on one hand it benefits candidates, serving as an elimp ir, who may not be the strongest, facing a difficultonent or the encum pant, side. at the same time it's a double-edged sword. when you have outside organizations running the show and being at the vanguard of what is happening, your role as a political party is diminished to some degree. important but diminished. >> before we go, does it make a certain amount of money opaque. >> two organizations like the center trying to keep track of federal election reports, keeping track of who is giving money, who is backing which candidate. we have seen it in previous elections. it will happen in 2016 where there's an odd chain, situation where you an a train of money. you'll have a nonprofit giving money to a super-pact that will support a candidate and you can say where is the money coming from, it will be a difficult question to answer, based on the ways the law is set up. republicans will do this, but democrats do this too. you think of an organization like the majority u.s.a. involved in the 2014 elections supporting demographic candidates. y