to emac's point you have to be worry what you wish for.ybody has miff with local municipality and local government. you have a risk of a tyrant running town and takeover. by the way, mark zuckerberg did some of this. he bought five parcels of property near his home in palo alto to control the neighborhood. by the way he is trying to keep in mind of who they want the market the properties too and so forth. to emac's point you may not get what you wish for and may be wrong kind of overlords. melissa: real threat. look at larry page of google he could buy all of boca raton, florida. that is hotbed for rich senior citizens. finally market google glass. there could be google bifolk calls. there could be -- >> ries and reward. melissa: emac what do you think. >> this is way to look at billionaire wealth, how much real estate they could have. melissa: yeah. >> they, bill gates could buy boston. melissa: that's right. they have ralph lauren, worcester and not very preppie. "star wars" creator george lucas. homestead, florida. florida loves a theme

no sign of emaceation. a pentagon official tells us he's calling on medical staff to refer to him as private 1st class. he doesn't want to be called sergeant, the rank to which he was promoted during his time in captivity, john. >> going to be a very difficult recovery there in landstuhl. thanks so much, karl. appreciate the update. >> more now on bergdahl's five years in the hands of the taliban. according to reports, bergdahl is telling medical personnel he was tortured and beaten and locked in a cage for trying to escape from his captors. nic robertson live for us this morning in qatar, doha. of course, the country that helped negotiate the release of those five taliban prisoners in exchange for sergeant private 1st class bergdahl, as he'd like to be known. what can you tell us, nic? >> reporter: yeah, well, those five senior taliban figures are still here in doha. the government here has promised the united states to keep a close eye on them. what we're hearing from a taliban source who's had accurate i

melissa: emac what is your interpretation? >> big headline out of this interview the charles plosser admitted fed is not good calling bubbles. like taking a hammer to a gnat with rate hikes. that is the big headline. talking about inflation going up -- is there a government bubble? is there a bubble out there? yeah. will we see rate hikes -- >> i'm glad to hear folks said we don't need more help. ask yourself who out there is thinking about doing business right now doesn't feel interest rates are quite low enough yet with junction bonds yielding less than 5%. they're holding out for little lower mark on interest rates. there is no one out there, go to the grocery store, tremendous food inflation. price of coffee through the fuel. >> here is the problem for economic planners. if you have 2% growth and you have inflation on food and stuff going up where you have to raise rates what does that do to the 2% growth when you start raising rates? melissa: no, it is a disaster. a major gaffe could be causing insomnia over at yahoo! mar

emacs general mitchell. >> mr. chief justice may it please the court. there at least two issues in this case in which epa and the petitioners agree. the first is the term air pollutants cannot be given a uniform construction throughout the clean air act. even after the courts ruling in massachusetts to air pollutant includes all all things airborne for purposes of title ii. the second of agreement is greenhouse gases cannot be treated the same as other air pollutants for purposes of the p. s. the entitlement programs because dam and programs because dan and aqs tessitura requirements of the programs are incompatible with sensible regulation of greenhouse gases. epa thinks it can fix this problem by imposing -- only to greenhouse gases. the proper response is for epa to conclude that congress never delegated regulatory authority over greenhouse gases in the psd title v programs. congress does not establish ground rules for square pegs and brunner williams on hold in these situations an agency cannot make around whole square by rewriting unambiguous statu