makes is limit the pool in portland we have one and two buildings that comply i don't know in emily rogers times to step in but i don't know the process of allowing this the fee is the operate process but someone xhertd from a residential unit to a hotel their subject to section 316 it's a change of use from the residential to the hotel they'll have to meet that section code for the loss of the dwelling to be clear i wanted to mention that in the process that's required for allowing the bed-and-breakfast bus under the current code it's seen as taking it out of the residential use category. >> i have e even if there's a family living in the how is it seems like less of a dwelling. >> we have no mid ground our either a residential unit or a hotel and no requirement for the residency so we don't have anything in between like a bed-and-breakfast to have someone living in the unit for 90 days. >> i want to know whether in a bed-and-breakfast there's someone living there 2 hundred and 70 days it might be appropriate for some of the hosts but that's the route they could be legal without having to

. >> emily roger. >> i'm emily not roger. >> long day. >> the address would be listed on there it's a property information database so what sort land use are entitled there so the restaurant would say what kind of restaurant under the proposed ordinance the only information it this he'd has been authorized to to the the shrldz their vacation day none of that information is posted. >> okay. good that's helpful. >> i want to clarify we've seen the 90 days when i say don't about the 90 days are you referring to the 90 days for so-called hosted you're there and have someone else in the spare bedroom; is that right. >> yes. every day. >> your typically there when they're there. >> yep. >> there are a current legislation proposes that you can do up to 90 days when our gone i know that supervisor kim applied the possibility of expanding that to the 90 day period so when people are referring to the 90 days specify. >> the one that effects me i'd be interested in. >> in closing, i have a petition for my district can i hand those off to you. >> yeah. if you want to leave those up there we'll ge

. >> thank you very much supervisors emily rogers with the plaintiff i think it's been described and it is a very exciting your honor, and forward-looking neighborhood that welcomes schools for the district and the district felt this legislation will further the goals and recommended approvals with modifications that were incorporated we know the supervisor for that sue thank you. >> thank you, ms. rogers if no comments we'll open this up for public comment i have a few comment cards. >> (inaudible). >> i'll call the comment cards (calling names) i'm sorry i'm going to mispronounce this name sorry. (calling names). come on up. >> i'm sorry i'm not dressed up i want to thank all the supervisors for their support and we are all up here we're partners this is darcy and jeff and jason i'm excited about the prospective of having a home basis for entertainment it is my dream to not just have a venue where we just serve alcohol to people and kick them to the curve but provide a genuine entertainment and night life so i've been doing shows in san francisco for almost 20 years i'm really, rea

mergers and conversions that are under side planning code so two years ago it was approved and emily rogers is here and whether this ordinance had anything to do with the conversions and we checked with the city attorney and this is interrelated to the short-term rentals and the conversions of hotels continue to be in place if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them or i was going to speak with ms. rogers so further clarify the ordinance. >> thank you, mr. pollack if no questions we'll proceeded to public comment unless the department has comments. >> good morning, committee members this is how a change that was made at a hearing can turn out out to have is policy implications and in this case the planning commission and the board assumed they were making the policies strong this change with have removed 50s from the planning code that is converted to student housing and so we do appreciate the amendment that will fix the error and recommend or not unanimously but 6 to one vote for the board to make this amendment today. >> thank you, very much. i have two comment cards (callin

emily miller didn't start all this. i was a misnomer in the media. tom rogers started all of this and i praise him for starting all of this. if i had anger in me i would say that guy did this to me. he didn't. he simply stood on -- stood up on behalf of native americans and found out something that didn't look or smell right. when you get to a certain level and to use members of congress to verify that this is a great lobbyist. you want to keep hiring him and the native americans unfortunately aren't getting a return that is not a helpful situation. tom rogers told the truth when he found out and i give tom rogers credit. he's the man who got the ball rolling. c-span: fox com, what's that story? >> guest: fox, was an interesting aspect. the federal government wanted to -- at the end of the day foxconn was the weird contract that the providers decided. members of congress their time is extremely valuable and when they vote they either go underground or bagram. when you go underground to cell phones literally would not work. chairman thomas, bill thomas of califo

emily miller started this. the whistleblower was tom rogers. he's a native american and has been involved in native american issues. he was the first woman covered with rightfully so the deals of jack abramoff and the indian tribes. tom rogers confronted jack abramoff not long ago at the press club within last year and said your people were in cash games and high-stakes card games with reporters. members of congress and mostly staff lobbyist. jack said i can't recall. at that point in time i played cards with breznahan and paid breznahan money in the last year that i was in trouble and i knew they had card games. i felt that was important to reveal in the process. i didn't think that it should occur and i felt reznor hand the way he would carry out stories on people yet he himself is a reporter was making terrible violations of the rules and the ethics and the smell of the ethics involved with staffers and lobbyists in this card games. the other thing is there was an arrangement of jack abramoff and i said to buy the hell magazine and breznahan