but if we really want to follow empirical data, then we should have in the year 2010 the ability to monitor how much water is contained in our reservoirs, how much water is pumped into them, and how much water is consumed. and we cannot get those figures really. we get them in a gentle way -- a jangled way. over the years, we have had some advocates. most of them was stopped coming over here because of exactly what i am saying. we come some of us, at the very few of us left, who have been monitoring the clean water projects for a long time. there are very few commissioners who have monitored them for as long as we have monitored them. and it is good that sometimes, you know, past general managers or people who have had some deep working experiences come back on the commission. and it is good that we have had the opportunity for others who worked once for the water department to come back and share their experiences. but what we, the constituents, are paying attention to right now is how best to utilize every gallon of water, clean water. especially had ceci -- hetch hetche water. those are

this discussion to make things simpler, but we don't follow some of the main elements to analyze empirical data. for example, you should know that every 10 years we figure out of the housing element. how should we subsidize the developers backed right redevelopment then constituents of san francisco that are against it. who is building the power plant? are we having a discussion where we will provide some energy at this point? i might add treasure island and the trans bay. the commissioners at some point will have an orientation about the rate cut and how municipalities including the military or subsidized. how the changes were made in public housing where at one time they were given free energy and they don't have to pay for it. how did that come about? things have changed drastically because we have quarry's will -- that will generate income. this is like a corporation. if we're going to address something like this, we will be asking questions like this. we will be asking what -- for the population of san francisco. how many residences do we have that consume a lot of problems? i think someon

give a general presentation, but when it comes to the victims, today, this city does not have empirical datauly reflects the numbers of victims who are suffering. we need to improve on that. this hearing talks about coordination between the city administrator, police, and we had the commander here. they will tell you, because of technology, because of lack of training, we did not give our constituents in this city the proper focus. when that chinese man was killed on third street, i did what i could, others here did what they could, but when it comes to resolving some issues, there is no office that addresses the concerns of those who want to say something in district 10, where the crime occurred, but you have to go to district 9. when it comes to community policing, the community response, your supervisor should ask to see airport to see how well they are doing. they can talk the talk, but we need to walk the walk. >> thank you, next speaker. >> good morning. i am the director of the san francisco general hospital trauma recovery center. i want to think the public safety committee for conve

why would you do that when blacks are being improved demonstrably, empirically, the evidence and datathere. nobody can dispute it. but i think he's got this desire, this socialistic instinct to create and perpetuate dependency class. and he does not feel comfortable with people being self reliance. host: you are from missouri -- what is the economy light there these days? guest: ups and downs. some businesses are doing well and others are not. i doubt that we are as hard hit as other areas. but as and as i say that i would hate mail from my fellow can gerardo -- cape girardeauand. host: what is the most effective way to stimulate jobs? guest: this is not rocket science is. conservatives are not extremists. tea party is not extremists. they want to restore the american ideal. they want to restore sound tax policy -- reduce taxes. by the way, bush's tax cuts, right composite tax cuts were not tax cuts for the wealthy -- they were across-the-board tax cut, in fact, skewed in favor of lower and middle income tax groups. the higher income earners pay a greater percentage of taxes. we know

why would you do that when blacks are being improved demonstrably, empirically, the evidence and data is there. nobody can dispute it. but i think he's got this desire, this socialistic instinct to create and perpetuate dependency class. and he does not feel comfortable with people being self reliance. host: you are from missouri -- what is the economy light there these days? guest: ups and downs. some businesses are doing well and others are not. i doubt that we are as hard hit as other areas. but as and as i say that i would hate mail from my fellow can gerardo -- cape girardeauand. host: what is the most effective way to stimulate jobs? guest: this is not rocket science is. conservatives are not extremists. tea party is not extremists. they want to restore the american ideal. they want to restore sound tax policy -- reduce taxes. by the way, bush's tax cuts, right composite tax cuts were not tax cuts for the wealthy -- they were across-the-board tax cut, in fact, skewed in favor of lower and middle income tax groups. the higher income earners pay a greater percentage of taxes. we k