for item number 1, david elliott lewis. if there is anyone else who would like to make public comment on item 1, please fill out a blue card. mr. lewis. >>> supervisors, david elliott lewis. i think you might have -- throw out the baby with the bath water situation here also an issue of free speech. i'm not a fan of aerial public advertising, but if this is -- by banning this you're also going to be banning opportunity for advocacy speech, for political speech, for free speech, then it becomes more troubling. you know, that speech tends to get crowded out by other media and when i say throw out the baby with the bath water, the dirty bath water is maybe garish commercial advertising you don't want to see, but just throwing out the baby, which is public advocacy free speech. i hope you can see that, have a decent sense of provision. th does become a free speech issue, we should have

we have one public comment card, david elliott lewis. if there is anyone else who would like to make public comment on item 2 or 3, you can fill out a blue card in the front of the room. >>> david elliott lewis. generally support the change to the general plan and the provisions for more bike parking street and in buildings. my only concern is the provision for paying in-lieu fees instead of providing services. that's only based on looking at what's happened with affordable housing when developers have paid in-lieu fees in exchange for not really providing housing, fees that were paid but not enough to provide for the missing housing. so, i'm just hoping if you do calculate in-lieu fees, that it really is enough to make up for what's being lost for bicycle parking. that's all. otherwise i'm really supportive of the plan. thank you. >> thank you. ms. shem. >>> thank you, supervisors. my name is [speaker not understood]. i want to thank supervisor avalos and your hard working staff. legislation that should have been easy, but like many thi

. >>> david elliott lewis here. certainly i support the mexican museum and certainly i support this project and have no problems with its height. i do have concerns, however, when you look at the total budget of what's being spent including entitlements, we're talking about over half a billion dollars. i'm not talking about construction, i'm talking about everything. a half a billion dollars for a project that's actually over 500 feet when you consider the penthouses and yet when you look at the percentage of money actually going to museum, it's pretty small. and i think of chair wiener's point about nothing being spent on transit impact fees. i know that's part of a bigger problem. that's troubling. so, if you continue to just approve these projects without having any provision for transit and this will create more need for transit, you basically kind of pushing the problem down the road and the problem of no transit impact fees being paid out of a half a billion dollar project, that's really troublesome. at some p

. >> next speaker >> david elliott lewis. i'm against the prohibition i see it as a prohibition cabins free speech. while a lot of the speak might be commercial it gives an opportunity for groups to get their message out. not everybody follows twitter or facebook. i think getting a message out even 55 the unconventional ways i think it's a diversity we tolerate in our city. i hope this won't move forward. and i hope you won't ban this informational splie >> any additional public comment on to me 2. seeing none, public comment is closed. i am supportive of supporting this to those the to the call of the chair. and as i indicated a previous hearing i'm not a fan of aerial advisement i'm not a fan of those aerial advertisements. what i also is a and i think i indicated many of this in the past hearing i think this this legislation was rushed in the way s it was brought forward. and the normal deliver way we bring it forward it was dividing the file and we're duplicating the file and to take it from a brief america's cup restrict