american literature of an 18th-century projects most still known as emily dickinson with the possible exception of frederick douglass and beneath the american renaissance to say though lyons share of the wrist and religious writings off sensationalist journalism remains today under examined by scholars of american literature. one of the discouraging reality is is the general lack of proper funding for those perfectly prepared with consumption of the ill-defined bracketed becomes difficult for them to devote themselves to the identification and retrieval but have not been identified already as literary and therefore digestible with their frigid institutions. although we give service to promiscuity it is nonetheless still the case to train students and higher colleagues of inadequate categories of literature and the literary. reading david reynolds in 1991 in a dark apartment had the effect of turning one already grouch year. i had realized ready to fiercely maintained the divide but the the work that interested me was to demonstrate the facility but that was certainly the case but many

harriet beecher stowe, emily dickinson and others. most african-american authors with the possible objection of frederick douglass and almost all of david reynolds in beneath the american renaissance. go to see the lion share of 19th century human religious writing, sensational journalism and feminist pamphleteering remains even today anomaly under examined by american literature and culture. moreover, one of the discouraging realities is that because of a general lack of proper funding for research in a strong desire to produce individuals perfectly prepared for consumption within a rather ill-defined market, it becomes difficult to encourage a printed color to the identification and retrieval of writing that has not been identified already is properly literary and therefore properly digestible within are often quite rigid intellectual and cultural institution. or to state the matter from another direction, though we all give serious into an promiscuity, it is nonetheless the case we continue to train students, train students in high

a quote from emily dickinson. so there are a couple of reasons why someone might have wanted to be anonymous and one might be to uphold modesty. an example of like is the guy who wrote "amazing grace." he was someone who didn't want to associate his work with himself because he didn't want to take attention away from his creator who he was trying to basically praise through this work. another example, we have alice in wonderland. the author, lewis carol, that wasn't his real name, basically didn't want to associate his stories with his serious academic work. and he was a painfully shy mathematician, didn't want those two worlds colliding. so they had a pragmatic point of his own identity, where in this person i'm this person and in this person i'm this person. another reason to be anonymous might be to stymie sexist. there's countless examples of this throughout history. two of my favorites are charlotte bronte who has a great quote here saying, i want to be judged as an author, not as a man or woman. in those day

emily dickinson herself was a complete skin under unknown when she died and the edition with all the punctuation corrected in the? titles but in poetry. she wasn't really known -- that was published shortly after her death until thomas h. johnson came along and found her in the library in 1935 and suddenly this complete unknown and people have this really great stuff. again, i don't want to necessarily make a hierarchy of text, but i will say there's some text that identifiably, the same with narratives. i think it's right that, for example, frederick douglass and harry jacobs did they really do stand out intrinsically a little more than -- i read some of these narratives. there's a lot of thickness and energy and subversive energy in those two spectrums in particular and certain other works, were some of the others are very interesting and important in their own way, that may be lacking density a richness that you do find in frederick douglass. so anyway. >> some texts are better than others. i am not [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] >> and however and dirt outside. the thing is

a quote from emily dickinson. so there are a couple of reasons why someone might have wanted to be unanimous and one might be to uphold modesty. an example of like is the guy who wrote "amazing grace." he was someone who didn't want to associate his work with himself because he didn't want to take attention away from his creator who he was trying to basically pray through this work. another example, we have alice in wonderland. the author, lewis carol, that wasn't his real name, basically didn't want to associate his stories with his serious academic work. and he was a painfully shy mathematician, didn't want those two worlds colliding. so they had a pragmatic point of his own identity, where in this person i'm this person and in this person i'm this person. another reason to be unanimous might be to stymie sexist. there's countless examples of this throughout history. two of my favorites are charlotte bronte who has a great quote here saying, i want to be judged as an author, not as a man or woman. in those days,