arizona has found a way of undermining what is really a public felt statute by encumbering at with immigration policy. i might want to say something about that, but i would not run counter to the majority rationale. >> justice lewis? >> the key. i would like to begin by complimenting council also. kenneth, it is always a pleasure to work with you in any capacity. especially under the grueling circumstances. teaneck, likewise. -- teaneck, likewise -- tina, likewise. that was really wonderful exercise. i will be brief because eight other people have already said what i would otherwise say, which is that i would affirm the court of appeals. i would like, very much, to find that it violates equal protection clause and that it is unconstitutional. when i was on this score, there were many occasions when a panel or myself wanted to do this. for that reason, i would take justice calabresi is approached -- judge calabresi's approach. >> i come out the same way. i think that i do about justice calabresi's reasoning. there are two constitutional pieces to this. the first is the uniformity of immigration