. -- emma gerald. i want to address some of the comments the dph management made yesterday, specifically when they talk about restraint, dealing with patients. i think they use the example of restraining patients with dementia that are being difficult. i want to make clear that whether or not it is public security or private security, the city as a whole is responsible if someone violates the civil rights of patients. the idea that private security is upfolded to different laws is ridiculous and is frankly untrue. both general hospital and laguna honda -- they are both government agencies, and they will both be liable. there is actually a great example, which is shortly after alameda county to a private security in 2004 -- there was a doctor that was murdered. this is with the private security when they first got there. the family sued, and they sued the city, and they won against the city. in 2007, the contract to begin to the private security company, which is supposedly the model they are using. in