supervisors. the request today is to delegate the acceptance of the public infrastructure to the director of public works and grant the director of property the authority upon director of public works' determination of completion to accept, record grant deeds and easements. i'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. >> thank you very much. colleagues any ques

we need more data and eir. this is a full bus company and i think calling it is a shuttle helps elide over some of the issues that are raised by many of the members the san francisco community. arguing these commuters are san francisco residence ignores that many of them moved here because of the shuttle service and it is not a shutting, it is a bus company. we need to as san francisco you can say our job is only transportation but you need to be advocating that the city work with other cities on the peninsula to put in housing for work forces . you need to advocate that the fees should be increased in sacramento. if you reposition this as a bus company that may change your options but also heard speakers say you can increase the fee substantially. we need dopos not all san francisco. a shuttle goes to ucsf to mission bay. a bus company that goes down the peninsula for 45 minutes to a hour after cruising all over san francisco is something else another together ft put this off, get more data, study the hub opti

ifou h c cenpo the ingl vir isalady sideou. 1 3 pple ll g shingl in eir feti. i'gointo gback to the e door torro s ettyloseo myye. i dot ow h youo it talko yo docr or prmact toy out vafce th canhelpreve shiles. sterg irsistly soth. the ndorruff. crted th psion. t lindtaste chocatiers. a rd oer sll wh a oothente luscus.. owin.. welcome... to the best ti of your day. unwind... expeencehe mt. onlyhe ldor uffl fr theindtaste chocatie. thinwheneoplhearbout mory care th're ared, ey tnk that it's sad. thinit'smpornt f eryo to ow tt the is souch re tmememo suprt an t stias y heabout th the resentstillha lives andhe livesstl maer a that theyarstill livi the liv. th there n locd aw d th thestilhave lotto live r, y kno that ey he pele tt ca >>>e'reack wit a le edionf "a onhe lkout is rnin l aut wayto proct yr cellhone becse let fe i 're l dng whixin the an cts so mu. amecansave spe neay $2illiepaing a placg tseamag artpnesince 07nd two of the cmon mhapshat dagethem spiingometng the orroppg the in water. that's what we've done u s therighther ta a lk. is rnin ware putting

we need more data and eir. this is a full bus company and i think calling it is a shuttle helps elide over some of the issues that are raised by many of the members the san francisco community. arguing these commuters are san francisco residence ignores that many of them moved here because of the shuttle service and it is not a shutting, it is a bus company. we need to as san francisco you can say our job is only transportation but you need to be advocating that the city work with other cities on the peninsula to put in housing for work forces . you need to advocate that the fees should be increased in sacramento. if you reposition this as a bus company that may change your options but also heard speakers say you can increase the fee substantially. we need dopos not all san francisco. a shuttle goes to ucsf to mission bay. a bus company that goes down the peninsula for 45 minutes to a hour after cruising all over san francisco is something else another together ft put this off, get more data, study the hub opti

the eir fails to talk about the drafting of draft eir has two schemes that may constitute and fails to perform the simultaneous comparison for the vitality - the public was preexcluded if commenting on the process and regarding the shadow the draft eir fails to consider the spaces used by the public the yerba buena children's area and the yerba buena in the north forest city has conceded the project could be conceded to forbode the shadows the eir used an continually small study for the traffic analysis the internal revenue identified impacts at some intersection but immediately addresses the feasible mitigations lo including the reducing the trips generating uses of project is getting additional height bus because it is so close to transit the project about double the amount of the sites the eir fails to accountant for the traffic in the area considering the changes to market street and regarding the wind the wind tunnel effects the exterior of the site leona helmsley. >> okay. thank you. >> diane (calling names). >> hi, i'm diane's e diane with the selma action committee to pick u

the eir fails to talk about the drafting of draft eir has two schemes that may constitute and fails to perform the simultaneous comparison for the vitality - the public was preexcluded if commenting on the process and regarding the shadow the draft eir fails to consider the spaces used by the public the yerba buena children's area and the yerba buena in the north forest city has conceded the project could be conceded to forbode the shadows the eir used an continually small study for the traffic analysis the internal revenue identified impacts at some intersection but immediately addresses the feasible mitigations lo including the reducing the trips generating uses of project is getting additional height bus because it is so close to transit the project about double the amount of the sites the eir fails to accountant for the traffic in the area considering the changes to market street and regarding the wind the wind tunnel effects the exterior of the site leona helmsley. >> okay. thank you. >> diane (calling names). >> hi, i'm diane's e diane with the selma action committee to pick u