thank you elsqun dennis for reading because it keepatize nice and concise because the objective is geto public record so the better you are preparing your comments in advns and reading them here, the better they are represented in the public comment. with that- >> dennis antinory and [inaudible] >> i is a copy of denniss comments to submit as well. i really like to acknowledge that the staff has made a lot of changes recommended by our group . they don't in my view go far enough and some of them are rather ineffective to accomplish the goals they state. the question keeps coming up and don't know why wego back to the 240 so called soft sites because there are many many other soft sites within the effected areas even with the exclusion. in my neighborhoods there are 30 one story businesses with no residences above them. some are in buildings that are commonly owned and 4 businesses within one building owned by the same landlord. that landlord would be under this program very tempted to displace those businesses. so, this idea of a right of first refusal doesn't work if someone has no wa