most this board of supervisors has supported self several piece of legislation for tenants that are ellis act evicted to allow people the opportunity to have a fighting chance to stay in san francisco because of that there is no justifiable reason that the unit subject to the ellis act being rented at short-term rentals we have stooped for you for our cities tenants to stay here when evicted we must preserve the character of our amazing city by making that possible for people of all protect levels not be reader by troufrt i'm proposing an amendment to prohibit short-term rentals in unit there has on ellis act evictions by where it is standing behind the principles in the need to protect our communities converting residential apartment into short-term rentals only exacerbates the housing crisis prohibiting short-term rentals in a unit for 5 years following an ellis act veeths support our long-standing policy to preserve the limited housing resources we have the amendment i'm introducing specifically says that a unit that has been subjected to a ellis act eviction within a 5 year period wou

going going through the process it's around ellis act it's around the restrictions as so forth in the condo conversion of ellis act evictions proposed legislation if not impose any undue burden on anyone to require a landlord to give tenant information about their rights is heralds american people imposition to even the right of recession 45 days most of the buy outs are 5060 or 90 day so the right of recession didn't put no one in an adverse situation as far as the condo restriction if you're going to ellis act it then face the condo restriction if you're not the condo ellis act restriction is irrelevant. >> hi bryan with the aids housing alliance speaking no support of increasing the transparency about what's happening in the housing market people are competing the informational, of course, they want to keep is hidden and keep the light of sunshine off their and the world of government is to provide that transcript and the act of information it's a good government policy those the buy out evictions started when we started to create effort to curtain of spectacle active displacement

act it then face the condo restriction if you're not the condo ellis act restriction is

act it then face the condo restriction if you're not the condo ellis act restriction is irrelevant. >> hi bryan with the aids housing alliance speaking no support of increasing the transparency about what's happening in the housing market people are competing the informational, of course, they want to keep is hidden and keep the light of sunshine off their and the world of government is to provide that transcript and the act of information it's a good government policy those the buy out evictions started when we started to create effort to curtain of spectacle active displacement that was supported by some folks it got unanimous support at the board of supervisors it's important my agency we get this type of accessed information as someone that i was ellis act evicted i know the process it's overwhelming and stressful all all of a sudden and everyday substantiate don't have the access to the information they need and i think that anyone anything we can do to increase the assessed information make the process less overwhelming and a make that more fair and equitable i think about the

act it's around the restrictions as so forth in the condo conversion of ellis act evictions proposed legislation if not impose any undue burden on anyone to require a landlord to give tenant information about their rights is heralds american people imposition to even the right of recession 45 days most of the buy outs are 5060 or 90 day so the right of recession didn't put no one in an adverse situation as far as the condo restriction if you're going to ellis act it then face the condo restrict

only exacerbates the housing crisis prohibiting short-term rentals in a unit for 5 years following an ellis act veeths support our long-standing policy to preserve the limited housing resources we have the amendment i'm introducing specifically says that a unit that has been subjected to a ellis act eviction within a 5 year period would not quality if the eviction occurred on november 1st, 2012, i've got copies of any amendment with respect to the unpaid taxes and with respect to the second item i'm going to ask the city attorney the best way to proceed i've suggested language what is the advise. >> city attorney and john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> so i believe at some point in the discussion probably makes sense for my colleagues merlin or myself to talk about the amendments to refer to planning are which which have them requires another hearing at the board the amendment you'll proposed supervisor avalos will not be referred back to planning i'll just supervisor breed has duplicate the file at some point during the hearing when the items come up for a vote i would just say you would

if buyouts are happening under an ellis act eviction, let's keep reforming ellis act and discourage its use. to the extent some tenants are agreeing to buyouts without consulting a tenants rights counselor or knowing their rights, i am happy to improve notification and access to counselor. i am comfortable with that element of the legislation, but i can't imagine how the government would ever give one party in any agreement the sole right to rescind an agreement 45 days after they sign it. how can anyone plan around that in position? and what is the implication of us telling people we need to protect them from their own decisions? i also don't understand why the landlord and tenant need to disclose their private negotiations about their homes to the city and then have that information be publicly available. and if you do not file the form on time, the city and others can sue you for $100 a day plus attorney fees. as supervisor campos said about the soda tax, there is an element to all of this that seems just a bit big brotherish to me. if we want to gather information to under buyouts w

>> um, ellie's jellies. >> jimmy: ellie's jellies.llies? >> i kept ripping my bread and i wanted to make an easier idea so i stop ripping my bread with knives. >> jimmy: you're ripping bread with knives? something wrong with you, ellie. [ laughter ] now, let's see you in action, okay? here's a plate over here. oh. this is no more ripping. this is good. you don't want to rip the bread anymore. there's the pieces of bread. and can i help? >> yeah, you can you have the peanut butter. >> jimmy: okie-doke. thank you. now, what do i do? >> you take off the lid. you twist, twist, twist. >> jimmy: this is brilliant. this is awesome, yeah. and there you go. [ cheers and applause ] you don't need a knife. >> no knives, no dishes, no parents. >> jimmy: no knives, no dishes, no what? >> parents. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: that's right. i always need my parents when i make a sandwich. so this will help me. you're gonna put one more in there. can i try it? >> yep. >> jimmy: all right, very good, thank you, ellie. [ cheers ] it's so delicious. i love it

regarding the trinity taxes seconded 3wi supervisor avalos and permitting the shortfalls subject to the ellis act evictions a second supervisor breed supervisor chiu. >> thank you colleagues let me first start by asking are there any other amendment you i think i need to ask the deputy city attorney he has amendments. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney stepping back to supervisor campos amendment i'm sure you're aware of there's been litigation go challenging various ordinances in the city involving the ellis act so as i mentioned supervisor campos amendment will require a revel to another k34e hearing and at or before that committee hearing provided the advice regarding the issue we suggest during the last two weeks we've looked electro the ordinances that is preponderance of the evidence and worked with supervisors office particularly supervisor chiu's office and had clean up amendments we'll ask the board to adapt may be the first amendment you'll vote on supervisor chiu has a copy of the amendment but essentially they've fixed the number one issues that came up in the past amendment the

the next one is supervisor campos prsht are short-term rentals that rental that are significant to ellis act evictions. >> supervisor campos supervisor chiu no supervisor cohen. >> just so i'm clear. >> this is the amendment to prohibit short-term rentals that were subject to ellis act within years. >> supervisor cohen i supervisor farrell marry no supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang no supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed there are 8 i's and 3 nos this amendment passes and supervisor breed had an amendment and this has to do with also i believe a private right of action and ammunition with the ellis act evictions. >> supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed pr there are 11 i's this amendment passes all right. deputy city attorney. >> through the chair it's mom and dad's that the two amendments by supervisor kim and supervisor breed regarding the private right of action have conflict overall i think those t

of certificate of preference holders and some have no more proprietor for instance, mann than the ellis act do we know terms of how this is breaking out. >> madam chair rosales actually, the whole team wants to share with the update on the affirmative marking on the shipyard and. >> good afternoon, commissioners just for the record there's 45 applications of which we have one certificate of preference one ellis act preference holder and one red burden which are the preferences of this project as well as 2 from 92414 and two other zip codes. >> okay. so 45 interested parties? commissioner i'm sorry the project impact area found in the d d a >> so i want to make sure i didn't misunderstand 4 five hundred mr. president, but did i hear you say 3. >> one certificate of preference holders at the lottery preference one ellis act housing preferable holder we have one rent burden that is a demographics. >> is that usual. >> it's typically and better. >> i guess i didn't focus on the sale. >> the units are not built yet so we anticipate them

0 impose more than 50 percent of the city's price control housing and give that efforts toy do the ellis act we must develop and pass legislation for the purpose of protecting renters in san francisco i believe that regulating beauties is a critical way to act to address our housing criticized we don't know about the exact buy outs for every local 7 butte buy outs took place in san francisco moreover the budget analyst recently released a report that analyze the data from the tenants union that found that the number of tenants seeking advise increased between calendar years 2009 from 76 inclines to one hundred plus in 2013 i imagine it number has been raised the buy outs are going up the amendment is a pyritic legislation that first requires the landlord to provide laents e tenants with a disclosure of the tenants rights before the landlord commences filing and at the time the buy out agreement is reluctance to writing it requires all buy outs to be in writing and allows the tenant to resend a buy anti agreement 45 days overtime there's an imbalance between the entertainment and landlord

to be the 25u7 priority for anyone that repeals san francisco the first thing i will introduce the ellis act measure reform measure that was supported by all the members of the board of supervisors senator mark leno and mayor ed lee to amend the ellis act great someone spectaculars drawings urgent care abusing the ellis act hold the property for 5 years but the second thing i want to prior itself housing for middle-income and low income people the reality is that the middle-class is being pushed out the san francisco because of the policies that have been lead in city hall including policies that president chiu has supported the reason why the other campaign has nor more is because if i go to sacramento i'll stand up for your middle-class (clapping.) do both david and i agree that affordable housing is the top priority for us moderating but the fact of the matter i've been working on this for 6 years he's been talking about it he voted against 21 thousand units of new housing in the city including public housing and low income affordable housing when i go to sacramento i support the refo

act evictions happening and those ellis act eviction were taking place as a way to use property for airbnb prurpz purposes i want to propose legislation that will completely weigh the mosaic active process in the current legislation and allow a potential nonprofit housing rights group to basically sue if the if it's found in the a building h that has had an ellis act eviction in the past 5 years rather than wait until there's a determination whether or not a violation has took place as it relates to airbnb this will give you an entity an opportunity if the city not to take action the ability to take action this will not be voted on today in terms of a apart of the current legislation but i'm introducing it so it can go through the perspective process and be discussed and added to the legislation in the future i wanted to make sure that i brought it to the attention of the 0 commission with that, i'll yield. >> supervisor farrell. >> should we vote on supervisor breed's amendments by the way, because i have a comment oh, at the end with that, first of all, i want to thank president c

act amendment i've just received i think what supervisor breed has an approach to deal with the ellis act is the cleanest way of assuring that we have shutting down the practice of landlords ellis acting the buildings or if you gave me in that practice people can run to court to stop you i think that makes sense i'm going to support supervisor breed's approach but happy to hear more and the final question around taxes i know that has been about i want to clarify a few miss statements our legislation did not exempt anyone if paying takes back or forward taxes i was the first support to support our treasurer in saying we know that anyone that engages in those activities hosts are spotted to be paying taxes that was opined by our city treasurer a few years ago i was or building i was the first official in san francisco so is that activity folks need to pay their full share of takes i'm going to turn it over to they're there has been legal issues whether or not officially hosting the city council as grappled with until we move this legislation no hosting platform had facilitated the tax f

claire sebastian, cnn, on ellis island. >> incredible.ll be right back after this. >>> the unfiltered truth is sometimes in the most embarrassing situation, but one mom is taking her mini insult comedian in stride. >> they say kids say the darnedest things. >> hey mama, are you going to make yourself interpret today, or are you going to look like you always do? >> mother and humorist joanna stein has a viral hit on her hands. >> your tummy looks like a bagel. >> thanks to her daughter's unintended insults, and yes, they are things that she said when she was 4. >> she has been dropping truth bombs. >> you have a lot of hairs on your face. is that a mustache or a beard? >> you probably reached for your tweezers? >> yes, i did. >> claire and i were playing in your under pants and they fit both of us at the same time. >> i was not wearing them at the time by the way. >> her daughter recreated these zingers in her current 7-year-old voice. mom recorded the video on a gopro camera, attached to a special rig on her head. can i have your ipad whe

of certificate of preference holders and some have no more proprietor for instance, mann than the ellis act do we know terms of how this is breaking out. >> madam chair rosales actually, the whole team wants to share with the update on the affirmative marking on the shipyard and. >> good afternoon, commissioners just for the record there's 45 applications of which we have one certificate of preference one ellis act preference holder an

stay in san francisco because of that there is no justifiable reason that the unit subject to the ellis act being rented at short-term rentals we have stooped for you for our cities tenants to stay here when evicted we must preserve the character of our amazing city by making that possible for people of all protect levels not be reader by troufrt i'm proposing an amendment to prohibit short-term rentals in unit there has on

if buyouts are happening under an ellis act eviction, let's keep reforming ellis act and discourage its use. to the extent some tenants are agreeing to buyouts