the encyclopedia britannica, and he found himself almost as reliable as the encyclopedia britannica, but of course, he never considered how much of the content on wikipedia was plagiarized from britannica. back and i had had enough of it and did not want to go there. my friend did a survey and said yes, plagiarism does affect wikipedia. it is not just those who want to say something evil or wicked about you. it is also those who are willing to steal the work of others. i will deal with this very quickly, and i do not want to keep you late. i would just ask you to think for a moment about which he leaks -- wikileaks. wikileaks dropped a bombshell on the world. its creator got access to information, government information, classified information, top-secret information, information about american interactions with people around the world, and much of it, most of it was accurate, which tells you something else about this wonderful technology, this marvelous new technology. government secrets are not easily kept. now, there is a problem with that if you look at rupert murdoch and his son