elaine dunkley, bbc news.of the sun for unlawful information gathering. but the judge decided that time had run out for the duke of sussex to pursue his claims about phone hacking. tom symonds is at the high court. tom, was this expected? well, prince har had tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six — tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years — tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under _ tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under the - tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under the law- tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under the law to i harry had six years under the law to claim about phone hacking in the court and many of the allegations he made go back several decades, so the question what has he ran out of time? his case was that he couldn't have sued news group newspapers, the publisher of the sun, because the palace had a secret agreement which meant it wouldn't suit those newspapers and would se