i definitely would welcome any further elberation at this point because i think the resolution and policy statement here is largely very clear and easy to implement. i think of all the items this is the trickiest one. on a case by case basis any clarification here will be very helpful. >> thank you. >> just want to make sure we don't forghet to consider the proposed revisions by the gttpa on landscapes and make sure this is part of the resolution. >> thank you. we will open public comment. do we have no cards? nope. any member of the public wish to speak, please come on up >> afternoon commissioners. dez rea smith with san francisco heritage and have a few copies here with some minor copy edits. it is just easier for you all to see. first we wanted to just reiterate or support for the development of those policy. we feel it is very important. 2 minor edits that we would like to see made take place on page 1, the third paragraph that begins where is the requirement of seek wuto consider alternatives. we think it should be clarified that alternatives considered need to meet most of the proj