i have kept abreast of the research anin emf radiation. i am aware the 1996 telecommunications act does not allow that to be considered. i mention these health reasons "-- solely as background information to support the fact that i think it is the wrong site and the wrong place. these antennas will be less than 50 feet from my head. that makes it a very intense personal issue. i have 26 petitions here, signed by the people who work in my building, who absolutely do not want this facility. my boss has promised that we can move, but we still have a two- year lease. nobody wants to be there with the cell phone towers here. we are very aware of the science because that is what we do as a company. there is a caltrans station less than 35 feet away with train tracks and lots of ugly structures, where the population is transient. less than 500 feet away is an excellent citing place that would cover the neighborhood without being on our heads. there was a large apartment condominium building across the street from us that those people just built a

there will be increased emf. there are no guarantees, as there are no universal standards for this. new construction materials tend to be inferior to even the cheapest materials in 1940. in a letter which i have submitted 18 copies of, it states that presently the city of vancouver is on the hook for 474 unsold units, and lawsuits from 62 condominium owners for the shoddy quality of their houses. they left the city of vancouver holding responsibility. you want jobs. there is ample jobs retrofitting the 1500 garden apartments. it is hard to say that the eir is there when the city will be paid $500,000. we have heard the developers say, "we will pay the city for every dollar the planning department has spent." i will lead to read the comments of catherine more. "the eir is incomplete. it fails to say why demolition is even necessary korea this will become a heavy traffic generator. the eir fails to identify impacts. future residents will remain car dependent. [bell] damn. president chiu: thank you. >> a less parking alternative. more and more projects in san francisco are analyzing th

and emf. imf. i know the promise emblazoned on almost every fine gael poster was to get ireland working. and yet in the program for government the plan to get ireland working is met with one of the few specific commitments in the program for government to slash 25,000 public sector jobs. you don't have to be an economic expert to realize you don't get ireland working by 25,000 jobs being axed. it means 25,000 more people unemployed, it means less money being spent in the economy, it means more suffering. and i want to say that it is paragraphly depressing -- particularly depressing that the labour party are going to support deputy kenny, this government and this program for government. labour, frankly, should be ashamed of themselves to sign up for a program that is going to axe the jobs of 25,000 of the people who voted for them. very particularly, voted for them in the hope and expectation that their jobs would be safe. they should be ashamed of the fact that on national television and on nationa