the specialists in this field is on the teaching staff here at the university of applied sciences in emden in northwestern many cilia some ascii has conducted research on the dilemma facing patients when they find out about what their genes might have in store for them. the primary focus for me was on the new way that individuals are expected to make decisions of friends on a bullet strictly speaking there is no right decision to make when all you're doing is choosing between different risks. it's basically a new form of gambling basing your decision on a lottery. the sociologist published her observations on genetic counseling and its social consequences in a book called the decision trap what impact does the information have on patients and can it be too much so mirsky has also studied human genetics and analyze d.n.a. in the lab she says genes should not be equated with destiny. is good and we see you know when we're talking about risk genes a specific change at the d.n.a. level can be a trigger but not necessarily. it might lead to a change whether visible or clinical i think but it al