enclopedia britannica pays 100 people to check the accuracy of articles. >> a huge community of peopleho are very enthusiastic, very eager to get things right. john: you pay those people. >> it's a volunteer community, a charitable projects. we are organized as a charity, so we exist from donations from the general public. all of the work that uc, the writing is done by the volunteer community. john: how can you know who is good and who is stupid? >> you know, if nothing is one thing and always try to remind people is that we don't consider it would appeal to be some kind of wide open former you can come and say and do anything. people will veryuickly challenging. we have some of the best and most interesting discussions you can find anywhere. let's actually find what's true, which sources to rely on the most. it's a fascinating proess. john: and it's pretty accurate. my site only has one mistake. comparing the accuracy of scientific articles verses cyclopedia britannica. panicle -- panels of experts and the appropriate specialty founder of course harry instapundit.com errors per injur