the obligations for environmental review is not pre- empted by the federal telecommunications act of 1996. >> to second be clear, penn to the federal law says that we can deny an application for these types of permits as long as this is not based on the environmental impact of the missions and i feel that this is what this is based on. >> ceqa overrides that in california. the amount of radiation cannot go over the fcc limits. we are interested in knowing what the levels are out there that have possibly exceeded those limitations and the federal government says that you cannot exceed those radiation levels that they have written about or made charges. >> i appreciate that, that is what i would like to ask both planning and t mobil. thank you. >> are there any other questions or should we proceed? let's go to the planning department. >> let's go -- good afternoon, vice president chiu. i am joined today with -- to is the subject of the appeal before you. this appeal is about the termination for a wireless antenna. the appellants have argued that the department is not considered a poten

. >> >> we are pre-empted under federal law from considering the health effect of the emissions as long as the city has determined that these comply with federal regulation. without getting into too much detail where the federal analysis, we would not be able to consider those things as long as we have determined that these are within federal regulatory limits. >> if i can ask these questions, are these in compliance with federal regulations? >> i will turn that back over to the department. >> yes, these are well below 1% sold of the threshold. >> thank you. >> any additional questions to the city staff? are there members of the public that wish to speak in support of the appellants? can you please step up to the microphone? >> hello, my name is victoria robinson and i live at 1653 grant ave. i am in favor of an appeal. i have a lot of things i want to say but after here -- but after hearing everyone talked, san francisco has a history of going against the federal government and making rules that fit us. looking at the environment, this is something we need to do. this is not 1995, this

carlos costli de taquito logra el empte. >> estos fueron los mejores goles del fin de semana. >> lindoslulas específicos que tienen tendencia a formar cáncer . >> si sigue confundido sobre su declaración de impuestos les queda media hora para llamar. >> sólo llámenos y recuerde que si le contesta una grabadora tiene que colgar y marcar de nuevo. >> gracias a todos, 18

there is no existing federal law that pre-empts public notification of radiation levels in any publicly acceptable -- accessible area in the city. it is incumbent of this city to look at all of these cumulatively and not just one by one. supervisors, it is income but to reject this review because they refuse to include the entirety both public and disclosed. >> i have supplemental exhibits here to submit. i am the second applicant on the appeal and i would like to present additional documentation. please note that based on the maps provided, the total number of antennas within 1 mile is 858. that is 858 within 1 mile radius. this does not count the nine additional antennas just recently proposed by at&t. according to the coverage check performed on the service, the voice and data coverage for north beach is stated as excellent. since at&t will very likely to inherit the intent after the purchase of the mobile. in the coverage in north beach is stated as best. supervisors, either they are making misrepresentations or the -- to the planning department or the consumers regarding the streng

on my mind is pre-empting the 22% increase in appropriations that the democrat congress and democraticdent have foisted upon the people. it is 22% on top of an $814 stimulus that did not work. they are keeping unemployment over 8%. also, the debt we have for 50 years was about 35% of gross national product. most of you will think that is too much. right now, is 65% and on the path to be 95%. over the next two years, we have to preempt that 22% and get back to the 2007 level of expenditures and freeze it for five years after the. maybe we can do better than that. i am telling you what my goal is. also, to get this debt down so we do not leave this legacy of debt to our kids. introducing my distinguished colleague, i want to put in the context that i hope you folks know and i hope the next 18 months. as well that elections are supposed to have consequences -- or what is the point of having elections? as a result of the last election, the new people elected like our distinguished speaker as well as 83 new house members -- if you want to put it in historical context, it is the greatest num

he pre-empted what he feared was going to be a major humanitarian disaster there. you, secretary rumsfeld, helped develop various ideas and principles for u.s. military action after 9/11 regarding u.s. leadership, a coalition building, definition of the military mission, the action of the un, etc.. i would like you to comment on how you think are the that obama is handling of libya. is the respecting or violating the principles you helped develop? i hope that is sufficiently provocative for starters. now i would like to ask the general to give a few of his comments about the matters dealt with in the secretary's book. >> thank you. it is a great pleasure to be with you today. i have great respect for the folks on this platform with me. it is absolutely true that in many ways, secretary rumsfeld has continued to support the troops and their families. i am proud to be sitting here next to him on this occasion. i will not speak to the book precisely. i would like to share with you some thoughts about things that had i known at the time, i would have made different rec

he pre-empted what he feared was going to be a major humanitarian disaster there. and secretary rumsfeld help develop various principles for u.s. military action after 9-11 regarding u.s. leadership, coalition billing, the definition of the military mission, u.s. freedom of action, role of the un, etc. i like for you to comment on how you think president obama is handling libya. is he respecting or violating the principles you build up for the bush administration? now like to ask general pace to give a few comments about the matters dealt with in the secretary's book. >> thanks, very much. it is a great pleasure to be with you here today. first of all, i have great respect for the folks on this platform with me, number one, in number two, is absolutely true that in many wireways, secretary rumsfeld has continued to support the troops. this is why am proud to be sitting here next to him on this occasion. i will not speak to the book precisely. i will share some thoughts about things, had i known at the time, i would have made different recommendations, because if i

. >> you guys pre-empted what i was going to ask about the economy.t is on the minds of many americans today. specifically in regard to the decisionmaking process behind the bailout and maybe not intervening in the collapse of lehman brothers. just as overall economic policy from this whole presidency and how you think history will judge that. >> the decision not to intervene in the lehman brothers collapse might have been a crucial one in speeding up the financial collapse, but i think it was the ongoing conventional wisdom that one should not do that, because that is what markets are there to do. so it was not done, and the effect was to spread panic among the investment houses and the banks, and everybody was holding on to whatever money that had, not trusting any other financial institution. in the end, that probably was a mistake, may be an unavoidable mistake, given the general take on what ought to be done. the bailout, there has been a lot made of that political. i would like you to consider first of all that the proposal -- initial proposal t