now, you might say to me, well, look, the email itself and emails that surround it show great deception. your two guest, jonah goldberg pointed out tremendous deception the government engaged in, outright lies to mislead the american public to make the president look good. guess what? that is not against the law. jenna: that point was also brought up in a slate.com editorial earlier today. it says this, the email shows that the white house is engaged in a coordinated effort to cover the president's backside. that does not necessarily new. they do that every day. so how would you prove, and what evidence is there it could be criminal? >> here's, here's the significance of this. should the attorney general appoint a special counsel to investigate the obfuscation around benghazi? is there enough evidence to believe that people violated the law by not complying with subpoenas or that people violated the law by breaking the hatch act? now in order to start an investigation you don't need absolute proof beyond a reasonable doubt. you need a standard of proof that is more than suspicion. we ha

you hid the email. why? well, you start hiding stuff like documents that have been subpoenaed, as you did here, reasonable people get real suspicious. let's face it people only hide the documents that are damning. so, no whatever jay but rather what else? what else are you hiding? but still no answers, just aversions. >> what this point makes is that these protests are outside of our embassy in cairo and' cartombs and elsewhere. fury over a video. that's what your news organizations were reporting. that's what we understood to be true. and that was simply the point that was being made by mr. rhodes. >> whoa, did you listen carefully to what he just said? note. the questions we have are not about caro, tunas or cartoon. it was benghazi. we have unanswered questions about benghazi. speeding the media off to other embassies as he did is a diversion. it's not answering questions about benghazi. but, get this: >> how much time has been spent focused on talking points that could have been spent on. [ laughter ] mo

graham: this email -- to remind the body of what we're talking about, this email was released as a result of a lawsuit, not voluntarily by the white house. in august of last year, the house of representatives, the committees of jurisdiction subpoenaed all documents related to benghazi, and basically were stiff-armed. senator mccain, ayotte and myself have written enough letters to destroy a small forest to the white house with nothing to show for it virtually. there was a private organization called judicial watch who sued under the freedom of information act and an independent judiciary -- thank god for that -- ordered this white house to disclose this email just days ago. knowing that the email was going to come out, the white house provided it to the congress a few days ago. what does that tell us? that tells us that they did not want you to know about this email, and they talk about 25,000 documents they provided. it doesn't matter the number of documents you provided to the congress. you could have provided us the benghazi phone book. it's the relevance of the documents and the signi

why was that email, why the lawsuit have to bring out that email? and why was that email initially classified? that makes little sense. so a lot of questions here and, they just still haven't been answered as we're going, approaching the two-year anniversary. jon: one of the white house defenses 2 i can try to restate it, that the original request for documents had to do with gauze gaugh emails. they claim that this particular email that just came out, or was just released, had to do with all of the protests underway that weekend or that week in the muslim world. does that wash with you, bob? >> that is a pretty weak argument. why not release it and then say that at the time? i mean, there's, clear indications here that they did not want that email out. they could have released it earlier and just the whole line of, well there were no politics in this. listen, months before an election, weeks, months, both side play politics. this happened as lindsey graham was saying seven weeks before the election. it's natural to think about the presidential elec

have you got this email or he received -- you received the email from the lawyer, and does he -- and in that email, as least as william la jeunesse read it, the lawyer confirms that he told your son to give the false statement? >> well, greta, what happened first though sons andrew could get to the telephone. he called me up within 72 hours of the arrest. he said mom where did you get that attorney? i said why? he said he just made me lie. what do you mean he just made you lie. >> he just made me say that i have never been to mexico. mom, i have been to mexico. i said why we make you say that? he said i got him off the list. is he on the u.s. consulate service. i checked him out. he went to school, he went to law school in america. he speaks english. he must be a good lawyer i said to andrew. said let me call him up. >> when was that within 72 hours made the statement how soon was it after that? >> that day. as soon as andrew could get to a phone. he was so trauma sized he immediately called me that day and i made a call out to him. >> when did you receive that email? >> then i follo

jon: we talk about a lot of emails and it sometimes becomes confusing in part because the emails are either not released or are being redacted in such a way that you can't really tell what they're about but i want to speak specific about the one catherine was just mentioning, a seven-page, an email regarding fox news reporting dated september 2th. the white house is apparently withholding that saying that it involves executive branch deliberations. do they, in your view, have the grounds to do so? >> i really don't know but i do know this. if it were not for an independent judiciary, the 14 september email that judicial watch was provide to the country through a court action last week would not have surfaced. and that email was devastating for the white house because it showed they were trying to shape susan rice's sunday tv appearances to drive the narrative it was a protest caused by a video. we done all we could to secure the compound before the attack and the president was hands on and we're going to go after the killers, clearly trying to shape the in different what was coming f

. >>> you may not want to open that work email, even if it is from your boss. how companies are putting their employees to the test. consumer >>> the next time your boss sundays you an email, don't rush to open it. could be a trick. >> consumer watch reporter julie watts explains why employees are being tested. >> reporter: some look yes lit mat, some screen scan. security experts say any fishy email is a clear pathway to problems. >> a lot of the beaches happen because of the things we click on. >> and convincing people not to click is kevin haynes' job. will they or won't they open up that suspicious email even if it appears to be from their boss. >> becoming aware of what could be coming to you, how do you assess that, what should you do? >> company sells security training to other companies. it is aimed at employees but with lessons for everyone. >> you would look for things like an email that may be too good to be true. >> and, of course, links that direct you some place else, misspellings, poor language, sloppy pung shouation. or a return email address wi

department of veterans affairs to produce emails and other written correspondent related into the investigation of the phoenix v.a. medical center. it's unfortunate that we have to come to this decision, but we did not do this without some substantial justification. the last few weeks have been a model of v.a. stonewalling which precipitated the need for this subpoena. first on april 24 our staff was briefed and informed on the existence of an alternate wait list and how that list was subsequently destroyed. we made follow-up phone calls to va-ocla beginning on the 28th asking for additional information about the list. however we didn't get a response back on the 28th so we called back on the 29th and got no response on the 29th. so we called again on april 30 and spoke directly to assistant secretary joan mooney, but still got no response. look, this failure to provide information led to my first letter stating that the committee would pursue a subpoena if we were not provided with the information that this committee had requested. yesterday, may 7, i received a response from v.a. that does no

but as we look at that email progress.he explanation gets less and less accurate which is a really bizarre thing. >> actually though they start trying to step all over anyone who is trying to investigate. they excluded fox news to the state department briefing from the media and the cia because we kept pushing it, bob. >> it's not a phony scandal it's dangerous for the administration to do that four americans dead. one brought to justice. the real problem too is getting the information. transparency has been an issue we talked about on the show with the administration. why does it have to take judicial watch to file a lawsuit on this one. the white house knows many media companies can't afford the lawsuit that judicial watch and got this memo from. >> it's terrible to think that all the efforts to short of shut this down. i know capitol hill they could have been a lot more aggressive on this had a select committee. capitol hill is perfectly able to -- speaker boehner select committee and do something. four dead americans.

some new emails out. watch, again, getting some emails from the administration here is a couple of them: >>> we're back with the panel there are many other emails. a lot of them we could read. steve, important? >> yeah. i think it is important it is important for three reasons. one, it clearly speaks to the politics of this. remember, is there was a time when democrats in congress and outside groups and the "new york times" in a prominent article were pushing this notion that really everybody had been targeted, which doesn't make sense on its face if you are targeting somebody, it's not applying to everybody. they said left wing groups had been included in this broad targeting as well as conservative groups. they are referring in these emails to tea party applications. that makes it as clear as it can possibly be what the motive was here. what the politics were here. two, the question of whether it was directed by d.c. they can't perceive the bureaucrats in cincinnati can't move forward until he they clea

it's not about emails. it's not about hiding, redacting. we should be better than this and american people should expect it and demand it, as a matter of fact. >> this is about pr. >> it shouldn't be. >> fine, okay. but that's aa -- you don't see a charge to the substance of the matter and it certainly doesn't amount to the investigations have already taken place. >> it was about an election. if we all the candy cole krsh crowley moment with romney. they believed it to be true. >> to say we didn't have to anything to do the video. >> they had a hard time because of islamaphobia-phobia. it's your thought. you can drone them but you can't blame them. >>> next, there's an outcry how long it took a cold blooded murderer by lethal injection. what about his victim? she was shot and buried alive? kimberly has the story coming up fighting constipation by eating healthier, drinking plenty of water, but still not getting relief? try dulcolax laxative tablets. dulcolax is comfort-coated for gentle, over-night relief. dulcolax. predictable over-night r

graham: this email -- to remind the body of what we're talking about, this email was released as a result of a lawsuit, not voluntarily by the white house. in august of last year, the house of representatives, the committees of jurisdiction subpoenaed all documents related to benghazi, and basically were stiff-armed. senator mccain, ayotte and myself have written enough letters to destroy a small forest to the white house with nothing to show for it virtually. there was a private organization called judicial watch who sued under the freedom of information act and an independent judiciary -- thank god for that -- ordered this white house to disclose this email just days ago. knowing that the email was going to come out, the white house provided it to the congress a few days ago. what does that tell us? that tells us that they did not want you to know about this email, and they talk about 25,000 documents they provided. it doesn't matter the number of documents you provided to the congress. you could have provided us the benghazi phone book. it's the relevance of the documents and the signi

told you about email in question yesterday.hose on the chain trying to come up with a strategy to deal with a specific fox news report. now our report, this is on the 27th of of 2012, contradicted the white house narrative about what had happened in the 24 hours after the assault on the consulate. alan colmes, is host of alan colmes show and fox news contributor. rich lowery, editor of "national review" and fox news contributor. just to lay there out a little bit more, reporting from our washington bureau came out on the 27th of september which was really the first time that it was said no, actually the white house did not, did not admit that it was terrorism in the first 24 hours after the attack. so then there's a back and forth. ben rhodes is involved. john brennan, the counterterrorism advise so the president is involved and pictures we pull up. denis mcdonough was involved in the email chain back and forth. was a strategy. how do we combat this story coming out of fox? what do we do? they're refusing to turn over content o

gerri: the people in those emails lied. >> the people in those emails lied and that ain't no lie.dr. jeff, thanks for coming on. >> always a pleasure, thank you, gerri. gerri: i feel he hadfied. coming up later in the show a growing epidemic among seniors and misuse of prescription drugs. they're abusing drugs. how the quiet tweets to obamacare could all but insure a taxpayer bailout for insurers. the details coming up. ♪ [ girl ] my mom, she makes underwater fans that are powered by the moon. ♪ she can print amazing things, right from her computer. [ whirring ] [ train whistle blows ] she makes trains that are friends with trees. ♪ my mom works at ge. ♪ >> gerri: obamacare was supposed to be a bargain that is how it was sold but buried deep in over 100 pages of regulation there is said door opening taxpayers to rate potential $1 billion bailout of the insurance industry. year with the latest of a senior fellow from the manhattan institute. the back door bailout? i feel like i have heard this before. we will bail them out just in time for the election. how do we do that? >> think

the reason why is laid out in the email. they wanted to make sure it was about the email and not about the administration's middle east policy. it answers those questions but it doesn't answer why they were pushing this when the intelligence community was saying it's not the video. bill: the white house was saying one thing and the cia was saying another thing. jay carney was trying to draw a distinction saying we were talking about the overall middle east issue. judicial watch's lawsuit helped bring these emails public. he suggested they were only look for benghazi material and he backs it up this way. >> we didn't asker to document about protests. we asked for benghazi talking points. we got this email in the state department and the white house in response to a specific request for benghazi documents. mr. carney is not credible here. bill: what he's saying is the document relate to benghazi because that's what the request was all about. >> this is typical of the way the white house has responded to questions about benghaz

or when you receive email. and in order to determine what ads to show you, they read your emails. >> there was a wave of negative news stories, comments, blog posts and so forth that came out that day. and the alarm bell was really rung by privacy advocates who said, "we cannot allow this to go forward. this is crossing a rubicon. you cannot scan our emails." >> and google tried to assure them, "really, no, no, it's not people. you know, we're just scanning the mail. other places scan your mail for spam, you know, so we're really not even doing anything different by that. we're just showing you ads." and a lot of people just felt it was creepy. >> if i were to go attach alligator clips to the phone wire, it'd be a felony. i'd go to prison for that. what gmail proposed was exactly that: a kind of wiretap of all email looking at the content to pitch advertising in real time. >> narrator: at google, andrew mclaughlin got a phone call. >> i got a phone call from a staffer for a state senator in california named liz

so look for it at the post office, when you go pick up your email. (laughter) and it's a true rogue's gallery. for instance, gui chunhui -- who also goes by the alias kandygoo, a clever way to pass for an american, name yourself after our two most popular foods -- and the infamous wang dong, whose name in english translates to peter johnson, jr. (laughter) it is about time they nailed wang dong! i get email offers from wang dong all the time and the pills he soled me never arrived. now how will she call me mr. pleasure at sight of extraordinary power manhood? in an attempt to give an edge to chinese industries, these guys stole trade secrets from corporations like westinghouse, u.s. steel, alcoa and the renewable energy company solar world. of course, the chinese can't do their own sorely research since they no longer have access to the sun. (laughter) folks, this is a major threat to our financial future. the chinese already know how to manufacture all our electronics. now they're trying to learn how to design them. if they also figure out how to bu

you've seen all the other emails, right?usting. neil: yes it was, but i'm saying is that typical of a lot of -- >> no. i not heard that bad. neil: who are you hanging out with? the pope? >> certainly not. neil: really? so gary b., what happens to this guy? i think this just comes and goes but obviously someone hates hip a lot? >> i think it does come and go because in the end, money is going to speak, right or wrong. i think he is entitled to his his privacy and go on to be a zillion nair and we won't be talking about this a month from now. neil: i wonder if they had e-mails back in my day, what they would have said. nice personality. that's about it. more after this. life an everyday miracle of survival today the future of all life on earth hangs in the balance what happens next depends on us ♪ well you done done me and you bet i felt it ♪ i tried to be chill but you're so hot that i melted ♪ i fell right through the cracks ♪ now i'm trying to get back ♪ before the cool done run out i'll be giving it my bestest ♪ and nothin

you've seen all the other emails, right? or heard worse. >> it is with pretty disgusting. neil: yes it was, but i'm saying is that typical of a lot of -- >> no. i not heard that bad. neil: who are you hanging out with? the pope? >> certainly not. neil: really? so gary b., what happens to this guy? i think this just comes and goes but obviously someone hates hip a lot? >> i think it does come and go because in the end, money is going to speak, right or wrong. i think he is entitled to his his privacy and go on to be a zillion nair and we won't be talking about this a month from now. neil: i wonder if they had e-mails back in my day, what they would have said. nice personality. that's about it. more after this. crestor lowered bad cholesterol in it's a fact. high-risk patients more than lipitor. bad cholesterol... you're going down! yeah! lowering cholesterol is a big deal, especially if you have high cholesterol plus any of these risk factors, because you could be at increased risk for plaque buildup in your arteries over tim

of tens of millions of americans. >> he said, "you can't justify the email collection. it is, on its face, a clear violation of the 4th amendment and perhaps the 1st amendment as well." >> narrator: addington was furious that goldsmith would raise questions about "the program," and he let him know. >> he was very tough in making his arguments. he was very sarcastic and aggressive against people with whom he disagreed, and dismissive oftentimes. and he acted with the implicit blessing of the vice president. so all of these things made him a very, very forceful presence. >> you know, david pushed, he pushed everybody. he pushed me. even when i was the attorney general, he would push me. so that was just david's nature, and i think jack didn't

the email continues. i'm puzzled how someone could be a member of the muslim brotherhood and unindicted co-conspirator in the holeland foundation trial, which was a trial in which people were convicted of supporting terrorism, providing financial support for terrorism, convicted and this individual mentioned as a named co-conspirator in the pleadings. the message in the email goes on, could be an associate of -- and then was redacted in the email -- say that the u.s. is staging car bombings in iraq and ok for men to beat their wives, question who was behind the 9/11 attacks and afforded the luxury of a visitor visa. it doesn't appear we'll be successful with denying him entry tomorrow, but maybe we could re-evaluate because the decision to delist him was made 17 months ago. senator grassley's message to secretary johnson at d.h.s. said in order to understand the events described in these emails, please provide the committee with answers to the following questions. number one, why was this individual remov

email your nomination to us at coolschools@kpix.com. we may come and feature your school on the show. >>> 6:20 right now. the u.s. government has thousands of northern california owls in its crosshairs. coming up at 6:30, the reason behind the mission to kill thousands of birds. >>> and i'm dennis o'donnell. coming up, which team has the best record in all of baseball? and giants pitchers dropping like flies last night. we'll show you who went down coming up. lovers: send us your questis about their health and well-being just email "petst kp com", or on our web x.com/pets... and >> we want to invite pet lovers to send us your questions about their health and their well-

because they admitted in this email. this is an email from david newman. he is he a nurse, a registered nurse in that hospital. and it's an email to his colleagues. and he says. this. he says we now -- we are now expected to book patients within 14 days. what this means is an actual appointment booked within 14 days. here is how i handle it. >> he breaks it all down. he has thought long and hard about how it unfolds. here is how i handle it if a patient comes in and they have a 14 day window. i want to see dr. smith. well, then i pull up the patient appointment on the screen? when would you like to see that doctor? i would like to see him on august 15th. you want to see him on august 15th. then guy back out of system, basically fung the date so that it looks like they did see that doctor on that particular day, even though they were waiting and never got an appointment. >> this health coordinator says yes it is gaming a system a bit this is straight in the email. but you have to know the rules of the game you are playing. and when we exceed the 14 day meas

which means, out of her public role, using her private emails.ink this will show some of the connections with other agencies. again more evidence on the violations of civil rights of these americans. and again, we're looking for the complete picture. both the whole irs accountable and to stop this from ever happening again. jenna: congressman brady i wonder, if you bring us behind the curtain if you will. how does this even go about? when you're to receive what, thousands of e-mails? do they come in a ream of paper to your office? how do you even begin this part of the investigation? what happens? >> well, it comes digitally but it is, it is a massive undertaking. i know back home in texas my folks want this to move much more quickly but for our investigative team to go through all these documents and to unearth and link them to the, not only the documents we've already examined but the interviews we've done at irs, and 3,000 tax applications we reviewed, it takes some time to do it thoroughly. so we'll get it digitally, and then work really begi

you could be emailing me about this. on the side of your email to me will be an ad for maternity clothes. jenna: isn't your email private? >> yes or no. if you google a company that sells maternity clothes they will sell the fact thaw googled them and your email address to a company that collects that and in turn markets it. is there a way to stop this? well, would require legislation to stop it. jenna: what do you think about that? lobbyists working on behalf of data collectors say that the potential for harm does not elicit the need for new legislation. if there actually is harm, if someone feels that their privacy has been violated, that is a different story but the potential is not enough to -- >> i tell you what i like and i rarely like this but in 24 instance i do. it's a decision by the highest court in europe. usually they're a bunch of socialisting giving government more power at price of individual freedom but last week they had a very interesting ruling saying you have the right to disappear. you have the righ

and in one email that's where we put the pieces toot. it -- together. it discusses what is revved to as a biosecurity threat, and that is what i indicated about the - starting up your computer, and how it more or less you can - attackers can brick a computer. that is what the snowden documents revealed. that's what the n.s.a. were doing. they were hacking into the bios software, to the platform there, and exploiting it. exploiting the vul neribility yits that they then go to the -- vulnerabilities, that they then go to the tech firms. asking them to open the door to allow the n.s.a. in to address the issues. >> bricking the computers is useless. google is not commenting but said that they work with experts, including the government to stay ahead of the game. where do you think these partnerships will go from here. will they be more public. will theyor is there -- continue or will there be a pull back because of this. >> i think the partnerships will continue. however, it's important to also note that there won't be transparency because of the revelation

what do you make of the emails? >> this email shows a couple of things. they are not surprising in one sense. we have known that one of the goals of the n.s.a. was to help american companies secure their networks from foreign threats, and that's what the n.s.a. was nominally doing when they met in 2012. at the same time the n.s.a. was hacking into google's - the very same network of google that it was trying to secure from the chinese. the n.s.a. was doing its own hacking into the networks. it's disturbing. google had a relationship with n.s.a. to prevent any sort of attack on the united states and sort of try to figure out what was going on there. at the same time by having the relationship and allowing something to go on between the n.s.a. and google, did they open a backdoor inadvertently to the n.s.a.? >> seems like they might have. one of the things that n.s.a. is supposed to do is keep american networks secure. it turns out that they were also sometimes maybe holding some of the level vulnerabilities in the same network close to their chest so only

finally, while it might be obvious that parents might use emails these days, we don't have any way of collecting systematically across the district parents' email addresses and don't have that information in our student information system so we'd like to figure out how we can move that forward and make that an option for families as well. that is it. i think we can now turn to questions about the overall presentation, both the digital district and this presentation and we'll have mr. ryan join us back up here. >> commissioner norton. >> i was really kind of mystified by this chart, which is the inverse -- you know, the children with the mobile device actually rises as the parents education level falls. i mean, do you have any interpretation of that or any sort of thoughts about that? >> well, i suspect a lot of it is financial on the mobile devices are easier to acquire than a computer. you don't have to sign up for additional internet plan, which costs a substantial chunk of money, as most of us probably know. you can get this with your phone, you have the family plans and et cetera,

this email was requested by congress 20 months ago.t 20 months later. >> that's my question, cammeron. they don't seem to be able to do anything about it. any of this stuff it's one thing to grandstand and hold the hearings i think american people and me getting frustrated because they don't do anything. >> part of that is the curse of coequal branches of government. what they can do is now investigate the alleged coverup of the alleged coverup because the fact that this document was provided to judicial watch, the watchdog group, in a specific request for documents related to benghazi, and congress had been asking for documents specifically related to benghazi and this wasn't included. >> this obviously no respect -- they have no respect for congress at all. all right. let's go to rosen. rosen, as you know, we do a the lo of work here with the veterans, the track chairs, raise a lot of money for them, that the v.a. should be doing. but, they are not. so we do it. now, there is a scandal that i don't really understand, so you have 90 s