the international human rights community and ukrainian human rights defenders colleagues of emnosti international react? let's listen, starting from 2014, here it is. well, there were, well, significant comments even regarding the materials prepared by amnesty international regarding ukraine and we remember that they were seriously criticized by ukrainian human rights defenders when it was announced that ukrainian military bases were located in hospitals or medical institutions in five cities for seconds, this is nonsense because we have information and collected data about the fact that in no ukrainian medical institution have the armed forces been stationed now. what could it be about? let's just say it was abandoned. well, there is a population center that already has, for example, no civilian population from where the evacuation took place. and probably already semi-destroyed or maybe a medical facility in this medical facility can house soldiers, it no longer functions as a medical facility 10 about the accusation, i will tell you for a second about the commission of a war crime and there it

the former director of the ukrainian office of the international human rights organization emnosty internationalksana pokalchuk oksana i greet you good evening, thank you for agreeing to talk with us good evening and oksana bogalchuk resigned after the scandalous and unbalanced report of emnosty international, which is called the military tactics of ukraine endanger the civilian population of the report e-e on the opinion of many was played by the russian propagandist oksana, my first question will be this: the ministry of culture and information works like this the center for strategic communications and information security, and here they are publishing this version of the truth without reference to the sources of how information was collected by enets international for this report on ukraine. in the temporarily occupied territories, and therefore the interviews were selected under obvious pressure, sometimes of this kind, the correct interview in quotation marks was the only chance to pass the filtering and to leave the occupied territories how can you comment on this oksano, do you know abou

yes, but at the same time the head of the ukrainian office of emnosti international resigned, and thisally such a very revealing step. she wrote in her post that she hoped until the end that the report would be corrected, that the decision would be somehow influenced, obviously, the decision of the central office was final, so we see that emnosti international is once again tainted, but the ukrainian division of internationalism was not involved at all in this work, in this analysis , in this report. in ukraine, in the war zone, who could analyze what happened in donetsk region, that they were in mykolaiv, and their opinions seem to be based on this, and about what it is. what i saw was not how the international human rights community and ukrainian human rights defender colleagues reacted in general . international, we talked with oleksandr pavlichenko, the executive director of the ukrainian helsinki union in ukraine. here's what he told us, let's listen to the important remarks even regarding the materials prepared by amnesty international regarding ukraine, and we remember that ukra

our viewers that you served er-e punishments in soviet times a-a very far from ukraine so, emnosti internationale you think that everything is the same with this organization, what has changed, maybe we have changed, and they have remained in their positions, yes, of course, this organization has undergone a very unfortunate evolution, because in my time, when they protected not only me, but also many ukrainian political prisoners, the main focus of this organization was to protect prisoners of conscience, that is, those who, through non-violent resistance, fought for authoritarian regimes, and this was a very honorable mission, which was initiated by the founder of amnesty international, peter benson, and continued until the end of the organization focus she always evoked great gratitude from all those whom she protected and i am really even today critical about this statement but at the same time i want to thank this organization for the very important they help and support, but what happened, this focus has changed, i have already forgotten which of the 90s , when the mandate of amnesty inter

the fact is that in this latest report, emnosty international stated that the ukrainian military endangers civilian population because they create bases and place weapons in residential areas in schools and hospitals . for example, the minister of foreign affairs - ukrainian dmytro kuleba said that such messages from this international organization create a false balance between the criminal and the victim. oleksii reznikov , the minister of defense, he in general, he said that this publication indicates a loss of adequacy. and now his deputy said that ukraine is open to investigations, but international organizations have first of all, to demand a stop to russia's aggression. please tell me , you are also investigating how the troops are moving, where they are, do you have confidence in this report of the international agency regarding the facts that are being conducted there, i don't think that they should be fake or something , but it is necessary to give a direct assessment of these facts. for example, if we are talking about a front-line city a-a, which is directly attacked, then it i

said that after such a report in general, such a press release uh, the general secretary of emnosti internationala lamar, should resign because she, after the media and others started reacting to this report, and everything. she just defrauded everyone with trolls, she said that they are just trolls and that's all, and we are terribly proud of ourselves, although after that, again, the head of the ukrainian international organization resigned, well, the whole story was like that, so my question is that we have very little time well, we see that there was such an ambiguous reaction to the capacity report of world changes, which, in principle, well, they actively wrote about the fact that this is some kind of manipulation. well, what about this video that gave itself off, is there the same reaction and more than that? it is necessary to draw some conclusions from this to do that is good. we reacted at the level of the ministry. but what should we do next, how should we demand? well, i don't know where to go. well, although i don't think that it is appropriate in this situation, it will give us some

great britain in ukraine probably reacted to the statement of the human rights organization emnosty international day before there they expressed that the ukrainian military allegedly endangers civilians, if russia had stopped its invasion of ukraine, the danger would not have been declared ms. ambassador, previously the ukrainian authorities also condemned the position of the human rights organization, in particular , president zelenskyi called the report of the international agency to try to shift responsibility from the aggressor to the victim putin invited erdogan to sochi, the turkish president accepted the offer and already today they will meet, what does the kremlin want to achieve, and why for erdogan, negotiations with the krill with the kremlin are important, see further in our material the president of turkey and the russian federation meet quite often raja pardogan already has a certain image of a negotiator between the european union and the kremlin, however, at meetings with putin, the turkish president manages to discuss his own issues as well during the six-hour talks in sochi . p

fighting in ukraine . sometimes de elimail also writes about the human rights organization emnosti internationalwspaper begins the article with the headline how emnosti became the mouthpiece of vladimir putin in the material of the british of journalists, it is about how a human rights group accused ukraine of war crimes to the delight of the kremlin, and also about the indignation of the entire free world, the rain of terror under this name, the american newspaper new york post writes about the enemy's daily missile strikes in ukraine, in the photo of ukrainian journalist oleksandr retushnyak , an employee cleans the remains of the rocket in mykolaiv this week, the british zagardian is also writing an article from mykolaiv, namely that the war against russia is entering a decisive phase, and with the corresponding headline, the question of time, ukrainians are determined to win back the south, the publication quotes the officer dmytro plenchuk that the ukrainians have a lot of motivation, but the russians are fighting for some reason, the washing machine is a rehearsal for the disaster, the bri

comment on this material from the fallout of the datetimes and which journalists wrote emnosti international, which is focused on covering the cases of prisoners of conscience, took on undermining self-confidence by becoming a mouthpiece of the propaganda of the putin regime, the once respected humanitarian organization emnost now shows a sad indifference to oppression by showing itself mildly towards fascism, she should have the honor to leave the stage end of the quote, your comment please, well, you know, this is how journalism works and the journalist is so emotional assessment eh i think that probably everyone has the right to make a mistake eh, there is no need to perceive eh so sharply and as eh a verdict of some kind especially the materials published by amnesty international, i.e. what they did of course, it should be sorted out. they need to be told what they did. it's not like that. why was it done? i think we won't find out. it might have been an unconscious mistake, maybe some kind of deliberate manipulative manipulation. the information presented in the material published by am

burdened israel with the bombing of the capital of tel aviv, the head of the ukrainian office of emnosti internationalresigned from her position, oksana pokalchuk wrote on facebook that with the management differed in value, the organization in its report accused the ukrainian military of endangering civilians, creating bases and placing weapons in residential areas. this conclusion was made after research in the kharkiv mykolaiv, donetsk and luhansk regions, according to oksana pokalchuk, the report did not include the position of the ministry of defense of ukraine, therefore she persuaded to remove the report, but it was not possible. deputy minister of defense hanna malyar explained that such studies do not take into account a number of factors, if any international organizations have the facts, our law enforcement agencies are ready to find out the circumstances, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that such studies do not take into account a number of factors, for example, the fact that the russians use the tactics of capturing and holding populated areas and while we wait for the russia

of the organization resigned from her position oksana pokalchuk of the ukrainian office of emnosti internationalidential areas. in the opinion of oksana pokalchuk, the report did not contain the positions of the ministry of defense of ukraine, so she persuaded to withdraw the report, but it was not possible minister of defense hanna malyar explained that such studies do not take into account a number of factors, if such facts are available to international organizations, our law enforcement agencies are ready to find out the circumstances, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that such studies do not take into account a number of factors, for example, the fact that the russians use the tactics of capturing and holding populated areas and while we we will wait for the russian enemy in the field, as sometimes some people advise us that the russians will simply occupy all our houses in response to criticism of the report, the head of international unes calamar she stated quoting ukrainian and russian trolls in social networks are attacking the investigation, she added that this will not wea

provide certain weapons, a vivid manifestation of this is this release, which today, a week ago, emnosti international-e, well, made public what we are talking about today we are talking to ms. oleksandr, i have a short question for you, actually, for now, again, we are talking in front of my eyes, the number of signatures under this petition is changing, how do you think it is being listened to by the international management , the management, i don't know, maybe the composition of the international, before that to change the leadership in connection with the fact that people are asking for this, well, this is their decision, we cannot influence how decisions are made in non-governmental international organizations, but i think that i will express to express one's position to the citizens, of course, it makes sense, if we just need to understand, let's understand that in this particular case, the international agencies did us a lot of harm , but we need to understand that, well, now they were just a tool, and this is one of the symptoms of a very big and serious problem that we are dealing with is th

around does not subside of a stunning report by the international human rights organization emnosty internationalwhich actually accused the ukrainian armed forces of creating threats to the civilian population by fighting in cities, that is, according to the logic of this organization, for example, in irpin, our armed forces had no right to defend themselves, that is, the armed forces of ukraine must go into a clean field and according to the laws war to wait until the russians come out for a fair fight and all this absurdity is written against the background of the daily terror of the ukrainian civilian population after the russian attacks on vinnytsia and kremenchuk i i’m not talking about the deer in the report. there is not a single word about pro-russian methods of waging war about inhumane crimes. only the polish division of the international agency wrote about it after the scandal broke out, and look at the ukrainian division that resigned. you can’t try to create an artificial balance between the victim and the rapist . ukraine defends itself and defends its land, and emblems internationa

if emnosti international published a report, they were thrashed there and they had to make excuses, if obvious to me, but it seems to me that it is not by chance that this is happening around the nuclear power plant. i think this is the beginning of a big attack on the russian rosatom this is the beginning of a big attack on russian hair. i think there will be an attempt. due to the fact that the world leader still likes it, is it for someone or not? there will be an attempt by the americans, primarily their westone house company, which has repeatedly tried to replace e with its own, so to speak, with its own fuel. politics. it seems incredible today. yes, but by some mechanisms, try to squeeze russia out of this huge market, where it is actually the leader. this is not just how it all started. not because someone wanted something there, so to speak, e wanted or from a military point of view. this also does not represent. it must be converted into something concrete. it seems to me that they took exactly this direction, well, let's see how events will develop and well, let's finish the