the first half you hit on the el camino del mar you come out of the presidio, -- the first house you hit, it was this house. the planning commission was brought into this in 2010. in 2008, there were a flurry of additions built on this, and at that time, there were complaints made by the adjoining property owners to dbi about the plan's not being correct, that no one knew about them, and no one had any opportunity to hear the variance, which is definitely needed for the additions on the house, and dbi went into whether or not it was a particular inspector or not, they went into the side, and they looked at the plants on the site, and the plans on this side seemed to be, they appeared to be, the plans that were being built, except for when mr. sweeney ran the plans in the file. he found that the plants that had been approved by dbi was very, very different from what was happening at the site, and whether or not mr. yee altered the plants, the plant at the site were altered, and dbi, after several months of trying to figure this out issued a series of stop work orders, and then we came

the property is at 135 el camino del mar, appealing a denial for a permit to alter a building, no. 200865117, 200864297, and 200989665. there was a veranda, upper floor, and tears, and front room at first for hour, building of the property line at the southeast corner of the rear property. the appeal number 12-035, is about the rear yard and noncompliance structure variance for the required rear yard, and that was constructed beyond the scope of a building permit number 9802662, and documented in building permit application number in 2010/1/7/04 three five eight. we will start with the appellant and the appellants representative. you are entitled to 14 minutes. there are two items. >> 14 minutes. i am an attorney, but i do not think i can talk to that long. good evening. i come to the meeting early and late. i was the attorney, and i will not take up too much time. i just want to point out a few things. director goldstein: would you like to state your name? >> my name is john carey. ms. hester makes use of talking about -- she was not there, i was, and they are totally incorrect. the settlem

in 1998, the building permit was issued to restore the residents at 135 el camino del mar back to its original condition and also allowed an edition over the garage. the floor plans were inaccurate, and it never received a variance for the planning code for the one-story addition that was over the garage. additionally, the appellate exceeded the scope of the building permit applications and expanded the building to the side, rear, and fraud without the benefit of a permit. in 2010, the appellate filed another permit, 4358, to legalize the condition of the subject property. the appellate did work extensively with the planning department to revise the design -- the appellant did work with the planning department. we set out narrow -- neighborhood notification. two reviews were filed. what went before the planning commission. the planning commission held several hearings on this item, as has been noted and then subsequently decided to take the review. they conditioned it to go back to the original permit from 1998, and that was a pattern that would allow them to restore the building to w