would d rh the level of $12.6 bibillion, and none is expected, given the strong safefety standards e enfd by the u.snuclear regulatory commission. >> we have a very strong regulatory process, a set of regulations. we do inspections. we have a strong enforcement process to handle when regulations aren't being follllowed, and d those thiningl combine--you knknow, help to gie us contntinued assurance e that nuclelear power is safe. >> after fukushima, steps were taken to review safety at u.s. nuclear plants. >> right now we are a little bit more than 2/3rds of the way through a 90-day review that we're doing to see if there are any immediate short-term issues that need to be addressed to deal with the events at fukushima. >> fukushima reinvigorated this discussion of how n.r.c.c. considers laland contamination, ececonomic consequenceses within n its regulatory framework and also if the n.r.c. would like to do anything differently in the future. >> we're always looking for ways to improve the regulatory procesess and how we regulate the e civilian uses of nuclear materiaials. >> but some expe