to believe there's still a little dick molpus in all of us. ( cheers and applause ) and that even elitist pricks like me can sometimes still pick up that 3:00 a.m. conscience wake-up call and that... (music). that sounded pretty good, man. what's next on the show? >> the commonwealth is preparing to repeal a 136-year-old law that makes it illegal for unmarried virginian couples to live together. >> jon: damn you, south. do not make me [bleep] on you. so you're saying virginia's not really for lovers? next you'll tell me michigan's not for bringing lemonade and condoms to someone who turns out to be nbc's... we'll apologize tomorrow. i guess we'll find out when virginia passed that law in tonight's episode of "19th century news." hello, everybody. my most he's teemed viewers, 'tis i your humble host. my guest tonight florence nightingale. she's written a new book on something called antiseptics and their role in fighting deadly infections on the irish. first the 1800s people. first, a brief word from our sponsor. when it's friday night and you don't have to be anywhere 'til tuesday. anyway

the eered, elitist, so much of this talking about physically getting guns that is cultural. >> the president did say during the campaign cling to their guns and religion. >> oddly enough opposite of 40 years ago. you listen to richard nixon on secret tapes he's saying things i'm for gun control and the way i will do it, scare all of the white voters about the black panthers. chris: and it worked. safe streets act. >> i think there's a mismatch with how people actually live and how people actually want to think about the country. if you look at the border for instance, look at brooklyn and what happened during hurricane sandy, there wasn't any rash of looting and rash of stealing. i don't know if this is going to work. wayne lapierre. chris: i have not seen a republican stand up and say i disagree with wayne lapierre in the media. >> there are two issues here. we will not get a sweeping gun control bill because politics are such we're not. but the question of can wayne lapierre help republicans build a big collision across issues. there i agree with mia i don't that i will happen. i think tha

the television audience doesn't want your elitist east coast, alternative, intellectual, left-wing-- - jack, just say jewish. this is taking forever. - stop trying to amuse yourself and start thinking about what makes actual human beings laugh. - who wants-- my puddings! [laughter] - now that's what i'm talking about. - what a dumb-- oh, no, he's really hurt. - hey, tracy, did you hear? fred dawkins, the incredibly overweight guy that pac-man was based on died last night. - i will eat a bowl of cherries and some ghost meat in his honor. orange and black decorations? is this halloween or princeton parents' weekend?

note elitist here. here was his prediction yesterday. roll it.es in double digit cliffs, up 2% or down 2% but it will be up 10%. stuart: he said that yesterday and what happened? take a victory lap because it went straight. charles: it is around 44, up 20%, not 10%, 20%. yesterday was up 10%. that was a bona fides grand slam. stuart: today -- [talking over each other] charles: it is up huge today and up even more, 20%. stuart: listen to charles payne. one more for us. charles: aruba networks report next thursday. they do in net working. bring your own drinks. [talking over each other] charles: these ompanies, if you want to use a blackberry fine, if you want to use the iphone, fine. it has to have a system that makes that possible. this company will do so well, they reported revenues, margins are improving, upgrade from morgan stanley. my subscribers, looking at next friday to take another victory lap. stuart: aruba networks, by it. your reputation is on the line. charles: pretty good so far. stuart: president obama pushing another increase in th

the new york times ran an editorial supporting our decision because the times still i mean it's an elitist organizations and i have my critiques of the times but nevertheless it still understands what is news and what is not. but that for me was a kind of frightening moment because i realized how deteriorated our systems of information become absolutely yeah i love how people say oh there is there's no bipartisan support well look at things like the end and the erosion of civil liberties it seems like it's all the uniform across the board but speaking historically you mentioned this is the way it's kind of been of except in the illegalities in terms of. looking at when civil liberties have been repealed and in the historical narrative of america in this short brief history of our nation lincoln f.d.r. you know when he authorized. the brief internment of japanese people i mean all these things were very brief periods and they were reinstated it seems like to have the n.d.a. ten plus years after an event where there's really no threat i mean and now it's coupled with the surveillance state p

new york times ran an editorial supporting their decision because the times still i mean it's an elitist organizations and i have my critiques of the times but nevertheless it still understands what is news and what is not. but that for me was a kind of frightening moment because i realized how deteriorated our systems of information become absolutely yeah i love how people say oh there is there's no bipartisan support well look at things like the n.e.a. and the erosion of civil liberties it seems like it's all uniform across the board but speaking in storage leigh you mentioned this is the way it's kind of been of except in these illegalities in terms of. looking at when civil liberties have been repealed and. in the historical narrative of america in the short brief history of our nation lincoln f.d.r. you know when he authorized the brief internment of japanese people i mean all these things were very brief periods and they were reinstated it seems like to have the n.d.a. ten plus years after an event where there's really no threat i mean and now it's coupled with the surveillance sta

new york times ran an editorial supporting their decision because the times still i mean it's an elitist organizations and i have my critiques of the times but nevertheless it still understands what is news and what is not. but that for me was a kind of frightening moment because i realized how deteriorated our systems of information become absolutely yeah i love how people say oh there's there's no bipartisan support we'll look at things like the end and the erosion of civil liberties it seems like it's all uniform across the board but speaking historically you mentioned this is the way it's kind of been of except in the illegalities in terms of. looking at when civil liberties have been repealed and in the historical narrative of america in this short brief history of our nation lincoln f.d.r. you know when he authorized. the brief internment of japanese people i mean all these things were very brief periods and they were reinstated it seems like to have the n.d.a. ten plus years after an event where there's really no threat i mean and now it's coupled with the surveillance state profi

well just ahead for you this hour it seems to be true our elitists celebrate by the store a budget dealfor the e.u. which had to cut brussels red tape could now fall victim to be a walker see itself that and other stories are coming up for you after a short break stay with us. wealthy british soil. the time to write. market why not. find out what's really happening to the global economy with mike stronger for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune into kaiser report. the government no longer represents the believe. the people are going to take the term. the way our economic system really. works. right. welcome back you're watching r t with me lucy catherine of well moscow court has ruled to place russian opposition leader sergei would self under house arrest for violating travel restrictions while under investigation with itself is accused of inciting violence during protests and using force against a policeman or to his own niece and now he is here to break down the details in the story of what's actually what's actually going on here and he said what we've done

it felt a little elitist for a mass beer brand was a little bit off. >> like you have to be dressed upiving in the big city this is a more expensive black label? >> exactly. >> what about the mercedes benz commercial? >> i think with that one there was so much hype and teasers mercedes benz was a title sponsor and it was in the super dome. when it ran it was a bit of a fizz fizzle. >> the last one your group didn't like is the pepsi next. >> this is the one where the teen is throwing the party the parents walk in on it and disrupt the flow t. has been played a little bite too many times. you can feel the panic of the kids they try the pepsi next and they are okay with the party all of a sudden. >> it didn't quite resinate. it was a story we have all seen before. >> does pepsi next make you feel all that? i don't think people were drinking that last night. >> thanks for womaning in this morning. >> great to see you. you were up late. we appreciate only a few hours of sleep. 26 after the top of the hour one state trying to eliminate words like freshman or penmanship because they are offe

lou: "new york times" has it, 72 hours of golf, elitist president, and boehner is -- >> it's the mainstream to the assroots and advocacy of the party. lou: what you just said, and i think you are exactly right, but you're saying the republican party has to go out and try to build up the membership ad get its party goingat the grassroots level. this is a party all they decided they needed was money and a few political conections and

lou: "new york times" has it, 7 hours of golf, elitist president, and boehner is -- >> it's the mainstreamaying the republican party has to go out and try to build up the membership and get its party going at the grassroots level. this is a party all they decided they needed was money and a few political connections

hate the elites and you in the green room, you thought because i have an english accept i must b elitist. >> you have an accent and it seems a little more -- >> first time on the show and i am a geezer? >> not in an american sense, but a british sense. hello, geezer, how are you doing? i am a fan of your veer knack lar. i can tell your dad used to work in -- >> he was upstairs. >> a fruit stand kind of guy. a blue collar tough guy. your accent seems a bit toned up. it seems a wee bit posh and sean connery, if you will. how do you talk in your sleep? >> this is how my dad would speak, okay this is that how you talk in your sleep? >> that's what i'm talking about. you are a yorkie or something. >> i am not. i am from darby. >> that is north. >> it is mid-land. >> aye, a midland maned. why are you talking a northern. >> if you come to america you reinvent yourself. i did. >> well, it is thought working. stick to the infomercials and talk about dicing carrots. >> you got me. >> you are a midlands man. >> the problem is jimmy came to america to reinvent himself too and oh god. he is still wor

that is the kind of elitist view of americans that was creing a lot of problems for the republican party to have a very narrow establish a base and then al but nonexistent ground operation to create voters. that seems like one of the problems you and i should talk about here. >> the problem in there. we talk to voters. we talk topeople. most people a very pragmatic about what we should do about fixing our immigration system. they want to have more security. they want to have a program. overall. lou: it is the folks who are the problem. the problem isyour party, your candid it. in many of your elected officials, those of the folks you have to work with, and that the american people. they pretty much know what they want. >> talking to elected officials to let congress numbers does senators. i have to say, it's a totally different marmot that it was a few years ago. we more republicans and conservatives are willing to come forward and support immigration and the solution rather than just say no to everything. lou: t think we were to say no to everything? where they say yes to more security,

there was an asumptive elitist quality to it. >> the jimmy fallon, you don't have a problem with it?can choose whether i want to watch that. >> you can choose whether you want to watch the oscars. >> no, no, no. i want to know who won best picture. three out of four americans will tell you, i don't want a politician's wife there at that point. >> i just want to know if "argo" won. i could care less who is doing it. >> you are putting politics, like it or not, in a space where people are not necessarily inviting it in their home for. >> she is clearly popular with a percentage of the population, and is reveling in that popularity. >> i had no problem with her showing up. my problem was that she never referenced or introduced the members of the armed forces behind her. i thought she looked stunning and beautiful. >> it's a natural progression. clinton going on the late night shows. wait, wait, wait. social media has now infiltrated politics. >> golden globes. >> exactly. we reference twitter as an authority on things and we reference -- i think it's a natural progression. >> take a hia

to me, it was a tone deaf quality, and an elitist quality, which we never hear with the obamas, to say i'm going to come into your entertainment space without being invited. clinton changed the math when he went on orsarsenio. there's a clear and wonderful blurring between entertainment and politics and information, but the viewer gets to choose when they want to blur. this would be akin to the president at the two-minute warning at the super bowl giving his speech verses earlier in the day when people can choose one way or another. i thought it was assumpative and very youwrong, to be honest wit you. >> back in 2008, everyone remembers when she said, i'll quote her, for the first time in my adult life, i'm proud of my country because i feel like hope is making a comeback. the campaign said she was taken out of context, but it did spark a lot of flack and backlash, and a lot of people still remember it, but she has made herself over, frankly, by becoming the opposite of all those things. she has become the ultimate soft female. >> we have watched two females completely make themselves

you hit people as elitists if they have armed guards, but you have it sometime. this is any kind of rhetoric they could muster to play under fears of people that have nothing to do with the responsib responsibleties of a nation to make sure that a newtown or a chicago or where ever it is stops happening in our american lives. >> there does seem to be a whisp of desperation. >> quite right. >> go ahead, michelle. >> this goes back to the '60s where you find that on the right, they've been coming back at the loeflt wieft with the el trough, if you will. it's a term that doesn apply to many, with me, is what it comes down to. >> now, michelle, you know one of the other things i saw a super bowl ad favoring gun safety in the washington d. market. and it was joining the flip-flopping of the nra. watch this. >> i'll do the graphics. they were showing support for universal background checks, 92% americans, 74% nra members. so it really shows how the nra's own members offer background checks. >> yeah, i think it's important to keep in mind here that the nra leadership is

this elitist idea someone like geraldo can't run for office. why the heck not?olitics for decades. i would like to see it happen. >> you know? watching that exchange there with him and bill o'reilly. little-known story. he almost ran for congress in massachusetts in 1990 against barney frank. bush white house tried to recruit him. he had been a boston operate. barney frank they thought was vulnerable and tried to recruit bill o'reilly and massachusetts, their news today, scott brown not going to run up there. speaking of massachusetts. there you are. all updated on the senate stuff. >>> anyway, i've never seen a mayor anywhere who loved his job and the city more than ed koch in new york. he didn't have to agree on him with everything and don't have to think the record was spotless because it wasn't to say he was one of a kind and politics in new york, in america won't be as fun and colorful without him. twins. i didn't see them coming. i have obligations. cute obligations, but obligations. i need to rethink the core of my portfolio. what i really need is sleep.

i'm not a wealthy elitist. he did that well. you know if he didn't lunge for the water, that's what we'd be talking about today. i think in the long run, that's what we winds up talking about. i think that's the message he articulates going forward as the leader of the party. >> the fact that he gave the speech also first in spanish. you know, he has been working on that bipartisan group of senators. and they will tell you you the democrats will tell you that he is working very closely with them, trying to make immigration reform a reality. >> but i wonder though, if -- yet, he didn't talk about that in his speech. he didn't talk about what he's doing about bipartisan pr approaches. what i found interesting, sigh felt that marco rubio, poll-tested well. the message he was doing, there was no change. he was delivering the romney/ryan stump speech. >> it was not the evolved republican message? >> well, it's not a change message. evolve -- you get into that, people will -- but it was not changed. the question is, did he broaden --

she was sitting there, and it was an elitist flavor to it that i was watching as a viewer and going, huh, and i'm a democrat. i just thought it was very, very, very tone deaf. i was really surprised they did it. >> okay, let's bring in somebody who may or may not agree with you. jodi kantor, columnist for the new york times. donny, pretty furious there. >> no, no. >> fairly furious, no place for the first lady at the oscars. what do you say about that? >> let me fill you in on what the first lady's strategy has been on this kind of thing. she has done this again and again. she popped up on "icarly," on nickelodeon awards for kids. part of what the white house has tried to do is keep her out of politics and insert her into other kinds of media that lots of people watch. that's why she does push-ups on "ellen degeneres," why she did the mom dancing skit on "jimmy fallon" the other night. and it's almost like this sort of michelle obama charm offensive strategy. like what they're trying to do is portray this woman who is disconnected from politics because of course the paradox of being

>> i don't think it is becoming elitist. only the very wealthy can. that's not the case.ook at data. back in 1995, average round fare ticket in the u.s. cost $290. something like that. that is according to the d.o.t. now it is up to 367. average increase of what, $4 of a year for 17 years? that's not a huge increase in fares. he is right, dan is right when he talks about the fact that they are rationalizing capacity. and ultimately, that means that you are going to have to pay more. i think part of the problem here mandy is that americans got used to this idea that it was a flying bus in the air and cheap ticket to do somewhere. those days are gone. as are the days when you can cash in frequent flyers miles and get a seat on any flight you want. those days are began as well. a there are a hundred million frequent flyers with new american airlines. it's not going to be easy. >> it is almost impossible. is this a caves like the new normal like it or lump it? >> i think so. but there is new innovation if transport tags in this country. better train service between d.c. and n