was told her emails were hacked and they were going, every email she received, every email she sent out, except over 30,000 except for four, ovr 30,000 were compromised and going to a foreign entity, n russia. and mr. strzok did nothing about it. now i thought when i started laying the groundwork, pointing out the people, i'm told an attorney behind mr. strzok mouthed oh, my gosh, something like that, as i was laying the ground work, i don't know if she knew what i was talking about or not, but i thought i picked up just a fleeting note of detection in peter strzok's eyes that he knew what i was talking about. but again. for my friends that are not familiar with the true rules of the house, let me explain. in trial courts, for example, the felonies that -- the felony court over which i was a judge, the rules of evidence are very strict. and we protect the jury from hearing things that don't have any basis for believability. that's why most hearsay cannot come in but there are exceptions. but, one rule that you always find in any court, no matter how strict the rules are, the credibility

what happened to hillary clinton's emails? 33,000 emails gone. just gone. i think in russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. i think it's a disgrace that we can't get hillary clinton's 33,000 emails. so i have great confidence in my intelligence people, but i will tell you that president putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today, and what he did is an incredible offer. he offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators with respect to the 12 people. i think that's an incredible offer. thank you. >> so the big question, obviously, we're asking today is, what will republicans do? not what will they say. not what will they tweet. what will republicans do? joining me from helsinki, eli stokel, and phil rucker, "washington post" white house bureau chief. from washington, msnbc capitol hill correspondent garrett haake and jake sherman, a senior writer for politico. garrett, what are republicans at least saying right now? >> they are responding with strong words and disappointment. as i'm standing here i have

if hillary's emails are still the issue, hillary's emails is why hillary is not president of the united states! the fbi's actions in investigating hillary and reopening the investigation ten days -- that proves that james comey was not going for hillary. >> jason: who was hillary emailing? she wasn't emailing herself. >> i let you talk -- >> jason: do you believe -- >> it doesn't matter at this point! >> jason: it does. >> it doesn't matter at this t point. we have a president of the united states who at the very best looked weak in front of putin on monday. at the worst, it is something we don't even want to talk about because it brings us down a rabbit hole. >> jason: chris, i will play a quote from president obama that happened before the election. i know you've heard it. but listen to this quote. >> there is no serious persont out there who would suggest somehow that you coulde even -- you could even rig america's elections in part because they are so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved. >> jason: so chris, these sameve three characters, brennan and clapper and comey, th

the phishing emails are out there.hen you lock back do you remember that email specifically and did it raise red flags for you? >> you know, there is a back story to that involving a couple of different people in the campaign. but, no, i don't remember getting it. and you know, but, the files that were obviously opened up, the russians stole them. they delivered them to -- through wikileaks to do maximum damage to our campaign. and all, again, as our intelligence community has assessed helped donald trump get elected president. and you know, to this day he refuses to admit it. keeps joking around about it. and attacks mueller and the investigators, refuses i think to stand up for america. we will see what happens next -- on monday when we meets with vladimir putin. what he should do is -- is insist that first of all that all of this activity stop. and that- or else there will be tremendous consequences. but as the director of national intelligence said, the red lights are blinking but i think the white house is essenti

google had this idea to send confidential email or information you would be able to set email, it wouldn the server and put a link in the email. the problem is even though that expires so no one can forward it, a screen capture with the camera, sensitive data. the biggest problem is putting links inside of email is a no-no from any security expert on the planet. that is where phishing attacks happen where people put a link that looks very real but instead takes you to a very bad place and they will try to capture your credit card numbers or other personal information or sneak software onto your device. jillian: what can people do? i don't know how to avoid this. >> the redesign of gmail is not for everybody but will be coming by the end of the year. in the meantime what you can do now is simply avoid clicking links as a general, you never want to do this. jillian: you know where it is coming from? >> doesn't matter. ask yourself this question. did i ask for this email? in that case it is safe to click a link. you asked for it. if it looks like it is from and mildred, it is not necessari

so how significant is it that those names turn out and in fbi investigation email?portant. if anyone deserves a medal today it was jim jordan for relentlessly pursuing this. so much so -- the fbi was advising mr. struct not to answer any questions but jordan was hitting this so hard that even the council backed down in the end and gave strzok position to provide modest information. what he did give was important and now we have more questions about how many versions of this dossier were actually out there. did he have a copy that was different than the ones that were released to the press? did he have his own method of communication with fusion gps, because he was using these people's names in the email? but more importantly, we find out that bruce or, married to nelly or who worked for the fusion gps was indeed serving as a conduit between that opposition research firm and the fbi passing along information from the group that had been hired by the hillary clinton campaign. >> which he never admitted that he knew. he even said, i don't know if hillary clinton paid f

the defendants accessed email accounts of volunteers and employees of a u.s. presidential campaign. including the campaign chairman starting in march of 2016. they also hacked into the computer networks of a congressional campaign committee and a national political committee. the defendants covertly monitored the computers and planted hundreds of files containing malicious computer code and stole emails and other documents. the conspirators created fictitious online personas, including d.c. leaks and guccifer 2.0 and used those to release information including thousands of stolen emails and other documents, beginning in june of 2016. the defendants falsely claimed that d.c. leaks was a group of american hackers and that gu romanian --s a loan was a lone romanian hacker. but both in fact were created and controlled by the russian g.r.u. in addition to releasing documents directly to the public, the defendants transferred stolen documents to another organization that is not identified by name in the indictment and they used that organization as a pass-through to release documents. the

server and those who had knowledge of the emails.n other words, all of the 72 witnesses testify voluntarily and none of them was under oath or had their testimony recorded. the fbi also did not obtain search warrants for the laptops used by clinton's attorney cheryl mills and other single sin. instead the emails on the laptops were secured through consent agreements. even lead fbi agent peter strzok, who the ig did conclude was biased, was pushing to use more aggressive investigative measures against both. finally, the court documents show the fbi did not try to obtain the personal phones and devices of clinton's top aides, who sometimes also used private email for state department work and used private devices to communicate with clinton while she was the secretary of state. even though republicans have serious issues with things the fbi did not do in regards to the clinton email investigation, the ig says those are judgment calls that are within the discretion of fbi agents to make. >> sandra: trace gallagher, thank you. my next gu

they are government emails about government activity.it's personal, political beliefs, if that was the case we wouldn't be seeingl them. >> brian: you say we got more, he also went out of his way to try to explain away hisis behav behavior. >> the viewers are going to have toto decide whether they take hs word that the bias didn't impact the investigations. the ig didn't believe it, mr. mueller didn't believe it, why should anyone else believe it? the facts are what they are. he tried to spin them and we have to decide as adults what to do with as evidence. should we allow the corrupted the mueller investigation to continue given the involvement of several other fbi in officials who thought like him. >> brian: continue to go through all that stuff, you are relentless to get to the truth. far away from today's hearing, president trump's european trip is continuing. he goes to a place called helsinki, finland, to meet with vladimir putin, besides that's really not much to do on this trip crabfest is back at red lobster! discover our larges

-- did you reply to that email? >> i did not. 2016, wereummer of you working as a speechwriter? >> no. >> would you have written the speech for donald trump the candidate in the summer of 2016 where he told an audience, russia, if you are listening, and then told the russians that if they hacked hillary clinton females, they would be rewarded. -- emails, they would be rewarded? >> i did not. >> does any of the behavior i have described concern you? >> tremendously. >> it indicates a set of standards and requests that encourage a foreign power to begin inserting themselves into our electoral process, it indicates a willingness to engage in a conversation and dialogue about how to do that, it implicates a variety of laws, without getting into what has or not been done investigative i'm referring to open-source investigations. >> we recognize the gentleman from north carolina. >> i'm going to go through a few quick questions. earlier, you were quoted as saying, we don't ever talk about ongoing investigations outside of

services, people were literally asking for a hitman. >> the emails for a living. it was absolutely not expected. >> reporter: bob decided to run with it. >> after receiving those emails, i have decided to basically transform the webpage. >> reporter: now it is almost a parody site, complete with an intake form. >> targets name and email, address where services are requested. >> reporter: bob gets requests at least a couple times times each week. >> i need her taken care of because she won't leave. i need her gone. >> reporter: let her bleed out. >> reporter: he says he waits a day and then response. >> he says yes i would like to speak with the field operative, you know who the field operatives are. >> reporter: those are the police. officers this kitchen, crimefighter calls to report the murder solicitation. >> as ridiculous as it is, it has led to the apprehension of some bad people, and ultimately saved the lives of several people. >> reporter: kpix5's security analyst and retired fbi agent jeff hart says a tip from bob's website is just the beginning of a poss

>> to be clear, i want to talk about this email. i want nothing more -- >> you can say that all you want but you're not talking about it and you're not answering my questions. are there three copies? >> three copies of what? >> the mccann copy and the buzzfeed copy and the one you got from corn and simpson -- let me ask you one another question. let me ask you one another question. glenn simpson testified in front of the senate judiciary committee on august 22nd, 2017, he was asked, did anyone from fusion ever communicate with the fbi? his response, no. no one from fusion ever spoke with the fbi. so here's what i'm having trouble understanding. if glenn simpson says no one ever spoke with the fbi, how is it that you got a copy of the dossier from simpson? >> sir, i can tell you i never had contact with fusion, with mr. simpson, with mr. corn. sir -- >> chairman, regular order. >> the gentlemen will have a few more seconds since he was interrupted. >> i mean, this is the frustration that every single member of this committee feels is

your emails are perfect foil for this effort. they are not interested in hearing your explanations because it is not about you. have acted more like they are on the defense team for donald trump then exercising their serious oversight responsibilities as members of these two committees. robert mueller was placed in the heavens -- praise to the ever -- praised to the heavens when he was appointed. now he is the villain. what is the thing that has changed? 19 indictments. i accept your sworn testimony. we don't have to take your word for it alone. pages,reported 500 interviews, review of documents, they'll come to the same conclusions. they were consistent with the approach described in love. these decisions were the result of discretionary -- these judgments were all reasonable. is a big analysis that was done. 500 pages. that is the same representation you make today. don't be frustrated because they are not interested in that. this is about promoting a narrative. president, the intelligence community is unequivocally concluding

but what your job was was to say that these are hacked, stolen emails and they came from a corruptedrce. and you knew enough to say that but you didn't do that. >> well, there's where i would agree with you is that the media should be careful about the narrative that they sketch and what is the story that's being told. >> it was given complete credibility. >> i would defend my news organization. >> it was given complete -- >> i would also say that the reason we know much about this is because of what we wrote, the story called the perfect weapon when we went through this, eric lipton, david sanger. scott shane. >> i agree. >> the reason you know much about this and we knew about it so early was because of the reporting we did afterward and went through the entire narrative step by step. >> and we worked with your reporters and i appreciate the work that you guys did. i really do. >> but remember one other thing. that was all after the fact. but at the time you were playing this, the media was playing this at the time as if this was credible sourcing and what donna said is absolutely

i find it interesting that they can't find his email address.can't tell us who they talk to when they called her office. but yet, they can tell the press that they reached out to us and we didn't respond. that is just ridiculous. >> ed: he is talking about the emails there. he's here to break it down. first of all, these kinds of accusations are very serious. i wonder on the substance of it, what is he saying? you have a fourth wrestler saying he was groped by the team doctor. that basically they talk to them, he didn't do anything. >> he and his office have been denying it all the way through. what we do have here are these emails now, he wrestled under jim jordan. there are a couple things. i talk to them tonight, he said the reason he started to send these emails, if you read through them they are peppered with emojis. the prose is hard to understand. he said, i want to understand and reach out to somebody like jim jordan. he started to do this in march, he followed up and mail in june. he's in a high profile position. he needs to lead. in on

the same sort of challenge which amounts when we see emails. if you have ever handled it white-collar case, emails are bane of your existence. clients will say all kinds of ridiculous things over emails and the government gets a hold of it, and they say it is a joke, or was allegedly a joke, they will come up. emails are always coming up and the government seeks them under a 2703 b order. we should make the same and that argument that emails are arguably more intrusive than the data at issue in carpenter. the emails not only show location -- how to get the location? ip address, right? you can look at the emails, extract the ip address, and you can go even further. you can then get the recipient ip address, which can give you the recipient's approximate location. so we are getting even more data, even more sensitive data, when we are looking at emails. so anytime you have emails, or any time that we have browsing data, we should be chomping at the bit and making challenges under carpenter. and what is the government going to do? anybody that has

>> because it was basicallyano vert collusion encouraging the russians to try to find her emails.nd so we see, you know, collusion in plain sight. now the question is there are things going on behind the scenes that may have in fact helped mr. trump get elected. >> were you suspicious or concerned that there may have been collusion or coordination going on between the trump campaign or donald trump and the russians after that july 27th press conference? >> i was very concerned that the russians were going to continue what they've done for many, many years, which was to use their presence in the united states and their contacts with american persons to be able to advance their objectives. >> that's not a no? >> that is not a no. that is not a no. >> he says it's unwitting or maybe waiting. he doesn't know. he is leaving that up to robert mueller. where does roger stone figure into this? what sort of questions is robert mueller asking about roger stone? >> one of the first questions i got in the voluntary interview was how often did longroger and president talk. and then to which my

he's going to have to eat those emails. now they allowed him to appear behind closed doors, which i thought was a mistake. there is no reason for them to do that. they have the upper hand. now his lawyer is saying it is y setup. "we need to know about that meeting in mccabe's office. that happened with strzok, page, with the agenda of stop trump. i want to back up one second. what tom fitton and judicial watch is doing is tremendously important that a great service to the i country. the documents thereafter, including andrew weissmann's emails, now the from strzok, let's see what the people who we know who has an agenda, let'set see what their email said. he is after the fisa applications. documents are power. this is a vitally important source. we need transparency. the american people should all demand them. congress is doing a great service to the greatest degree, they demand these documents and answers from peter strzok. don't stop with peter strzok here. the risk is to make peterer strk the bad guy so he is a bad apple

what should give you pause is hillary clinton and her missing emails."gn government to meddle." and he's like, "you're just trying to save her." and i said, "no, you're asking a foreign government to meddle." and he keeps steamrolling over me and he at the end of it says, "no, i would really like to see those emails." so that was a huge day. this is an american presidential candidate asking for help from a foreign government. doing it very blatantly. it was very weird. but then the campaign continues on. and he says a whole bunch of other totally crazy things. >> seth: yeah. >> and the intelligence community -- [ light laughter ] >> seth: yeah, we just have to like -- then we just throw stuff away. we don't have room in there. >> everything gets totally buried by the next controversy, which is what actually ended up really helping him, because you couldn't focus on just one thing. and a lot of folks asked, "well why didn't you press that harder?" we had no indication whatsoever from anybody in the intelligence community. peter strzok wasn't texting any o

the emails not only show location. ip address, right? you can look at the emails, extract the ip address, and you can go even further. you can then get the recipient ip address, which can give you the recipient's approximate location. so we are getting even more data, even more sensitive data, we are looking at emails. oranytime you have emails, any time that we have browsing data, we should be chomping at the bit and making challenges under carpenter. and what is the government going to do? we know they are not just going to fold up shop. they will not give up. the good-faith exception is actually going to show up, and that will be something that we really have to grapple with. so when you look at the davis case, davis v. united states, davis relied on appellate presidents, but when there was that, it was directly on point. i think the davis case was not looking at, for example, statutory, it was appellate. so we will look in your particulars or section as to whether there is a pellet for whatever the government is seeking. that will be

back pretty much in a week unless we have a lot, a lot of emails.we can notify you but we're not sure on the actual turnaround time. in terms of priorities for fixing areas in the parks and playgrounds, the number one is really a safety concern. so if it's generally something is completely unsafe it's going to be attended to faster than something that just a cosmetic complaint or inquiry. yeah. >> okay, excellent. one last thing -- the registration online, you know, it's a tad complicated and just some input, it's not a fun experience to go through. there is -- you know, the summer programs that you have that you offer, camps and everything, i kept trying to look for those but they fill up so fast and i just wish that there was a ran rank -- excuse me -- that rec and parks would expand the program for summer offerings because it seems very limited and they fill up so fast that a lot of people are not able to get in. and there's only a one or two-week window to even deal -- you know, to get in on it. and so for myself son, we end up paying more for o

back pretty much in a week unless we have a lot, a lot of emails.ify you but we're not sure on the actual turnaround time. in terms of priorities for fixing areas in the parks and playgrounds, the number one is really a safety concern. so if it's generally something is completely unsafe it's going to be attended to faster than something that just a cosmetic complaint or inquiry. yeah. >> okay, excellent. one last thing -- the registration online, you know, it's a tad complicated and just some input, it's not a fun experience to go through. there is -- you know, the summer programs that you have th

but there was that critical email what i would call a turning point email text message in august of 2016tly by the inspector general where they talk about stopping trump and the inspector general said that kind of crossed the threshold from badmouthing the candidate to speaking about taking a decisive action against him. you remember two weeks ago agent strzok was up here on capitol hill for a closed-door deposition, a transcribed interview. it went on for 11 hours, 90 minutes was in a classified session and his team wants that transcript released immediately so the public can see what they say were just badgering questions that really didn't go to the heart of what happened during the clinton email and the russia investigation, sandra. >> sandra: what are really sort of the possible outcomes of his testimony today? he could sit down and answer all the questions he is asked. he could sit down and say he is not answering any questions at all. what -- one thing of what to expect but what could happen. what scenarios could play out? >> right. that's a great question. there are a number of s

the defendants access email accounts of volunteers and employees of a u.s. presidential campaign.ng the campaign chairman starting in march of 2016. they also hacked into the computer networks of a congressional campaign committee and a national political committee. the defendants covertly monitor the computers and planted hundreds of files containing malicious computer code and soul emails and other documents. the conspirators created fictitious online personas including d.c. weeks. and they used those personas to release information including thousands of stolen emails and other documents. beginning in june of 2016. the defendants falsely claimed that d.c. leaks was a group of american hackers and that it was a lone romanian hacker. in fact, both were created and controlled by the russian gru. the defendants transferred stolen documents to another organization that is not identified by name in the indictment and they use that organization as a pass-through to release the documents. we discussed the timing of the release in an attempt to enhance the impact on the election. in an

we have these emails, wrestled under jim jordan at ohio state, the reason he started to send these emailsy are peppered with emoji's, the pros is hard to understand but he says i want to reach out to jim jordan who is in high profile position and he started to do this, followed up in may and june and he is in a high profile position, he called him rev. james, has a squeaky clean image, wants to be speaker of the house and if not he wants to cut through the ohio state bs. >> what evidence is there that jim jordan knew or didn't know the sexual abuse -- >> how do you go back 25 or 30 years, i don't know that i knew something 25 or 30 years ago and how do i prove this, it is over jim jordan. and run for leadership, and if kevin mccarthy, and the leadership. ed: don't know of any evidence that proves he knew about sexual abuse, we don't know if other evidence will emerge. any hints in the emails, this person was trying to blackmail jim jordan or going to expose it. >> taking advantage of what jim jordan's position was, and look at who was copied on them they were sent to jim jordan, one of th

david: when you say you go through your emails, nobody emails you directly? tim: sure they do.id: how can you respond to all those emails? tim: i can't, but it doesn't mean that i can't read a fair number myself. because i think it's important to keep your hand on the pulse of the user. david: have you ever thought that maybe you could run for president of united states? [applause] tim: i think, yeah, you know, the president is something, you would love to be president, but not ever run. and that should never happen in our country, so that kind of eliminates me. ♪ david: today, let's talk about some of the values you have been espousing. one is of privacy. tim: we see privacy as a fundamental human right. so to us, it's right up there with other civil liberties that make americans what they are. it defines us as americans. we see that this is becoming a larger and larger issue for people. and so our tax on this is we take a minimal amount of data from customers, only that which we need to provide a great service, then we work really hard to protect it with encryption and so for

so google says gmail apps make your email moruseful. a few yearlings the company started opening up email and data inside it to third-party softwa devopers that make apps to third' party utility tools for you to use later, travel apps, shopping apps. there's an array of ways to let you sup power your email. the more you're allowing developers to access your email, the more you're risking theat personal in your email to fall into the wrong hands. >> are these computers or real people reading the e-mails? >> that's the surprising thing i we fou our reporting for mhis story is that, in most cases, these are cputers scanning these messages automatically. we talked to a company called return path that is hooked up ta more tn 2 million users and actively scanning theires mess mostly that's computer scanning them, but in some cases wer found, in or train the computers, they need to be human beings step in and manually review those messages, and in the case of this return path company, they were having employees manually step in and say this me

she gets subpoenaed and she gets rid of 33,000 emails. that gives me a problem.ssia or china or any other country has those emails, i mean, to be honest with you, i would love to see them. >> happy anniversary to that infamous exchange. russia, if you are listening, it's two years old today. two things have not changed. one, the investigation into why donald trump said that and what he did or did not know about russian meddling is still ongoing, and, two, russia is still meddling. earlier this week the president tweeted he was, quote, very concerned that russia will be fighting hard to have an impact on the upcoming election based on the fact that no president has been tougher on russia than me. they will be pushing hard for the democrats. they definitely don't want trump. yes, they are still trying hard to have an impact on the upcoming election. no, it is not on behalf of the democrats. as t"the daily beast" reported, hackers have targeted at least one vulnerable senate democrat running for re-election. missouri senator clare make haskill. in a statement, she c

. >> a lot of the emails received basically one line. i'm inquiring about your service. how much would it cost to take care of somebody in austria, those kinds of things. >> reporter: the criminals of the internet came calling from indonesia and right here in the united states. >> they believed this was a real legitimate operation. >> the former data recovery expert, inis in has a wife, a daughter, a twonld twin boys who he keeps in his mind when he passes along murder-for-hire inquiries. >> i have 9-year-old boys. they'rable to pull up this website from school, at the public library down the street. >> inis in says he is no longer running this site. he said this is a parody on the site. he said he's going to be transitioning now to writing maybe murder mysteries. repoinbrk. >> thank you. sam also tweeted about his story. for his tweets and other reporters' tweets you can look for more. >>> we're reporting on the duck boat that capsized. 17 on board died including nine from one family. the boat now sits 80 feet under water. witnesses say

it is popping up in email accounts including mine.n artists are threatening to release compromising videos. they're using passwords to convince victims it's not a scam. >> imagine opening your inbox to find your name and one of your real passwords in the subject line. it happened to me this weekend, and emails like this are popping up across the country. once they get your attention, with this new more credible, and creepy twist, they tried to extort money, using an old scam, claiming they have webcam videos of you watching adult videos and threatening to send them to the contact list if you do not pay up. good news, it is a scam. the bad guys do not have compromising video. the bad news, that you have one of your passwords. >> if some of you saw that, they could believe that they had more dirt on you beyond that password. she says the scam may evolve to something you may actually fall for. >> you may not be worried about your nonexistent porn viewing history being revealed, but you might be worried about something happening to someon

you would never have read the first chris stevens email.dam shifted everything and has power to keep you from finding out. would know about the dossier. you would know it was used under a court proceeding. would know about strzok and page. in fact, you wouldn't be having a show tonight. if adam had have his way. if maxine waters wants to make him the attorney general, more power to it. otherwise, nobody gives much of a damn. >> jason: he has misled and misused that position. for my own personal vantage point from time to time again. coming before you is peter strzok. as i recall, he said he would voluntary testify. then you heard his attorney in that clip today, he may not show up. >> i am certainly sorry if anyone hurt his feelings last week in the 13 hours we spent. the only thing i did was go over what he had written. if he is offended, he is offended with things that he wrote. he wrote a lot of texts. there are emails. of course he's going to be asked, what did you mean? i can't use all of the words. on a family-friendly show on years.

imagine if your in the dnc and you get an email from the i.t.epartment and we're updating the security. we're going to change your password so click on the link below and change your password. you click the link, it looks legitimate, you put in your credentials, but it hasn't. you have given that to someone else. what these hackers have done is it taken and created sort of pretend websites so they can reset credentials but really all they are doing is stealing them from us. >> and shouldn't the dnc have a sophisticated security system in place? how was it bypassed? >> it's so much easier than you think. we all think that the hackers are just these great criminals and know everything about how to get into a network and certainly some of these people may be but really the biggest flaw in security is us humans. you know, we're easy to trick. we don't know everything about technology. and when somebody of authority says they need us to do something, we generally do. so let's say for an example i wanted to get all the emails associated with a particu

they immediately sent emails to the house counsel. their emails were written separately but they are very consistent in what they described. there is no question that the evidence, the preponderance of the evidence is very clear on this. he did say these things, he did have a chance to intimidate, and for him to come a month later, say it never happened, we will put that before any fair-minded person who says, who do you think is telling the truth here. >> it is a form of evidence. so moving forward here, what would you like to see done with all of this? you have it pay up deputy ag who said he didn't threaten people and you have people who definitely felt threatened and kept contemporaneous complaints. >> i want the attorney general, the deputy attorney general and other members of the department of justice and the fbi to respond to congress. to recognize that we have not only the rights with the responsibility to get to understand this. they have this bureaucratic arrogance which says, if you irritate us, we will come after you. tha

email was hacked your phone number thm .credit card number associating potentially. there are people who were getting death threats, death threats via calls on cell phones. and they also had financial information compromised. that's why there is a civil lawsuit attached to this set of facts, because there were people tangibly impacted. i think instead of putting the responsibility on the dnc for perhaps not doing enough to prevent the hack, i think we should focus on the fact that there were people impacted negativesly by this criminal -- potentially criminal act laid out in the indictment we saw yesterday. >> look, in terms of impacting negatively, rick, the revelations of the indictments, how does that potentially affect the midterm elections? >> well, low back, it remains to be seen. this is a very serious indictment. but she is right. it's not amounting to anything. the russians wouldn't be be extradited to the united states and will never see an american courtroom. but there is a many a hammer coming down. there is a whole other side. and while rosenstein made i

i don't give my email out to people anymore. i like, scrubbed my email off the internet. i got a new email address. i don't put it on cards. not in my signature. i don't, if you want to message me, go on the website. there is a form. the form goes to the intern. if she thinks it is a email word responding to. she send me a collection of emails every week. here are a few you can respond to or send them to the appropriate people. i had filters on my in box for every spelling of the n-word. they get creative. like a three n word, you have seen that? this is what you put your time into. how can i spell nigger? that is what you focused on, right? i would spend time coming up with like all the variations of spelling. i glad i don't have to look at that stuff anymore. i have always had time where, you know, i wanted to, things i put in the activist lent, i used to talk about feelings all the time. i would say, oh, my god, i'm so fat. i didn't think about what i was actually saying. somebody who i am, has now become good friends with online, aab body positive activist, she called

if you're homeless and trying to keep warm try maintaining your privacy for a week without a single email web search or location data set collected by the n.s.a. and the telecoms try signing up for the military because you need college money and then one day just walking off the base. i kind of born out of them do this anymore . try living off the grid trying trunks claiming to see that while you don't have the green pieces of paper they want in exchange for the mashed potatoes you do have some pictures you're drawn and some napkins to give them a. try running for president is a third party candidate. jill stein is. still stunned was chained to a chair by police during one of the debates try parking your car four inches outside the line where society says you have to park your car try using the bathroom at starbucks without buying something while black. we are less free than a dog wandering the streets we live in one of the hardest working most on equal societies on the planet with more billionaires ever meanwhile the us applies not. first sent over the paid blood used around the world an

you have an interesting email transparency policy where everyone can read everyone else's emailed, aserstand it. >> people can choose to make certain emails available, but it is an opt in per email basis. emily: susan fowler, who wrote the report on discrimination at uber that ultimately resulted in the ceo leaving the company, she works at stripe. what do you see yourselves continuing to do to attract and retain whether it is women or underrepresented minorities? >> there is a whole bunch of specific initiatives. making sure that people who are becoming moms and parents stay with the company. we track those numbers carefully. we are delighted they are as high as they are. there are specific initiatives we work on for female entrepreneurs, specific hiring practices and what we do in hiring people, hiring goals, what we set for managers. i think sometimes people leap too quickly to what their checklist is of initiatives. if you are actually going to take this seriously and do it well, it has to be something that really deeply is suffused in the culture and everybody lives every day. ag

he concluded a may 6th email with #rape coverup. a wave life di sabato told fox he sent the email to jordan to help him realize he needed to lead on what he suggested was common knowledge. >> it was uncomfortable joke that doc would and wanted to give you a genital exam every time you saw him. >> jordan denies being aware of sexual abuse. he says the timing of the attacks is suspicious. >> right after the big hearing with mr. rosenstein, it's right when there is all this talk about speaker's race. the law firm who is doing the investigation said they tried to contact us and we didn't respond. we have no record. >> emails obtained by fox show that law firm tried contacting him at jim dot jordan at mail dot house.gov which is nonexistent account. the congres congressman received full support from the president yesterday. is he one of the most outstanding people i have met since i have been in washington. i believe him 100 percent. with lawmakers out of town, it's been pretty quiet. but next week jordan's colleagues will be fielding ma

now, those emails appear to show a map and details on the appearance two days before her arrest. undercover detectives accused her of allowing people at the club to touch her illegally but charges were dropped. >>> the white house is facing criticism for banning a reporter from a press event after she asked a question that was deemed inappropriate for the venue, so as the press was ushered out of the oval office on wednesday, cnn's kaitlan collins could be now, collins, who was a reporter representing all of the tv networks at the time, says she was reprimanded by the white house press staff and uninvited to that rose garden announcement. fox news is actually among those protesting the move and defending the cnn reporter. >>> some privacy issues appear to have cost facebook billions of dollars on wall street. the company is looking to rebound today after its stock fell more than 20% in after-hours trading. that's about $144 billion in losses. now, analysts say facebook was hurt by slow user growth and new privacy rules in europe. >>> they say there's no such thing as a free lunch

accuse th ointo national committee and hillary clinton's campaign and linking -- leaking damaging emails. that was the same day that then candidate trump said that he wished russians would find the missing emails. >> they created fictitious online personas and use them to release information including thousands of stolen emails and other documents. >> the indictments come three days before president trump is scheduled to meet with russian president vladimir putin. today president trump said he will raise the issue of election interference during their meeting. >>> president trump is in scotland after wrapping up his trip in london. the president did his best to avoid huge protests taking place in london. >> reporter: queen elizabeth met with president trump and the first lady. a military band gave a royal salute before playing the national anthem. the streets to protest the presidents visit. >> he is a cheat and at the.>> reporter: the president said that he felt very unwelcome in london. he avoided the center of the  city and visited the military academy and the prime minister's count