i also just reviewed the generation investment m emorandum. although it references the fact this they have a smaller carbon footprint, it doesn't specifically say -- it's not somehow discount any conversations that were had. the minimum doesn't say that it is a one to one swap for that billion dollar carbon c onstrained passive index. the question becomes that are we going to increase our passive index center 500 to a billion dollars with goldman or someone else. will the board come back and say that this is a substitute but either way, i think the returns and case made by staff and the original generation write up was based upon the performance not necessarily their esg considerations alone. what i would like to do is follow up offline, deal with this issue of whether or not it is swap or not. i think commissioner divis driscoll, you and i, we agree on some of this stuff. we agree on little bit different direction. i'm happy to call the vote if that's what the board wants. to the extent that board members don't want to vote on this, that's th