he went to eisenberg. fiona hill testified she went to eisenberg and gave an account on this on july 10th. july 25th after the phone call, lieutenant colonel vindman and others were so concerned that he ran to eisenberg and it seems they're keeping a record because they realize this was deeply harmful to national security and also potentially, wait for it, illegal because extortion is illegal. conspiracy to extort is illegal. and obstruction of justice is illegal. at the very least, these are impeachable offenses and thankfully we have career officials who are risking their career and their reputation because lieutenant colonel vindman is now called what? a double agent. that's, by the way, an anti-semitic smear. he's willing to put his name on the line. tomorrow, he's going to corroborate what ambassador taylor said. you had two state department officials today who testified also. so this is a damning narrative that's been corroborated now by multiple witnesses and trump's in trouble. >> eisenberg, i'm so

here's jesse eisenberg in "zombieland: double tap. >> hi. >> are we dropping her off at a no kill animal shelter or something? >> come on, she's a human being, all right we're not gonna, like, leave her here alone >> yeah, we can't just leave columbus's girlfriend. >> okay. >> ah, a minivan nice >> i'm not going to feel guilty about this you left me in, like, the harshest way possible. >> yeah, but you recovered pretty quickly >> well, thank you >> can you help me >> i got it. >> it's just, like, heavy. >> no problem. >> thank you >> go ahead, get in. >> you are so nice [ laughter ] >> jimmy: jesse eisenberg everybody. [ cheers and applause "zombieland: double tap" opens october 18th we'll be right back with hailee steinfeld, stick around, everybody. [ cheers and applause ♪ of his great-great-grandmother, goldi knows to never compromise. too shabby! too much! too perfect! i can rent this? for that price? absolutely. what is this, some kind of fairy tale? it's just right! book your just right rental at thrifty.com. oh! baby bear! we hi

was leaving it, and not necessarily the faith of the victims. >> stahl: laurie zitrain- eisenberg, aegant and historian, is cataloguing these gifts. >> zitrain-eisenberg: clearly, this was a jewish event in that it's an anti-semitic attack in a synagogue. but other people weren't seeing this as a jewish event. >> stahl: well, you've all become part of a club that no one wants to join of houses of worship that have come under attack: muslims, jews, christians. >> zitrain-eisenberg: and all of a sudden we're actually in contact with them. >> stahl: parishioners from mother emanuel a.m.e church in charleston, where another white supremacist killed nine african americans in 2015, came to pittsburgh and comforted survivors. we asked miri, dr. jer rabinowitz's widow about that; as well as sharyn stein whose husband dan was also killed that day; and dan leger and his wife ellen. >> leger: you know at mother emanuel church, the person who killed, what was it, nine people, sat in bible study with them for an hour and then he pulled out his gun and shot them. >> stahl: and then they forgave hi

who could say i want this squirreled away hidden from history like this guy eisenberg? unusual to say the least. that server to my knowledge was used for the most secret super classified documents. never in my knowledge for a transcript. >> let me ask you about that -- the decision to do that, what would be the purpose of doing it? why would you hide something? >> well, obviously it seems from what we've learned already that the intent was to minimize the number of people who could see something that might be embarrassing or worse to the president. which by the way is not supposed to be the role of a white house lawyer. >> what do you make about the fact mulvaney was acting chief of staff and head of omb which is huge job was not even notified about going after and killing al baghdadi? >> if those reports are true, it's extraordinary. i can't imagine a situation where the white house chief of staff would not only not be notified but not be part of it planning and discussions around such a consequential decision. and there was some statement suggesting he wasn't near sec

>> what we learned was, and it had been reported by other organizations that john eisenberg was the one who raised this point of, let's put this document on a secure or limited network, where people aren't going to see it, out of concern about leaks. the july 25 call sparked a lot of concern among national security aides, including alex vindman, an army officer, who went right to eisenberg, right away. what we learned is that the reason this was placed on a top-secret server was because minutes after the call ended between president trump and president zelensky, this army officer went to john eisenberg, the legal adviser to the national security council and said, this is really upsetting. what the president has done is wrong. we cannot be asking foreign governments for their assistance in investigating a u.s. citizen. it's totally improper. and on that note, eisenberg made a command decision in that very meeting, conferring with another lawyer and said, we need to get this document on a cia server, where people aren't going to see it. that raised a lot of hackles for vindman, wondering,

eisenberg and their deputies spoke multimillimultiple times the following week. they decided the accusations had a reasonable basis. so mr. eisenberg now is in receipt of a fire alarm pulled at the cia by the cia general counsel when she first became aware of this whistle-blower's consternations. it's my understanding that he wasn't able to file his complaint at the cia, had to go to the dni. he also was aware of at least one call, maybe two, from alexander vindman. what are folks close to mr. eisenberg saying about his knowledge and what did he doid s put this transcript where it wa as accessible as it should have been, knowing this transcript was a problematic document for the president. like a test, another example of how donald trump has been an amazing civics lesson for learning what -- what do you do when you have a complaint and you need to report it to your superior, how far does it go? this is another reason why, you know, what are the different options for someone who is struck inside, internally, by behavior they believe is wrong? the whistle-blower to

that's serious business and it's been revealed now by eisenberg. >> yeah. >> i said by eisenberg. no, the cover-up that eisenberg is responsible -- >> participated in. >> -- and participated in has now been exposed. >> what's extraordinary is you now have a couple new players, at least two entered the public consciousness of this thing that maybe guilty of a cover-up. the thing i find most extraordinary about this is you've had this parade of witnesses, career diplomats and military people with no political agenda and people who served the president loyally for periods of time come forward one by one and based on all the testimony we've been able to hear about, they have corroborated every single piece of the whistleblower complaint. there has not been, to my knowledge, one substantive fact in the whistleblower complaint that has been contradicted by any evidence that's been turned up not just by the intelligence committee but by anybody else working on it. now as you say on top of that, we have things that go beyond the whistleblower complaint in terms of evidence by a cover-up b

turn went to the -- went to eisenberg, john eisenberg, the national security council attorney to raise concerns aboun whether there was something illegal going on. >> so this john eisenberg is kind of the in-house lawyer at the nsc. he examined this. patiently did not take action, and do we know why? >> well, he assured the person that he was going to elevate it, and what happened thereafter we don't know. >> and does any of this also bump up against the story we've been covering of the coming shrinkage in size of the national security council? does that reduce the kind of professional ability and departments that will be at the president's disposal, many of them career folks who keep the mechanism of national security going? >> yeah. i mean, it's certainly looking like there is going to be a big cut to the national security council, something that had been talked about for a long time.be i think it does reflect to a certain degree the white house's paranoia, the feeling like these people can't be trusted. but you're right. these are the folks that do make government run and make our f

eisenberg and eisenberg's deputy michael ellis that accredits are investigating accusations that trump withheld military aid to ukraine unless it investigated his democratic rival joe biden our white house correspondent kimberly halkett has more from washington on who's been testifying on wednesday. the testimony on wednesday on capitol hill by 2 state department officials are expected to be particularly damaging to the white house once again this is an effort by the democrats to offer further timelines and a deep dive into ukraine policy under the administration of donald trump we expect that at least one of the witnesses will testify that there was a request to withhold military aid to ukraine and that this came at the direction of president trump but all eyes are also on what will take place in the u.s. house of representatives on thursday that's when a vote is expected under the direction of the speaker of the house nancy pelosi to formalize the process impeachment inquiry that's already underway but until now the white house has alleged that this has not been transparent it's been

eisenberg.e was on the receiving end of a phone call from the cia general counsel when she caught wind that plfrps a whistle-blower who had concerns about donald trump's call with the president of ukraine. he was also on the receiving end of yesterday's witness mr. vindman who went and saw him when he became concerned about that call and about some omissions perhaps from the transcript that far call. talk about these developments just in the last hour on capitol hill, phil. >> yeah, nicole, this is a big deal because both of these gentlemen you just talked about have the potential to deliver the most explosive testimony yet in the impeachment inquiry. bolton, because it is his job to run the national security process at the white house during this period, and he would be able to detail in very granular precise detail because of his rigor as a lawyer, because of the note-taking that he took in the government to be able to show how the process was irregular, how rudy giuliani was involved in ways

. >> jimmy: so you've got woody harrelson, emma stone -- >> jesse eisenberg >> jimmy: jess eisenberg you're the new character. who do you play in this? >> yeah, so they all came back it's ten years later, they're still fighting zombies, and kicking ass, and taking names. and they come across new survivors, one of which is madison, who makes me get to live -- i get to live out all of my wildest valley girl fantasies. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: what does madison sound like what does she do what does she talk like? >> it's like, i'm from the valley, like zoey's from the valley so, it's like, i got to research this voice and character for 24 years [ laughter ] so it's like kind of awesome she wears like a juicy couture track suit, and she has a bedazzled sidekick and she has these nails which zoey also has too. >> jimmy: oh my gosh and how is it working with everybody? we love -- >> you know, they're the best people >> jimmy: i know jesse, i know woody, i know emma yeah >> they're the best people they're just -- everything you think they're going to be and more i just love them all so much,

vindman himself went to john eisenberg to raise concerns. the question is what did eisenberg do after he heard the concerns. this is at the tail end of the closed-door depositions before the democrats move into the more public phase of their inquiry. we are told from a source familiar with the matter that bill taylor, the president's top diplomat, the u.s. diplomat nin ukraine is willing to testify publicly and we heard from the statement he came out publicly and he was concerned and he was told that the president had ordered, who wanted the ukraine government to announce those invest galgzs that could help the president politically before moving forward on other efforts including releasing stalled military aid that could help ukraine deter russian aggression, so perhaps we could see that in a public setting. erin? >> manu, thank you very much. i want to go now to someone who has been inside the room for all of the impeachment depositions so far. congressman krishnamoorthi. i want to ask you about colonel vindman's deposition because you wer

, that's the deputy white house counsel, also a legal adviser, on national security issues, eisenbergsed moving the transcript to a highly classified server and restricting access to it. "the washington post" writes this, quote, vindman's account marks the first known instance in which a witness, before the impeachment inquiry, has provided a first-hand account linking eisenberg to the decision to move the problematic transcript to a highly classified server. joining our conversation just in time former u.s. ambassador to russia, michael mcfaul. let me ask you -- i could talk to you for another 45 minutes, but let me just -- have you ever heard of someone in the white house counsel's office ordering a transcript after any sort of inner agency review -- or if there was a problem, was locking it down in a server for code word protected intel, which, it's my understanding, is usually human intel or operational intel, the right thing to do with it. >> no. you know, i worked at the white house for three years. i was on lots of presidential phone calls. i corrected lots of presidential tran

these ukraine meetings at the white house and after she reported back he actually had her call john eisenberg, deputy white house counsel for the security council and left me wondering could bolton have done nor if he was that concerned and is that not the same john eisenberg who instructed lawyers to put those call readouts in that vault? >> right. i actually don't -- i think what bolton did was fine. could he have done a bit more? perhaps. but he actually pursued the right policy. when i was at the national security council and certainly any of the agencies i worked for, if you saw any kind of problem telling the inside counsel was the way to go. having some kind of record. right? whether it was -- for what they did, reaching out to counsel was the right maneuver. the counsel, h.r., many avenues to purchase see and they did the right thing and had it on the record. i do thinks that wa where it landed. i wouldn't be surprised now given that bolton is out if he's not going to end up being a thorn in their side because there's a lot he knows and a lot he was aware of. i just don't think there

according to the "washington post," vindman told eisenberg that what the president did was wrong. proposed moving the call summary to a highly class classified server and restricti restricting access to it. eisenberg is one of three major figures who congressional investigators want to hear from next week. another is the president's former national security adviser, john bolton. according to one former white house official, bolton used the term "drug deal" to describe the pressure put on ukraine to investigate the president's campaign rival, joe biden. >> if indeed what we are -- we have learned is true, he thought this was a drug deal, he thought that mr. giuliani was a hand grenade, then tell the american people. >> reporter: the president's top russia adviser, tim morrison, will sit for a highly anticipated deposition today. in a surprise move last night, the white house announced morrison was stepping down to pursue other opportunities. and that he had been considering leaving for some time. >> cutting ties with the administration makes it less likely that the president could

this, there are these different threads in here, and really i would like to focus on bolton and eisenberg. just based on what we learned there from greg, and the fact that he was the person to go to and he took these concerns in and that it's not clear what happens with them. what are we to make of that? >> i think, as greg said, there's still some reporting to do to know essentially what happened once bolton made it clear that he was unhappy with this sort of ukrainian agenda that was being run out of the white house with giuliani. but i think just looking at it overall, what is abundantly clear from greg and his colleagues reporting is that the motion that donald trump picks up the phone and calls ukraine and has some casual conversation about, you know, oh, you need to deal with corruption. it's just bogus at this stage. this thing having to do with biden and ukraine and the arms, being run from month s before hand, his political appointees in the state department, as well as now we learned from the arrest today, so, this is where greg's reporting ties into the arrests today, as well a

. >> okay, eisenberg was the story that they went to about concerns and pressure that sondland was putting on. >> look, a lot of this comes back to the question of what are the lawyers doing? are they doing what the lawyers are supposed to be doing? and is he saying okay, let me process movement, clear your concern, they are adding detail by detail. i don't think in the public we're in ae position potion fo context yet. there is reasons you do it, or it could look like you're covering up. i have to mention mr. mechum said this is not a formal chiel, that is certainly true, the impeachment clause is 31 words and it doesn't provide for the details to make it look more or less like a trial. it is up to the house and the senate how they run this. the second point is that john mechum whoetrote a whole book a impeachment and i have not. >> we know is not about the crime, it is about the cover up. if we see big names like john bolten undermining the president's accounts of what happened, will that make the republicans take notice and do something? >> you just asked the question of the era. some m

whether it's john eisenberg, we don't know.ems on the last reporting in the last 24 to 48 hours that he's somewhat of a controversial figure right now due to his handling of that phone call between president trump and president zelensky. the second part of this that's concerning is that it completely undermines the president's claim that the phone call with president zelensky is nothing but perfect. he's repeated it multiple times. he said there's no wrongdoing on that phone call. there is nothing of concern to him which is one of the primary reasons he released the transcript. and yet having the white house regarding that phone call swhal undermines that entire narrative. and i do think this is something that a lot of house democrats are going to seize on as well in the coming days and point to, to say, look, it's not just us on capitol hill who think this is problematic. it's white house officials who are now looking into it themselves. >> let's talk, gabby, about the senior official in charge of u.s. policy george kent. what

requesting testimony from john bolton the impeachment inquiry has sent requests for testimony to john eisenberg, the top lawyer for the national security counsel and michael ellis, asking them for appear for depositions monday. fiona hill, president trump's former top russia aide on the national security council testified earlier this mont she met with john eisenberg twice at john bolton's urging after she was worried about rudy giuliani's involvement in the trump-ukraine issue. calling him a hand grenade who's going to blow everybody up, which is exactly what rudy giuliani apparently has done. lieutenant colonel alexander vindman told the impeachment inquiry yesterday that he twice reported his concerns about president trump's dealings with ukraine including the president's july 25th phone call with the president of ukraine. two current state department officials, christopher anderson, and catherine croft, testified in under oath depositions to the impeachment inquiry today. christopher anderson served as the ukraine expert advising former special envoy to ukraine kirk volker. christopher ande

"the washington post" reports that colonel vindman who testified two days ago old eisenberg the white what the president did was wrong. vindman told the national security council lawyer what the president did was wrong. scribbling notes on a legal pad, eisenberg proposed a step that other officials have said is at odds with other white house protocol -- moving a transcript of the call to a highly class y classified server. i want to know broadly speaking how important is the handling of these notes to you? >> let me just say -- i can comment on that. i was white house staff secretary. i spent three years in the west wing. i had a code word, top clearance. it is unusual what was done here. one explanation is this is a consciousness of guilt. there is awareness that there is a problem. obviously it has become on enormous problem. to cover it up, to deep six it in some code word national security database which would never include something as banal as a call memorandum even if it was confidential is a red flag for me. by the way, there is reporting out there that there were other call t

we assume that league counsel would be john eisenberg, the top lawyer at the national security counsel. but again, this is from the opening statement due to be delivered tomorrow morning by lieutenant colonel zander vinman from the national security counsel, the first u.s. official to be testifying. he will be doing so in defiance of a white house that is telling him not to show up. it's going to be a big day tomorrow. we'll see you again tomorrow night. now it's time for "the last word with lawrence o'donnell." >> i have the same opening statement in my hands we've been studying while you've been on the air. and it reads like, tip of the iceberg, when you consider how much this colonel was exposed to in the white house. it's a remarkably short and effective opening statement, but there's a lot between the lines here. >> yeah, and it's five or six pages, from the colonel, but he's listening in on the call, he's the subject matter expert, he's a military veteran and a national security lifer. he's interacting not directly with the president on this, but interacting directly with everyon

the two of them went together to eisenberg about problems that they had about the call.he also testified that he had tried to put things back in that had been left out of that partial transcript that was released that the president keeps saying is perfect and for whatever reason, because because it was already put in that deep server which could not then be extricated. so there's a lot in him, and of course he's beennd trashed by republican critics and the white house. >> aandrea, he's been trashed the president himself as being a, quote unquote, never trumper, although we should point out to the viewers that there's no evidence's that he opposed trum or would consider him a never trumper. in fact he worked in the administration and was selected for theec job on the national security council. and the reason why he has been such an important witness for the democrats in this inquiry is because of his credibility, because of his career public is service, as you just pointed out. >> phil rucker, kristen welker, garrett haake, yamiche alcindor, matt miller, thanks to all. jo

and what do you do with a blank can >> reporter: eisenberg and put the call out on for artwork by students. thr y received ove200 submissions from schools all over the country. many now hang over the fencing around tree of life. over 100 pieces came from stunts attending marjorrj toneman douglas high school in ploarkland,da-- the site of another mass shooting just eight months before the attack on tree of life. >> we have been unwillingly and forcibly inducted into a club no one wants to belong to. and you think that's, like, a metaphor, right? and what that 's actually a real, tangie fellowship. >> i've had contact, a ctt of contact, with some of the parkland famies. ouey came up here and you hcoe an instanection. >> reporter: michele senthal her during her mourning process. she lost her heothers, david and cecil rosenthal. >> and when there are other shootings, we reach out to each trigger.t is a huge >> rorter: and there have been many such triggers in the past year. they include e attack on two mosques in christchurch, new zealand inmarch, and nearly simultaneous shootings in el paso,

woody harrelson, emma stone, abigail breslin, jesse eisenberg!ers and applause ] >> hola, guillermo! >> hola, guillermo! >> hola, guillermo! >> jimmy: hold on a second. >> guillermo: yes, i'm very hot. please be quiet. sorry about that, he's so boring. hello, everybody. is acting fun? >> yeah. >> yeah. >> great fun. >> great. >> we all love habiting. >> not as fun as being on here, though. >> guillermo: tell me about your new movie "zombieland: double tap." >> it's really fun. >> fantastic. >> guillermo: okay, okay. it is time to play "parking lot tequila shot!" ♪ [ cheers and applause ] >> wait, what's parking lot? >> guillermo: "parking lot" is when you leave. >> you mean like go home? >> guillermo: yeah, woody, like go home. >> oh, okay. tequila shot, i guess. ♪ >> guillermo: here, one more, one more. >> thank you. >> guillermo: do you guys have a clip of the movie? >> there should be a clip, yeah. >> guillermo: okay, drink tequila and roll the clip. >> light 'em up! let's go, let's go! get up to safety! here we go! [ cheers and applause ] >>

and still to come, john eisenberg is the deputy counsel to president trump. he can appear on monday. then john bolton, the former security adviser to the president, who was invited but says he will only appear under subpoena. i want to bring here john meeks. he is a democrat on the foreign affairs committee, one of the committees involved in the depositions. sir, thank you so much for joining us. >> good to be with you. >> you voted yes on the house impeachment resolution today, setting up the process for public hearings. when you see these names, you know the folks who have testified behind closed doors. who do you think it's imperative that the american people hear from in the public phase of these hearings? >> i think most of them. look, i've been in the skiff. i've been listening to some of the testimony. i think the move we're making so that the american public will get an opportunity to hear them will be very beneficial. then you can get rid of the some of the chatter you hear coming from some of my republican colleagues. you can see the credibility of

rudy giuliani's efforts for a ukraine investigation that they went to national security lawyer john eisenberg. "the new york times" and associated press went for the reporting the national security advisor john bolton called giuliani a hand grenade that was going to blow everybody up. in a statement to fox, giuliani said to bolton i'm disappointed in john, i'm not sure he realizes i've received all of this evidence as part of my representation of the president. it was all part of suppression of evidence involving ukrainian collusion. giuliani also tells fox news he has no plans to comply with a congressional subpoena. with congress back in session, house democrats scheduled a full week of depositions, including senior official george can't you's expected to address whether giuliani pushed for the removal of the former u.s. ambassador to ukraine. they plan to press kent on the biden corruption allegations. >> what did he know about burisma, a corrupt foreign company that the sitting vice president's son, with no energy experience and no ukraine experience, got hired at $50,000 a month at least

this week, regina king, nat wolff, aaron paul, jimmy eat world, woody harrelson, emma stone, jesse eisenbergand howard stern. so please join us for all this week. our first guest is an oscar-winning actress straight out of south africa whose resume spans from "snow white" to "mad max" with a lot in between. she gives voice to morticia in "the addams family." it opens in theaters friday. please welcome charlize theron. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ how are you doing? >> i'm good. i'm good. you know. >> jimmy: did you just come back from bowling? what's going on with the hand? >> i have now changed my career. yes. i am a professional bowler. can you bowl with that? no, which fingers do you need? you need that finger. >> jimmy: it looks like the hand guard with bowling, yeah. but it's not, huh? >> yeah. it's not as cool as i thought it was going to be. >> jimmy: it's kind of cool. >> i don't know. this is so stupid. i did an action movie, and i tore the ligament off the bone fighting a very big -- oh, yeah? it's cool? >> jimmy: it is cool. [ laughter ] >> i messed up my elbow as well. >> jimmy: is

eisenberg is believed to be the one who moved the call to the secret server. all three have emerged as key figures in the investigation. joining me is garrett hague, white house correspondent and msnbc political analyst peter baker, staffer mika oyang and assistant secretary of state joel reuben. not one republican voted with democrats, an independent did, but not one republican. you compare that to the clinton impeachment inquiry in 1998, 31 voted with the gop to launch the inquiry. what is the difference between then and today? >> it's not quite an apples to apples comparison. so much has been done behind closed doors, what we know about it comes from opening statements or by leaks. the tables are different. the presidents behind the scenes have handled them differently. the vote to watch will be when we get to that stage of voting for articles of impeachment. democrats did not push as hard as they could at this point knowing that we have such a long road to go before articles of impeachment are actually voted on and that any republican who would have stuck

he did the right thing by contacting both his supervisors and john eisenberg, who is the lawyer who overseesegal matters for the nsc. >> he doesn't have the aid either, he only has the meeting. >> that's right. the statement much like taylor's is remarkable. it's detailed. each entry begins with a date, says who was there, who heard, there are all kind of other witnesses you can identify from reading the statement that could corroborate the assertions that he makes. >> andrew, jim, thank you very. here's what's obvious at this point. i'll keep pounding the facts, we'll keep testing the arguments on the facts, but when are you going to acknowledge what is obvious here? all right, this is big breaking news tonight. it's yet an even more qualified person telling you what you already know. we know what the president did. the only question is what consequence should come because of it. all right. other big, big story going on in the country right now, the world's most wanted terrorist is gone. now, people should feel good about that politically, the president should brag about it, fine. now what?

there are two other big invitations for john eisenberg the lawyer for the national security counsel also in the middle of this because he was someone who several staffers who had issues with the president's july phone call went and spoke with him about. he's also another person that he and the national security counsel legal team, the white house pinned the blame on for moving that transcript of the president's call to that highly-secure system. >> rough transcript. >> yes. rough transcript and not exact as we learned from the testimony yesterday and one more, michael ellis, that is his deputy there who has come under the spotlight of his own at times because he used to work for the house intelligence committee in nunes was in charge he was facing accusations of letting the white house see information. and we're waiting to see what they say. >> and bolton has a lot to contribute. i suspect he won't testify unless he's subpoenaed. but let's talk about what vindman said. because vindman said yesterday many his deposition, cnn just broke this news, that he became convinced that this aid, $4

. >> reading the story, one of the most interesting components is the role of john eisenberg, the lawyerho has been there from the beginning, people went to him and expressed these alarm bells and concerns about what they heard. he also was there way back when there were other concerning things happening with flynn, et cetera. i want to ma-- to hear more abo him and what his role is. it is not surprising to me that people were concerned when they read the call. that wasn't that interesting. what was interesting was his role in being the person that people went to and he sat on it and that is clearly -- or the story indicates that is why people went to the cia. >> everyone stick around. we have a lot more to talk about in the middle of this impeachment inquiry. we have learned that president trump is trying to make controversial moves with his national security council and the changes he wants to make next. stay with us. what do you look for when you trade? i want free access to research. yep, td ameritrade's got that. free access to every platform. mhm, yeah, that too. i don't want any t

regina kink, nat wolff, music from jimmy ate world, woody harrelson, eisenberg will be here.e first voice i hear when i wake up that isn't screaming "daddy make pancakes." you can hear him every morning on siriusxm, and read his innermost thoughts in this book "howard stern comes again," please welcome the pride of long island, howard stern. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ [ cheers and applause ] ♪ >> how exciting. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ >> wow. >> jimmy: have you felt the enthusiasm in this city? >> you know what, as you said, l.a. is all abuzz. it's great. i live in new york. i'm a hermit as you know. when i come out here, like every 15, 20 years, first they think there's a giant praying mantis in town. then there i am and people get excited. >> they do. >> as you are excited. >> jimmy: i am excited. very excited. [ cheers and applause ] >> for those of you who don't know, jimmy is my dear friend. >> jimmy: uh-huh. >> we even go on vacation occasionally together. >> jimmy: yes, that's true. >> a very close relationship, i'm almost family. >> jimmy: yes. >> i'm not quite family

the surviving reporting sources say democrats also invited national security counsel lawyer john eisenbergify. >>to extended making it easy to it access all your favorite entertainment. >>this was a sore that led newscast is really painful to watch video of staff the an close your eyes because nobody likes to see some to get. yeah just something like this exactly bad outing all around tonight for the warriors and as we told you at the top of the show steph curry left tonight's game with a broken left hand. >>the severity is not yet known but according to reports the next step is a c t scan to see if surgery is needed now to the game warriors hosting the sun's golden state fans still looking for a home win. that 1st quarter devin booker's, 3 ball sons went on a 19 to one run 4314 phoenix after one. >>booker with 31 points second stanza aron baynes get the and the fall 24 points, 13 rebounds kelly and a half 3 months green gets teed up after no call for getting push in the back maybe a little frustration too, sun's up 26 of the breaking up 3 and a half minutes gone in the 3rd curry's well th

quote, the lawyer's inquiry centers on why one of their colleagues, deputy white house counsel john eisenbergript of the call in a computer system typically reserved for the country's most closely guarded secrets. we are waiting for peter baker from the "new york times" to join us. but let me start with you, frank figliuzzi. why would an internal investigation focus on the white house lawyer who put this rough transcript in a server saved for code word intel and who it's also been reported that he took the meeting when the whistle-blower first approached her about his concerns. >> i think we would ask this riddle. when does an investigation become retaliation? because that's what this sounds like to me, nicole. it sounds like cover for going after the guy who trid to do the right thing, the guy who actually has to answer the question by saying you really incriminated yourself and compromised these calls. so they wouldn't see the light of day so what we could protect you from being accused of a crime. so if you don't want us to stick it in there, then we can release it publicly and let everyon

the call transcript that was moved to that secret server because vindman reported it to john eisenberglk about that. we're going to look ahead at the major day tomorrow in the impeachment inquiry. a full house voting on a resolution that permits public impeachment hearings and the release of deposition

we assume that league counsel would be john eisenberg, the top lawyer at the national security counselhe opening statement due to be delivered tomorrow morning by lieutenant colonel zander vinman from the national security counsel, the first u.s. official to be testifying. he will be doing so in defiance of a white house that is telling him not to show up. it's going to be a big day tomorrow. we'll see you again tomorrow night. now

following the call, i again reported my concerns to nsc's lead counsel," that would be john eisenberg. colonel vindman stresses that he personally has had no direct contact or communication with president trump. and he also says he is not the whistleblower. he says, "i want the committees to know i am not the whistleblower who brought this issue to the cia and the committees' attention. i do not know who the whistleblower is and i would not feel comfortable to speculate as to the identity of the whistleblower." colonel vindman begins his opening statement with some basic biographical information. he says, "i have dedicated my entire professional life to the united states of america. for more than two decades, it has been my honor to serve as an officer in the united states army. as an infantry officer, i served multiple overseas tours, including south korea and germany, and a deployment to iraq for combat operations in iraq. i was wounded in an ied attack and awarded a purple heart. since 2008, i have been a foreign area officer, specializing in eurasia. in this role, i have served in

the coming days because his testimony is so we do expect the national security council lawyer john eisenberg next week and heard the concerns from vindman and owners. it is uncertain if he'll appear and this comes as the closed-door portion of the investigation is coming to a close, wolf. >> the closed-door portion. the public hearings are only set to begin fairly soon now. and the top u.s. diplomat in ukraine bill taylor is willing to testify potentially a star witness for the democrats. how damaging could his public testimony be and it certainly will be televised? >> reporter: we're told from a source familiar with his thinking that he's willing to testify publicly. this after he went behind closed doors and raised significant concerns about the aid withheld to ukraine also saying he been told that the president had pushed for a public decoration by ukraine of investigations into the bidens as well as into the 2016 elections before that aid was released, before they would have agreed to meetings with the ukraine officials and washington. at the same time as all of the witnesses have come f

we assume that league counsel would be john eisenberg, the top lawyer at the national security counsels is from the opening statement due to be delivered tomorrow morning by lieutenant colonel zander vinman from the national security counsel, the first u.s. official to be testifying. he will be doing so in defiance of a white house that is telling him not to show up. it's going to be a big day tomorrow. we'll see you again tomorrow night. now it's time for "the last word with lawrence o'donnell." >> i have the same opening statement in my hands we've been studying while you've been on the air. and it reads like, tip of the iceberg, when you consider how much this colonel was exposed to in the white house. it's a remarkably short and effective opening statement, but there's a lot between the lines here. >> yeah, and it's five or six pages, from the colonel, but he's listening in on the call, he's the subject matter expert, he's a military veteran and a national security lifer. he's interacting not directly with the president on this, but interacting directly with everybody who the presi

cult classic ten years after the original, "zombieland: double tap" stars woody harrelson, jesse eisenbergtone reprising their roles and squaring off against the newly evolved undead with a few new twists along the way. >> my sister is gone. she picked up a boy. he's from berkeley. >> berkeley? >> you don't have weed, do you? >> do i look like the type of person that would have weed? >> i'm sorry. >> boom, yeah. >> i have nothing against hippies, i just want to beat the [ muted ] out of them. >> we're going to go get her. we ride at dawn. >> start talking. >> you first. my name's tallahassee. >> critics are giving "zombieland: double tap" a solid 70% on rotten tomatoes. the movie's humor is never mean spirited or partisan and most people will leave the theater reasonably entertained and not offended. it sets the bar low and steps easily over it, which makes it better than a lot of recent big-screen comedies. >> so will you be watching either one? >> i may go see zombieland. >> i wasn't sure about the maleficent review. >> how was your first time on "insomniac theater"? >> not bad. we previ

this internal probe is looking especially at the actions of the deputy white house counsel john eisenberglaced that rough transcript of the call into a separate private server, george. we are told that this is simply a fact-finding review, but there are reports that some within the white house think that this is a hunt for a scapegoat. >> much more to come. thanks very much. michael. >>> we're going to turn to the nor'easter taking aim threatening to make a mess of the evening commute across the region. several major airlines offering to waive change fees for travel in and out of the area and ginger is tracking it all and joins us now with the timing of the storm. good morning, ginger. >> good morning to you, michael. we have already seen this storm drop 3 inches to 5 inches of very helpful rain southwest of montgomery, alabama, helping the drought through georgia, but boy, is it going to come fast through tomorrow morning. that is the timing in the northeast. if you're from pennsylvania and new jersey, over to connecticut and even up to maine, you'll be thinking about the rain but the wi

bolton, who instructed her to report the issue to john eisenberg.long with his lying about the drug deal. it was uncertain what the white house counsel did at that point. also on this front, prosecutors in the wall street journal, prosecutors probe giuliani's work in ukraine. this is from the southern district of new york, the u.s. attorney investigating giuliani's work. that is some news this morning on that and you also have usa today reporting on this week's impeachment inquiry and the deadlines. it giuliani has the deadline today, given a document -- a deadline of today. to have appeared pressed the ukrainian government pursue two politically motivated investigations. there is also a wednesday .eadline on thursday, gordon sondland will testify and friday, rick perry faces a subpoena deadline for documents related to ukraine and today, the vice president also facing a deadline to turn over documents to these committees investigating impeachment. back to our conversation. let's go to john in florida, you say you could not support elizabeth warren.