i love the idea that the bear pooping in the forest is pooping fish emulsion. i think that that's how we have to approach this. we are not separate from the fish. and that if we do not do something about that, it is all about our supply and making sure we can all manage it and live together with an outcome that we can live with moving into the future. i am interested in continuing this conversations and having more data put forward. we want to be digging deeper and asking for where it is a science on this that is really backing up the state position, that is backing up the p.u.c. plan. too early to understand it knowing that there isn't going to be a silver bullet or a specific outcome. that the scientists or the recommendations of the scientists will come forward with. and the top position that the state board is going to be and as the ultimate arbitrator. they will be the ones at the end of the day that say this is what we are going to do. i am hoping that in the next couple of months, now that we have the gift of time, that we will be able to continue these

date poop fish emulsion, if there is any. what does that do? that causes the trees to be healthy. what does that do? that causes water to be filtered properly through soil. and through evapotranspiration. while we are talking about fish, i want to emphasize we're talking about something way beyond that. and that you cannot take 80% of the river out of the river watershed for years and years and years, without experiencing the failings of that. without watching the watershed fail. which is what we are doing. because residents of that watershed ecosystem are no longer thriving. their populations are dropping. sometimes down to zero. that is what we are talking about here. if that watershed fails, what is the long-term prospect for healthy humans here in the bay area? what is a prospect for bolstering business in silicon valley? we have very little. if we do not do the right thing is to protect the watershed, and taking 80% of it out, 80% of the water out is not protecting the watershed. which is, in part, what they p.u.c. should be committed to, as protecting the watershed and not j

date poop fish emulsion, if there is any. what does that do? that causes the trees to be healthy. what does that do? that causes water to be filtered properly through soil. and through evapotranspiration. while we are talking about fish, i want to emphasize we're talking about something way beyond that. and that you cannot take 80% of the river out of the river watershed for years and years and years, without experiencing the failings of that. without watching the watershed fail. which is what we are doing. becaussi